Hello folks.
We have found that certain third party LSB and OCF resource loading
scripts (in our case, Groupwise ones) search for the HB script
libraries in a fixed /usr/lib/heartbeat. If your are using a 64 bit
OS, like SLES10-x86-64, those scripts fail because they cannot find
the scri
Hi.
I would do:
ln -s /usr/lib64/heartbeat /usr/lib/heartbeat
But that would be cheating ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis
Martin-Santos
Sent: 4. helmikuuta 2008 15:28
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Subject: [Linux-HA] 32
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:28:16PM +0100, Luis Martin-Santos wrote:
> Hello folks.
>
> We have found that certain third party LSB and OCF resource loading scripts
> (in our case, Groupwise ones) search for the HB script libraries in a
> fixed /usr/lib/heartbeat. If your are using a 64 bit O
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
> Dejan Muhamedagic
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 12:36
> An: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit
Hi Dejan,
>
> If
al Linux-HA mailing list
> > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit
>
>
> Hi Dejan,
>
>
> >
> > If I understand your question correctly, those libraries were
> > moved to the $OCF_ROOT/resource.d/heartbeat/. OCF_ROOT is
> > typically set to /usr/lib/
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
> Dejan Muhamedagic
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 14:19
> An: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit
Hi Dejan,
> > What is t
On Feb 5, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Dejan Muhamedagic
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 14:19
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit
Hi Dejan
On 2008-02-05T14:55:35, Andreas Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Does this mean I can rely on $OCF_ROOT being set and on
> $OCF_ROOT/resource.d/heartbeat/.ocf-shellfuncs being a shell snippet to
> execute that sets the listed variables?
Yes, OCF_ROOT is a OCF-mandated setting. The .ocf-shellf
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
> Lars Marowsky-Bree
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 16:19
> An: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit
Hi Lars,
>
> No. OCF_
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
> Andrew Beekhof
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 15:08
> An: General Linux-HA mailing list
> > 4) Who is fiddling with sheebang paths? (Can I assume LSB
> compliance?)
>
> sheebang?
I
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:53:05PM +0100, Andreas Mock wrote:
> > -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
> > Andrew Beekhof
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 15:08
> > An: General Linux-HA mailing list
> > > 4) Who is fiddli
al Linux-HA mailing list
> > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit
>
> Hi Lars,
>
> >
> > No. OCF_ROOT is part of it, but the variables in the shell are a
> > heartbeat/CRM/Pacemaker "extension". We reserve the right to redefine
> > them as needed
On Feb 5, 2008, at 9:53 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Andrew Beekhof
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 15:08
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
4) Who is fiddling with sheebang paths? (Can I assume LSB
On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:12 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Andrew Beekhof
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 08:49
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit
I wrote it wrong
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
> Andrew Beekhof
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 08:49
> An: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit
> >
> > I
Linux-HA mailing list
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit
Hi Lars,
No. OCF_ROOT is part of it, but the variables in the shell are a
heartbeat/CRM/Pacemaker "extension". We reserve the right to
redefine
them as needed, they are not part of our exported API.
All true, however we do
On 2008-02-06T08:58:46, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right. If there is enough demand, then we can just make the equivalent of
> ocf-shellfuncs for that language.
> autoconf makes this relatively straight forward, you just supply the
> template and it'll fill in the values.
Actu
17 matches
Mail list logo