be equal on both
devices.
THX
Am 13.03.21 um 19:02 schrieb Chris Murphy:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 5:22 AM Thomas <74cmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Gerät Boot Anfang Ende Sektoren Größe Kn Typ
>> /dev/sdb1 2048 496093750 496091703 236,6G 83 Linux
>&g
n sda and sdb
- create 2 partitions on sda, part #1 for OS + part #2 for swap
(swapfile is not working with BTRFS on multiple drives)
- restoring the (file) backup
Question:
Would you recommend to create a swap partition on sdb, too?
Regards
Thomas
Am 13.03.2021 um 19:02 schrieb Chris Murphy
Linux Swap / Solaris
thomas@pc1-desktop:~
$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Festplatte /dev/sdb: 238,47 GiB, 256060514304 Bytes, 500118192 Sektoren
Festplattenmodell: SanDisk SD9TB8W2
Einheiten: Sektoren von 1 * 512 = 512 Bytes
Sektorgröße (logisch/physikalisch): 512 Bytes / 512 Bytes
E/A-Größe (minimal
iB, used=0.00B
Can you please advise how to fix these errors?
Regards
Thomas
[0.00] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0x70a, date = 2010-09-29
[0.00] Linux version 5.10.22-2-lts (linux-lts@archlinux) (gcc (GCC) 10.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.36.1) #1 SMP Wed, 10 Mar
Dear Friend,
I will be pleased if you can allow me to invest $104M Dollars in
Estate Management,in your company or any area you best that will be
of good profit to both of us
Please do well to respond including your information for more details.
Thanks.
Mr.Richard Thomas
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 12:58:05AM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 08:20:43PM +, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > 5.11 does not boot anymore on Ingenic SoCs, I bisected it to this commit.
> >
> > Any idea what could b
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 08:20:43PM +, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> 5.11 does not boot anymore on Ingenic SoCs, I bisected it to this commit.
>
> Any idea what could be happening?
not yet, kernel crash log of a Malta QEMU is below.
Thomas.
Kernel bug detected[#1]
7;m not really sure.
In this case, his snapshots are all of the root.
I don't know how Ceph works, but since we already confirmed that there
are no subvolumes under /var, the only other explanation is that
/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph- is a submount
What is the the result of running:
mount | grep
2019 at 3:33 AM Thomas Schneider <74cmo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
However, I run into an issue and need to restore various files.
I thought that I could simply take the files from a snapshot created
before.
However, the files required don't exist in any snapshot!
Therefore I have c
/ceph/osd/ceph-219/
insgesamt 0
To create a snapshot I run this command:
snapper create --type single --description "validate
/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-"
Am 28.08.2019 um 00:24 schrieb Chris Murphy:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 3:33 AM Thomas Schneider <74cmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
How
Hi,
I'm running Debian 10 with btrfs-progs=5.2.1.
Creating snapshots with snapper=0.8.2 works w/o errors.
root@ld5507:~# uname -r
5.0.18-1-pve
root@ld5508:~# btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid: 70997a0b-a36f-46cf-9ddc-b88d47eabc9e
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 11.17GiB
devid 1 siz
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 4/18/19 11:41 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace by using the storage
> > array based interfaces.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
> > Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov
30523392ERROR: failed to repair root items:
Operation not permitted
Any ideas what is going on or how to recover the file system ? I would
greatly appreciate your help !!!
best,
Thomas
uname -a:
Linux server2 4.19.5-1-default #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Nov 27 19:56:09 UTC
2018 (6210279) x86_64
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 2018-03-08 04:30, Kees Cook wrote:
> > /**
> > + * SIMPLE_MAX - return maximum of two values without any type checking
> > + * @x: first value
> > + * @y: second value
> > + *
> > + * This should only be used in stack array sizes, since the type-che
Bool initializations should use true and false. Bool tests don't need
comparisons.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer
---
diff -u -p a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -6958,7 +6958,7 @@ static int __btrfs_free_extent(s
...
Regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Wurfbaum
Starkertshofen 15
85084 Reichertshofen
Tel.: +49-160-3696336
Mail: tho...@wurfbaum.net
Google+:http://google.com/+ThomasWurfbaum
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=16061335414
Xing: https://www.xing.com/profile/Thomas_Wurfbaum
signature.asc
29786112 wanted 1489835 found 1489871
parent transid verify failed on 29786112 wanted 1489835 found 1489871
parent transid verify failed on 29786112 wanted 1489835 found 1489871
Ignoring transid failure
leaf parent key incorrect 29786112
Error searching -1
Regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Wurfbaum
Am Mittwoch, 2. August 2017, 11:31:41 CEST schrieb Roman Mamedov:
> Did it just abruptly exit there? Or you terminated it?
It apruptly stopped there
Regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Wurfbaum
Starkertshofen 15
85084 Reichertshofen
Tel.: +49-160-3696336
Mail: tho...@wurfbaum.net
Google+:h
1486833
parent transid verify failed on 29376512 wanted 1327723 found 1486833
parent transid verify failed on 29376512 wanted 1327723 found 1486833
Ignoring transid failure
--
Thomas Wurfbaum
Starkertshofen 15
85084 Reichertshofen
Tel.: +49-160-3696336
Mail: tho...@wurfbaum.net
Google
subscribe linux-btrfs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please find attached my dmesg.log
Regards,
Thomas[0.00] Linux version 4.11.8-2-default (geeko@buildhost) (gcc version 7.1.1 20170629 [gcc-7-branch revision 249772] (SUSE Linux) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jun 29 14:37:33 UTC 2017 (42bd7a0)
[0.00] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.11.8
runs, even after 15 hours.
Is there anything else i could do?
Regards,
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
.
Any hints,
Thanks in advance,
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
form through the Contact now
E-mail: thomascreditf...@gmail.com
Thomas B. Dawson
THOMAS CREDIT FIRM
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the
nd recreate a new one then copy all data?
Do not hesitate if you want more information, I can definitely provide this.
Cheers,
François-Xavier Thomas
[ cut here ]
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 6290 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:320 record_root_in_trans+0x10c/0x120 [btrfs]
Modules linked
perhaps 'btrfs rescue'?
Thank you in advance for your help and have a pleasant day!
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So I don't think it's related. Yours looks like some subtle timer base
> > race. It smells like a locking problem with timers. I'm not seeing
> > what it might be, but it *might* have been fixed by doing the
> > TIMER_MIGRATING
tending the
partition?
THX
-------
thomas@pc8-nb:~$ uname -a
Linux pc8-nb 4.6.1-towo.1-siduction-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT siduction 4.6-1
(2016-06-04) x86_64 GNU/Linux
thomas@pc8-nb:~$ sudo btrfs --version
btrfs-progs v4.5.2
thomas@pc8-nb:~$ sudo btrfs fi
tending the
partition?
THX
-------
thomas@pc8-nb:~$ uname -a
Linux pc8-nb 4.6.1-towo.1-siduction-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT siduction 4.6-1
(2016-06-04) x86_64 GNU/Linux
thomas@pc8-nb:~$ sudo btrfs --version
btrfs-progs v4.5.2
thomas@pc8-nb:~$ sudo btrfs f
extending the partition?
THX
-------
thomas@pc8-nb:~$ uname -a
Linux pc8-nb 4.6.1-towo.1-siduction-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT siduction 4.6-1
(2016-06-04) x86_64 GNU/Linux
thomas@pc8-nb:~$ sudo btrfs --version
btrfs-progs v4.5.2
thomas@pc8-nb:~$ sudo btrfs fi us
ailed on 42795008 found 8FF848E2 wanted
bytenr mismatch, want=42795008, have=18446744073709551615
Couldn't read tree root
Could not open root, trying backup super
Superblock bytenr is larger than device size
Could not open root, trying backup super
Do you have any advice on how to proceed
Hello Friend
I must Say That I have Enormous Respect for you considering the Manner in Which
I have Made contact with you. My name is Mr.Steven Thomas, The financial
controller at the Royal Bank of Scotland (Main Branch) in New Delhi, INDIA, and
I am getting in touch with you regarding a
change to
the user
space tools are necessary.
