On 2018-07-03 03:35, Duncan wrote:
Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Mon, 02 Jul 2018 07:49:05 -0400 as
excerpted:
Notably, most Intel systems I've seen have the SATA controllers in the
chipset enumerate after the USB controllers, and the whole chipset
enumerates after add-in cards (so they
Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Mon, 02 Jul 2018 07:49:05 -0400 as
excerpted:
> Notably, most Intel systems I've seen have the SATA controllers in the
> chipset enumerate after the USB controllers, and the whole chipset
> enumerates after add-in cards (so they almost always have this issue),
>
On 2018-06-30 01:32, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
30.06.2018 06:22, Duncan пишет:
Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2018 07:26:41 -0400 as
excerpted:
On 2018-06-24 16:22, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 06/23/2018 07:11 AM, Duncan wrote:
waxhead posted on Fri, 22 Jun 2018 01:13:31 +0200
On 2018-06-29 23:22, Duncan wrote:
Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2018 07:26:41 -0400 as
excerpted:
On 2018-06-24 16:22, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 06/23/2018 07:11 AM, Duncan wrote:
waxhead posted on Fri, 22 Jun 2018 01:13:31 +0200 as excerpted:
According to this:
30.06.2018 06:22, Duncan пишет:
> Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2018 07:26:41 -0400 as
> excerpted:
>
>> On 2018-06-24 16:22, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>>> On 06/23/2018 07:11 AM, Duncan wrote:
waxhead posted on Fri, 22 Jun 2018 01:13:31 +0200 as excerpted:
> According
Hugo Mills posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:54:36 + as excerpted:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 06:43:38PM +0200, waxhead wrote:
> [snip]
>> I hope I am not asking for too much (but I know I probably am), but I
>> suggest that having a small snippet of information on the status page
>> showing a
Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2018 07:26:41 -0400 as
excerpted:
> On 2018-06-24 16:22, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>> On 06/23/2018 07:11 AM, Duncan wrote:
>>> waxhead posted on Fri, 22 Jun 2018 01:13:31 +0200 as excerpted:
>>>
According to this:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 08:50:11PM +0200, waxhead wrote:
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:13 PM, waxhead wrote:
> > > According to this:
> > >
> > > https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
> > > Page 4 , section 1.2
> > >
> > > It claims that BTRFS still
Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:13 PM, waxhead wrote:
According to this:
https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
Page 4 , section 1.2
It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may never
be resolved.
Could someone shed some light on
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 06:43:38PM +0200, waxhead wrote:
[snip]
> I hope I am not asking for too much (but I know I probably am), but
> I suggest that having a small snippet of information on the status
> page showing a little bit about what is either currently the
> development focus , or what
David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 01:13:31AM +0200, waxhead wrote:
According to this:
https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
Page 4 , section 1.2
It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
never be resolved.
Could someone shed some
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 05:11:52AM +, Duncan wrote:
> > According to this:
> >
> > https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf Page 4 ,
> > section 1.2
> >
> > It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
> > never be resolved.
> > Could someone shed
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 01:13:31AM +0200, waxhead wrote:
> According to this:
>
> https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
> Page 4 , section 1.2
>
> It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
> never be resolved.
> Could someone shed some light on
On 2018-06-24 16:22, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 06/23/2018 07:11 AM, Duncan wrote:
waxhead posted on Fri, 22 Jun 2018 01:13:31 +0200 as excerpted:
According to this:
https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf Page 4 ,
section 1.2
It claims that BTRFS still have
On 06/23/2018 07:11 AM, Duncan wrote:
> waxhead posted on Fri, 22 Jun 2018 01:13:31 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> According to this:
>>
>> https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf Page 4 ,
>> section 1.2
>>
>> It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
>>
waxhead wrote:
> Jukka Larja wrote:
>> waxhead wrote 24.6.2018 klo 1.01:
>>> Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 22.06.2018 02:13, waxhead wrote:
> According to this:
>
> https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
> Page 4 , section 1.2
>
> It claims that
Jukka Larja wrote:
waxhead wrote 24.6.2018 klo 1.01:
Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 22.06.2018 02:13, waxhead wrote:
According to this:
https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
Page 4 , section 1.2
It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
never be
waxhead wrote 24.6.2018 klo 1.01:
Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 22.06.2018 02:13, waxhead wrote:
According to this:
https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
Page 4 , section 1.2
It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
never be resolved.
Could
Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 22.06.2018 02:13, waxhead wrote:
According to this:
https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
Page 4 , section 1.2
It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
never be resolved.
Could someone shed some light on exactly
waxhead posted on Fri, 22 Jun 2018 01:13:31 +0200 as excerpted:
> According to this:
>
> https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf Page 4 ,
> section 1.2
>
> It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
> never be resolved.
> Could someone shed some
On 22.06.2018 02:13, waxhead wrote:
> According to this:
>
> https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
> Page 4 , section 1.2
>
> It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
> never be resolved.
> Could someone shed some light on exactly what these
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:13 PM, waxhead wrote:
> According to this:
>
> https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
> Page 4 , section 1.2
>
> It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may never
> be resolved.
> Could someone shed some light on exactly
According to this:
https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
Page 4 , section 1.2
It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
never be resolved.
Could someone shed some light on exactly what these technical issues
might be?! What are BTRFS biggest
23 matches
Mail list logo
