On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:58:57AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Wine?
Not sure how applicable it is for our purposes (software verification
of pthreaded programs), but I'll pass it along. Thanks.
Cheers,
Muli
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
Hello,
This question is for LINUX USB gurus:
ov511 and pwc are both linux kernel usb drivers for 2 families of webcams :
ov511 chip based
webcams and philips-based webcams.
Both are part of the linux kernel (under drivers/usb)
(this is only a general description;for details see:
my os exercise?;)
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
I'm looking for a program that uses pthreads, does something
non-trivial, and has a good automated testing framework. Google is
being less than
On Monday 28 June 2004 20:19, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
I'm looking for a program that uses pthreads, does something
non-trivial, and has a good automated testing framework. Google is
being less than helpful. Any recommendations?
Well, I believe python uses pthreads, and I'm almost sure it has a
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Micha Feigin wrote:
I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
started working on it, but it seems a real pain since it doesn't seem
to be supported and compiling from source requires me to get quite a
few packages to compile.
Anyway, is it
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Micha Feigin wrote:
I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
started working on it, but it seems a real pain since it doesn't seem
to be supported and compiling from source requires me to get quite a
few packages to compile.
Anyway, is it
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:30, Micha Feigin wrote:
I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
I guess you mean a *new* version of apache, ssh etc. Otherwise you could
simply install the original RH-6.2 RPMS.
Anyway, is it possible to upgrade it in place to red-hat
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:30:21PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
started working on it, but it seems a real pain since it doesn't seem
to be supported and compiling from source requires me to get quite a
few packages to
Oron Peled wrote:
100Mb should be more than enough for many kernels + their initrd and
symtabs.
Why would anyone ever need 100 MB for a /boot partition? Mine is 16 MB - and
only 3.5 MB of it is used... Also, I don't see why the root partition would
need to be so large, as root doesn't
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
You can do a clean install . But first: is there any existing data
outside of /home ? Any simple way of backing it up and restoring?
If you have something like PartitionMagic, you can create a new partition called
/backup and store tarballs of user accounts and other needed
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:45:18PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
And you're correct here, but the obfuscation was done by the compiler,
not the programmer. Standard C++ name mangling, something about
QAction and QObject. There is a nifty utility to undo the mangling and
give you the function's
Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:23,Ilya Konstantinov:
1. You having an old version of Qt.
Solution: Upgrade your Qt to the version which Skype claims it requires.
2. You having a version of Qt compiled with an old compiler (g++
pre-3.0). You can find it out by doing:
objdump -T
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 19:38, William Sherwin wrote:
Oron Peled wrote:
100Mb should be more than enough for many kernels + their initrd and
symtabs.
Why would anyone ever need 100 MB for a /boot partition? Mine is 16 MB -
and only 3.5 MB of it is used...
Indeed ~20MB should be safe,
I hate to mention it but,
LaTex was created for this. Lyx should give you what you need. I will
warn you that it is a paradine switch.
good luck
Aaron
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in
Yosef Meller wrote:
I'm currently using Open-Office whenever I can, but I am still stuck
with QText on Windows for my homework, and the headache is because my
powerfull formula editor (MathType 5.0 - big brother of Equation Editor
3.0) does not have a good replacement in Open Office. Truth is,
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:11:15PM +0300, Yosef Meller wrote:
I'm currently using Open-Office whenever I can, but I am still stuck
with QText on Windows for my homework, and the headache is because my
powerfull formula editor (MathType 5.0 - big brother of Equation Editor
3.0) does not have
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:11:15PM +0300, Yosef Meller wrote:
I'm currently using Open-Office whenever I can, but I am still stuck
with QText on Windows for my homework, and the headache is because my
powerfull formula editor (MathType 5.0 - big brother of Equation Editor
3.0) does not have
17 matches
Mail list logo