Sincerely,
Thomas Rohwer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
works for me (I
used
it on my system in some cases), but is not extensively tested.
Sincerely,
Thomas Rohwer
Hello,
I am using as kernel Linux 4.1.3 (64bit) and btrfs-prog version 4.0 (32 bit
user space).
I wanted to use send/receive with btrfs for the first time today and I got the
urce code.
I also have not tested the 32bit/32bit 64bit/64bit userspace/kernel
combinations.
If there is interest, I can resubmit an improved patch. Please CC me in
replies, since I have not subscribed to the list.
Sincerely,
Thomas Rohwer
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rohw
lse?
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2014/ols2014-pimpale.pdf
Regards, Thomas Koch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi,
I want to replicate a snapshot from PC1 to virtual machine using this command:
user@pc1-gigabyte ~ $ sudo btrfs send
"/home/.snapshots/lmde_home_2015-02-07_02:38:21" | ssh vm1-debian sudo btrfs
receive /home/.snapshots/
At subvol /home/.snapshots/lmde_home_2015-02-07_02:38:21
sudo: Kein
Hi Gui,
no worries. I'am happy with the btrfs fi sh (with or without patch)
I'll try your paches. At the moment I have started to recover the data
from an other device where some parts of the data was stored before.
Since there was no progress during mkfs I don't now what was affected
on the disc
[All bad supers]:
All supers are valid, no need to recover
Did I miss anything?
Thanks
René
2014-10-30 4:54 GMT+01:00 Anand Jain :
>
>
>
> yes that's the one.
>
>> btrfs-progs: fix device missing of btrfs fi show with seed devices
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
-
>
> Could you try to back out the patch from progs and give it a shot ?
> and pls report what you see. Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/25/14 00:43, Rene Thomas wrote:
>>
>> # btrfs --version
>> Btrfs v3.17
>>
>> # btrfs fi show
>> Label:
Dear Developers / Maintainer,
I’ve set up a running RAID5 with three devices (sda1 / sdb1 /sdc1)
Mountpoint was /home, filesystem was mounted
A chain of unfortunal circumstances gives me the chance to run as root
in a terminal.
mkfs.ntfs /dev/sdb1
where /dev/sdb1 is device 1 in the Array.
After
h are available in the pthread library.
- Adds the necessary rules to generate the btrfsck.static link and
btrfstune.static binary.
- Adds an 'install-static' target to install the static
binaries. Note that they are renamed to not carry a '.static'
suffix.
S
y: Gustavo Zacarias
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni
---
Makefile | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index e721e99..926885f 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -57,10 +57,15 @@ btrfs_image_libs = -lpthread
btrfs_fragments_libs = -lgd -l
Hello,
Here are two patches that we have in the Buildroot embedded Linux
build system against btrfs-progs. The first patch allows to disable
the build and installation of the docmentation, the second patch
improves static building and installation.
Thanks,
Thomas
Gustavo Zacarias (1):
Add
tputs
that might give you a better picture.
Thanks,
Thomas
# btrfs fi show
Label: 'home' uuid: 911ddc1a-fa8e-445e-960d-2159b2765536
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 72.24GiB
devid1 size 89.02GiB used 89.02GiB path /dev/mapper/home
Btrfs v3.14.2-dirty
# mount -
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan cox.net> writes:
[...]
> Normally you'd do a data balance to consolidate data in the data chunks
> and return the now freed chunks to the unallocated space pool, but you're
> going to have problems doing that ATM, for two reasons. The likely
> easiest to work around is th
Am 13.01.2014 08:25, schrieb Duncan:
> [This mail was also posted to gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs.]
>
> Thomas Kuther posted on Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:05:25 +0100 as excerpted:
>>
>
> [ Rearranged to standard quote/reply order so replies are in context.
> Top-posting
en grown quite a while ago using "btrfs filesystem
resize max", but "btrfs fi df" still shows the old data size. How could
that happen?
