Does anyone know why we don't use redirection to a new gateway for ipip
encapsulation? It's simple, useful and I don't understand why we don't do it.
I've put together a couple of simple scripts to test my ideas and they work like
this
If an incoming ipip packet is going to turn around and
> From: Carlos A Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Error compiling libax25
> Date: Monday, December 13, 1999 9:35 PM
>
>
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PR
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Below is a cut-and-paste of the errors:
[root@py5vs libax25-0.0.7]# make
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.
-DAX25
So, give me a packet terminal for Linux that's ax.25 and tnc commands
aware.
I'm not a programmer, but I'll gladly provdide you with a features
list if you are!
cul - jk
-
James S. Kaplan KG7FU
Eugene Oregon USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rio.com/~kg7fu
ICQ # 12276
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Carlos A Schneider wrote:
> Hello all:
> I'm trying to compile libax25-0.0.7, but there are errors
> during make.
> Configure reports that can't locate file /sys/ioctl.h,
> but it is there. So, I think that some libs are missing,
> but I don't know which one.
> I have glibc-2
I'm suprised that 'eye diagrams' are mentioned at all for 2100baud Bell202 as
the two tones are not harmonically related so hence unlikely (with random data)
to produce a display thats useful - I've not looked at the soundcard stuff to
see what qualifications are made using this diagnostic tool.
Hello all:
I'm trying to compile libax25-0.0.7, but there are errors
during make.
Configure reports that can't locate file /sys/ioctl.h,
but it is there. So, I think that some libs are missing,
but I don't know which one.
I have glibc-2.1 installed, and the system is an 486DX2
running RH 6.0.
Coul
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Jesse Royall wrote about, Re: off topic...contact for Chuck
Harrington:
> Chuck doesn't support his software anymoresomeone else does and and
> has made some of us that use his software vary unhappy. Go get
> winpacket...atleast when you register that software they won'