Re: cleaning memory.

2005-04-28 Thread Micha Feigin
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:41:46 +0200 Tzahi Fadida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My next move was to try a big allocation like cacheman in windows to free memory right now. I don't think that would work since the kernel allocates big memory chunks sort of on loan. You can allocate more memory then you

Service console redirection

2005-04-28 Thread Gil Freund
Hi, I have Debian installed on two servers, and IBM Netfinity 5000 and an HP Proliant DL380, and I would like to make the most of their service ports. The DL380 has the service port redirected to ttyS0. I can see the the BIOS boot sequence via minicom, and if I set up GRUB and inittab correctly

VMware GSX host file systems

2005-04-28 Thread Gil Freund
Hi, I am planning on deploying VMware GSX on a Debian system. While I am happy with ReiserFS for most FS needs, I am wondering if it would make sense to user XFS or JFS for the VM image partition, as it seems both perform better with large files. On a side note, can anyone share information on

RE: VMware GSX host file systems

2005-04-28 Thread Tzahi Fadida
It is my understanding that XFS mechanism do a lot of caching to memory to achieve good performance. This is a consideration between stability in the case of catastrophy to performance. Regards, tzahi. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: VMware GSX host file systems

2005-04-28 Thread Gil Freund
On 4/28/05, Tzahi Fadida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is my understanding that XFS mechanism do a lot of caching to memory to achieve good performance. This is a consideration between stability in the case of catastrophy to performance. 2 x PSU, 2 x UPS and a generator should take care of power

Re: VMware GSX host file systems

2005-04-28 Thread Marc A. Volovic
XFS is optimized for sequential access performance. It's work with small files (especially MANY small files) is dismall. I suggest piloting JFS. M Gil Freund wrote: On 4/28/05, Tzahi Fadida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is my understanding that XFS mechanism do a lot of caching to memory to

Re: VMware GSX host file systems

2005-04-28 Thread Gil Freund
On 4/28/05, Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: XFS is optimized for sequential access performance. Just to clarify, do you mean batch type processing? It's work with small files (especially MANY small files) is dismall. Most of the VM disk files are in the 4-10 GB range, inside there

Re: VMware GSX host file systems

2005-04-28 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 10:52:20PM +0300, Gil Freund wrote: On 4/28/05, Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: XFS is optimized for sequential access performance. Just to clarify, do you mean batch type processing? Without knowing, I guess Marc meant audio/video, which is a large part of

RE: cleaning memory.

2005-04-28 Thread Tzahi Fadida
To answer the why question, its two fold. The first and most impotrant is the debugging issue. Sometimes problems do not reveal themselves but for the most stressfull conditions. The second is for experiments under different conditions to see how it perfoms. i.e. benchmarks. I allocated 520 mb of

Re: VMware GSX host file systems

2005-04-28 Thread guy keren
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Gil Freund wrote: On a side note, can anyone share information on performance of the ESX product vs. the GSX product on Linux? Aside from memory over-committing, most ESX functions (such as vMotion) are not relevant to me. the ESX product does not work on linux. it

Re: cleaning memory.

2005-04-28 Thread guy keren
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Tzahi Fadida wrote: I am using the /proc/sys/vm/block_dump to see reading and writing of blocks for a process. I am looking at the postgresql database process. When I run a query for the first time I see a lot of READs. but the next times I run it, it doesn't show

Re: VMware GSX host file systems

2005-04-28 Thread Marc A. Volovic
Yedidyah Bar-David wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 10:52:20PM +0300, Gil Freund wrote: Just to clarify, do you mean batch type processing? Without knowing, I guess Marc meant audio/video, which is a large part of SGI's users. Yes, indeed. Streaming, mainly video. Worst performance was on

RE: cleaning memory.

2005-04-28 Thread Tzahi Fadida
I can't reboot or unmount in the middle of the query. option 3 sounds good. its for debugging and benchmarking. but not just, I am doing only sequential access on some of my algorithms and OScaching is useless and it seems I can't use huge relations to defeat the cache replacement (since the

Re: cleaning memory.

2005-04-28 Thread Amos Shapira
On 4/29/05, Tzahi Fadida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did not completely understand you.Postgresql only uses regular files as its db. Do you suggest somethinglike mountingan image file that supports RW? can you give an example? I suspect an image file on top of a filesystem won't help here since the