Can I downgrade the kernel from 3.17.1 to latest 3.10 if I have a
btrfs partition formatted and used on 3.17.1?
I mean, is there something that could go wrong with the fs if suddenly
I use an older kernel?
I want to downgrade because last night we had some 1200 oops's in 1
hour on the 3.17
Cristian Falcas posted on Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:13:48 +0300 as excerpted:
Can I downgrade the kernel from 3.17.1 to latest 3.10 if I have a btrfs
partition formatted and used on 3.17.1?
I mean, is there something that could go wrong with the fs if suddenly I
use an older kernel?
I want to
Thank you for your answer.
I will reformat the disk with a 3.10 kernel in the meantime, because I
don't have any rpms for 3.16 now.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Cristian Falcas posted on Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:13:48 +0300 as excerpted:
Can I downgrade the
On 10/21/2014 01:13 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:
Can I downgrade the kernel from 3.17.1 to latest 3.10 if I have a
btrfs partition formatted and used on 3.17.1?
I went back from 3.17.0 to 3.16.3 when 3.17 acted flaky, and since then
gone up to 3.16.5 with nice results. 3.17.2 is, I think,
On 10/21/2014 06:18 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:
Thank you for your answer.
I will reformat the disk with a 3.10 kernel in the meantime, because I
don't have any rpms for 3.16 now.
Don't bother reformatting (yet). The on-disk layout is stable between
the releases. It should run fine and all
On 10/21/2014 06:18 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:
Thank you for your answer.
I will reformat the disk with a 3.10 kernel in the meantime, because I
don't have any rpms for 3.16 now.
More concisely: Don't use 3.10 BTRFS for data you value. There is a
non-trivial chance that the problems you
I will start investigating how can we build our own rpms from the 3.16
sources. Until then we are stuck with the ones from the official repos
or elrepo. Which means 3.10 is the latest for el6. We used this until
now and seems we where lucky enough to not hit anything bad.
We upgraded to 3.17
On 2014-10-21 11:34, Cristian Falcas wrote:
I will start investigating how can we build our own rpms from the 3.16
sources. Until then we are stuck with the ones from the official repos
or elrepo. Which means 3.10 is the latest for el6. We used this until
now and seems we where lucky enough to
On Oct 21, 2014, at 9:18 AM, Cristian Falcas cristi.fal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for your answer.
I will reformat the disk with a 3.10 kernel in the meantime, because I
don't have any rpms for 3.16 now.
If you've formatted with features in common between 3.10 and 3.17, I don't
think
On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Cristian Falcas cristi.fal...@gmail.com wrote:
I will start investigating how can we build our own rpms from the 3.16
sources. Until then we are stuck with the ones from the official repos
or elrepo. Which means 3.10 is the latest for el6. We used this until
now
On Oct 21, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Cristian Falcas cristi.fal...@gmail.com wrote:
I will start investigating how can we build our own rpms from the 3.16
sources. Until then we are stuck with the ones from the official
When you say el6 you mean el7 right? The last kernel for el7 is
3.10.x
But Redhat lie a little with kernel version numbers. They say you have a
3.10 kernel, but I think they backport a lot from newers kernels.
Probably the btrfs of redhat el7 is not really a btrfs from 3.10, maybe
is btrfs
I'm rebuilding now the 3.16.6 version from fedora for el6 (I had to
make some small modification: remove perl-carp dependency and some
compiler flag). And it's for el6, so we have only elrepo with a newer
kernel.
Is it safe to install the kernel without recompiling it first for the
new platform?
Chris Murphy posted on Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:07:27 -0400 as excerpted:
One thing I wonder, if going back to kernel 3.14 (or even 3.10), which
btrfs-progs to use? Is it OK to use 3.17?
The goal is to have userspace entirely backward compatible (well, to the
last incompatible device format
14 matches
Mail list logo
