- Original Message -
From: Oren Held [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ben-Nes Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: internet services - server farm
Hi,
I don't see why it should be problematic, if each daemon accesses its
own files
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 06:57:49PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2003 18:09, Amichai Rotman wrote:
First thing I like to protest ...
Seconded. However I do appreciate triggering this thread as well as
the followups about what the contents of the URL is.
And now for the
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 12:15:13AM +0200, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
Does that mean that base took 172mb? For some reason I believe it
should be much much less.
i'v put 30mb swap.
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch-preparing.en.html#s-mmhr
states 50M for a standard server. As
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 17:17, Shaul Karl wrote:
For example, would it purchase MS Word and thus motivate MS
to furthere invest in RTL languges support or would it use a new Word
processor for free but pays for the creation of a new Linux market?
This is hardly the issue. its not like
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 17:43, Oded Arbel wrote:
The only valid point here (except for the general concept which is also
very valid) is that maybe by buying MS products the government supports an
agresive monopol which counters accepted goals of compatability and
striving for an open market
well, after messing with dselect all day, i managed to operate it and install
everything under the constrains (with window maker xfree86,etc..).
However, i have one problem left. i need to translate this:
http://www.angelfire.com/nt/sucks/XF86Config.txt
to the new XF86Config-4 format.
i tried to
