Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012 schrieb Chester:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Martin Steigerwald
mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
[251818.022631] [ cut here ]
[251818.022714] WARNING: at
/media/data/mattems/src/linux-2.6-3.4.1/debian/build/source_amd64_non
We dereferenced node in the error message after freeing it. Also
btrfs_panic() can return so we should return an error code instead of
continuing.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
---
v2: in the first version I just deleted the kfree().
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:14:13PM +0300, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
There used to be a BUG_ON(ret) there before EH patch (79787eaa) went in.
Bail out with EINVAL.
Cc: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov idryo...@gmail.com
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |4 ++--
1 files
On 06/22/2012 09:58 PM, Miao Xie wrote:
On fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:26:01 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 4b5a1e1..4053e3e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -3727,6 +3727,62 @@ commit:
return
On 06/23/2012 04:50 AM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hello list,
i've seen this deadlock today and can reproduce it while using ceph.
Is this a known bug?
[ 599.514534] INFO: task kworker/6:0:29 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 599.530394] echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 04:05:43AM -0400, Andrew Mahone wrote:
A large portion of the work was done by Dave Sterba, but in flattening the
commits attribution has been lost. My contribution has been in debugging some
of the cases in which it could crash or produce incorrect data, and cleaning
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:15:23AM -0600, Dan Carpenter wrote:
We dereferenced node in the error message after freeing it. Also
btrfs_panic() can return so we should return an error code instead of
continuing.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
---
v2: in the first
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:41:12AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:15:23AM -0600, Dan Carpenter wrote:
We dereferenced node in the error message after freeing it. Also
btrfs_panic() can return so we should return an error code instead of
continuing.
Signed-off-by:
Am 25.06.2012 15:08, schrieb Josef Bacik:
This isn't showing the guy who's actually trying to commit the
transaction. Next time this happens can you do a sysrq+w and capture
the output and post it here so we can see what everybody is doing?
Thanks,
Josef
No problem.
Kernel trace:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:08:31AM -0600, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Am 25.06.2012 15:08, schrieb Josef Bacik:
This isn't showing the guy who's actually trying to commit the
transaction. Next time this happens can you do a sysrq+w and capture
the output and post it here so we
Thats weird, sysrq+w should have a bunch of stacktraces but it's empty, so
unless theres a bug theres nothing blocked. Is the box actually hung or is it
just taking forever? Maybe try sysrq+w again to see if the one you pasted was
just a fluke? Thanks,
This one looks better:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:45:02AM -0600, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Thats weird, sysrq+w should have a bunch of stacktraces but it's empty, so
unless theres a bug theres nothing blocked. Is the box actually hung or is
it
just taking forever? Maybe try sysrq+w again to see if
Howdy,
My btrfs pool looks like this:
usr
usr_daily_20120622_00:01:01
usr_daily_20120623_00:18:25
usr_daily_20120624_00:01:01
usr_daily_20120625_00:01:01
usr_hourly_20120625_05:00:02
usr_hourly_20120625_06:00:01
usr_hourly_20120625_07:00:01
usr_weekly_20120610_00:02:01
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:58:40AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Howdy,
My btrfs pool looks like this:
usr
usr_daily_20120622_00:01:01
usr_daily_20120623_00:18:25
usr_daily_20120624_00:01:01
usr_daily_20120625_00:01:01
usr_hourly_20120625_05:00:02
usr_hourly_20120625_06:00:01
Hi,
still seeing this warning (well the line number changed) on 3.5.0 (rc4):
[ 11.909589] [ cut here ]
[ 11.909616] WARNING: at
/home/arnd/Projekte/kernel/linux-2.6/fs/btrfs/super.c:221
__btrfs_abort_transaction+0xae/0xc0 [btrfs]()
[ 11.909617] Hardware name:
Am 25.06.2012 16:48, schrieb Josef Bacik:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:45:02AM -0600, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Thats weird, sysrq+w should have a bunch of stacktraces but it's empty, so
unless theres a bug theres nothing blocked. Is the box actually hung or is it
just taking
On 06/25/2012 08:21 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
Yes and no. If you have 2 drives and you add one more, we can make it
do all new chunks over 3 drives. But, turning the existing double
mirror chunks into a triple mirror requires a balance.
