[Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH][crmsh] deal with the case-insentive hostname

Hi, I set upper-case hostname (GUEST03/GUEST4) and run Pacemaker 1.1.9 + Corosync 2.3.0. [root@GUEST04 ~]# crm_mon -1 Last updated: Wed Apr 10 15:12:48 2013 Last change: Wed Apr 10 14:02:36 2013 via crmd on GUEST04 Stack: corosync Current DC: GUEST04 (3232242817) - partition with quorum Version:

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] handle idmapd using nfsserver RA

Hi, My previous patch had a spelling error, revise it just a bit. Thanks, Junko 2012/5/30 Junko IKEDA tsukishima...@gmail.com: Hi, I am trying to setup NFSv4 server using nfsserver RA, and adding some handlings for rpc.idmad. http://linux.die.net/man/8/rpc.idmapd Please see the attached

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] nfsserver RA : add check statement to start function

Hi, Thank you for your quick response! This one seems to be missing. Or is it covered now by the monitor test? nfsserver_start () can now return $OCF_SUCCESS if it detects that nfs server is already started. This ocf_log debug, which complains about the argument, will not be called anymore

[Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] nfsserver RA : add check statement to start function

, so ocf_log debug complains; Not enough arguments [1] to ocf_log. I added a check statement for this. Please see the attached. Regards, Junko IKEDA NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION nfsserver-validate-all.patch Description: Binary data nfsserver-check-start.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] Filesystem RA: remove a status file only when OCF_CHECK_LEVEL is set as 20

Hi, Is my case hard to understand? multipath means the Fibre Channels, there are two cables for redundancy. Thanks, Junko 2012/5/9 Junko IKEDA tsukishima...@gmail.com: Hi, In my case, the umount succeed when the Fibre Channels is disconnected, so it seemed that the handling status file

[Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] Filesystem RA: remove a status file only when OCF_CHECK_LEVEL is set as 20

OCF_CHECK_LEVE), it's enough to try unmount the file system, isn't it? https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/blob/master/heartbeat/Filesystem#L774 Regards, Junko IKEDA NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION Filesystem.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] Filesystem RA: remove a status file only when OCF_CHECK_LEVEL is set as 20

Hi, In my case, the umount succeed when the Fibre Channels is disconnected, so it seemed that the handling status file caused a longer failover, as Dejan said. If the umount fails, it will go into a timeout, might call stonith action, and this case also makes sense (though I couldn't see this).

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] named RA: support IPv6

Hi, Thank you for pointing that out! Regards, Junko IKEDA 2012/1/17 Dejan Muhamedagic de...@suse.de: On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:10:14PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:32:20PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 05:50:14PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic

[Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] named RA: support IPv6

, right? named_monitor() output=`$OCF_RESKEY_host $OCF_RESKEY_monitor_request $OCF_RESKEY_monitor_ip` if [ $? -ne 0 ] || ! echo $output | grep -q '.* has address '$OCF_RESKEY_monitor_response Would you please give me some advice? Regards, Junko IKEDA NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION named_ipv6

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] add the new parameter for replication network in mysql RA

Hi Raoul, Thank you for your comments! this method should leave the slave be if the master did not change since the last sync. consider:   crm node standby node02; crm node online node02 the slave should pick up where it left using mysql's own way of saving the last replication information

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] add the new parameter for replication network in mysql RA

Hi, sorry, agein. My previous patch was wrong. I attached the new one. Thanks, Junko 2011/11/11 Junko IKEDA tsukishima...@gmail.com: Hi, The current mysql RA, it set hostname (= uname -n) as its replication network, but I have the following restriction. # uname -n node01 # cat /etc

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] add the new parameter for replication network in mysql RA

Hi Raoul, Sure, thanks! Regards, Junko 2011/11/14 Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] r.bha...@ipax.at: hello junko-san! i propose the following documentation update to clarify the parameter's usage. parameter name=replication_hostname_suffix unique=0 required=0 longdesc lang=en A hostname suffix that

