Re: Kernel Modules

2011-07-10 Thread Felix Blanke
Well, the mail still says the truth :) On 7/10/11 11:57 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote: Hallo, Felix, Du meintest am 10.07.11: I'll be quiet about this topic now. I've to admit that I was a little bit drunk yesterday. Sorry again! Don't drink and write! Viele Gruesse! Helmut -- To unsubscribe fro

Re: Kernel Modules

2011-07-10 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Felix, Du meintest am 10.07.11: > I'll be quiet about this topic now. I've to admit that I was a little > bit drunk yesterday. Sorry again! Don't drink and write! Viele Gruesse! Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to m

Re: Kernel Modules

2011-07-10 Thread Felix Blanke
You don't understood me. Ofc the developer need bug reports and all that stuff. But it's the way youre doing it. Imho a lot of your mails sounds like the only goal of them are to punish btrfs. Maybe I'm the only one who feels this way, then I'm sorry. I'll be quite about this topic now. I've t

Re: Kernel Modules

2011-07-10 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On 07/09/2011 07:28 PM, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote: > On Saturday 9 July, 2011 10:12:43 you wrote: >> If your btrfs lives on two or more devices you will have to run >> 'btrfs device scan' prior to mount or give all devices as arguments >> to mount.btrfs. > > Ohhh, I'd added a disk drive without

Re: Kernel Modules

2011-07-10 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Felix, Du meintest am 10.07.11: > Did you ever say something positive about btrfs? :D All I read from > in the last months is complaining about btrfs. I use it, since many months. But it's still an adventure, I won't use it for valuable data. > I'm sorry but it seems that 90% for your co

Re: Kernel Modules

2011-07-09 Thread Felix Blanke
Did you ever say something positive about btrfs? :D All I read from in the last months is complaining about btrfs. In this case it was his fault because he forget to update the fstab. Im pretty sure it was also your fault when you screwed up your 2.6.38.5 kernel... I'm sorry but it seems that 90

Re: Kernel Modules

2011-07-09 Thread Hugo Mills
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 10:28:03AM -0700, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote: > On Saturday 9 July, 2011 10:12:43 you wrote: > > If your btrfs lives on two or more devices you will have to run 'btrfs > > device scan' prior to mount or give all devices as arguments to mount.btrfs. > > Ohhh, I'd added a d

Re: Kernel Modules

2011-07-09 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Cacook, Du meintest am 09.07.11: > Just compiled a custom kernel, but unable to mount a btrfs partition. > It essentially says 'unrecognized filesystem'. What could be > missing? Perhaps you only need a newer kernel. Sounds funny, but some days ago I had a similar problem, with kerne

Re: Kernel Modules

2011-07-09 Thread CACook
On Saturday 9 July, 2011 10:12:43 you wrote: > If your btrfs lives on two or more devices you will have to run 'btrfs > device scan' prior to mount or give all devices as arguments to mount.btrfs. Ohhh, I'd added a disk drive without modifying fstab. Thanks. Where would you put a device scan to

Re: Kernel Modules

2011-07-09 Thread Andreas Philipp
On 09.07.2011 18:19, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote: > Just compiled a custom kernel, but unable to mount a btrfs partition. It > essentially says 'unrecognized filesystem'. What could be missing? > > # File systems > # > CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y > CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y > CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y > CON

Kernel Modules

2011-07-09 Thread CACook
Just compiled a custom kernel, but unable to mount a btrfs partition. It essentially says 'unrecognized filesystem'. What could be missing? # File systems # CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y # CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP is not set CONFIG_EXT3_F