This is becomming a "collection of maybe unrelated BTRFS funny tales"
thread... still I'd be happy on suggestions regarding
Hello,
I'm experiencing an interesting issue with the BTRFS filesystem on my
SSD drive. It first occured some time after the upgrade to kernel
3.13-rc (-rc3 was my first 3.13-rc) but I'm not sure if it is related.
The obvious symptoms are that services on my system started crashing
with "no space
When operating from inside a mounted btrfs subvolume which is not the
root subvolume "btrfs send" exits with the error:
ERROR: open failed. No such file or directory
Steps to reproduce:
1. mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda1
2. mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
3. btrfs subvolume create /mnt/foo
4. umoun
50412 level 0
[...]
What I'm missing here is some line starting with 'Generation: ...'.
Well, it is not there...
Certainly, the 'btrfs restore -t n /dev/sda7 /mnt/restore' trick does
not find anything useful.
Is there anything left I could try before giving up on this?
Dearest,
Kind regards, I am Miss ZILDA THOMAS ,tall,slim,fair,and a very good
looking girl that loves travelling and dancing, a student,that loves to be
loved,kindly permit my contacting you through this medium I am compelled
to contact you via this medium for obvious reasons which you will
Hello!
I have the following disk setup:
1x 3TB WD
2x 2TB WD
On each disk I have created a single partition, and this partition is formatted
in BTRFS.
Then, I have setup a multidevice filesystem:
root@pc5:/media# btrfs filesystem show
Label: 'WD30EZRX-00M' uuid: 7008c941-a5e1-44b6-9965-de726d22cc2
Hi,
how can I do the following in a shell script:
- check whether my file system supports cp --reflink?
- check whether two files share the same data on disk, i.e. one has been
created by cp --reflink of the other?
Thank you!
Thomas Koch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
takes this approach to
explain btrfs?
Thank you,
Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Am 08.07.2013 15:20, schrieb Josef Bacik:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:08:46AM +0200, Thomas Kuther wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm about to migrate from VirtualBox to Qemu+VGA-Passthrough. All my virtual
>> disk images are stored in a BTRFS subvolume on-top of a MDRAID
setup (md raid1 layer
below btrfs), or (still) a bug in Qemu?
Would cache=writethrough or writeback be an option with BTRFS?
Thanks in advance for any input.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a me
Thomas Koch:
> On Monday, June 10, 2013 09:00:47 AM Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 01:14:35PM -0600, Thomas Koch wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I had a power loss on my btrfs file system during package installation
> > > and now I fou
On Monday, June 10, 2013 09:00:47 AM Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 01:14:35PM -0600, Thomas Koch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had a power loss on my btrfs file system during package installation and
> > now I found this:
> >
> >
> > % ls
. Unfortunately I wasn't clever enough to save the
output of btrfsck somehow. Do you need it?
Could you help me to get rid of these bogus files, please?
Regards,
Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a me
Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer
---
diff -u -p a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
@@ -3429,10 +3429,9 @@ static int __find_xattr(int num, struct
strncmp(name, ctx->name, name_len) == 0) {
ctx->found_idx
Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer
---
diff -u -p a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -3296,10 +3296,7 @@ int btrfs_resume_balance_async(struct bt
}
tsk = kthread_run(balance_kthread, fs_info, "btrfs-balance");
The semantic patch that makes this change is available
in scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci.
More information about semantic patching is available at
http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer
---
diff -u -p a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
this may be related to the "no space"
problem. I just installed kernel 3.3.3, and the problem with "no space"
seems to be gone. Thanks for your quick help.
Sincerely,
Thomas Rohwer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
hould avoid mounting /dev/sda
in this situation.
Sincerely,
Thomas Rohwer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
oc/version
Linux version 3.3.0 (tr@humbur) (gcc version 4.6.3 (GCC) ) #3 SMP Thu Apr 5
00:14:18 CEST 2012
Some help would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Thomas Rohwer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@
Hello Josef,
On 04/24/2012 05:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 02:53:55PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> today my laptop crashed with the following output. Installed is
>> Archlinux with btrfs on a SSD.
