Hi Goffredo, Bart, Hugo,
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012 schrieb Goffredo Baroncelli:
On 10/09/2012 02:51 PM, Bart Noordervliet wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Goffredo
Baroncellikreij...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bart,
I replayed in another email to Hugo about that. Basically I am not
Am Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2012 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
$ ./btrfs filesystem df /
Path: /
Summary:
Disk_size: 72.57GB
Disk_allocated:25.10GB
Disk_unallocated: 47.48GB
Logical_size: 23.06GB
Used: 11.01GB
Am Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2012 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 05:01 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Type for the first column is probably enough.
Why is the third column called Chunk-size? If my understanding is
correct,
Hi Goffredo,
thank you very much for your work on making the btrfs filesystem df
output that much more understandable. It is a real improvement
already. I would however like to bring this comment from Hugo to your
attention once again:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Hugo Mills
Hi Bart,
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Bart Noordervliet
b...@noordervliet.net wrote:
Hi Goffredo,
thank you very much for your work on making the btrfs filesystem df
output that much more understandable. It is a real improvement
already. I would however like to bring this comment from
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bart,
I replayed in another email to Hugo about that. Basically I am not contrary
to the change, only it is unrelated to my patches. In may patches I use the
function pretty_sizes() which adds the suffix KB, MB,
On 10/09/2012 02:51 PM, Bart Noordervliet wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Goffredo Baroncellikreij...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bart,
I replayed in another email to Hugo about that. Basically I am not contrary
to the change, only it is unrelated to my patches. In may patches I use the
Looks good. Only a few comments, inline.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
$ ./btrfs filesystem df --help
usage: btrfs filesystem disk-usage [-d][-s][-k] path [path..]
Show space usage information for a mount point(s).
-k Set KB (1024 bytes)
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
This serie of patches updated the command btrfs filesystem
df. I update this command because it is not so easy to get
the information about the disk usage from the command fi df and fi show.
From the man page (see 2nd
On 10/03/2012 01:56 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
Looks good. Only a few comments, inline.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
$ ./btrfs filesystem df --help
usage: btrfs filesystem disk-usage [-d][-s][-k]path [path..]
Show space usage information for a
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:17:53PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 01:56 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
Looks good. Only a few comments, inline.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
[snip]
Also, use kB, MB, GB, TB for powers-of-ten based units,
On 10/03/2012 05:01 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Type for the first column is probably enough.
Why is the third column called Chunk-size? If my understanding is
correct, it's just a break down of Disk_allocated from the summary
section. If so, why not call it Disk_allocated to avoid confusion?
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 05:01 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Type for the first column is probably enough.
Why is the third column called Chunk-size? If my understanding is
correct, it's just a break down of Disk_allocated from the summary
On 10/03/2012 07:46 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 05:01 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Type for the first column is probably enough.
Why is the third column called Chunk-size? If my understanding is
correct, it's just a
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:01:00PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 07:46 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 05:01 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Type for the first column is probably enough.
Why is the third
15 matches
Mail list logo
