Re: [ OT] Nostalgia is not what it used to be (was: Petition to ask MainConcept)

2007-10-03 Thread Julian Daich
On Thursday 04 October 2007 05:41:15 Amos Shapira wrote: > My personal first *owned* was a ZX Spectrum 48k (and not long ago I threw > away the book of the source code of its ROM). > > --Amos I just installed Spectmu on my laptop. http://www.inf.bme.hu/~mszeredi/spectemu/spectemu.html Now, I'm loo

Re: [ OT] Nostalgia is not what it used to be

2007-10-03 Thread Julian Daich
On Thursday 04 October 2007 06:24:22 Shachar Shemesh wrote: > > Actually it was not the case for all of those little boxes. Is the reason > > why I then decided to have a ZX Spectrum :) > > > >   > > Exqueeze me? Are you saying you could program the graphic characters > without doing any direct mem

Re: [ OT] Nostalgia is not what it used to be

2007-10-03 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Julian Daich wrote: > On Wednesday 03 October 2007 10:27:32 Amos Shapira wrote: > >> You needed "poke" and "pick"(sp?) to do ANYTHING on those boxes, as far as >> I remember ( a good intro to computer hardware, as you learned about CPU >> port numbers in no time :). >> > > Actually it was n

Re: [ OT] Nostalgia is not what it used to be (was: Petition to ask MainConcept)

2007-10-03 Thread Amos Shapira
On 03/10/2007, Julian Daich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 03 October 2007 10:27:32 Amos Shapira wrote: > > You needed "poke" and "pick"(sp?) to do ANYTHING on those boxes, as far > as > > I remember ( a good intro to computer hardware, as you learned about CPU > > port numbers in no t

Re: [ OT] Nostalgia is not what it used to be (was: Petition to ask MainConcept)

2007-10-03 Thread Julian Daich
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 10:27:32 Amos Shapira wrote: > You needed "poke" and "pick"(sp?) to do ANYTHING on those boxes, as far as > I remember ( a good intro to computer hardware, as you learned about CPU > port numbers in no time :). Actually it was not the case for all of those little boxes

Re: [ OT] Nostalgia is not what it used to be (was: Petition to ask MainConcept)

2007-10-03 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
"Amos Shapira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As for Shachar's comment that he doesn't think that the AppleWorks > was writen entirely in assembler (I didn't follow the entire > discussion but that's the gist I got from this part of it) - > personally I'd expect it was actually writen in Assembler.

Re: [ OT] Nostalgia is not what it used to be (was: Petition to ask MainConcept)

2007-10-03 Thread Amos Shapira
On 03/10/2007, Julian Daich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 03 October 2007 09:52:34 Michael Tewner wrote: > > I remember when the C128 came out with Sprites - efficient basic > > animations. Ah... Those were the days. > > Sprtites( 2D hardware acceleration) were also included in the C6

Re:[ OT] Nostalgia is not what it used to be (was: Petition to ask MainConcept)

2007-10-03 Thread Julian Daich
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 09:52:34 Michael Tewner wrote: > I remember when the C128 came out with Sprites - efficient basic > animations. Ah... Those were the days. Sprtites( 2D hardware acceleration) were also included in the C64 and its 1980's predecessor Vic20. However there were no BASIC n