-chris
So trigger one. This is the exact analogue to
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:38:38AM -0600, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 25.06.2012 16:48, schrieb Josef Bacik:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:45:02AM -0600, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
wrote:
Thats weird, sysrq+w should have a bunch of stacktraces but it's empty, so
unless theres a bug theres
Am 25.06.2012 20:02, schrieb Josef Bacik:
Can you turn that off and see if you
can still reproduce the deadlock? If so sysrq+w again, if not then I know where
to look ;). Thanks,
without discard i can't reproduce but random write speed with ceph
without discard is a LOT slower (around
Hi!
I got a X server / drm related crash or hard lockup. After I rebooted I
tried to mount the BTRFS on my esata disk. It has big metadata
(mkfs.btrfs -l 32768 -n 32768).
I got:
[ 43.764274] ata5: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x405 action 0xe
frozen
[ 43.764278] ata5: irq_stat
Greetings everybody,
I am running a fio test on btrfs compiled from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git,
up to commit:
cb77fcd88569cd2b7b25ecd4086ea932a53be9b3 Btrfs: delay iput with async extents
including this commit.
Below is a fio configuration file, and later
Hello
Maybe someone will be able to help.
I have 2 unusable instances of btrfs.
1. when I did a re-size (stretch) I had a power lost and now btrfs system
is not detected on the drive (tried find-root, restore, btrfsck, btrfs show
and maybe something else - can't remember as it was some time ago
Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
Hi!
I got a X server / drm related crash or hard lockup. After I rebooted I
tried to mount the BTRFS on my esata disk. It has big metadata
(mkfs.btrfs -l 32768 -n 32768).
I got:
[… backtrace …]
BTRFS was not mounted. After trying
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:30:34PM -0600, Alex Lyakas wrote:
Greetings everybody,
I am running a fio test on btrfs compiled from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git,
up to commit:
cb77fcd88569cd2b7b25ecd4086ea932a53be9b3 Btrfs: delay iput with async extents
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:30:34PM -0600, Alex Lyakas wrote:
Greetings everybody,
I am running a fio test on btrfs compiled from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git,
up to commit:
cb77fcd88569cd2b7b25ecd4086ea932a53be9b3 Btrfs: delay iput with async extents
With v3.4 the same. Can't go back more as this really results in very
fast corruption. Any ideas how to debug?
Stefan
Am 25.06.2012 20:28, schrieb Stefan Priebe:
Am 25.06.2012 20:02, schrieb Josef Bacik:
Can you turn that off and see if you
can still reproduce the deadlock? If so
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:33:09PM -0600, Stefan Priebe wrote:
With v3.4 the same. Can't go back more as this really results in very
fast corruption. Any ideas how to debug?
What workload are you running? I have a ssd here with discard support I can try
and reproduce on. Thanks,
Josef
--
Am 25.06.2012 22:11, schrieb Josef Bacik:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:33:09PM -0600, Stefan Priebe wrote:
With v3.4 the same. Can't go back more as this really results in very
fast corruption. Any ideas how to debug?
What workload are you running? I have a ssd here with discard support I can
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 02:20:31PM -0600, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 25.06.2012 22:11, schrieb Josef Bacik:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:33:09PM -0600, Stefan Priebe wrote:
With v3.4 the same. Can't go back more as this really results in very
fast corruption. Any ideas how to debug?
What
Hello!
Long time ago I created btrfs on /dev/sda
After some changes btrfs moved to /dev/sda1 (well, to md, and sda1 is
part of md).
As result, btrfs fi show show me 2 filesystems: new one and old one.
Probably I need to do some cleaning. Can someone tell me what to do.
fdisk -u -c -l /dev/sda
We used the wrong ioctl macro for the getflags ioctl before.
