On 07/24/2012 10:21 AM, Yount, William D wrote:
I have two servers: KNTCLFS001 and KNTCLFS002
I have a drbd partition named nfs, on each server. They are mirrored. The
mirroring works perfectly.
What I want is to serve this drbd partition up and have it so that if one
server goes down,
from there.
-Original Message-
From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
[mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Kurz
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 4:18 AM
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Active/Active Cluster for DRBD partition
On 07/24
I have two servers: KNTCLFS001 and KNTCLFS002
I have a drbd partition named nfs, on each server. They are mirrored. The
mirroring works perfectly.
What I want is to serve this drbd partition up and have it so that if one
server goes down, the drbd partition is still available on the other
Um, you appear to have cman and corosync as cloned resources.
Thats really not a good idea.
Have you seen the clusters from scratch document?
That would be a good place to start.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Yount, William D
yount.will...@menloworldwide.com wrote:
I have two servers,
I have two servers, 10.89.99.31(KNTCLFS001) and 10.89.99.32(KNTCLFS002). I am
trying to use 10.89.99.30 to float between them in an Active/Active cluster.
I have several services which should be running simultaneously on both servers.
I am trying to set up an Active/Active cluster. I am using
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 9:51 PM, emmanuel segura emi2f...@gmail.com wrote:
Why you are using cman corosync together?
I think you should use cman+pacemaker or corosync+pacemaker
Right. cman uses corosync underneath, but you should only
configure+start one of them.
Probably cman in this case.
Why you are using cman corosync together?
I think you should use cman+pacemaker or corosync+pacemaker
2012/6/9 Yount, William D yount.will...@menloworldwide.com
I have two servers which are both Dell 990's. Each server has two 1tb hard
drives configured in RAID0. I have installed CentOS on
I have two servers which are both Dell 990's. Each server has two 1tb hard
drives configured in RAID0. I have installed CentOS on both and they have the
same partition sizes. I am using /dev/KNTCLFS00X/Storage as a drbd partition
and attaching it to /dev/drbd0. DRBD syncing appears to working
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Artur linu...@netdirect.fr wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently switching to Heartbeat (3.0.3) and Pacemaker (1.0.9.1) on
Debian Squeeze with CRM/CIB setup.
This is the first time i try to configure it so please be kind with a
newbie. :)
I would like to setup an
Hello,
I'm currently switching to Heartbeat (3.0.3) and Pacemaker (1.0.9.1) on
Debian Squeeze with CRM/CIB setup.
This is the first time i try to configure it so please be kind with a
newbie. :)
I would like to setup an active/active cluster with 2 nodes, with sticky
resources and a connectivity
Hello,
I want to build an active-acitve Cluster with following specifications:
Node A: Application for the customers (App-A)
Node B: Application for tests and integration (App-B)
If node A fails, the Application App-A shall switch to Node B and - that's the
On Monday 15 November 2010 14:47:45 Kube, Thomas wrote:
Hello,
I want to build an active-acitve Cluster with following specifications:
Node A: Application for the customers (App-A)
Node B: Application for tests and integration (App-B)
If node A
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] Active-Active Cluster Question
On Monday 15 November 2010 14:47:45 Kube, Thomas wrote:
Hello,
I want to build an active-acitve Cluster with following specifications:
Node A: Application for the customers (App-A)
Node B: Application
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Marc-Christian Petersen m@gmx.de wrote:
Hello all,
first: I'm completely new to pacemaker.
I want to setup a scenario like this:
Machine A)
- has IP address 10.0.0.251
- DRBD resources
drbd1 (for apache2)
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:05:17 +0100, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Moin Andrew,
- start the NFS server on the node where Cacti is
well you'd need to add an NFS resource and use a colocaiton constraint
to tie it to cacti
- mount the NFS share from the NFS server after the NFS
Hello all,
first: I'm completely new to pacemaker.
I want to setup a scenario like this:
Machine A)
- has IP address 10.0.0.251
- DRBD resources
drbd1 (for apache2)
drbd2 (for mysql)
drbd3 (for cacti)
- LVM ontop of
16 matches
Mail list logo