>> Is it btrfs related?
> S
Hello,
today my laptop crashed with the following output. Installed is
Archlinux with btrfs on a SSD.
Is it btrfs related?
Thanks,
Thomas
Apr 21 13:01:01 localhost anacron[3307]: Anacron started on 2012-04-21
Apr 21 13:01:01 localhost anacron[3307]: Will run job `cron.daily' in 48
min.
A
Hello Mitch,
I have good news for you. I looked through all log files and found in
the everything.log the following:
Regards,
Thomas
Jan 31 05:12:24 localhost kernel: [87276.968049] btrfs memmove bogus
src_offset 1870 move len 687876531 len 4096
Jan 31 05:12:24 localhost kernel
Hello Mitch,
On 01/31/2012 10:37 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Weber
wrote:
Hello,
this morning my laptop with btrfs crashed. It is an ssd drive.
It is a Linux aramis 3.2.2-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jan 26 08:40:20 CET
2012 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo
Hello,
this morning my laptop with btrfs crashed. It is an ssd drive.
It is a Linux aramis 3.2.2-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jan 26 08:40:20 CET
2012 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel
GNU/Linux
Regards,
Thomas
This two lines are from a photo, that i made
On Thursday 01 December 2011 09:55:27 Arne Jansen wrote:
> As RAID0 is already not a strict 'all disks or none', I like the idea to
> have it even more dynamic to reach full optimization. But I'd like to see
> some properties conserved:
> a) In case of even size disks, the stripes should always be
On Thursday 01 December 2011 09:55:27 Arne Jansen wrote:
> As RAID0 is already not a strict 'all disks or none', I like the idea to
> have it even more dynamic to reach full optimization. But I'd like to see
> some properties conserved:
> a) In case of even size disks, the stripes should always be
I can no longer mount my Btrfs filesystem after a clean reboot. Before
the reboot, there were errors in the syslog, but unfortunately I can't
recover them now that the root filesystem won't mount.
Here is a mount attempt using kernel 3.2.1 with the latest git copy of
the btrfs-progs from Josef's r
The advantage of kcalloc is, that will prevent integer overflows which could
result from the multiplication of number of elements and size and it is also
a bit nicer to read.
The semantic patch that makes this change is available
in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/25/107
Signed-off-by: Thomas
Hello,
please can you help me.
i read that btrfs can create subvolumes.
that is a great feature but can i limit the filesystem space that the subvolume
can be used?
regards,
Thomas--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message
wife has accidently deleted a ton of photos...
-Original Message-
From: Fajar A. Nugraha [mailto:l...@fajar.net]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 7:39 AM
To: Mike Thomas
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs errors
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Mike Thomas wrote:
> Hi, I&#x
Hi, I've been using btrfs for a while now, I've been utilizing snapshotting
nightly/weekly/monthly. During the weekly I also do a backup of the
filesystem to an ext4 filesystem. My storage is a linux md raid 5 volume.
I've recently noticed these errors in the logs during the backup of the
files
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:59:26 +0100
> Von: Arne Jansen
> An: Thomas Schmidt
> CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Betreff: Re: [RFC] improve space utilization on off-sized raid devices
> Right you are. So you want to sacrifice str
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:42:48 +0100
> Von: Arne Jansen
> An: Thomas Schmidt
> CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Betreff: Re: [RFC] improve space utilization on off-sized raid devices
> On 17.11.2011 01:27, Thomas Schmidt wrote:
I wrote a small patch to improve allocation on differently sized raid devices.
With 2.6.38 I frequently ran into a no space left error that I attribute to
this. But I'm not entierly sure. The fs was an 8 device -d raid0 -m raid10.
The used space was the same across all devices. 5 were full and 3 b
Hello!
My Btrfs partition (/home) is out of free space.
The partition is a logical drive within a LVM configuration.
I've already extended the LVM logical volume.
However, it's impossible to mount the partition from a live CD system
(SystemRescue CD).
