Hi Chris,
As I mentioned at the kernel summit, I have a file system that I use mostly
for storing my one kernel git tree and occasionally some build trees
(those are normally on a tmpfs), and I have again run into the problem
where the file system is only partially full (I think 18% in this case)
On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:29:05 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
As I mentioned at the kernel summit, I have a file system that I use mostly
for storing my one kernel git tree and occasionally some build trees
(those are normally on a tmpfs), and I have again run into the problem
where the file
On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:06:19 +, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
You didn't give us any btrfs fs show or btrfs fs df outpu to look at,
Of course fi, not fs..
-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 16:29:05 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I also played around with it some more. After removing a few small
files, I could create new files with up to 20-60MB again before hitting
ENOSPC. I then did a 'make clean' in all the object directories I had
and after that could
Hi Arnd,
Ok, one more data point:
Why don't you provide the data point you were specifically asked for,
btrfs fi df ;)
Regards, Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:49:12PM +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Hi Arnd,
Ok, one more data point:
Why don't you provide the data point you were specifically asked for,
btrfs fi df ;)
btrfs fi show is important as well -- it's hard to work out the
state of the FS from just one of
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 21:49:12 Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Hi Arnd,
Ok, one more data point:
Why don't you provide the data point you were specifically asked for,
btrfs fi df ;)
I've cleaned it up again already. At the moment, it's working fine,
with this data:
Data: total=65.11GB,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Ok, now I'm in the bad state again (after running a 'make allmodconfig'
kernel build:
Label: none uuid: 1d88cccb-3d0e-42d9-8252-a226dc5c2e47
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 8.79GB
devid1 size 67.14GB used
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 22:57:25 Hugo Mills wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Ok, now I'm in the bad state again (after running a 'make allmodconfig'
kernel build:
Label: none uuid: 1d88cccb-3d0e-42d9-8252-a226dc5c2e47
Total devices 1
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 22:57:25 +0100
Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Ok, now I'm in the bad state again (after running a 'make allmodconfig'
kernel build:
Label: none uuid: 1d88cccb-3d0e-42d9-8252-a226dc5c2e47
On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 23:49:10 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Label: none uuid: 1d88cccb-3d0e-42d9-8252-a226dc5c2e47
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 8.79GB
devid1 size 67.14GB used 67.14GB path /dev/sdc6
*ding ding ding*
The term
11 matches
Mail list logo