As we don't have the set/getflags ioctls in the user space ioctl.h
at the moment, it's safe to fix it now.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Block abloc...@googlemail.com
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Hi Stefan,
I haven't seen this one. The async commit stuff is mine, but there
haven't been problems with it for a year or more. This is a recent
kernel, I assume?
Can you dump the other tasks? Something is preventing the commit from
completing.
[adding linux-btrfs to cc]
sage
On Fri,
Thanks it seems to be a problem with the discard option. I'm already talking to
JBacik at linux-btrfs.
You can find more info in this thread.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg17439.html
Hopefully we can solve it as discard gives me a huge improvement in ceph.
Stefan
Am 26.06.2012
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:29:34PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
I got a X server / drm related crash or hard lockup. After I rebooted I
tried to mount the BTRFS on my esata disk. It has big metadata
(mkfs.btrfs -l 32768 -n 32768).
I got:
[ 43.764274] ata5: exception Emask 0x10
On 06/25/2012 03:28 PM, Gareth Pye wrote:
To me one doesn't have to be triggered, a user expects to have to tell
the disks to rebuild/resync/balance after adding a disk, they may want
to wait till they've added all 4 disks and run a few extra commands
before they run the rebalance.
They do?
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:37 AM, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
They do? E.g. mdadm doesn't make them...
Hrm, you are right. It is something I always confirm is happening
though. Without a M=N mode there would need to be two balances as the
first balance would be doing it wrong :(
--
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:54:50PM +0400, Dmitry MiksIr wrote:
Hello!
Long time ago I created btrfs on /dev/sda
After some changes btrfs moved to /dev/sda1 (well, to md, and sda1 is part
of md).
As result, btrfs fi show show me 2 filesystems: new one and old one.
Probably I need to do some
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:46:01AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/25/2012 08:21 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
Yes and no. If you have 2 drives and you add one more, we can make it
do all new chunks over 3 drives. But, turning the existing double
mirror chunks into a triple mirror requires a
On 06/25/2012 03:54 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:46:01AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/25/2012 08:21 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
Yes and no. If you have 2 drives and you add one more, we can
make it do all new chunks over 3 drives. But, turning the
existing double mirror
I am also facing similar issue while applying this patch.
[santosh@localhost linux-next]$ sudo git am mail_Dan.txt
Patch format detection failed.
[santosh@localhost linux-next]$
regards
santosh
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25,
btrfs_set_extent_delalloc() has the possibility of returning the error.
So I add the code in which the return value of btrfs_set_extent_delalloc()
is checked.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh t-i...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
We didn't check error of btrfs_update_inode(), but that error looks
easy to bubble back up.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh t-i...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c|2 +-
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c |4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
On 06/26/2012 06:18 AM, David Sterba wrote:
3756 if (root-fs_info-log_root_recovering) {
3757 BUG_ON(!test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
3758 BTRFS_I(inode)-runtime_flags));
3759 goto no_delete;
3760 }
and
When we're evicting an inode during log recovery, we need to ensure that the
inode
is not in orphan state any more, which means inode's run_time flags has _no_
BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM. Thus, the BUG_ON was triggered because of a wrong
check for the flags.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
Maciej Sujkowski posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:43:36 +0100 as excerpted:
Maybe someone will be able to help.
I have 2 unusable instances of btrfs.
1. when I did a re-size (stretch) I had a power lost and now btrfs
system is not detected on the drive (tried find-root, restore, btrfsck,
Hi Stephan,
Maybe it can help:
If I remember discard from a kvm guest works only with ide and scsi device, but
not virtio device.
- Mail original -
De: Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag
À: Sage Weil s...@inktank.com
Cc: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
I don't use discard in KVM. I use it at the osd disc with ceph-osd.
Am 26.06.2012 um 06:09 schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com:
Hi Stephan,
Maybe it can help:
If I remember discard from a kvm guest works only with ide and scsi device,
but not virtio device.
- Mail
47 matches
Mail list logo
