Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 06.12.10:
Kernel 2.6.37-rc4:
# btrfs filesystem df /srv/MM
Data, RAID0: total=2.39TB, used=2.37TB
System, RAID1: total=8.00MB, used=188.00KB
System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
Metadata, RAID1: total=4.25GB, used=3.51GB
Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GB, used=2.33MB
Helmut -
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 06:05:00PM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Du meintest am 06.12.10:
Kernel 2.6.37-rc4:
# btrfs filesystem df /srv/MM
Data, RAID0: total=2.39TB, used=2.37TB
System, RAID1: total=8.00MB, used=188.00KB
System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
Metadata, RAID1:
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 06.12.10:
But after copying about 300 MByte (part of a 1.5-GByte *.mpg) I
got no space left on device. Looks like balancing has stolen
about 300 GByte.
This sounds exactly like a problem I've had. What output do you
get from btrfs fi df /srv/MM?
I've just
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:13:00PM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 06.12.10:
But after copying about 300 MByte (part of a 1.5-GByte *.mpg) I
got no space left on device. Looks like balancing has stolen
about 300 GByte.
This sounds exactly like a problem
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 06.12.10:
Can you try that again with either the latest 2.6.37-rc, or with
the btrfs-unstable kernel? There's a bug in earlier versions that
breaks the reporting of RAID types, which is what I wanted to see
here.
Compiling 2.6.37-rc is no big problem, it only
Helmut -
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:45:00PM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote:
If/when I install 2.6.37-rc4: should I update btrfs (from the 20101117
version)?
I think that's the latest version.
How can I see that changing the kernel makes things better? It's more
and more difficult to
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 06.12.10:
How can I see that changing the kernel makes things better? It's
more and more difficult to externalize (?) btrfs directories to
other disks ...
Updating the kernel won't fix the problem I'm thinking of (sorry).
It will, however, fix the bug that
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:13:00PM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 06.12.10:
How can I see that changing the kernel makes things better? It's
more and more difficult to externalize (?) btrfs directories to
other disks ...
Updating the kernel won't fix the
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de wrote:
Hallo, Evert,
Du meintest am 04.12.10 zum Thema Re: 800 GByte free, but no space left:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de
wrote:
Hallo,
I wrote am 02.12.10:
I use 2 disks (1.5 Tbyte
Hallo, cwillu,
Du meintest am 05.12.10:
I am not an expert on this by a long shot, but it looks like you
added these two disks in raid0.
I won't hope that this error is related to RAID0, I haven't
installed (as far as I know) RAID0.
My installation way:
(2-TByte-Disk)
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de wrote:
Hallo, cwillu,
Du meintest am 05.12.10:
I am not an expert on this by a long shot, but it looks like you
added these two disks in raid0.
I won't hope that this error is related to RAID0, I haven't
installed (as far as
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de wrote:
Hallo, Evert,
Du meintest am 04.12.10 zum Thema Re: 800 GByte free, but no space left:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de
wrote:
Hallo,
I wrote am 02.12.10:
I use 2 disks (1.5 Tbyte
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 04:08:26AM -0700, Evert Vorster wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de wrote:
Hallo, Evert,
Du meintest am 04.12.10 zum Thema Re: 800 GByte free, but no space left:
I am not an expert on this by a long shot, but it looks like you
Hallo, cwillu,
Du meintest am 05.12.10:
Maybe you're right. But if you're right then I have got the worst of
two worlds. I don't want neither RAID0 nor RAID1, I want a bundle of
different disks (at least partititions) which seem to be one large
disk. And I've hoped btrfs does this job.
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 05.12.10:
If the smallest device defines the capacity then I should use
2*1.35 TiByte, but my system tells no space left at about 2.4
TiByte - where are (at least) 300 GiByte hidden?
devid2 size 1.35TB used 1.35TB path /dev/sdc3
devid1 size
devid 2 size 1.35TB used 1.35TB path /dev/sdc3
devid 1 size 1.81TB used 1.35TB path /dev/sdf2
Here devid 2 is at 100%, and hence you are getting the no more space
left errors. So, the 300 TB is on the bigger disk, and not usable for
you right now.
I _think_ that a
Hallo, Evert,
Du meintest am 05.12.10:
devid 2 size 1.35TB used 1.35TB path /dev/sdc3
devid 1 size 1.81TB used 1.35TB path /dev/sdf2
[...]
When I created a file system with
mkfs.btrfs -d single /dev/sdb6 /dev/sdb7
I was able to fill the resulting file system to 2.7Gb
Hallo,
I wrote am 02.12.10:
I use 2 disks (1.5 Tbyte and 2.0 TByte) under 1 LABEL (for my video
collection, nearly alle files have more than 1 GByte):
Label: MM2 uuid: ad7c0668-316c-4a79-ba00-3b505b9d99b4
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 2.38TB
devid2 size 1.35TB used 1.35TB
Hallo, Evert,
Du meintest am 04.12.10 zum Thema Re: 800 GByte free, but no space left:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de
wrote:
Hallo,
I wrote am 02.12.10:
I use 2 disks (1.5 Tbyte and 2.0 TByte) under 1 LABEL (for my video
collection, nearly alle files
Hallo,
I've new problems.
I use 2 disks (1.5 Tbyte and 2.0 TByte) under 1 LABEL (for my video
collection, nearly alle files have more than 1 GByte):
Label: MM2 uuid: ad7c0668-316c-4a79-ba00-3b505b9d99b4
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 2.38TB
devid2 size 1.35TB used 1.35TB
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de wrote:
Btrfs Btrfs v0.19
btrfs in the kernel has been version 0.19 for a *long* time. The
version number there may never change. How do you encode a feature
mask in a version number? Some features may be in one tree but not
Hallo, Mike,
Du meintest am 02.12.10:
Btrfs Btrfs v0.19
btrfs in the kernel has been version 0.19 for a *long* time. The
version number there may never change. How do you encode a feature
mask in a version number? Some features may be in one tree but not
upstreamed all together and
22 matches
Mail list logo
