Re: [4.9] btrfs check --repair looping over file extent discount errors

2017-04-22 Thread Martin Steigerwald
ASAP. Thanks, Martin Martin Steigerwald - 14.04.17, 21:35: > Hello, > > backup harddisk connected via eSATA. Hard kernel hang, mouse pointer > freezing two times seemingly after finishing /home backup and creating new > snapshot on source BTRFS SSD RAID 1 for / in order to b

Re: [4.9] btrfs check --repair looping over file extent discount errors

2017-04-22 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hello Chris. Chris Murphy - 22.04.17, 09:31: > Is the file system created with no-holes? I have how to find out about it and while doing accidentally set that feature on another filesystem (btrfstune only seems to be able to enable the feature, not show the current state of it). But as there

Re: [4.9] btrfs check --repair looping over file extent discount errors

2017-04-22 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Martin Steigerwald - 22.04.17, 20:01: > Chris Murphy - 22.04.17, 09:31: > > Is the file system created with no-holes? > > I have how to find out about it and while doing accidentally set that I didn´t find out how to find out about it and… > feature on another filesystem (bt

[4.9] btrfs check --repair looping over file extent discount errors

2017-04-14 Thread Martin Steigerwald
on it. Anyway deleting that subvolume works and I as I suspected an issue with the backup disk I started with that one. I got merkaba:~> btrfs --version btrfs-progs v4.9.1 merkaba:~> cat /proc/version Linux version 4.9.20-tp520-btrfstrim+ (martin@merkaba) (gcc version 6.3.0 20170321 (Debian

Re: 4.11.6 / more corruption / root 15455 has a root item with a more recent gen (33682) compared to the found root node (0)

2017-07-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
th > snapshots, is unlikely to hit me. Hmmm, the BTRFS filesystems on my laptop 3 to 5 or even more years old. I stick with 4.10 for now, I think. The older ones are RAID 1 across two SSDs, the newer one is single device, on one SSD. These filesystems didn´t fail me in years and since 4.5 or 4.6

Re: 4.11.6 / more corruption / root 15455 has a root item with a more recent gen (33682) compared to the found root node (0)

2017-07-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
filesystems like Ext4 and XFS can do it… so this should be possible with BTRFS as well. Thanks, -- Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: runtime btrfsck

2017-05-10 Thread Martin Steigerwald
past experience something like xfs_repair surpasses btrfs check in the ability to actually fix broken filesystem by a great extent. Ciao, -- Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org Mo

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 08/15] dm mpath: merge do_end_io_bio into multipath_end_io_bio

2017-05-22 Thread Martin Wilck
turn 0; /* I/O complete */ > + BUG_ON(!mpio); You dereferenced mpio already above. Regards, Martin >   > - if (noretry_error(error)) > - return error; > + if (!error || noretry_error(error)) > + goto done; >   > - if (mpio->pg

Re: Regarding handling of file renames in Btrfs

2017-09-16 Thread Martin Raiber
le operations? > as far as I can see it only uses the log tree in some cases where the log tree was already used for the file or the parent directory. The cases are documented here https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c#L45 . So rename isn't much heavier than unlink+cre

Re: qemu-kvm VM died during partial raid1 problems of btrfs

2017-09-13 Thread Martin Raiber
tuff like e.g. page files or the shadow storage area from the image backups, as well and has a mode to store image backups as raw btrfs files. Linux VMs I'd backup as files either from the hypervisor or from in VM. If you want to backup big btrfs image files it can do that too, and faster th

Re: Regarding handling of file renames in Btrfs

2017-09-10 Thread Martin Raiber
ty >> data pages to disk, and then commit transaction. >> While only calling btrfs_commit_transacation() doesn't trigger dirty >> page writeback. >> >> So there is a difference. this conversation made me realize why btrfs has sub-optimal meta-data performance. Cow b-tree

Something like ZFS Channel Programs for BTRFS & probably XFS or even VFS?

2017-10-03 Thread Martin Steigerwald
of presentation PDFs on their site as well) Thanks, -- Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Something like ZFS Channel Programs for BTRFS & probably XFS or even VFS?

2017-10-03 Thread Martin Steigerwald
in userspace, I am all for it. [1] http://www.netbsd.org/releases/formal-7/NetBSD-7.0.html (tons of presentation PDFs on their site as well) Thanks, -- Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majo

Re: 4.13: "error in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:3009: errno=-28 No space left" with 1.3TB unallocated / 737G free?