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] prevent Slave promotion in mysql RA

Hi Marek, Florian, Thank you for your comments! Did you set evict_outdated_slaves? No, If set to false (the default), then the slave will be allowed to stay in the cluster, but its master preference will be pushed down so it's not promoted, and this seems to be Ikeda-san's preferred

[Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] change the monitor log level of mysql RA

noisy. I think there is no problem if we change these log level from info to debug. Please see attached. Regards, Junko IKEDA NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION mysql-log.patch Description: Binary data ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux

[Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] prevent Slave promotion in mysql RA

]; then # Sanitize a below-zero preference to just zero master_pref=0 fi $CRM_MASTER -v $master_pref fi I'm less familiar with the replication behavior, please advise me how to do it. Regards, Junko IKEDA NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION mysql

[Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] add the new parameter for replication network in mysql RA

? Regards, Junko IKEDA NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION mysql-replication_hostname_suffix.patch Description: Binary data ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] specify the full path for ipmi command

Hi Dejan, Many thanks! Can I get it from http://hg.linux-ha.org/glue/ ? Regards, Junko 2011/9/22 Dejan Muhamedagic de...@suse.de: Hi Junko-san, On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:22:40AM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote: Hi Dejan, Thank you for your reply! I attached the revised patch. Just applied

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] specify the full path for ipmi command

Hi Dejan, Thank you for your reply! I attached the revised patch. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/74350 I don't see the connection between the two. I am trying to use /tmp/ipmitool command for some tests, and add its path for root. so $PATH for root is here; # echo

[Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] specify the full path for ipmi command

? Best Regards, Junko IKEDA NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION ipmi.patch Description: Binary data ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]add sfex_init man to .spec

Hi, The latest resource-agent has man page for sfex_init, and I add it to .spec. Please see the attached patch. Best Regard, Junko IKEDA NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION sfex_init.patch Description: Binary data ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev

[Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]modify description for ethmonitor RA

' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/root/Desktop/work/20110622/resource-agents' make: *** [all] Error 2 Best Regards, Junko IKEDA NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION ethmonitor.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Translate crm_cli.txt to Japanese

Hi, May I suggest that you go with the devel version, because crm_cli.txt was converted to crm.8.txt. There are not many textual changes, just some obsolete parts removed. OK, I got crm.8.txt from devel. Each directory structure for Pacemaker 1.0,1.1 and devel is just a bit different. Does

[Linux-ha-dev] execute permission for exportfs RA

Hi, I tried to compile the latest agents package from mercurial repository, but new exportfs RA complained about something like this; # hg clone http://hg.linux-ha.org/agents/ # cd agents # ./autogen.sh # ./configure --localstatedir=/var --disable-fatal-warnings # make /bin/sh:

[Linux-ha-dev] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] recovering from the online backup failure

Hi, I had done some tests for this patch, and I could get the desired results. I think this patch wouldn't affect the current usage. Serge, Thank you for your review! Thanks, Junko --- Forwarded message --- From: Serge Dubrouski serge...@gmail.com To: Junko IKEDA ike

[Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] recovering from the online backup failure

Hi, If some failures happen during the online backup of PostgreSQL, pgsql can not handle the fail over, because backup_label, this is a file for a backup process of Postgres, remains on the shared disk. pgsql can not start DB if this file remains. Please see the attached. Thanks, Junko

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] route del in IPaddr RA

; then - return $OCF_SUCCESS - fi +MSG=`$PING $PINGARGS 21` +if [ $? = 0 ]; then +return $OCF_SUCCESS +fi done - + +ocf_log err $MSG return $OCF_ERR_GENERIC } Thanks, Junko On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:13:29 +0900, Junko IKEDA ike...@intellilink.co.jp

[Linux-ha-dev] route del in IPaddr RA

Hi, I wonder why IPaddr RA needs to run route del before it deletes the target interface. Does the old version of IPaddr contain route add? If route del fails, RA will be able to return $OCF_SUCCESS, but I feel a little strange when I see the error message from route command like this.

