[Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-04 Thread Luis Martin-Santos
Hello folks. We have found that certain third party LSB and OCF resource loading scripts (in our case, Groupwise ones) search for the HB script libraries in a fixed /usr/lib/heartbeat. If your are using a 64 bit OS, like SLES10-x86-64, those scripts fail because they cannot find the scri

RE: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-04 Thread Kettunen Janne ENFO
Hi. I would do: ln -s /usr/lib64/heartbeat /usr/lib/heartbeat But that would be cheating ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis Martin-Santos Sent: 4. helmikuuta 2008 15:28 To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org Subject: [Linux-HA] 32

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-05 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:28:16PM +0100, Luis Martin-Santos wrote: > Hello folks. > > We have found that certain third party LSB and OCF resource loading scripts > (in our case, Groupwise ones) search for the HB script libraries in a > fixed /usr/lib/heartbeat. If your are using a 64 bit O

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-05 Thread Andreas Mock
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von > Dejan Muhamedagic > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 12:36 > An: General Linux-HA mailing list > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit Hi Dejan, > > If

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-05 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
al Linux-HA mailing list > > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit > > > Hi Dejan, > > > > > > If I understand your question correctly, those libraries were > > moved to the $OCF_ROOT/resource.d/heartbeat/. OCF_ROOT is > > typically set to /usr/lib/

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-05 Thread Andreas Mock
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von > Dejan Muhamedagic > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 14:19 > An: General Linux-HA mailing list > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit Hi Dejan, > > What is t

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-05 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Feb 5, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Andreas Mock wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Dejan Muhamedagic Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 14:19 An: General Linux-HA mailing list Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit Hi Dejan

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-05 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-02-05T14:55:35, Andreas Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) Does this mean I can rely on $OCF_ROOT being set and on > $OCF_ROOT/resource.d/heartbeat/.ocf-shellfuncs being a shell snippet to > execute that sets the listed variables? Yes, OCF_ROOT is a OCF-mandated setting. The .ocf-shellf

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-05 Thread Andreas Mock
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von > Lars Marowsky-Bree > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 16:19 > An: General Linux-HA mailing list > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit Hi Lars, > > No. OCF_

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-05 Thread Andreas Mock
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von > Andrew Beekhof > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 15:08 > An: General Linux-HA mailing list > > 4) Who is fiddling with sheebang paths? (Can I assume LSB > compliance?) > > sheebang? I

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-05 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:53:05PM +0100, Andreas Mock wrote: > > -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht- > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von > > Andrew Beekhof > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 15:08 > > An: General Linux-HA mailing list > > > 4) Who is fiddli

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-05 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
al Linux-HA mailing list > > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit > > Hi Lars, > > > > > No. OCF_ROOT is part of it, but the variables in the shell are a > > heartbeat/CRM/Pacemaker "extension". We reserve the right to redefine > > them as needed

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-05 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Feb 5, 2008, at 9:53 PM, Andreas Mock wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Andrew Beekhof Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 15:08 An: General Linux-HA mailing list 4) Who is fiddling with sheebang paths? (Can I assume LSB

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:12 AM, Andreas Mock wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Andrew Beekhof Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 08:49 An: General Linux-HA mailing list Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit I wrote it wrong

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-06 Thread Andreas Mock
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von > Andrew Beekhof > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 08:49 > An: General Linux-HA mailing list > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit > > > > I

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Linux-HA mailing list Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit Hi Lars, No. OCF_ROOT is part of it, but the variables in the shell are a heartbeat/CRM/Pacemaker "extension". We reserve the right to redefine them as needed, they are not part of our exported API. All true, however we do

Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit

2008-02-06 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-02-06T08:58:46, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right. If there is enough demand, then we can just make the equivalent of > ocf-shellfuncs for that language. > autoconf makes this relatively straight forward, you just supply the > template and it'll fill in the values. Actu