2017-10-19 Thread Martin Raiber
ENOSPC issues with 4.9.x than with the latest 4.14. Regards, Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: again "out of space" and remount read only, with 4.14

2017-12-18 Thread Martin Raiber
On 03.12.2017 16:39 Martin Raiber wrote: > Am 26.11.2017 um 17:02 schrieb Tomasz Chmielewski: >> On 2017-11-27 00:37, Martin Raiber wrote: >>> On 26.11.2017 08:46 Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >>>> Got this one on a 4.14-rc7 filesystem with some 400 GB left: >>>

Re: how to run balance successfully (No space left on device)?

2017-11-10 Thread Martin Raiber
fault and as usual not all the conditions may be relevant. Could also be instead an upper layer error (Hyper-V storage), memory issue or an application error. Regards, Martin Raiber -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message t

Re: Read before you deploy btrfs + zstd

2017-11-13 Thread Martin Steigerwald
is safe to use? Are you aware of any other issues? I consider switching from LZO to ZSTD on this ThinkPad T520 with Sandybridge. Thank you, -- Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More m

Re: Read before you deploy btrfs + zstd

2017-11-14 Thread Martin Steigerwald
David Sterba - 14.11.17, 19:49: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:34:37AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Hello David. > > > > David Sterba - 13.11.17, 23:50: > > > while 4.14 is still fresh, let me address some concerns I've seen on > > > linux > > &

Re: Read before you deploy btrfs + zstd

2017-11-15 Thread Martin Steigerwald
1072 > ZSTD_DStreamWorkspaceBound with ZSTD_BTRFS_MAX_INPUT: 549424 > > This is not something I could fix easily, we'd probalby need a tuned > version of ZSTD for grub constraints. Adding Nick to CC. Somehow I am happy that I still have a plain Ext4 for /boot. :) Thanks for looking

Re: Multiple btrfs-cleaner threads per volume

2017-11-02 Thread Martin Raiber
On 02.11.2017 16:10 Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > On 11/02/2017 04:02 PM, Martin Raiber wrote: >> snapshot cleanup is a little slow in my case (50TB volume). Would it >> help to have multiple btrfs-cleaner threads? The block layer underneath >> would have higher throughput w

Multiple btrfs-cleaner threads per volume

2017-11-02 Thread Martin Raiber
Hi, snapshot cleanup is a little slow in my case (50TB volume). Would it help to have multiple btrfs-cleaner threads? The block layer underneath would have higher throughput with more simultaneous read/write requests. Regards, Martin Raiber -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: again "out of space" and remount read only, with 4.14

2017-12-03 Thread Martin Raiber
Am 26.11.2017 um 17:02 schrieb Tomasz Chmielewski: > On 2017-11-27 00:37, Martin Raiber wrote: >> On 26.11.2017 08:46 Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >>> Got this one on a 4.14-rc7 filesystem with some 400 GB left: >> I guess it is too late now, but I guess the "btrfs fi

metadata_ratio mount option?

2018-05-07 Thread Martin Svec
ors. Best regards. Martin [1] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Manpage/btrfs(5)#MOUNT_OPTIONS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Btrfs remounted read-only due to ENOSPC in btrfs_run_delayed_refs cont. [Was: Re: metadata_ratio mount option?]

2018-05-08 Thread Martin Svec
Hello Chris, Dne 7.5.2018 v 18:37 Chris Mason napsal(a): > > > On 7 May 2018, at 12:16, Martin Svec wrote: > >> Hello Chris, >> >> Dne 7.5.2018 v 16:49 Chris Mason napsal(a): >>> On 7 May 2018, at 7:40, Martin Svec wrote: >>> >>

Re: "decompress failed" in 1-2 files always causes kernel oops, check/scrub pass

2018-05-12 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hardware is fine. Passes memtest86+ in SMP mode. Works fine on all > other files. > > > > [ 381.869940] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at > 00390e50 [ 381.870881] BTRFS: decompress failed […] -- Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: metadata_ratio mount option?

