On Monday 16 August 2004 08:11 pm, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Lee Revell wrote:
Don't need to. The email, now archived all around the world, is proof
of prior art.
Theyll just make a tweak here, a tweak there (some technical detail
overlooked in the email, but obviously
Thanks John,
The mouse problem is caused by the kernel missing usbmouse, as I didn't
have one to test it when I built the kernel (got one now so the next
build should be ok).
It's great news that it's working with Nvidia cards, this is a mixture
of X.org's X11R6.7.0 and Jennifer Dillon's
Pete Bessman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok, that function is new to gtk+-2.4. I modified the relevant code
to omit that function call when on gtk+-2 systems 2.4, and it
compiles fine on Fedora Core 1 with PlanetCCRMA now.
www.gazuga.net/phat-0.2.1.tar.gz
Let me know if this works for you.
Works,
Hi list,
John Check [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..]
Theoretically your box, specifically your GTK+ version. That function
is defined in GTK+-2.0, but it might not have been introduced until
the recent 2.4 release, and you might be running the more popular 2.2.
This isn't noted in the
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:50:19AM +0200, Frank NEUMANN wrote:
But there is one thing about the fanslider I can't understand: If (one of)
the ideas of this widget is to let the user easily select a fine-grained value
from a small widget that consumes little screen estate, why does the fan
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 03:48 am, Phil Kerr wrote:
Thanks John,
The mouse problem is caused by the kernel missing usbmouse, as I didn't
have one to test it when I built the kernel (got one now so the next
build should be ok).
It's great news that it's working with Nvidia cards, this is a
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 05:19 am, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:50:19AM +0200, Frank NEUMANN wrote:
But there is one thing about the fanslider I can't understand: If (one
of) the ideas of this widget is to let the user easily select a
fine-grained value from a small
Good Morning,
Here's the position paper I drafted up. As usual I'll request that responses
be well considered. I'll post this to my webserver after I have a chance to
mark it up and hopefully, I can stop repeating myself and get things
implemented. Apologies in advance for the length. Comments
At Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:25:41 +0200,
Wolfgang Woehl wrote:
Pete Bessman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok, that function is new to gtk+-2.4. I modified the relevant code
to omit that function call when on gtk+-2 systems 2.4, and it
compiles fine on Fedora Core 1 with PlanetCCRMA now.
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 07:17, John Check wrote:
[blah, blah, snip]
So What's Your Plan Smartass?
First thing is to improve the documentation factor to help make things easier
for the brave. Right now it's a Gordian knot and here are what the scissors
look like. I expect we all know
Download from http://www.notam02.no/arkiv/src/snd/
Screenshot: http://www.notam02.no/arkiv/src/snd/snd-ls-0.9.1.png
Snd-ls v0.9.1
-
Released 17.8.2004
Contains
Snd v7.6 from 2.8.2004
About
-
Snd-ls is a distribution of the sound editor Snd. Its target is
Am Dienstag, 17. August 2004 01:47 schrieb Lee Revell:
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 19:24, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, John Check wrote:
That was exactly what I was thinking when the penny dropped for me.
Originally I was thinking of offload the softsynths, but FX are
expensive
TAP-plugins 0.7.0 released.
Homepage: http://tap-plugins.sf.net
Reminder: the docs are in a separately downloadable package, get it
from the same place!
New plugins (as always, check the docs for detailed usage info):
* TAP Chorus/Flanger
An implementation capable of creating traditional
At Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:15:30 -0400,
Jesse Chappell wrote:
In fact the sliderbutton really just seems to lack the visual
indication of sliderness, and i think adding it as Dave suggested
would be a good addition (or make a new widget).
I have no idea what you mean by lacking a visual
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 15:56, Pete Bessman wrote:
At Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:15:30 -0400,
Jesse Chappell wrote:
In fact the sliderbutton really just seems to lack the visual
indication of sliderness, and i think adding it as Dave suggested
would be a good addition (or make a new widget).
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 11:26 am, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 07:17, John Check wrote:
[blah, blah, snip]
So What's Your Plan Smartass?
First thing is to improve the documentation factor to help make things
easier for the brave. Right now it's a Gordian knot and here
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 12:53 pm, Ralf Beck wrote:
Am Dienstag, 17. August 2004 01:47 schrieb Lee Revell:
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 19:24, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, John Check wrote:
That was exactly what I was thinking when the penny dropped for me.
Originally I was
At Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:11:07 -0400,
Dave Robillard wrote:
Sorry about the flicker, it doesn't happen when
dragging to the right or down;
It doesn't flicker, but the rightmost edge is really jumpy and glitchy
looking. Maybe add a bit of a horizontal threshold for resizing so it
doesn't
Pete Bessman wrote on Tue, 17-Aug-2004:
None of this is the point of the sliderbutton. I tend to think that
representing discrete numerical quantities (i.e. Channels 1 to 16) is
best done with the roman alphabet.
OK, but I also see that the widget itself is capable of variable
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 01:01 pm, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 07:17:54AM -0400, John Check wrote:
(snip)
I'm going to whomp up a database driven reporting system that extends the
concept to include protocol and library support and has some
Wiki like features. One will be
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 10:06 am, Pete Bessman wrote:
votes++;
Caveat: for purposes of discussing this article and all it entails,
everybody falls into either the I'm with it or the I don't care
I see a lot of what FGFS has on this list.
group (tautological, I know, but bear with me).
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 04:00 pm, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 12:53, Ralf Beck wrote:
Am Dienstag, 17. August 2004 01:47 schrieb Lee Revell:
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 19:24, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, John Check wrote:
That was exactly what I was thinking
Damn. That was all perfectly lucid. I must be missing something ;-)
Seriously though, it all makes sense to me. (Sorry for top-posting but
I'm lazy).
Jan
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 06:17, John Check wrote:
Good Morning,
Here's the position paper I drafted up. As usual I'll request that
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 05:59:15 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
I'm not that familiar with jack internals, but writing a new jack driver
(like the firewire one, and oss one) would be a much, much better idea
than writing some alsa-over-network monstrosity for too many reasons to
list.
Err..
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 05:59 pm, Paul Davis wrote:
I'm not that familiar with jack internals, but writing a new jack driver
(like the firewire one, and oss one) would be a much, much better idea
than writing some alsa-over-network monstrosity for too many reasons to
list.
Err.. yeah
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 17:14, John Check wrote:
group (tautological, I know, but bear with me). Both perspectives are
equally valid, and since they aren't mututally exclusive, let's be
nice to each other.
This is pretty sweet, I haven't heard any negatives.
You seem surprised?
The
Hello, I would like to do a fft on an mp3 in python. I beleive I have
all of the fft stuff straight in my mind but am not sure of the best way
to get the sample data into a python array. I ran accross a web site a
while back which suggested using sox to convert a wav file into a raw
sample
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:07:25PM +0200, Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen wrote:
Snd-ls is a distribution of the sound editor Snd.
excellent!
thanks a lot for that.
bests,
martin
28 matches
Mail list logo