The error in dmesg is: BTRFS: inode 8443 st
kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next
I see last commit is 3+ months ago
--
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2011-03-01 19:39, Chris Mason wrote:
> We'll have raid56, but it won't be variable stripe size. There will be
> one stripe size for data and one for metadata but that's it.
Will the stripe *width* be configurable? If I have something like a
Sun Thor with 48 drives, I would probably not be en
On 2011-02-10 13:27, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> snprintf is standard, and should be about as safe as it gets with the
>> glibc functions.
>
> But snprintf is not like strlcpy.
It is indeed uglier to write 'snprintf(dst, size, "%s", src
On 2011-02-07 13:22, Eduardo Silva wrote:
> Please find the attached patch which replace unsafe strcpy(3) by
> strncpy(3) functions.
strncpy() doesn't NUL-terminate the destination buffer if the
maximum length is reached. And as far as I can see, there is
no other initialization of those buffers
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Thomas Bellman wrote:
So, basically database transactions with an isolation level of
"committed read", for file operations. That's something I have
wanted for a long time, especially if I also get a rollback()
oper
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Thomas Bellman wrote:
What is the visibility of the changes for other processes supposed
to be in the meantime? I.e., if things happen in this order:
Should be atomic too, at close time.
1. Process A does fda = open("fo
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Massimo Maggi wrote:
Are you suggesting to do:
1)fopen with O_TRUNC, O_ATOMIC: returns fd to a temporary file
2)application writes to that fd, with one or more system calls, in a
short time or in long time, at his will.
3)at fclose (or e
On Mi, 04.08.10 21:30 Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:48:40PM +0200, Thomas Kuther wrote:
> > On Di, 06.07.10 20:16 Chris Mason wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:15:04PM -0700, Yee-Ting Li wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
rify failed on 2419214266368 wanted 127839 found 127837
parent transid verify failed on 2419214266368 wanted 127839 found 127837
Segmentation fault
Mount endlessly loops, like explained in this thread.
If there is a way, I would really like some aid copying the data off.
The backup is quite out of da
I knew it was safely on disk at my end. But I am a fairly careful
programmer.
Note that in my previous life I was a userspace programmer, and in my
current life I'm a sysadmin. I'm speaking as an interrested user of
Btrfs, not as a kernel programmer.
/Thomas Bellman
--
To
I'm happy that I'm not alone with my preference for subcommands :) over short
- commands.
Btw: I think it would be a good idea start from the beginning with a 'libbtrfs'
library and a corresponding API. That way integrating into other languages like
Python and integration into tools like parted
benefit of a git-like syntax is the extensibility : whatever functionality gets
added to btrfs it will never interfer/confuse with the existing ones. The
downside (w/o alias) is rather long command lines (which I don't mind because I
find it harder to remember all the shortcuts).
Thanks
On 1 Feb 2010, at 15:19, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:17:24AM +0100, Thomas Kupper wrote:
>>
>> On 31 Jan 2010, at 09:46, Thomas Kupper wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 Jan 2010, at 19:20, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Ja
On 31 Jan 2010, at 09:46, Thomas Kupper wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2010, at 19:20, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 05:57:49PM +0100, Thomas Kupper wrote:
>>>
>>> On 30 Jan 2010, at 16:18, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Ja
On 30 Jan 2010, at 19:20, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 05:57:49PM +0100, Thomas Kupper wrote:
>>
>> On 30 Jan 2010, at 16:18, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Thomas Kupper wrote:
>>>> Just a short que
On 31 Jan 2010, at 18:39, Piavlo wrote:
> Thomas Kupper wrote:
>> On 30 Jan 2010, at 16:18, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Thomas Kupper wrote:
>>>> Just a short question:
>>>>
>>>> How can
On 30 Jan 2010, at 19:20, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 05:57:49PM +0100, Thomas Kupper wrote:
>>
>> On 30 Jan 2010, at 16:18, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Thomas Kupper wrote:
>>>> Just a short que
On 30 Jan 2010, at 16:18, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Thomas Kupper wrote:
>> Just a short question:
>>
>> How can I check the data and metadata modes of a multi-device btrfs device?
>> btrfs-show is of no help and df is still not
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
