Quoth Tzafrir Cohen on Tue, Sep 02, 2003:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:02:21PM -0400, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> > Try to do "| sed s/../foo/" and see what happens -- you will
> > get "fooM", where M is mem sofit.
>
> I'm not exactly sure what should happen. On a redhat 9.0 computer I get
> diffe
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:02:21PM -0400, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth Tzafrir Cohen on Mon, Sep 01, 2003:
> > A small test (I hope you won't mind the Hebrew):
>
> [snip -- can't do Hebrew ATM]
>
> > It should have given the same output. Indeed the range between the Yud
> > and the Tav worked, s
Quoth Tzafrir Cohen on Mon, Sep 01, 2003:
> A small test (I hope you won't mind the Hebrew):
[snip -- can't do Hebrew ATM]
> It should have given the same output. Indeed the range between the Yud
> and the Tav worked, so the regex worked on multibyte Hebrew chars.
No it didn't. It replaced vav,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 11:11:16AM -0400, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth Tzafrir Cohen on Sun, Aug 31, 2003:
> > Use vim 6. Use dtterm or uxterm. Or build mlterm on your own. With
> > dtterm you have to use a UTF-8 locale (probably en_US-UTF-8). This is
> > something that should work on a standard s
Quoth Tzafrir Cohen on Sun, Aug 31, 2003:
> Use vim 6. Use dtterm or uxterm. Or build mlterm on your own. With
> dtterm you have to use a UTF-8 locale (probably en_US-UTF-8). This is
> something that should work on a standard solaris 8/9 desktop.
Yes, I'm aware that all this exists. Still, does s
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 01:34:35AM -0400, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth nadav mavor on Sat, Aug 30, 2003:
> > áâãåì àðé ðéîðò îìøãú ìøîä äæàú àáì äôòí àðé
> > àçøåâ îîðäâé
>
> Right...
>
> > à äúéòåï ëé éù ëàìä ùìà éëåìéí ìäú÷éï ì÷åç
> > ãåàø ùúåîê áàéáøéú äåà îâåçê
> > åçñø éñåã
>
> Except s
Quoth Tzafrir Cohen on Sun, Aug 31, 2003:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 01:34:35AM -0400, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> > Except some of us use tty-based mailers (for various reasons),
> > and UNIX does not support Unicode natively yet. And support for
> > Hebrew in UNIX is much less advanced than support f
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 06:52:11AM -0400, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth Tzafrir Cohen on Sun, Aug 31, 2003:
> > On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 01:34:35AM -0400, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> > > Except some of us use tty-based mailers (for various reasons),
> > > and UNIX does not support Unicode natively yet.
Quoth nadav mavor on Sat, Aug 30, 2003:
> áâãåì àðé ðéîðò îìøãú ìøîä äæàú àáì äôòí àðé àçøåâ îîðäâé
Right...
> à äúéòåï ëé éù ëàìä ùìà éëåìéí ìäú÷éï ì÷åç ãåàø ùúåîê áàéáøéú äåà îâåçê
> åçñø éñåã
Except some of us use tty-based mailers (for various reasons),
and UNIX does not support Unicode nat
