Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:37:50 -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > I don't think that changing the english rules of pronunciation is a > good solution. > > "no no, it's pronounced 'lad-spah'." > "why?" > "it sounds cooler with a european accent" I've met many europeans who pronounce it L-A-D-S-P-A,

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:21:39 +0200, Leonard paniq Ritter wrote: > On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 04:55 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > > Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > > > > > > > > What about SHAG: Steve Harris' Audio Gear > > > > > actually, now that i think about it "AudioGear" would be a fancy

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:29:16 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 17:48 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > > > Then again, domains aren't free, and I know I'm not paying for it. :) > > > > If we can find one thats not too expensive I'll pick up the tab. > > > > - Steve > > If

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Apr 26, 2006, at 4:30 PM, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote: I don't agree about taking away the "L". Ladspa is not linux- specific, but it has certainly originated from linux, and has the best support in linux software. If linux dissapears before the ladspa format, we can at least still remembe

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Trouble compiling cheesetracker in Slackware 10.2

2006-04-26 Thread Jonathan Woithe
Blaze Monger wrote: > I have SCONS installed and when i type scons, it gives me this: > > Checking for libsigc++-1.2... > Package sigc++-1.2 was not found in the pkg-config search path. > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `sigc++-1.2.pc' > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Esben Stien
Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PEEP - Palindromic Extensible Environment for Plugins This is a very good one;). PEEP Extensible Environment for Plugins -- Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a http://www. s tn m irc://irc. b - i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread grae
Whatever the name ends up being, I'd really encourage that it be extremely unique. When I search for LADSPA in google, I get LADSPA and nothing but LADSPA related results. Now that's beautiful and it'd be a real shame to lose that. If it were to change to LAP (just for example), then just do a g

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 04:55 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > SLAP - Simpler Linux Audio Plugin i like that :D > -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 04:55 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > > > > > What about SHAG: Steve Harris' Audio Gear > > actually, now that i think about it "AudioGear" would be a fancy name, no? > -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.pa

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] LAC 2006 Live Streams

2006-04-26 Thread Christoph Eckert
> yes, if all goes well. we will not have time to edit them, but if > someone volunteers, we can upload the raw dumps immediately after > they are done, in 30min chunks. any takers? any chance to cut them by talk? How difficult is it to do? Can it be done after the conference or is there need to

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] LAC 2006 Live Streams

2006-04-26 Thread Joern Nettingsmeier
Hans Fugal wrote: > That sounds great! Will these also be available for download afterwards? > yes, if all goes well. we will not have time to edit them, but if someone volunteers, we can upload the raw dumps immediately after they are done, in 30min chunks. any takers? jörn

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Patrick Shirkey
Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: What about SHAG: Steve Harris' Audio Gear LAP - Linux Audio Plugin LDP - Linux Digital Plugin LFX - Linux FX LPA - Linux Plugin API PLA - Plugin for Linux Audio SLAP - Simpler Linux Audio Plugin -- Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd. Http://www.boosthar

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 13:30 -0700, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote: > I think the argument about S is valid enough though, but not a good enough > argument to change a name we all have learned and love(?). As an > alternative, we can change the meaning of s into something else, like > Super, Second,

[linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Kjetil S. Matheussen
Steve Harris: Several people have suggested that LADSPA is not a great name for what we are calling LADSPA 2. Reasons for this include: The L, it's not really linux specific, and though /we/ know that its the L of LAD, its not obvious to people outside. The S, it ain't really going to be s

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Jens M Andreasen
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 17:48 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > Then again, domains aren't free, and I know I'm not paying for it. :) > > If we can find one thats not too expensive I'll pick up the tab. > > - Steve If you can put up with not beeing the root domain, you could get somthing like [ladsp

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Phil Frost
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 07:13:23PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > Thats the kind of suggestion that makes non-free software developers think > were all pissing about. > > But I still dont like it that much ;) > > EEP - Extensible Environment for Plugins? > PEEP - Portable ... > MEEP - Multiplatform

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 14:58 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > PEEP - Palindromic Extensible Environment for Plugins or PEEPER Extensible Environment for Plugins, Entitled Recursively 10 points to anyone who can fit both Palindromic and Recursive in there. ;) -DR-

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 19:39 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:33:42PM +0200, Lars Luthman wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 20:29 +0200, Carlo Capocasa wrote: > > > Thanks for putting in all the effort with LADSPA! I am, through Om, also > > > a big user. > > > > > > I'll go v