2018-05-07 Thread Martin Svec
Hello Chris, Dne 7.5.2018 v 16:49 Chris Mason napsal(a): > On 7 May 2018, at 7:40, Martin Svec wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> According to man btrfs [1], I assume that metadata_ratio=1 mount option >> should >> force allocation of one metadata chunk after every alloca

Re: Data and metadata extent allocators [1/2]: Recap: The data story

2017-10-27 Thread Martin Steigerwald
hotgunblast.png > [4] > https://syrinx.knorrie.org/~knorrie/btrfs/keep/2016-12-18-heatmap-scripting/ > fsid_ed10a358-c846-4e76-a071-3821d423a99d_startat_320029589504_at_1482095269 > .png [5] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg64418.html > [6] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke

Re: Recommendations for balancing as part of regular maintenance?

2018-01-08 Thread Martin Raiber
On 08.01.2018 19:34 Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 2018-01-08 13:17, Graham Cobb wrote: >> On 08/01/18 16:34, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: >>> Ideally, I think it should be as generic as reasonably possible, >>> possibly something along the lines of: >>> >>> A: While not strictly necessary,

Btrfs remounted read-only due to ENOSPC in btrfs_run_delayed_refs

2018-02-23 Thread Martin Svec
.096979] BTRFS warning (device sdb): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. [285169.096981] BTRFS: error (device sdb) in cleanup_transaction:1873: errno=-28 No space left How can I help you to fix this issue? Regards, Martin Svec -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &q

Btrfs blocked by too many delayed refs

2017-12-21 Thread Martin Raiber
with btrfs_should_throttle_delayed_refs . Maybe by creating a snapshot of a file and then modifying it (some action that creates delayed refs, is not truncate which is already throttled and does not commit a transaction which is also throttled). Regards, Martin Raiber -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: BTRFS and databases

2018-08-02 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Andrei Borzenkov - 02.08.18, 12:35: > Отправлено с iPhone > > > 2 авг. 2018 г., в 12:16, Martin Steigerwald > > написал(а):> > > Hugo Mills - 01.08.18, 10:56: > >>> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 05:45:15AM +0200, MegaBrutal wrote: > >>> I know it

Re: BTRFS and databases

2018-08-02 Thread Martin Steigerwald
dont-let-friends-use-btrfs-for-oltp Interestingly it also compares with ZFS which is doing much better. So maybe there is really something to be learned from ZFS. I did not get clearly whether the benchmark was on an SSD, as Tomas notes the "ssd" mount option, it might have been. Thank

Re: BTRFS and databases

2018-08-02 Thread Martin Raiber
On 02.08.2018 14:27 Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 2018-08-02 06:56, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> >> On 2018年08月02日 18:45, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >>> >>> Отправлено с iPhone >>> 2 авг. 2018 г., в 10:02, Qu Wenruo написал(а): > On 2018年08月01日 11:45, MegaBrutal wrote: > Hi all,

Experiences on BTRFS Dual SSD RAID 1 with outage of one SSD

2018-08-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
not compress, but Crucial m500 mSATA SSD does. That has been the secondary SSD that still had all the data after the outage of the Intel SSD 320. Overall I am happy, cause BTRFS RAID 1 gave me access to the data after the SSD outage. That is the most important thing about it for me. Thanks, -- Martin

Re: lazytime mount option—no support in Btrfs

2018-08-19 Thread Martin Steigerwald
. Has any thought been given to adding support > > for lazytime to Btrfs? […] > Is there any new regarding this? I´d like to know whether there is any news about this as well. If I understand it correctly this could even help BTRFS performance a lot cause it is COW´ing metadata. Thanks, -- Martin

Re: Experiences on BTRFS Dual SSD RAID 1 with outage of one SSD

2018-08-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Thanks for your detailed answer. Austin S. Hemmelgarn - 17.08.18, 13:58: > On 2018-08-17 05:08, Martin Steigerwald wrote: […] > > I have seen a discussion about the limitation in point 2. That > > allowing to add a device and make it into RAID 1 again might be > > dange

Hang after growing file system (4.14.48)

2018-08-17 Thread Martin Raiber
7fe655700 R09: 0101 [Fri Aug 17 16:21:06 2018] R10: 56521bf7c0cc R11: 0246 R12: 7f67fd6d6440 [Fri Aug 17 16:21:06 2018] R13: 7f67fd6d5900 R14: 0064 R15: 0000 Regards, Martin Raiber

Re: Experiences on BTRFS Dual SSD RAID 1 with outage of one SSD

2018-08-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Austin S. Hemmelgarn - 17.08.18, 14:55: > On 2018-08-17 08:28, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Thanks for your detailed answer. > > > > Austin S. Hemmelgarn - 17.08.18, 13:58: > >> On 2018-08-17 05:08, Martin Steigerwald wrote: […] > >>> Anyway, creating

