PLEASE TAKE ME OFF THE CC LIST.
BTW: I'm on holidays and won't be replying to email for a while.
Richard B. Johnson writes:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
[SNIPPED]
that we provide source to the end-user, they required that we supply
a
"current" distribution of Linux if
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
According to our Legal Department, to satisfy the GPL requirement
that we provide source to the end-user, they required that we supply a
"current" distribution of Linux if the end-user requests it.
There /is/ no single "current" distribution. *A* current
- Original Message -
From: "Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No. According to our Legal Department, to satisfy the GPL requirement
that we provide source to the end-user, they required that we supply a
"current" distribution of Linux if the end-user requests it.
Your legal
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
For instance, there was a simple new change in the type of
an object passed to poll and friends. This just cost me two
weeks of unpaid work! Unpaid
Alexander Viro wrote:
* Inodes got a new field: i_bdev. Filesystems should not worry
about it - just remember to call init_special_inode() when you are
initializing device/fifo/socket in-core inode (in foo_read_inode() or in
foo_mknod(); all filesystems in the tree are doing it now).
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 08:07:38PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
No. According to our Legal Department, to satisfy the GPL requirement
that we provide source to the end-user, they required that we supply a
"current" distribution of Linux if the end-user requests it.
Cobalt's lawyers seem
Alan Cox wrote:
Linux isnt at war. War involves large numbers of people making losing decisions
that harm each other in a vain attempt to lose last. Linux is about winning.
Wonderful!!! (wrt Linux but too better wrt war)
Can I cite that? ;-)
--
Abramo Bagnara
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
Folks, there are changes underway in block device interface and
some of them made it into 2.3.38.
[SNIP...]
Good grief Charley Brown! You, in a few key-strokes, just blew away
major portions of the work done
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
For instance, there was a simple new change in the type of
an object passed to poll and friends. This just cost me two
weeks of unpaid work! Unpaid because I had to hide it. If
anyone in Production Engineering had learned about this, the
stuff
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
For instance, there was a simple new change in the type of
an object passed to poll and friends. This just cost me two
weeks of unpaid work! Unpaid because I had to hide it. If
anyone in Production
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
Folks, there are changes underway in block device interface and
some of them made it into 2.3.38.
[SNIP...]
Good grief Charley Brown! You, in a few key-strokes, just blew away
major portions of the work done over the past few years by software
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard B. Johnson
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
Folks, there are changes underway in block device interface and
some of them made it into 2.3.38.
[SNIP...]
Good grief Charley Brown! You, in a few key-strokes, just blew away
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
Good grief Charley Brown! You, in a few key-strokes, just blew away
major portions of the work done over the past few years by software
engineers who ported their drivers to Linux. Linux will never be
accepted as a 'professional' operating system
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
Folks, there are changes underway in block device interface and
some of them made it into 2.3.38.
[SNIP...]
Good grief Charley Brown! You, in a few key-strokes, just blew away
major portions
14 matches
Mail list logo