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Luis Garrido
SAX: Sexy Audio eXtensions (or just make it recursive (TM)) APE: Audio Pluggable Extensions (not my favorite: there is already an important audio application that uses the term and I cringe thinking of the simian lingo that is going to develop around it, but well...) PEA: Pluggable Extensions for A

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 19:13 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:03:38PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 20:09 +0200, Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:10 +0300, Sampo Savolainen wrote: > > > > I think we would select a short name

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 19:06 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:18:13AM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:38 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > > This is why the "plugin" is really a directory, all the stuff in there is > > > neccesary. > > > > On the plugin

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Thorsten Wilms
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 07:39:40PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > This has the additional benefit that 'apa' means 'ape' or 'monkey' in > > swedish. > > Now, APE would be pretty cool. > > Audio Plugin Extenstions? Hhmm, Audio Plugin Excellence Audio Plugins Extraordinary *shrug* Cheers, Thorst

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:33:42PM +0200, Lars Luthman wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 20:29 +0200, Carlo Capocasa wrote: > > Thanks for putting in all the effort with LADSPA! I am, through Om, also > > a big user. > > > > I'll go very simple and broad here and suggest 'APA', standing for > > 'Audi

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:10:23PM +0200, Luis Garrido wrote: > SAX? (Simple Audio eXtensions) Yup, it names also the XML parser, but > it is music related. Incidentally, at some point in the near future it > will be possible to register .ax domain names, don't know under which > conditions. I qui

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Lars Luthman
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 20:29 +0200, Carlo Capocasa wrote: > Thanks for putting in all the effort with LADSPA! I am, through Om, also > a big user. > > I'll go very simple and broad here and suggest 'APA', standing for > 'Audio Plugin Architecture'. This has the additional benefit that 'apa' means

[linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Carlo Capocasa
Thanks for putting in all the effort with LADSPA! I am, through Om, also a big user. I'll go very simple and broad here and suggest 'APA', standing for 'Audio Plugin Architecture'. + Aypeeay has a nice sound to it + The name is forwards compatible with being ported to Windows, Mac, or even beco

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > Thinking about this I was worried about parallel installed multiple > versions of the same plugin, but as long as the URI refers to a > compatible version of the plugin, we don't need versioning in the struct > itself, since the URI

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:09:26PM +0200, Leonard paniq Ritter wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:10 +0300, Sampo Savolainen wrote: > > I think we would select a short name anyway. Most of them are gone already, > > so we have the same problem whichever [a-z][a-z][a-z] we select :) > > > XAP sugge

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:03:38PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 20:09 +0200, Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:10 +0300, Sampo Savolainen wrote: > > > I think we would select a short name anyway. Most of them are gone > > > already, > > > so we have

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Luis Garrido
SAX? (Simple Audio eXtensions) Yup, it names also the XML parser, but it is music related. Incidentally, at some point in the near future it will be possible to register .ax domain names, don't know under which conditions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.ax CHAP? (Cunningly Hacked Audio Plugins) W

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:04:35PM +0200, Leonard paniq Ritter wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 06:48 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > > if it never refuses then its ok with me ;) > > > > It's certainly allowed to refuse, it would just be bad manners, unless the > > host has ignored the required featu

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:18:13AM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:38 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > This is why the "plugin" is really a directory, all the stuff in there is > > neccesary. > > On the plugin bundle thing, I've got working C code that takes a path to > the d

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 20:04 +0200, Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 06:48 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > > if it never refuses then its ok with me ;) > > > > It's certainly allowed to refuse, it would just be bad manners, unless the > > host has ignored the required features l

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 15:56 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > That's somewhat like saying a corrupt binary should never cause a > segfault... if the data file gets corrupted in a way that breaks the > syntax, then there wont be enouhg data for hte host to attempt to load the > plugin and it will refuse,

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 20:09 +0200, Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:10 +0300, Sampo Savolainen wrote: > > I think we would select a short name anyway. Most of them are gone already, > > so we have the same problem whichever [a-z][a-z][a-z] we select :) > > > XAP suggests t

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:10 +0300, Sampo Savolainen wrote: > I think we would select a short name anyway. Most of them are gone already, > so we have the same problem whichever [a-z][a-z][a-z] we select :) XAP suggests this could be an XML document type. what about FAP (FAP Audio Plugin)? GO FAP

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 06:48 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > if it never refuses then its ok with me ;) > > It's certainly allowed to refuse, it would just be bad manners, unless the > host has ignored the required features list. so required features have to be checked on both sides. isn't that red

