On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:23:03PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
Onmon, 25 Feb 2013 11:50:01 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:04:40PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:34:47PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
Onfri, 22 Feb 2013 16:40:35 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:04:40PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:34:47PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:40:35 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:32:50AM -0500, Marios Titas wrote:
Sorry, but the bug persists even with the above patch.
On mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:50:01 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:04:40PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:34:47PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:40:35 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:32:50AM -0500, Marios Titas wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:23:03PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
Onmon, 25 Feb 2013 11:50:01 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:04:40PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:34:47PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
Onfri, 22 Feb 2013 16:40:35 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
A user reported some weird behaviours,
if we move a file with the noCow flag to a directory without the
noCow flag, the file is now without the flag, but after remount,
we'll find the file's noCow flag comes back.
This is because we missed a proper inode update after inheriting
parent directory's
Sorry, but the bug persists even with the above patch.
touch test
chattr +C test
lsattr test
mv test test2
lsattr test2
In the above scenario test2 will not have the C flag.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com wrote:
A user reported some weird behaviours,
if we move a
Wouldn't though inheriting create all sorts of problems? For instance
check the example that I give in my other responese [1].
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg22396.html
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On fri, 22 Feb 2013
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:10:37AM -0500, Marios Titas wrote:
You are right, your patch does improve the situation a bit. But it
still does not address the main issue. To illustrate that, consider
the following scenario:
Sorry for so much confusion for users.
Please let me explain the
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:34:47PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
Onfri, 22 Feb 2013 16:40:35 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:32:50AM -0500, Marios Titas wrote:
Sorry, but the bug persists even with the above patch.
touch test
chattr +C test
lsattr test
mv test test2
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:19:27PM -0500, Marios Titas wrote:
I think that many end users will find all this very confusing. They
will never expect that renaming a file will cause it to suddenly lose
one flag (NODATACOW) while preserving the other (NODATASUM).
Especially since they cannot
10 matches
Mail list logo
