On 2006-08-29T13:36:41, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point of renaming them *gpl is that it would be impossible to
accidentally link against one. Therefore anyone who is doing it, knew
perfectly well what they were doing when they did it.
I'm not a lawyer, but legally
Keisuke MORI wrote:
Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew Soffen wrote:
I don't see it being any problem.
Is there any convention that other projects use ?
Not that I know of. I just thought this might make things clearer to
those who want to link to our libraries - which ones
Hi,
I've been thinking about our conventions for naming libraries.
It seems to me to be somewhat confusing for the novice to tell which
libraries of ours are GPL and which are LGPL.
So, I had an idea I'd like some feedback on.
How about if we named all our GPLed libraries libxxxgpl instead of
Matthew Soffen wrote:
I don't see it being any problem.
Is there any convention that other projects use ?
Not that I know of. I just thought this might make things clearer to
those who want to link to our libraries - which ones are under which
license.
For those who are linking to our GPLed