Re: Experiences on BTRFS Dual SSD RAID 1 with outage of one SSD

2018-08-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hi Roman. Now with proper CC. Roman Mamedov - 17.08.18, 14:50: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 14:28:25 +0200 > > Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > First off, keep in mind that the SSD firmware doing compression > > > only > > > really helps with wear-leveling. Doing

Re: Experiences on BTRFS Dual SSD RAID 1 with outage of one SSD

2018-08-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Austin S. Hemmelgarn - 17.08.18, 15:01: > On 2018-08-17 08:50, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 14:28:25 +0200 > > > > Martin Steigerwald wrote: > >>> First off, keep in mind that the SSD firmware doing compression > >>> only

Re: Experiences on BTRFS Dual SSD RAID 1 with outage of one SSD

2018-08-18 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Roman Mamedov - 18.08.18, 09:12: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 23:17:33 +0200 > > Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > Do not consider SSD "compression" as a factor in any of your > > > calculations or planning. Modern controllers do not do it anymore, > > > th

Re: Healthy amount of free space?

2018-07-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Nikolay Borisov - 17.07.18, 10:16: > On 17.07.2018 11:02, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Nikolay Borisov - 17.07.18, 09:20: > >> On 16.07.2018 23:58, Wolf wrote: > >>> Greetings, > >>> I would like to ask what what is healthy amount of free space to >

Re: Healthy amount of free space?

2018-07-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
nance from user space, the filesystem needs to be fixed. Ideally I would not have to worry on whether to regularly balance an BTRFS or not. In other words: I should not have to visit a performance analysis and tuning course in order to use a computer with BTRFS filesystem. Thanks, --

Re: Transactional btrfs

2018-09-08 Thread Martin Raiber
Am 08.09.2018 um 18:24 schrieb Adam Borowski: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 06:08:33AM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: >> On 2018-09-06 03:23, Nathan Dehnel wrote: >>> So I guess my question is, does btrfs support atomic writes across >>> multiple files? Or is anyone interested in such a feature?

Re: Transaction aborted (error -28) btrfs_run_delayed_refs*0x163/0x190

2018-07-10 Thread Martin Raiber
On 10.07.2018 09:04 Pete wrote: > I've just had the error in the subject which caused the file system to > go read-only. > > Further part of error message: > WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 1351 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3076 > btrfs_run_delayed_refs*0x163/0x190 > > 'Screenshot' here: >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: Check each block group has corresponding chunk at mount time

2018-07-03 Thread Martin Steigerwald
gt; > Maybe it's a good idea to added it to "submitting-patches.rst"? > > I guess it's not officially documented but if you do git log --grep > "Link:" you'd see quite a lot of patches actually have a Link pointing > to the original thread if it has sparked some pertinen

Re: Btrfs remounted read-only due to ENOSPC in btrfs_run_delayed_refs

2018-03-09 Thread Martin Svec
Dne 9.3.2018 v 17:36 Nikolay Borisov napsal(a): > > On 23.02.2018 16:28, Martin Svec wrote: >> Hello, >> >> we have a btrfs-based backup system using btrfs snapshots and rsync. >> Sometimes, >> we hit ENOSPC bug and the filesystem is remounted read-only. H

Re: Btrfs remounted read-only due to ENOSPC in btrfs_run_delayed_refs

2018-03-13 Thread Martin Svec
Dne 10.3.2018 v 15:51 Martin Svec napsal(a): > Dne 10.3.2018 v 13:13 Nikolay Borisov napsal(a): >> >> >>>>> And then report back on the output of the extra debug >>>>> statements. >>>>> >>>>> Your global rsv is essen

Re: Btrfs remounted read-only due to ENOSPC in btrfs_run_delayed_refs

2018-03-10 Thread Martin Svec
Dne 9.3.2018 v 20:03 Martin Svec napsal(a): > Dne 9.3.2018 v 17:36 Nikolay Borisov napsal(a): >> On 23.02.2018 16:28, Martin Svec wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> we have a btrfs-based backup system using btrfs snapshots and rsync. >>> Sometimes, >>

Re: Btrfs remounted read-only due to ENOSPC in btrfs_run_delayed_refs

2018-03-10 Thread Martin Svec
Dne 10.3.2018 v 13:13 Nikolay Borisov napsal(a): > > > And then report back on the output of the extra debug statements. Your global rsv is essentially unused, this means in the worst case the code should fallback to using the global rsv for satisfying the memory

