Yes I meant the resource is running first and crashes later on, so that
monitor reports "not running".
generally, one shouldn't report "not running" in such cases
Okay, maybe I should have read this more precisely.
http://www.linux-ha.org/OCFResourceAgent
"monitor - monitor the health of a res
Hello all,
I am making some of my own ocf scripts and was thinking that certainly I
am not the only one doing this.
Is there a repository out there somewhere?
Dave
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman
/etc/init.d/heartbeat: line 261: EchoNoNl: command not found
What is it missing?
heartbeat-2.1.2-3.el5.centos
heartbeat-stonith-2.1.2-3.el5.centos
heartbeat-gui-2.1.2-3.el5.centos
heartbeat-pils-2.1.2-3.el5.centos
Dave
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-
On Thursday 13 September 2007, Dominik Klein wrote:
> > http://www.linux-ha.org/v2/faq
> >
> > That's were you'll find one example of calculating scores. Check
> > also the list archives---quite a few times this issue came up.
>
> Of course I read that.
>
> What I want to know is: Does the cluster
We recently upgraded from RHEL5 Beta to the full RHEL5. I did a quick
check against the glib-related RPMs installed, and found that the full
RHEL5 did not have glib installed (it had glib2 though). Comparing back
to a system which still had the beta release I saw the
glib-1.2.10-19.el5 RPM installe
On 9/13/07, Dominik Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Afraid I can't offer an answer here. Though, in case the "not
> > running" part was unexpected, i.e. the resource had been started,
>
> Yes I meant the resource is running first and crashes later on, so that
> monitor reports "not running".
On 9/13/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/30/07, Andreas Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/24/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 8/21/07, Andreas Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > I have a Heartbeat 2.1.2 two-node cluste
Afraid I can't offer an answer here. Though, in case the "not
running" part was unexpected, i.e. the resource had been started,
Yes I meant the resource is running first and crashes later on, so that
monitor reports "not running".
then it seems to be wrong to calculate scores differently.
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 13.09.2007 16:24 >>>
>No, that's definitely not normal. This is a strong contender on
>the todo list here. However, so far seems to be tough to shake it
>out and I guess it'll take some time. There's a bug opened and
>some discussion on the matter here:
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:58:59PM +0200, matilda matilda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after running HAv2 (2.1.2) for a while now (thanks for all the
> necessary advice and help) I found out that lrmd is consuming
> relativly much CPU time as stated by 'ps'.
>
> I just want to ask the technical reas
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:49:11PM +0200, Dominik Klein wrote:
> >http://www.linux-ha.org/v2/faq
> >
> >That's were you'll find one example of calculating scores. Check
> >also the list archives---quite a few times this issue came up.
>
> Of course I read that.
>
> What I want to know is: Does th
On 8/30/07, Andreas Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/24/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/21/07, Andreas Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I have a Heartbeat 2.1.2 two-node cluster installation using three
> > > ping nodes to check network conne
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 09:32:06AM -0400, Doug Knight wrote:
> I could do that, but isn't there a reason why warnings are set to fatal
> for the build?
True.
> Also, I successfully built the 2.0.8 on the same system
> some time ago. I was building the 2.1.2 to try it out as an upgrade to
> o
http://www.linux-ha.org/v2/faq
That's were you'll find one example of calculating scores. Check
also the list archives---quite a few times this issue came up.
Of course I read that.
What I want to know is: Does the cluster make a difference between
monitor result "error" and monitor result "n
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:53:46AM +0200, Dominik Klein wrote:
> Hi
>
> I did some tests on score calculation as I could not find a good web
> resource on this. Now I would like to get this confirmed or corrected.
>
> Suppose I have a resource with a resource location constraint wit score
I could do that, but isn't there a reason why warnings are set to fatal
for the build? Also, I successfully built the 2.0.8 on the same system
some time ago. I was building the 2.1.2 to try it out as an upgrade to
our existing configuration.
Doug
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 14:55 +0200, Christian Frank
Hi,
add --disable-fatal-warnings to the configure.
cause "cc1: warnings being treated as errors" will stop compiling
everytime you have a compiler warning.
Regards,
Christian
Doug Knight schrieb:
All,
I just downloaded the 2.1.2 tar ball to my RHEL5 64 bit system, and got
the following error
All,
I just downloaded the 2.1.2 tar ball to my RHEL5 64 bit system, and got
the following error during the ConfigureMe make phase:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include
-I../../include -I../../include -I../../linux-ha -I../../linux-ha
-I../../libltdl -I../../libltdl -I/usr/
Hi Andreas -
Everything seems fine. I responded to Andrew in relation to what I'd
asked Dejan.
(Regarding failover w/ no network connectivity)
We use the R1 version of heartbeat / ldirectord as follows:
On our DMZ segment:
2 nodes (running hearbeat w/ ldirectord) connected via serial
2 webserver
On 9/13/07, Peter Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13/09/2007, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/13/07, Peter Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thanks Dejan - that was very helpful.
