Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: MusE 0.8.1 released

2006-03-28 Thread Dave Robillard
On Tue, 2006-28-03 at 09:20 +0200, Robert Jonsson wrote: > Hopefully it's configuration. I'll check for ladcca to be sure. > > To answer the previous question, the support is for lash-0.5.0, I've tested > it > and it works reasonbly (closing the project leads to a double-delete error in > glibc

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: MusE 0.8.1 released

2006-03-28 Thread Robert Jonsson
> app.cpp:2730: error: jump to case label > app.cpp:2720: error: crosses initialization of 'int ok' <...> > Looks like Frieder's Patch might fix it.. Testing.. Yes I think so. FWIW there's a new package on the site now where this is added. Regards, Robert > > Flo

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: MusE 0.8.1 released

2006-03-28 Thread Florian Schmidt
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:43:06 +0100 Robert Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 28 Mar 2006 10:13, Florian Schmidt wrote: > <...> > > > > thing and now it _seems_ to build. We'll see.. > > > > Flo > > Just curious, did it work out? Nope make[4]: Entering directory `/home/tapas/source/

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: MusE 0.8.1 released

2006-03-28 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 28 Mar 2006 10:13, Florian Schmidt wrote: <...> > > thing and now it _seems_ to build. We'll see.. > > Flo Just curious, did it work out? Regards, Robert -- http://spamatica.se/musicsite/

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: MusE 0.8.1 released

2006-03-28 Thread Florian Schmidt
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:44:08 +0200 Florian Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I _do_ have cvs lash installed and debian's ladcca package, too. I > asssumed that because of the differing naming schemes i wouldn't run > into trouble. Seems i was wrong. Oh well, it seems it was a problem with debi

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: MusE 0.8.1 released

2006-03-28 Thread Florian Schmidt
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:31:03 -0500 Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What lash is this anyway? is the modern, useful, actually handy for > > stuff lash as in http://www.nongnu.org/lash/ or the ladcca from dawn > > of time one? > > 0.5.0+ versions of LASH do not contain the phrase "