Re: Btrfs remounted read-only due to ENOSPC in btrfs_run_delayed_refs

2018-03-09 Thread Martin Svec
, or is it an indication of a damaged filesystem? Also note that rebuilding free space cache doesn't help. Thank you. Martin Dne 23.2.2018 v 15:28 Martin Svec napsal(a): > Hello, > > we have a btrfs-based backup system using btrfs snapshots and rsync. > Sometimes, > we hit ENOSPC bug and the filesyst

Re: extent-tree.c no space left (4.9.77 + 4.16.2)

2018-04-21 Thread Martin Svec
too. Martin Dne 21.4.2018 v 9:38 David Goodwin napsal(a): > Hi, > > I'm running a 3TiB EBS based (2+1TiB devices) volume in EC2 which contains > about 500 read-only > snapshots. > > btrfs-progs v4.7.3 > > There are two dmesg trace things below. The fir

BTRFS related kernel backtrace on boot on 4.18.7 after blackout due to discharged battery

2018-10-05 Thread Martin Steigerwald
30b2fea7fb77 ]--- [6.251219] BTRFS info (device dm-3): checking UUID tree Thanks, -- Martin

Re: BTRFS related kernel backtrace on boot on 4.18.7 after blackout due to discharged battery

2018-10-05 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Filipe Manana - 05.10.18, 17:21: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 3:23 PM Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Hello! > > > > On ThinkPad T520 after battery was discharged and machine just > > blacked out. > > > > Is that some sign of regular consistency check / replay

Re: Interpreting `btrfs filesystem show'

2018-10-15 Thread Martin Steigerwald
reports the raw size and sometimes the logical size. Especially in the "Total" line I find this a bit inconsistent. "RAID1" columns show logical size, "Unallocated" shows raw size. Also "Used:" in the global section shows raw size and "Free (estimated):" shows logical size. Thanks -- Martin

Re: very poor performance / a lot of writes to disk with space_cache (but not with space_cache=v2)

2018-09-19 Thread Martin Steigerwald
are that? I am wondering whether to switch to freespace tree v2. Would it provide benefit for a regular / and /home filesystems as dual SSD BTRFS RAID-1 on a laptop? Thanks, -- Martin

Re: Possible deadlock when writing

2018-12-01 Thread Martin Bakiev
I was having the same issue with kernels 4.19.2 and 4.19.4. I don’t appear to have the issue with 4.20.0-0.rc1 on Fedora Server 29. The issue is very easy to reproduce on my setup, not sure how much of it is actually relevant, but here it is: - 3 drive RAID5 created - Some data moved to it -

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] btrfs-progs: sub: Relax the privileges of "subvolume list/show"

2018-11-27 Thread Martin Steigerwald
olume. Does that work recursively? I wound find it quite unexpected if I did btrfs subvol list in or on the root directory of a BTRFS filesystem would not display any subvolumes on that filesystem no matter where they are. Thanks, -- Martin

Re: ssd optimised mode

2009-02-23 Thread Martin K. Petersen
anything that can be done in a Dmitri filesystem to minimise the damage of a lost eraseblock. The problem is that we have no way of knowing what's inside each erase block. We don't even know how big the erase block is. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from

Re: ssd optimised mode

2009-02-23 Thread Martin K. Petersen
and/or dt. In the filesystem case it was trivial to map out the affected files in debugfs and correlate those to a logical region on the disk. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message

Re: ssd optimised mode

2009-02-23 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Dmitri == Dmitri Nikulin dniku...@gmail.com writes: Dmitri Already SanDisk are offering a proprietary Extreme FFS Dmitri (perhaps even based on Unix FFS) for Windows Vista only. Extreme FFS is SanDisk's next generation FTL/firmware. It's not a filesystem that plugs into the OS. -- Martin K

Re: ssd optimised mode

2009-02-23 Thread Martin K. Petersen
as such. The article you posted references some benchmarketing numbers involving Vista. That does not imply it's a Windows-only product. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExtremeFFS -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs

Re: Is it possible for the ext4/btrfs file system to pass some context related info to low level block driver?

2011-05-03 Thread Martin K. Petersen
of weeks ago at the Linux Storage Workshop. In the meantime: Can you point me to the relevant eMMC stuff so I can see how many tiers or classes we have to work with there? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs

Re: discard synchronous on most SSDs?

