On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 09:14:31PM +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Shaul Karl wrote:
What do you mean by different subnet? What are the other options, why
he has to be shamed if this is not his setup and why would someone
choose the wrong setup?
IP addressing and routing is by
My home network consists of 3-4 computers and an ADSL modem all
connected one to the other with cross RJ45 cables, with no hubs.
This was simplest at each point in time (it started with two computers
and one cable and at each point I had enough network cards) but it's
somewhat inconvenient because
On Thursday 24 July 2003 16:45, Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
rant about non-crossed cables
I recall that some new cards autodetect polarity. Does this refer
to polarity on each pair or also to Tx/Rx autodetection? Is there a
chance that it will work with crossed cables anyway?
I never heard
Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
My home network consists of 3-4 computers and an ADSL modem all
connected one to the other with cross RJ45 cables, with no hubs.
This was simplest at each point in time (it started with two computers
and one cable and at each point I had enough network cards) but it's
Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
My home network consists of 3-4 computers and an ADSL modem all
connected one to the other with cross RJ45 cables, with no hubs.
This was simplest at each point in time (it started with two computers
and one cable and at each point I had enough network cards) but it's
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote on 2003-07-24:
Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
My home network consists of 3-4 computers and an ADSL modem all
connected one to the other with cross RJ45 cables, with no hubs.
This was simplest at each point in time (it started with two computers
and one cable and at each
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:26:19PM +0300, Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
Actualy the main issue is computer 3 which holds the connection to the
ADSL modem now; I rarely use this computer but I frequenltly use the
net so it's up most of the day. I'd like to put a hub in front of
Is it worth the
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 05:15:00PM +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
You could also do it wit some routing tables, for example, I assume that
you have network segment on a different subnet (shame on you if you didn't):
What do you mean by different subnet? What are the other options,
On 2003/07/24 20:35, Shaul Karl wrote:
I believe that straight through cables are simpler to produce: you
literally push the cable into the RJ connector and press it.
Hardly. If you just cut a round cable and press the wires into a flat
array, you get them in nearly random order. Nearly
Shaul Karl wrote:
What do you mean by different subnet? What are the other options, why
he has to be shamed if this is not his setup and why would someone
choose the wrong setup?
IP addressing and routing is by subnet, as in subnet mask. If you AND
the IP address (as a 32 bit unsigned
Shaul Karl wrote on 2003-07-24:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:26:19PM +0300, Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
Actualy the main issue is computer 3 which holds the connection to the
ADSL modem now; I rarely use this computer but I frequenltly use the
net so it's up most of the day. I'd like to put a
Take a look here for the background:
http://www.netguru.co.il/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=articlesid=19
The cable issue is mostly historical. All network equipment is devided
into 2 categories:
- DTE (Data Terminal Equipment: NICs)
- DCE (Data Communication Equipment: hubs, switches,
12 matches
Mail list logo
