Hi all!
The Tel Aviv Linux club will gather again on Sunday, 21-October-2007 to have a
collective hacking session. What we do is work together on resolving bugs in
an open source project. This time it will be Archive::Zip (
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Archive-Zip/ ).
More information can be
Hi all!
The Tel Aviv Linux club will gather again on Sunday, 21-October-2007 to have a
collective hacking session. What we do is work together on resolving bugs in
an open source project. This time it will be Archive::Zip (
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Archive-Zip/ ).
We'll meet at 18:30 in
On 13/10/2007, Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, October 11, 2007 12:04 pm, Amos Shapira wrote:
Also - is there a way to tell Firefox OK, pull that bloody flash but
put
a black/white/aqua-marine patch on top of it so it doesn't pop in front
of
me?
If all you are interested
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 10:52 +, Amos Shapira wrote:
I tried a few of them (AdBlockPlus, AdBlock, and some FlashBlock or
another) but it looks like somehow when I block flash the regular part
of the site just doesn't come up.
Maybe it's because of the long distance of my connection. I
Hello All,
I am Guy Sheffer from the Jerusalem Linux Club (JLC).
Our club is now in reparation for an installation party around November.
We are planning to install Debian off our install server and Ubuntu off
CDs.
However, when we made contact with Canonical to use ShipIt, they only
offer
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 20:14 -0400, Guy Sheffer wrote:
I am Guy Sheffer from the Jerusalem Linux Club (JLC).
Our club is now in reparation for an installation party around November.
However, when we made contact with Canonical to use ShipIt, they only
offer Ubuntu 6 and not 7.
If I understand
Hello Miki,
I routinely ssh to a server in USA using 012.net.il, and the performance
is much better than the one reported by you even when it is worse than
usual.
HOWEVER: 012.net.il cannot be that much different from Netvision and
Bezeqint, so you may want to look for configuration problems in
Hi,
I'm working on a project that require me to ssh to a US server.
The problem is that through Netvision Bezeqint the performance are
horrible ( though Bezeqint its almost always faster then Netvision )
I don't mind paying double for a better connection. Waiting 10 sec to see
something happens
I'm using Netvision and BezeqInt with a server hosted in the
Connecticut, USA and while its not the fastest connection ever, its
quite reasonably responsive most times.
Your problems seems to be a configuration issue with your hosting
provider.
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 16:20 +0200, Michael Ben-Nes
Hi,
I don't use Netvision (I use Barak, though it'll be the same thing
eventually). But I've not seen ten-second lags to anywhere for a long
time, certainly it's been a long time since I saw lag like that when there
were no known problems.
I regularly SSH to two servers in California for
What can be the problem?
Its an ordinary 64bit RedHat 5 on a new dell hardware.
I ssh using blowfish. In the morning the speed is lame but acceptable. in
the evening I can even wait 15 sec for a response.
Checked ping with no significant packet loss.
Traceroute is around 300 for both ISP ( upload
IF it's connected to a Cisco switch, I would turn off autonegotiation in the
switch and force the same connection paramters on the Cisco and on the Linux
(with ethtool) - for example to 100Mbit/s Full Duplex - of course be sure to
force to the right thing before the Cisco configuration is
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 17:31 +0200, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
What can be the problem?
Its an ordinary 64bit RedHat 5 on a new dell hardware.
I ssh using blowfish. In the morning the speed is lame but acceptable.
in the evening I can even wait 15 sec for a response.
Checked ping with no
I had a similar experience
most of our ISP's are tagging our traffic, you could pay additionally for an
qos ip address, which will result without packet drops.
I had VoIP trunk (which is very sensitive for packet lost), using Netvision,
Barak etc I had about 12-25% packet drop, when
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 06:49:51PM +0200, Ohad Levy wrote:
I had a lot of discussions with netvision support, and at the end of the day
they admitted that non tagged traffic get really shaped (for non-standard
ports)...
I wonder if they were being honest with you. I have a VoIP line from
Hi,
I'm having some problems with my current network card and my friend gave me
a Realtek 8139 card to install until I'm buying a new one. Anyway...before
I'm installing the Realtek card, I've 2 questions (it's urgent):
1. Do you know if the Realtek 8139 drivers are already embedded in Fedora
Core
Eran Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Do you know if the Realtek 8139 drivers are already embedded in
Fedora Core kernel?
Yes.
2. Can someone help me and write in a few points how do I make it
work?
Have you tried sticking it in and rebooting?
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL
Hello to all! First post, and it figures it's off-topic.
I'm looking for a 1U server to buy. It doesn't need to be current
technology, a Pentium 3 or higher will do just fine.
Any ideas? To keep it on-topic, it will be running debian and
asterisk, connecting by IAX2 trunk to a server in
Very well supported.
On Monday, 15 October 2007 20:32:55 Eran Levy wrote:
Hi,
I'm having some problems with my current network card and my friend gave me
a Realtek 8139 card to install until I'm buying a new one. Anyway...before
I'm installing the Realtek card, I've 2 questions (it's urgent):
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:32:55PM +0200, Eran Levy wrote:
Hi,
I'm having some problems with my current network card and my friend gave me
a Realtek 8139 card to install until I'm buying a new one. Anyway...before
I'm installing the Realtek card, I've 2 questions (it's urgent):
1. Do you know
I asked the questions before installing the card, so thats why I'm answering
in delay... guys you answered fast and I really appreciate it.
It seems like its working. I will try to work with it and if I will get into
any problems, I will call for help :)
Really appreciate your help,
Eran
On
On 15/10/2007, Ofek Doron [Ofek BIZ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amos,
1. you can find a prepared xen images ( http://jailtime.org/) and use it.
Thanks. I've already found this web site but it doesn't have FC7.
2. when i need a xen guest, if I already have a similar system , I use
tar
On Monday, 15 בOctober 2007 16:20, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a project that require me to ssh to a US server.
The problem is that through Netvision Bezeqint the performance are
horrible ( though Bezeqint its almost always faster then Netvision )
I don't mind paying double
On 16/10/2007, Michael Ben-Nes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What can be the problem?
Its an ordinary 64bit RedHat 5 on a new dell hardware.
I ssh using blowfish. In the morning the speed is lame but acceptable. in
the evening I can even wait 15 sec for a response.
Checked ping with no
they *should* work out of the box without any driver related issues.
just configure the network options and that's it. if you're using the
fedora gui, it's really easy, if not, use system-config-network
On 10/15/07, Eran Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm having some problems with my current
Oded Arbel wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 20:14 -0400, Guy Sheffer wrote:
I am Guy Sheffer from the Jerusalem Linux Club (JLC).
Our club is now in reparation for an installation party around November.
However, when we made contact with Canonical to use ShipIt, they only
offer
On Monday, 15 בOctober 2007 16:20, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a project that require me to ssh to a US server.
The problem is that through Netvision Bezeqint the performance are
horrible ( though Bezeqint its almost always faster then Netvision )
I don't mind paying double
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Lior Kaplan wrote:
Shlomo Solomon wrote:
OK - is it fixable?
Already fixed in Apache 2.2.X series, but RHEL/Centos 4.4 comes with
2.0.x. So the bug will be fixed in the next OS upgrade for the mirror
server.
As I'm not the sysadmin, I can't tell when would
28 matches
Mail list logo