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 17:55 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:48:32PM +0100, tom christie wrote: > > > That's somewhat like saying a corrupt binary > > > should never cause a segfault... > > No, not at all. > > The data file is accessed as an input stream (to the host / LADSPA

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:48:32PM +0100, tom christie wrote: > > That's somewhat like saying a corrupt binary > > should never cause a segfault... > No, not at all. > The data file is accessed as an input stream (to the host / LADSPA library). > It's fine for a bad data file to cause the library t

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Todays "LADSPA2" update

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:02:26AM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > Specifying the base along with it would be a very good idea though. > Better to have a 'logarithmic' hint and a seperate 'log_base' though. Do the maths on that. - Steve

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Todays "LADSPA2" update

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:07:23AM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > > like to protest at the continued inclusion of the "logarithmic" port > > > hint. its totally useless. at the very least, the hint should be removed > > > and replaced by two other hints: logarithmicE and logarithmic10. saying > >

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:55:12AM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > My suggestion is that we ressurect the XAP name > > (http://www.google.com/search?q=lad+xap) > > It stood for Xap Audio Plugin IIRC. > > > > Pros: it's short*, relatively unused** and pronouncable*** > > I know it's stupid, but s

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread tom christie
> That's somewhat like saying a corrupt binary > should never cause a segfault... No, not at all. The data file is accessed as an input stream (to the host / LADSPA library). It's fine for a bad data file to cause the library to fail to be able to load it, or to load it and produce unexpected outpu

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:38 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > This is why the "plugin" is really a directory, all the stuff in there is > neccesary. On the plugin bundle thing, I've got working C code that takes a path to the directory, parses manifest.ttl, gleams the available plugin DLLs and data fil

RE: [linux-audio-dev] LAC 2006 Live Streams

2006-04-26 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
Cool! Joern, do you need access to LAD site to post the recordings/materials for archival purposes and/or to offload the main server? Please e-mail me off-list and I'll provide you with the necessary info. Best wishes, Ico > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-aud

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Om-synth CVS compile problem

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 16:52 +0200, Lars Luthman wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:30 -0400, Dave Phillips wrote: > > Lars Luthman wrote: > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > >I compiled it just yesterday. set_name() has moved up to the superclass > > >LibFlowCanvas::Port, you need the latest CVS versi

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Todays "LADSPA2" update

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:22 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 07:05:20 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:51 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > > I've written a first cut at an ontology/schema for the plugin RDF: > > > http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa2/ladspa-2.ttl > >

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Todays "LADSPA2" update

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 07:05 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:51 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > I've written a first cut at an ontology/schema for the plugin RDF: > > http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa2/ladspa-2.ttl > > > > The term schema is a bit misleading, as it doesn't really enfor

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Om-synth CVS compile problem

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 06:06 -0400, Dave Phillips wrote: > Greetings: > > Has anyone else encountered this problem when compiling recent CVS > Om-synth : > > if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../..-DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED > -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -I../../../src/common -I../../../src/cl

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:54:43PM +0100, tom christie wrote: > It's really just an extra layer of protection... > I realise that the binary and data files will be accessed as a single unit, > but a corrupt data file should never cause a segfault. That's somewhat like saying a corrupt binary shoul

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 07:23 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > Several people have suggested that LADSPA is not a great name for what we > are calling LADSPA 2. Reasons for this include: > > The L, it's not really linux specific, and though /we/ know that its the L > of LAD, its not obvious to peopl

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Om-synth CVS compile problem

2006-04-26 Thread Lars Luthman
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:30 -0400, Dave Phillips wrote: > Lars Luthman wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > >I compiled it just yesterday. set_name() has moved up to the superclass > >LibFlowCanvas::Port, you need the latest CVS version of flowcanvas. > > > > > > > Thanks, Lars, that fixed the problem

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Om-synth CVS compile problem

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Phillips
Lars Luthman wrote: [snip] I compiled it just yesterday. set_name() has moved up to the superclass LibFlowCanvas::Port, you need the latest CVS version of flowcanvas. Thanks, Lars, that fixed the problem. Btw, is it possible to run multiple independent instances of Om-gtk ? Best, dp

[linux-audio-dev] Re: LAC 2006 Live Streams

2006-04-26 Thread Arnold Krille
Hi, 2006/4/25, Joern Nettingsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > the linux audio conference 2006, which takes place at the zkm in > karlsruhe/germany from april 27 to april 30, will be streamed live for > your convenience, inspiration and enjoyment. Thanks in advance for providing this service for all o

