Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Announcing: heartbeat 2.1.4

2008-08-19 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-08-19T10:47:20, Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have uploaded packages for Debian (sid) to debian.org and they should be available in the debian archive for most architectures within in the next 24 hours. Source and i386 binaries are also available at

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] To avoid STONITH for a node which is doing kdump

2008-08-19 Thread Satomi Taniguchi
Hi Lars, Thank you for your reply! Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: (snip) There is one missing bit though; a node not doing kdump needs to be STONITH'ed; so, failure of the kdump-stonith plugin should escalate to the next plugin. I'm not sure the current STONITH subsystem can handle this. I

[Linux-ha-dev] 3.0 thoughts

2008-08-19 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
Hi, here are my thoughts for 3.0: - Remove code which depends on pacemaker (mgmt, dopd, CIM/SNMP) - Remove unmaintained code (telecom/). - Split up packages so heartbeat's cluster infrastructure layer can be installed separately from - supporting libraries, resources, stonith, and lrm code -

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] 3.0 thoughts

2008-08-19 Thread Simon Horman
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:47:36PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: Hi, here are my thoughts for 3.0: - Remove code which depends on pacemaker (mgmt, dopd, CIM/SNMP) - Remove unmaintained code (telecom/). - Split up packages so heartbeat's cluster infrastructure layer can be

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] 3.0 thoughts

2008-08-19 Thread Rasto Levrinc
Am Tuesday 19 August 2008 schrieb Lars Marowsky-Bree: Hi, here are my thoughts for 3.0: - Remove code which depends on pacemaker (mgmt, dopd, CIM/SNMP) - Remove unmaintained code (telecom/). dopd does not depend on crm directly, but it uses clplumbing. Can it stay there? Rasto -- : DI

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] 3.0 thoughts

2008-08-19 Thread Robert
When thinking about splitting the packages, I think a seperate RA package is useful. Most changes are done at the RA level (new versions of supported applications, bug fixes etc.) and the RA's are very useful for other cluster managers or homegrown solutions too. The more people use a certain

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] 3.0 thoughts

2008-08-19 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-08-19T23:13:25, Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm fine with all of this. Though I wonder if it might be best to get 3.0.0 out the door before worrying about splitting up the packages. Uhm, but that's the whole point of 3.0.x. ;-) What release goals for 3.0.0 do you have in

[Linux-ha-dev] uninstall Heartbeat 2.1.4-1 on RedHat

2008-08-19 Thread Junko IKEDA
Hi, Heartbeat 2.1.4-1 works well, but it seems that an uninstall process has a problem. I grubbed rpms from here. http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/ha-clustering:/lha-2.1/RHE L_5/x86_64/ There is no problem with installing (rpm -ihv), but uninstall (rpm -e) would say like this;

[Linux-HA] Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Announcing: heartbeat 2.1.4

2008-08-19 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-08-19T10:47:20, Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have uploaded packages for Debian (sid) to debian.org and they should be available in the debian archive for most architectures within in the next 24 hours. Source and i386 binaries are also available at

[Linux-HA] Starting Hearbeat and DRBD with troubles

2008-08-19 Thread Faria
Hello, Always when the Linux is starting, hearbeat can't load drbd module. Then I set the drbd start before hearbeat. Still the hearbeat is good, no erros. But the hearbeat find the resource active (in case drbd) then hearbeat is restarted. Now, when I start the DRBD using hearbeat creating

[Linux-HA] Announcement: Talk on FrOSCon

2008-08-19 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Hi, I will have a short talk about Linux-HA Version 2 (1 hour) on FrOSCon conference next Sunday (Aug, 24th). For details see: http://programm.froscon.org/2008/track/Administration/203.en.html FrOSCon takes place in St. Augustin near Bonn/Colone, Germany. The talk will be held in German.

[Linux-HA] 3node split site quorumd tests

2008-08-19 Thread Robert
Hi, I've been running some tests with quorumd and a three node setup. The setup is shown in the attached graphics. The cluster uses export HA_quorum=majority:quorumd. The tests are promising so far. When I simulate a split site scenario by shutting down br0 the resources are active on one

Re: [Linux-HA] 3node split site quorumd tests

2008-08-19 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Dienstag, 19. August 2008 15:55 schrieb Robert: Hi, I've been running some tests with quorumd and a three node setup. The setup is shown in the attached graphics. The cluster uses export HA_quorum=majority:quorumd. (...) Please can you send me / post a working setup for the quorum server?

Re: [Linux-HA] 3node split site quorumd tests

2008-08-19 Thread Robert
Well the setup was shown in the first e-mail of this thread. The config is like this: On quorum server node (node3quorumd) [ ... /etc/ha.d/quorum ...] cluster testcluster version 2_0_8 interval1000 timeout 5000 takeover3000 giveup 2000 nodenum

[Linux-HA] Heartbeat over FibreChannel

2008-08-19 Thread Todd, Conor
Hi. Perhaps this is a moronic question, but would it be possible to use a Fibre Channel interface (and the storage network its connected to) to send heartbeat signals? I have a services cluster with a bunch of storage attached, but it's all connected via SAS, and so all of the nodes are