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] route del in IPaddr RA

Hi, By the way, this is a really trivial thing, I have some requests about logging messages of IPaddr. Please see the modified attachment. Thanks, Junko On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:13:29 +0900, Junko IKEDA ike...@intellilink.co.jp wrote: Hi, I wonder why IPaddr RA needs to run route del

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] xm dump-core from xen0

Development List Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] xm dump-core from xen0 Hi, On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 07:22:02PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote: Hi, I run the new xen0 on domU now, and need an additional feature for a dump destination. I have RHEL5.2 x86_64 and xen 3.1. This would dump

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] xm dump-core from xen0

Hi, My operation is here; # ssh x3650g # export dom0=x3650g # export hostlist=dom-d1:/etc/xen/dom-d1 dom-d2:/etc/xen/dom-d2 # /usr/lib64/stonith/plugins/external/xen0 on dom-d1 # echo $? 0 dom-d1 was created well. # /usr/lib64/stonith/plugins/external/xen0 reset dom-d1 # echo $? # 1

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] xm dump-core from xen0

Sorry for all of my mistakes... I have a wrong /etc/hosts. It works well for now. By the way, Could I config this plugin on two Dom0 and two DomU? ex.) domU-1 on Dom0-1, and domU-2 o Dom0-2 Thanks, Junko Hi, My operation is here; # ssh x3650g # export dom0=x3650g # export

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] xm dump-core from xen0

I run the attached cib.xml. It seems that this configuration works well (but I need more tests) If there is any strange elements, please let me know. Thanks, Junko Sorry for all of my mistakes... I have a wrong /etc/hosts. It works well for now. By the way, Could I config this plugin on

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] xm dump-core from xen0

be a big deal. I can add one more config parameter like run_dump, then if it's set the script will call xm dump-core before destroying xunU. On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Junko IKEDA ike...@intellilink.co.jp wrote: Hi Serge, I'm trying to manage xen domain-U with xen0 plugin

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] xm dump-core from xen0

4, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Junko IKEDA ike...@intellilink.co.jp wrote: Hi, Attached is a patch that adds that functionality. Many thanks! I'll give it a try. By the way, xen0 plugin should run on domain-0, right? Is it possible to run it on domain-U? Thanks, Junko On Tue, Mar 3

[Linux-ha-dev] xm dump-core from xen0

Hi Serge, I'm trying to manage xen domain-U with xen0 plugin. There are two xm command, like xm destroy and xm create in xen0, How do you think to add xm dump-core into it? If possible, I want to get the dump of domain-U when some fence events happen. Best Regards, Junko Ikeda

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] SFEX resource agent for heartbeat

Hi, See also this page, please. http://www.linux-ha.org/sfex/ Thanks, Junko -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Xinwei Hu Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 6:55 PM To: High-Availability Linux Development List Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev]

[Linux-ha-dev] uninstall Heartbeat 2.1.4-1 on RedHat

with /sbin/ldconfig for RedHat? Best Regards, Junko Ikeda NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] crm_mon doesn't exit immediately

If there's no objection I would like to push this patch into the lha-2.1 repository, but any problem on that? sure It seems that the latest pacemaker also presents the same behavior so I think the both needs to be fixed as well. I thought it was fine? sorry, that might have been

RE: [Linux-ha-dev][RFC]heartbeat-2.1.4---Masterresource'sdemoteoperationgoesintoaninfinite loop

Btw. You do realize that setting ordered=false for the master resource also means that the group's actions wont be ordered either don't you? You mean, there's a possibility that slave resource will start/stop before master's action complete if I don't set ordered=true, right? No.