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread tom christie
It's really just an extra layer of protection... I realise that the binary and data files will be accessed as a single unit, but a corrupt data file should never cause a segfault. Without a built-in struct version identifier the host (or LADSPA library) may segfault by incorrectly accessing the st

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Todays "LADSPA2" update

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 07:29:30AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:22 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > > Paul, while I've got your attention, are you OK with droppping runAdding? > > You're the person who most likly to have implemented it I think. > > > > 99% of my plugins suppo

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Todays "LADSPA2" update

2006-04-26 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:22 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > Paul, while I've got your attention, are you OK with droppping runAdding? > You're the person who most likly to have implemented it I think. > > 99% of my plugins support it, but it would have made my life much easier > if they didn't. Ste

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Todays "LADSPA2" update

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 07:05:20 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:51 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > I've written a first cut at an ontology/schema for the plugin RDF: > > http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa2/ladspa-2.ttl > > > > The term schema is a bit misleading, as it doesn't really

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Todays "LADSPA2" update

2006-04-26 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:51 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > I've written a first cut at an ontology/schema for the plugin RDF: > http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa2/ladspa-2.ttl > > The term schema is a bit misleading, as it doesn't really enforce > anything, it really just gives you some hints about what t

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Om-synth CVS compile problem

2006-04-26 Thread Lars Luthman
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 06:06 -0400, Dave Phillips wrote: > Greetings: > > Has anyone else encountered this problem when compiling recent CVS > Om-synth : > > ... > > PortController.cpp: In member function 'virtual void > OmGtk::PortController::set_path(const Om::Path&)': > PortController.cpp:1

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Om-synth CVS compile problem

2006-04-26 Thread Patrick Shirkey
Dave Phillips wrote: Greetings: Has anyone else encountered this problem when compiling recent CVS Om-synth : if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../..-DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -I../../../src/common -I../../../src/clients -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/local/share/om\" -DX

[linux-audio-dev] Todays "LADSPA2" update

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
I've written a first cut at an ontology/schema for the plugin RDF: http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa2/ladspa-2.ttl The term schema is a bit misleading, as it doesn't really enforce anything, it really just gives you some hints about what to write. The bulk of it is english text to explain the meaning of

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:55:55 -0400 Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it takes *way* more lines of code than that to use a ladspa plugin in > this way, and thats for the existing header-only specification. > > one the design goals of a good plugin API is to make life simple for > plugins, b

[linux-audio-dev] Om-synth CVS compile problem

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Phillips
Greetings: Has anyone else encountered this problem when compiling recent CVS Om-synth : if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../..-DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -I../../../src/common -I../../../src/clients -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/local/share/om\" -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:48:01 +0100, tom christie wrote: ... > Well, it provides a _built-in_ way of ensuring that the struct is > properly accessed, > even if the metadata file is corrupted or lost. > Say a user meddles with the metadata file to make a 2.0 plugin look > like a 2.1 plugin. The

[linux-audio-dev] Trouble compiling cheesetracker in Slackware 10.2

2006-04-26 Thread Blaze Monger
I have SCONS installed and when i type scons, it gives me this: Checking for libsigc++-1.2... Package sigc++-1.2 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `sigc++-1.2.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'sigc++-1.2' found

[linux-audio-dev] [ANN] Simple Sysexxer 0.1

2006-04-26 Thread Christoph Eckert
Hi all, as it is LAC time, it's also release time :) . Simple Sysexxer is a GUI sysex tool comparable to Sysexxer, but it's based on Qt4 (no KDE dependency) and ALSA only (no OSS dependency). Theoretically it should also build and run on Mac OS X, but I didn't try it yet. Feedback and bugre

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread tom christie
> don't think that the string is needed I think that's fair. > One version number should be enough though, > and it doesn't have to match the actual version of the LADSPA spec Both those points (especially the second) sound simple and sensible. Okay, so on reflection... There's a case to be ma

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:10:02 +0300, Sampo Savolainen wrote: > Quoting Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > My suggestion is that we ressurect the XAP name > > (http://www.google.com/search?q=lad+xap) > > It stood for Xap Audio Plugin IIRC. > > > > Pros: it's short*, relatively unused** and

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Sampo Savolainen
Quoting Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > My suggestion is that we ressurect the XAP name > (http://www.google.com/search?q=lad+xap) > It stood for Xap Audio Plugin IIRC. > > Pros: it's short*, relatively unused** and pronouncable*** More pros: we would have a VST -alike logo already! (looking