2014-03-14 Thread Martin K. Petersen
code to hdparm, or both... -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Using BTRFS on SSD now ?

2014-06-05 Thread Martin K. Petersen
. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Using BTRFS on SSD now ?

2014-06-08 Thread Martin K. Petersen
reason for a drive vendor to implement that page unless the drive actually supports queued trim. And consequently it's perfectly normal for that page to be absent. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body

Re: SSD Optimizations

2010-03-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
that reported the right thing but which did in fact return the old data afterwards. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http

Re: SSD Optimizations

2010-03-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
perspective). -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: A couple of questions

2010-06-01 Thread Martin K. Petersen
no window of error. But obviously the ideal case is where the same IMD can be passed throughout the stack without conversion. Not sure what you use for file service? I believe NFSv4 allows for checksums to be passed along. I have not looked at them closely yet, though. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle

Re: A couple of questions

2010-06-03 Thread Martin K. Petersen
of the standard. I haven't looked into this for a long time. Last time I talked to the NFS folks they seemed to think it would be possible to bridge the two methods. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: mkfs: allow not to trim a device

2012-03-20 Thread Martin K. Petersen
. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: btrfs on whole disk (no partitions)

2014-06-23 Thread Martin K. Petersen
scsi:scsi_dispatch_cmd_start /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_event # echo 1 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on [do stuff] # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body

Re: btrfs on whole disk (no partitions)

2014-06-23 Thread Martin K. Petersen
. There are a few exceptions to this such as direct I/O, legacy filesystems using bufferheads and raw block device access. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org

Re: mkfs.btrfs vs fstrim on an SD Card (not SSD)

2014-08-22 Thread Martin K. Petersen
echo scsi:scsi_dispatch_cmd_start Chris /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_event echo 1 Chris /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on cat Chris /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe MMC doesn't go through SCSI like ATA does. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from

bitte antworten

2014-08-31 Thread Dr. Martin Dustin
-- Lieber Freund, Wie geht es Ihnen heute? Ich hoffe, fein, ich bin Dr. Martin Dustin aus Harlesden , North West London, hier in England. Ich arbeite für NatWest Bank London (National Westminster Bank Plc. ) . Ich schreibe Ihnen aus meinem Büro , die von einer großen immensen Nutzen für

bitte antworten

2014-08-31 Thread Dr. Martin Dustin
-- Lieber Freund, Wie geht es Ihnen heute? Ich hoffe, fein, ich bin Dr. Martin Dustin aus Harlesden , North West London, hier in England. Ich arbeite für NatWest Bank London (National Westminster Bank Plc. ) . Ich schreibe Ihnen aus meinem Büro , die von einer großen immensen Nutzen für

bitte antworten

2014-09-01 Thread Dr. Martin Dustin
-- Lieber Freund, Wie geht es Ihnen heute? Ich hoffe, fein, ich bin Dr. Martin Dustin aus Harlesden , North West London, hier in England. Ich arbeite für NatWest Bank London (National Westminster Bank Plc. ) . Ich schreibe Ihnen aus meinem Büro , die von einer großen immensen Nutzen für

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] block: add a bi_error field to struct bio

2015-06-04 Thread Martin K. Petersen
headache. I am entirely in favor of this patch. It was a big chunk of changes to read through but I did not spot any obvious problems or polarity reversals. It would be nice to get the respective fs/md/target driver folks to check their portions, though. Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.peter

Re: [PATCH 02/35] block: add REQ_OP definitions and bi_op/op fields

2016-01-06 Thread Martin K. Petersen
y the REQ_ prefix in bios since the flags were consolidated a while back. When I attempted to fix the READ/WRITE mess I used a BLK_ prefix as a result. Anyway. Just bikeshedding... -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l

Re: [PATCH 00/35 v2] separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs

2016-01-06 Thread Martin K. Petersen
ces and everything looks sensible to me. I wonder what the best approach is to move a patch set with this many stakeholders forward? Set a "speak now or forever hold your peace" review deadline? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: [PATCH 02/13] scsi/osd: don't save block errors into req_results

2017-05-26 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Christoph, > We will only have sense data if the command exectured and got a SCSI > result, so this is pointless. "executed" Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.peter...@oracle.com> -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from th

<    3   4   5   6   7   8