RE: [Linux-ha-dev][RFC]heartbeat-2.1.4---Masterresource'sdemoteoperationgoesinto aninfinite loop

of it next time. Thanks, Junko 2008/4/18 Junko IKEDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fixed by: http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-0.6/rev/4817a7094683 It works well with group-master/slave, too. Many thanks! Please merge it into Heartbeat 2.1.4. Thanks, Junko

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] [RFC] heartbeat-2.1.4 --- build onRHEL5.1

any ideas as to why the current code doesn't work for you? I failed to build rpm on open suse 10.1 too... It might be a potential problem in Heartbeat 2.1.3. See attached configure-213.log. It's sure that the summary says CIM provider and TSA plugin would not be built, Build CRM

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] [RFC] heartbeat-2.1.4 --- Master resource's demoteoperation goes into an infinite loop

. Is there something wrong with cib.xml ? This is similar case to what Yamauchi-san posted. Best Regards, Junko Ikeda NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] [RFC] heartbeat-2.1.4 --- build onRHEL5.1

Hi, I keep failing to build lha-2.1 on RHEL5.1 for now. It seems that --enable-cim-provider=no and --enable-tsa-plugin=no are ineffective for ConfigureMe. We don't need CIM providers or TSA plugin, so have a try to make patch about it. Please check the attached. Sorry for annoying. The

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] [RFC] heartbeat-2.1.4

Hi again, Another request; Would it be possible to include the following patch in release 2.1.4? http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/rev/6307bb091d02 It will help the problems which are posted into Bugzilla 1814, for all platform not only ppc.

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] [RFC] heartbeat-2.1.4

Hi, So, that said, I've pushed my proposed code to http://hg.linux-ha.org/lha-2.1/. It, for reasons outlined above, likely doesn't build yet (because the in-tree packaging is broken), but I wanted to share the scope of changes with you. There are some fixes about failcount in

RE: AW: [Linux-ha-dev] Call for testers: 2.1.3

Hi, There was two bugs in the configure stuff: 1) It got the package name for pegasus wrong for Red Hat 2) It didn't work if you had pegasus installed but didn't enable the CIM provider. I tried this branch and it worked well.

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Shared disk file Exclusiveness control programfor HB2

right there, it might be related to CCM problem, I'm not sure. If it's possible to handle this function as RA, could you consider introduction of SF-EX into the next release as the first step? Thanks, Junko IKEDA NTT DATA INTELLILINK

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] Shared disk file Exclusiveness controlprogramforHB2

If Node B updates the lock status _at just the right moment_, sfex_update() detects that the other node is trying to update its status, and it will be terminated with exit(2). This time window is enough to destroy all data if you are bad luck ;-( Node B is just updating its lock status,

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] Shared disk file Exclusiveness controlprogramforHB2

Assume we have 2 nodes. 1. Node A B reach step 3) in the same time. 2. sfex_lock on Node B is scheduled out due to some other reasons. 3. sfex_lock on Node A goes through step 3 to 6, and Node A holds the lock now. Node A is sure to hold the lock at this moment. sfex_lock() is going

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] Shared disk file Exclusiveness controlprogramforHB2

: [Linux-ha-dev] Shared disk file Exclusiveness controlprogramforHB2 2007/8/9, Junko IKEDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, sorry, my previous answer was off the mark... When 2 nodes reach there at the same time, node A notices that the other node want to lock too, so give up lock itself. I only see

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Shared disk file Exclusiveness control program for HB2

for it? We have no problem with improving it, but it's not known exactly how we should do. Best Regards, Junko Ikeda NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Robertson Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:12

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] Shared disk file Exclusiveness control program forHB2

Hi, You know that could be true... but if it's called from RA, 2 nodes wouldn't reach that part at the same time, right? One node will be able to reach there according to the score rule. Thanks, Junko -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] Shared disk file Exclusiveness control programforHB2

] On Behalf Of Junko IKEDA Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 4:30 PM To: 'High-Availability Linux Development List' Subject: RE: [Linux-ha-dev] Shared disk file Exclusiveness control programforHB2 Hi, You know that could be true... but if it's called from RA, 2 nodes wouldn't reach that part

RE: [Linux-ha-dev] Split-Brain that use the latest development version

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lars Marowsky-Bree Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 11:13 PM To: High-Availability Linux Development List Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Split-Brain that use the latest development version On