Jeff
I think I may have found an issue in the ATAPI code in the function
atapi_packet_task.
From my testing with the sata_via driver, I have been getting a timeout
when sending the first inquiry command.
Here is the section of code of interest:
/* make sure DRQ is set */
status = at
gp wrote:
Jeff
I think I may have found an issue in the ATAPI code in the function
atapi_packet_task.
From my testing with the sata_via driver, I have been getting a timeout
when sending the first inquiry command.
Here is the section of code of interest:
/* make sure DRQ is set */
stat
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> After that, I'll do a round of driver writing for Marvell and several other
> boards.
Any tentative time-frame ? I'm also interested due to the presence of
this controller disguised as Adaptec AIC-8110 on my Asus mainboard.
Unfortunately Asus only prov
Howdy!
Some IDE drives destined for use in server class or datacenter
machines will come with "write cache" disabled. With the current
code, the setting of the drive is effectively ignored, and the cache
is always enabled if the drive has cache.
It is hard to define or enable certain behaviors t
- Add documentation for the use of the Kbuild variable
BLK_DEV_HDWC.
drivers/ide/Kconfig | 11 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff -X /home/dwm/lib/ide-excludes -Nwupar
lk-2.6.11-rc2-bk5.a/drivers/ide/Kconfig lk-2.6.11-rc2-bk5.b/drivers/ide/Kconfig
--- lk-2.6.11-rc2-
- add hook in ide-taskfile:ide_cmd_ioctl() to call the new
function ide_write_cache().
drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff -X /home/dwm/lib/ide-excludes -Nwupar
lk-2.6.11-rc2-bk5.a/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c
lk-2.6.11-rc2-bk5.b/driver
- use new config variable BLK_DEV_HDWC in idedisk_setup code.
include/linux/ide.h|5 +
drivers/ide/ide-disk.c |4 ++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -X /home/dwm/lib/ide-excludes -Nwupar
lk-2.6.11-rc2-bk5.a/include/linux/ide.h lk-2.6.11-rc2-bk5.b/inc
- remove (now obsolete) write_cache() from ide-disk.c. replace calls in
ide-disk.c with calls to ide_write_cache().
drivers/ide/ide-disk.c | 27 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff -X /home/dwm/lib/ide-excludes -Nwupar
lk-2.6.11-rc2-b
- change the way that ide_write_cache controls the use of flushing
via blk_queue_ordered() to match the setting of the drive's
write cache setting. This patch leaves the idedisk_issue_flush
in ide-disk.c, but the func could be moved to ide-io to complete
the break of t
- move idedisk_issue_flush to ide-io.c supporting
ide_write_cache()
include/linux/ide.h|1 -
drivers/ide/ide-disk.c | 38 --
drivers/ide/ide-io.c | 36
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 39 deletions
Howdy!
Some IDE drives destined for use in server class or datacenter
machines will come with "write cache" disabled. With the current
code, the setting of the drive is effectively ignored, and the cache
is always enabled if the drive has cache.
It is hard to define or enable certain behaviors t
Bogdan Costescu wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
After that, I'll do a round of driver writing for Marvell and several other
boards.
Any tentative time-frame ? I'm also interested due to the presence of
this controller disguised as Adaptec AIC-8110 on my Asus mainboard.
Unfortuna
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:17:24 CST, Doug Maxey wrote:
>Howdy!
>
Whoops! looks like the script needs a little work. Disregard this one. :-/
And they all need a Signed-off-by line. sigh.
++doug
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EM
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:16:01 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy!
Hi,
> Some IDE drives destined for use in server class or datacenter
> machines will come with "write cache" disabled. With the current
> code, the setting of the drive is effectively ignored, and the cache
> is
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:11:37 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:16:01 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>We have too many config options already.
>
>Behavior should be simple:
>* no cache flushes - wcache off by default
>* cache flushes - wcache on by defa
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:06:22 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:11:37 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:16:01 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >We have too many config options already.
> >
> >Behavior should be
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:35:17 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:06:22 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:11:37 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> >On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:16:01 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:43:52 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:35:17 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:06:22 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:11:37 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wr
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:49:08 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:43:52 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:35:17 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> >On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:06:22 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:15:40 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:49:08 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:43:52 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:35:17 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wr
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:32:53 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> The datacenters/server folks that would be using these drives would
>> expect them to remain as set. I have to check, but unless something
>> has changed very recently in the kernel, setting with hdparm does not
>> "stick" in
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:54:49 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:32:53 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >> The datacenters/server folks that would be using these drives would
> >> expect them to remain as set. I have to check, but unless something
> >>
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:56:41 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:54:49 -0600, Doug Maxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:32:53 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > >> The datacenters/server folks that would be using t
Martins Krikis wrote:
Without this patch, if the BIOS of an ICH6R box has IDE set to "RAID"
mode then ata_piix will not find any SATA disks because it incorrectly
tries the legacy mode. With the patch all 4 SATA drives become visible.
I don't think it would break any other vendor's SATA, but you ca
--- Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martins Krikis wrote:
> > Without this patch, if the BIOS of an ICH6R box has IDE set to
> "RAID"
> > mode then ata_piix will not find any SATA disks because it
> incorrectly
> > tries the legacy mode. With the patch all 4 SATA drives become
> visible.
BK info and patch attached.
Please do a
bk pull bk://gkernel.bkbits.net/libata-2.6
This will update the following files:
drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
through these ChangeSets:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/01/28 1.1987)
[PATCH] fi
26 matches
Mail list logo
