Hi,
Now that the archives are accessible this is all a non-issue. It's
just that I've been irritated because most other projects I know of
are interested in getting users into development and make getting
involved as easy as possible. Of course there are off-topic posts and
trolls on
Terry Dawson wrote:
I'm sure when there is some concensus that we have a stable set of kernel
support and tools, ie when the development slows a bit, that the list will
be made public. I just don't think we're ready for that just yet.
Terry
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 10:22:11AM +0300, Tomi Manninen OH2BNS wrote:
Quoting Hessu's original announcement of the dev-hams list:
Following recent discussion it was decided to publish the existence of
the list, and make the mailing list archive available for anyone to
read.
snip
Heikki Hannikainen wrote:
Following recent discussion it was decided to publish the existence of
the list, and make the mailing list archive available for anyone to read.
Thank you very much for doing public this interesting information.
Although I don't understand why the classical scheme
Developers make the bats, balls and gloves (baseball) and yet the users
want to take part in creating/changing the rules of the game.
I get the impression that the developers know what the users need
do not wish to be emcumbered by the expressed wishes, wants or needs
of the users (read
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 08:22:35PM +, Julian Munoz Dominguez wrote:
I hope the rest of the dev-hams subscribees don't mind me speaking on their
behalf, but to be on the safe side assume that the contents of this message
are my opinion only, although I'm fairly confident the others would
Julian Munoz Dominguez said:
Heikki Hannikainen wrote:
Following recent discussion it was decided to publish the existence of
the list, and make the mailing list archive available for anyone to read.
Although I don't understand why the classical scheme in other areas will
not work in
you quote me out of context and I was not complaining about the
IRS. I was HAPPY to say that the money I spend on that list is treated as
a business expense. That, if you don't know, saves me money.
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Fred Macinster wrote:
I cannot resist.
Whinning about the IRS.
I run a couple of lists, and one is a busines. The business list
is limited to those who I do business with. I pay to have the list and
it's a business expense according to the IRS.
The other is a list I get free and it is a Linux User List
(SNMLUG) and anyone can join this
I cannot resist.
Whinning about the IRS. Man do you re-use your stamps as well?
Stop bitching. No wonder Ham Radio is on death's doorstep.
Makes me sick to tell people I am one when I see this sort of
stuff.
I run a couple of lists, and one is a busines. The business list
is limited to
Quoting Heikki Hannikainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Subscription is by invitation only: someone already on the list can
publicly suggest inviting someone, and if no-one objects, the person will
be asked if he/she is interested in joining. This has kept the list quite
small with about 20
Hello,
The dev-hams mailing list was set up a few years ago to provide a
discussion list for linux-hams software developers, with a better
signal-to-noise ratio better than on this list. It was thought to be
necessary, because some developers were thinking of unsubscribing the list
due to
12 matches
Mail list logo