> > >
> > > Last question :-)
> > >
> > > I've modified this setup, taking into accoun
On 8/26/07, Jake Conk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed OCFS2 and got it up and running on my computers and network but
> now I want to have heartbeat configured to be incharge of mounting and
> unmounting the disk I'm sharing over the network when its host machine is up
> and goe
On 8/24/07, Martin Bene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a heartbeat 2.1.2 cluster with two nodes and two drbd resources
> set up as described on
> http://wiki.linux-ha.org/DRBD/HowTov2?highlight=%28drbd%29:
>
> Drbd0 prefers to run as master on node1, drbd1 prefers to run as master
>
On 9/13/07, Peter Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Dejan - that was very helpful.
>
> Last question :-)
>
> I've modified this setup, taking into account your advice about
> removing the ldirectord attributes (where are these things
> documented!?).
http://linux-ha.org/ResourceAgents
>
>>> "Peter Farrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12.09.2007 17:24 >>>
> Andreas -
>
> A follow up if you will...
Hi Peter,
do you need further assistence. I saw that Dejan helped you.
Is everything fine and running?
In which mode does you use ldirectord? (NAT?)
Best regards
Andreas Mock
_
Hi
I would like to share these scripts I wrote.
showfailcount.sh shows - who would have guessed it - the failcount of
all resources on all nodes
showscores.sh shows the current scores of all resources on all nodes
resetfailcount.sh resets the failcount on all nodes for all resources or
the
Thanks Dejan - that was very helpful.
Last question :-)
I've modified this setup, taking into account your advice about
removing the ldirectord attributes (where are these things
documented!?).
Everything is running fine and I've got no errors in cluster.log -
only a few WARN's and they seem ha
>> there is no 'cib' process.
>
> actually there is :-)
Oops - Thanks for the correction Andrew!
>
>> If I understand things right, the crmd
>> process handles all core CIB maintenance operations.
>
> nope, all done by the CIB process
Makes sense
__
Hi
I did some tests on score calculation as I could not find a good web
resource on this. Now I would like to get this confirmed or corrected.
Suppose I have a resource with a resource location constraint wit score
300 for node A, score 250 for node B, resource stickiness = 200, failure
stic
I'd like to reorder the primitives in that group:
Resource Group: web
resource_web_ip (heartbeat::ocf:IPaddr2)
resource_web_ip_27 (heartbeat::ocf:IPaddr2)
resource_web_fs_ww (heartbeat::ocf:Filesystem)
resource_web_fs_cache (heartbeat::ocf:Filesystem)
resource_web
On 8/24/07, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 10:17:17AM +0200, peter panda wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i'm trying to use the resource monitoring feature of Heartbeat V2. i have
> > read the documentation, but still have some questions please.
> > 1. does my script n
On 8/24/07, mingdao lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi, all
> I have a cluster which include 12 nodes.
> For each node, I set the ha.cf as:
> keepalive 100ms
> warntime 300ms
> deadtime 500ms
>
> This means that heartbeat should handle about 120 udp packets every seconds.
> Could heartbeat work cor
On 9/13/07, Yan Fitterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Junko IKEDA wrote:
> >>> once again something about SplitBrain...
> >>> During SplitBrain, I wrecked the resource on the both nodes.
> >>> fail count was increased at this time.
> >>> But after recovering from SplitBrain, fail count returned
On 8/27/07, Martin Bene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've got an ordered resource group "web" (on heartbeat 2.1.2)
>
> Resource Group: web
> resource_web_ip (heartbeat::ocf:IPaddr2)
> resource_web_fs_ww (heartbeat::ocf:Filesystem)
> resource_web_fs_cache (heartbeat::oc
On 8/31/07, mingdao lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi, all
> I have a strange problem that it always output debug info when I used
> command "crm_resource".
> For example:
> ipmux2:~ # crm_resource -L
> crm_resource[19729]: 1999/12/10_21:56:01 info: Invoked: crm_resource -L
> Resource Group: group
On 8/27/07, Per Andreas Buer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a bug in the Xen resource agent. monitor calls fail if monitor
> is called during migrations. To trigger det bug - just set up HB2 to use
> live migrations and flip one of the nodes into and out of standby mode.
> After a short whil
On 11-Sep-2007 Departamento Técnico de El Norte de Castilla wrote:
> Yes, but I heard about some magical key combinations that restart systems
> even in a kernel panic (Something like Alt + Sys Req + some key) and I
> thought that maybe some kernel module waiting for a serial com signal could
> d
Junko IKEDA wrote:
once again something about SplitBrain...
During SplitBrain, I wrecked the resource on the both nodes.
fail count was increased at this time.
But after recovering from SplitBrain, fail count returned to zero on
both!
Is this due to the restart of crmd or pengine/tengine?
Mo
On 9/13/07, Junko IKEDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > once again something about SplitBrain...
> > > During SplitBrain, I wrecked the resource on the both nodes.
> > > fail count was increased at this time.
> > > But after recovering from SplitBrain, fail count returned to zero on
> both!
> > >
> > once again something about SplitBrain...
> > During SplitBrain, I wrecked the resource on the both nodes.
> > fail count was increased at this time.
> > But after recovering from SplitBrain, fail count returned to zero on
both!
> > Is this due to the restart of crmd or pengine/tengine?
>
> Mos
39 matches
Mail list logo
