On Mar 18, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Johan Hoeke wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I also agree, that it is a good idea to continue monitoring for
unmanaged resources but I would see this behaviour as a bug if the
"on_fail" action is executed if its "fence".
I wouldn't want a on_fail=restart to be ex
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:55AM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
LS,
Running a 2 node cluster, heartbeat
On Feb 21, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:55AM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
LS,
Running a 2 node cluster, heartbeat-2.1.3-3 centos rpms, RH AS 4.6
While testing a "mainten
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:51:25PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
>> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:29:08PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
> But the stonith resource is monitored? How did it fail
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:51:25PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:29:08PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> >> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>
> >>> But the stonith resource is monitored? How did it fail?
>
> an incomplete iptabl
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:29:08PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
>
>
> >> I'm due to test the cluster
> >> again this afternoon. We're going to pull out the heartbeat cable to
> >> test and make sure the data doesn't get corrupted. Stonith / riloe has
> >> work
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>> I'm due to test the cluster
>> again this afternoon. We're going to pull out the heartbeat cable to
>> test and make sure the data doesn't get corrupted. Stonith / riloe has
>> worked well, except that one time apparently.
>
> But the stonith resource is monitor
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:58:54PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:00:35PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> >> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:09:19PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> Dejan Mu
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:00:35PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
>> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:09:19PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:26:12PM +0100, Joh
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:00:35PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:09:19PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> >> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:26:12PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> Dejan Mu
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:09:19PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
>> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:26:12PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:55AM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:09:19PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:26:12PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> >> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:55AM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> >>> Oops. So there's an on_fa
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:26:12PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
>> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:55AM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
>>> Oops. So there's an on_fail=fence for this monitor operation. Is
>>> that necessary?
>> We want the clust
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:26:12PM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:55AM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> >> LS,
> >>
> >> Running a 2 node cluster, heartbeat-2.1.3-3 centos rpms, RH AS 4.6
> >>
> >> While testing a "maintenance sce
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:05:32PM +0100, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:55AM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> > > LS,
> > >
> > > Running a 2 node cluster, heartbeat-2.1.3-3
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:55AM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> > LS,
> >
> > Running a 2 node cluster, heartbeat-2.1.3-3 centos rpms, RH AS 4.6
> >
> > While testing a "maintenance scenario" for the clu
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:55AM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
>> LS,
>>
>> Running a 2 node cluster, heartbeat-2.1.3-3 centos rpms, RH AS 4.6
>>
>> While testing a "maintenance scenario" for the cluster I set all
>> resources to is_managed is false,
>> and proceed
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:55AM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote:
> LS,
>
> Running a 2 node cluster, heartbeat-2.1.3-3 centos rpms, RH AS 4.6
>
> While testing a "maintenance scenario" for the cluster I set all
> resources to is_managed is false,
>
> Feb 20 21:09:41 sierpinski pengine: [15725]:
LS,
Running a 2 node cluster, heartbeat-2.1.3-3 centos rpms, RH AS 4.6
While testing a "maintenance scenario" for the cluster I set all
resources to is_managed is false,
Feb 20 21:09:41 sierpinski pengine: [15725]: notice: native_print:
R_BB10PRD_DB (heartbeat::ocf:oracle):Started
si
19 matches
Mail list logo
