Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-16 Thread David Lee
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2008-04-15T11:55:02, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Given that the software runs not only on Linux but also on *BSD, Solaris > > and potentially any UN*X-like OS, could I suggest that the names try, > > where reasonably possible, not

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-16 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-04-15T11:55:02, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given that the software runs not only on Linux but also on *BSD, Solaris > and potentially any UN*X-like OS, could I suggest that the names try, > where reasonably possible, not to be based on 'linux'. But the project's name _is_ Linu

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-15 Thread David Lee
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2008-04-11T13:55:04, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > As Lars mentioned yesterday, the reason for 2.1.4 is to allow time for > > some > > > addit

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-14 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-04-11T13:55:04, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * heartbeat-core (alternate name: cluster-core, lha-core) > > This project would contain all the pieces relevant to the operation of a > > single

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-11 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
High-Availability Linux Development List wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2008-04-11T16:05:35, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > * heartbeat-core (alternate name: cluster-core, lha-core) > > > > > This project

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-11 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-04-11T16:05:35, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > * heartbeat-core (alternate name: cluster-core, lha-core) > > > > This project would contain all the pieces relevant to the operation > of

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-11 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-04-11T18:10:13, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > True. It's there only because of CRM. It still however depends on > ha.cf and logd.cf. It could be useful with v1 too, but right now > it probably depends on both. There'll have to be some code > changes to support the new layo

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-11 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:05:35PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2008-04-11T13:55:04, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > > > * pacemaker > > > This project contains all the pieces relevant t

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-11 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-04-11T16:42:27, Sebastian Reitenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Second, please do not split everything into a single separate > software. Not every OS/Distribution is like Debian, with its thousands > small packages. Well, I'm certainly not trying to make this like debian ;-) Distro m

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-11 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-04-11T16:05:35, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * heartbeat-core (alternate name: cluster-core, lha-core) > > > This project would contain all the pieces relevant to the operation of a > > > single node. > > > Conceptually, the project would include: > > > - clplumbing

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-11 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
High-Availability Linux Development List wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2008-04-11T13:55:04, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > As Lars mentioned yesterday, the reason for 2.1.4 is to allow time for some > > > ad

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-11 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-04-11T13:55:04, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As Lars mentioned yesterday, the reason for 2.1.4 is to allow time for some > > additional project changes (both managerial and technical). > >

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-11 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2008-04-11T13:55:04, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As Lars mentioned yesterday, the reason for 2.1.4 is to allow time for some > additional project changes (both managerial and technical). > > Part of these changes are to split the, currently monolithic, Heartbeat > project into

[Linux-ha-dev] RFC: Proposed project restructuring

2008-04-11 Thread Andrew Beekhof
As Lars mentioned yesterday, the reason for 2.1.4 is to allow time for some additional project changes (both managerial and technical). Part of these changes are to split the, currently monolithic, Heartbeat project into logical components that can be updated/released/ replaced independently