Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Replace the old man page with asciidoc and
man page for each btrfs subcommand.
From: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
To: dste...@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, c...@fb.com
Date: 2014年05月18日
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Replace the old man page with asciidoc and
man page for each btrfs subcommand.
From: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
To: dste...@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, c...@fb.com
Date: 2014年05月18日
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 02:51:39PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Replace the old man page with asciidoc and man
page for each btrfs subcommand.
From: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
To: dste...@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com,
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 03:04:33PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Replace the old man page with asciidoc and man
page for each btrfs subcommand.
From: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
To: dste...@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com,
On 2014/05/18 02:05 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 03:04:33PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
I don't have any real suggestions for alternatives coming from my
experience, other than not this. I've used docbook for man pages
briefly, many years ago. Looking around on the web,
On Sat, 17 May 2014 13:50:52 Martin wrote:
On 16/05/14 04:07, Russell Coker wrote:
https://blogs.oracle.com/bill/entry/ditto_blocks_the_amazing_tape
Probably most of you already know about this, but for those of you who
haven't the above describes ZFS ditto blocks which is a good feature
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76421
Perceived issue: SABNZBD hangs, requires restart.
Diagnosis shows the following in my system log at the time of hang.
This happens more than once.
Log:
[ 5883.464766] INFO: task SABnzbd.py:994 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 5883.464906]
On May 18, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Joshua McKinney jos...@joshka.net wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76421
Perceived issue: SABNZBD hangs, requires restart.
Diagnosis shows the following in my system log at the time of hang.
This happens more than once.
Log:
[
On 2014/05/16 11:36 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 05/16/2014 04:41 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 14:06:24 -0400
Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca wrote:
No comment on the performance issue, other than to say that I've seen
similar on RAID-10 before, I think.
Hi,
Over the weekend I tried to copy one external usb drive (on ext4) to
another one formatted with btrfs.
Now I came back, and 48h later only ~300GB were copied and I found
messages like the following on syslog:
May 16 18:33:13 raspberrypi kernel: [ 8161.213142] btrfs-endio-wri D
c0420f24 0
I filed a bug for null pointer dereferences I started hitting:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76451
Noticing qgroup in the trace, I tried disabling/re-enabling quota
support for the filesystem. That turned out to be a mistake. Now as
soon as I mount, I'm getting an oops thanks to
I am now getting the following error when trying to do a btrfs send:
root@maru2:/usr/local/src/btrfs-progs# ./btrfs send
/usr/local/snapshots/2014-05-15 /backup/intermediate
At subvol /usr/local/snapshots/2014-05-15
ERROR: send ioctl failed with -5: Input/output error
I'm running a 3.14.4
Summary:
It's insufficient to pass rootflags=degraded to get the system root to mount
when a device is missing. It looks like when a device is missing, udev doesn't
create the dev-disk-by-uuid linkage that then causes systemd to change the
device state from dead to plugged. Only once plugged,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:36:03PM +0800, Scott Middleton wrote:
I read so much about BtrFS that I mistaked Bedup with Duperemove.
Duperemove is actually what I am testing.
I'm currently using programs that find files that are the same, and
hardlink them together:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:09:38PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 14, 2014, at 7:50 AM, Marc MERLIN m...@merlins.org wrote:
So, I had btrfs_pool1 that was trashed/lost as discussed here recently.
I did btrfs send btrfs_pool2/root_ro.date | btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs_pool1
Then
On 01/15/2014 07:00 AM, Miao Xie wrote:
When we mounted the filesystem after the crash, we got the following
message:
BTRFS error (device xxx): block group 4315938816 has wrong amount of free
space
BTRFS error (device xxx): failed to load free space cache for block group
4315938816
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Replace the old man page with asciidoc and
man page for each btrfs subcommand.
From: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
To: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: 2014年05月18日 20:05
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 03:04:33PM +0800, Qu Wenruo
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 18:41 +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 06:37:27PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 09:29:08AM +0800, Gui Hecheng wrote:
Add '-h' option for help for super-recover,
update the manpage at the same time.
We don't have the short
A mdrestore_struct was being written to without its mutex being held.
This race was found with ThreadSanitizer; the relevant part of the report
looks like this:
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=18828)
Write of size 8 at 0x7fc3d088 by main thread:
#0 build_chunk_tree
19 matches
Mail list logo
