Re: 4.4.0 - no space left with >1.7 TB free space left

2016-09-15 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:53:32 +0500 Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 20:36:26 +0900 > Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > > > On 2016-02-08 20:24, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > > > >> Linux 4.4.0 - btrfs is mainly used to host lots of test containers, > > >>

Re: 4.4.0 - no space left with >1.7 TB free space left

2016-05-12 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
On 2016-05-12 15:03, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: FYI, I'm still getting this with 4.5.3, which probably means the fix was not yet included ("No space left" at snapshot time): /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-9.3-main.log:2016-05-11 06:06:10 UTC LOG: could not close temporary statistics file

Re: 4.4.0 - no space left with >1.7 TB free space left

2016-05-12 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
On 2016-04-08 20:53, Roman Mamedov wrote: > Do you snapshot the parent subvolume which holds the databases? Can you > correlate that perhaps ENOSPC occurs at the time of snapshotting? If > yes, then > you should try the patch https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7967161/ > > (Too bad this was not

Re: 4.4.0 - no space left with >1.7 TB free space left

2016-04-08 Thread Duncan
Roman Mamedov posted on Fri, 08 Apr 2016 16:53:32 +0500 as excerpted: > It's not in 4.4.6 either. I don't know why it doesn't get included, or > what we need to do. Last time I asked, it was queued: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg52478.html But maybe that > meant 4.5 or 4.6 only?

Re: 4.4.0 - no space left with >1.7 TB free space left

2016-04-08 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
On 2016-04-08 20:53, Roman Mamedov wrote: > Do you snapshot the parent subvolume which holds the databases? Can you > correlate that perhaps ENOSPC occurs at the time of snapshotting? If > yes, then > you should try the patch https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7967161/ > > (Too bad this was not

Re: 4.4.0 - no space left with >1.7 TB free space left

2016-04-08 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 20:36:26 +0900 Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > On 2016-02-08 20:24, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > >> Linux 4.4.0 - btrfs is mainly used to host lots of test containers, > >> often snapshots, and at times, there is heavy IO in many of them for > >> extended periods

Re: 4.4.0 - no space left with >1.7 TB free space left

2016-04-08 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
On 2016-02-08 20:24, Roman Mamedov wrote: Linux 4.4.0 - btrfs is mainly used to host lots of test containers, often snapshots, and at times, there is heavy IO in many of them for extended periods of time. btrfs is on HDDs. Every few days I'm getting "no space left" in a container running

4.4.0 - no space left with >1.7 TB free space left

2016-02-08 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Linux 4.4.0 - btrfs is mainly used to host lots of test containers, often snapshots, and at times, there is heavy IO in many of them for extended periods of time. btrfs is on HDDs. Every few days I'm getting "no space left" in a container running mongo 3.2.1 database. Interestingly, haven't

Re: 4.4.0 - no space left with >1.7 TB free space left

2016-02-08 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
On 2016-02-08 20:24, Roman Mamedov wrote: On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:22:34 +0900 Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Linux 4.4.0 - btrfs is mainly used to host lots of test containers, often snapshots, and at times, there is heavy IO in many of them for extended periods of time. btrfs is

Re: 4.4.0 - no space left with >1.7 TB free space left

2016-02-08 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:15:38 +0900 Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > With the last error, a snapshot was made at around 06:06 > "no space left" was reported on 06:14. If you mean the log that you have posted in your original message, the ENOSPC happened at 06:06 and 14 seconds, not

Re: 4.4.0 - no space left with >1.7 TB free space left

2016-02-08 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:22:34 +0900 Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > Linux 4.4.0 - btrfs is mainly used to host lots of test containers, > often snapshots, and at times, there is heavy IO in many of them for > extended periods of time. btrfs is on HDDs. > > > Every few days I'm

Free space left

2010-01-16 Thread Michael Niederle
How can I detect how much free space is left on a btrfs-volume? As I read (and learned in practice!) df reports cannot be trusted if used on btrfs-volumes. Greetings, Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to

Re: Free space left

2010-01-16 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On Saturday 16 January 2010, Michael Niederle wrote: How can I detect how much free space is left on a btrfs-volume? As I read (and learned in practice!) df reports cannot be trusted if used on btrfs-volumes. Try btrfs-show $ btrfs-show Label: bar uuid:

Re: Free space left

2010-01-16 Thread Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle
Hi, Goffredo! Try btrfs-show Thanks for your advice! btrfs-show works but it displays a lot of error message for non-btrfs devices: btrfs-show failed to read /dev/sdg failed to read /dev/sdg1 failed to read /dev/sdg2 failed to read /dev/sdg3 failed to read /dev/sdg4 failed to read /dev/md1

Re: Free space left

2010-01-16 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On Saturday 16 January 2010, you (Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle) wrote: Hi, Goffredo! Try btrfs-show Thanks for your advice! btrfs-show works but it displays a lot of error message for non-btrfs devices: btrfs-show failed to read /dev/sdg failed to read /dev/sdg1 failed to read

Re: Free space left

2010-01-16 Thread Svein Erik Brostigen
Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: Try btrfs-show Ok: $ mount /dev/sdc on /media/452f782b-738a-4699-abfa-588eecab07ea type btrfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=devkit) $ df /dev/sdc 932G 6.7G 925G 1% /media/452f782b-738a-4699-abfa-588eecab07ea $ btrfs-show failed to read /dev/sdb1

Re: Free space left

2010-01-16 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On Saturday 16 January 2010, you (Svein Erik Brostigen) wrote: Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: Try btrfs-show Ok: $ mount /dev/sdc on /media/452f782b-738a-4699-abfa-588eecab07ea type btrfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=devkit) $ df /dev/sdc 932G 6.7G 925G 1%

Re: Free space left

2010-01-16 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On Saturday 16 January 2010, Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer wrote: Hello, kreij...@gmail.com (Goffredo Baroncelli) writes: Try btrfs-show [...] How do you read this then: Label: none uuid: 27fafa43-7ad0-4e8a-ada8-36f73ef8984c Total devices 2 FS bytes used 79.63GB

Re: Free space left

2010-01-16 Thread Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
Hello, kreij...@gmail.com (Goffredo Baroncelli) writes: Try btrfs-show [...] How do you read this then: Label: none uuid: 27fafa43-7ad0-4e8a-ada8-36f73ef8984c Total devices 2 FS bytes used 79.63GB devid2 size 111.79GB used 111.01GB path /dev/sdb devid1