Re: are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-03-15 Thread linux-il
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 08:54:47PM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote: I think that there is some truth in saying that currently, Hamakor distribution mirrors are more declaration of intents then fully usable mirrors. It could be that the reasons for that are beyond Hamakor control. Is it wise to have

Re: are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-03-13 Thread Shaul Karl
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 02:48:05PM +0200, Herouth Maoz wrote: I switched to an official Mandrake mirror (in Europe) and I no longer trust the IGLU mirror. I think that there is some truth in saying that currently, Hamakor distribution mirrors are more

Re: are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-03-07 Thread Shlomo Solomon
write this, Mandrake Update is working. Even with an ADSL connection, it's a bit slow, but at least it's getting the job done. So, in answer to my own question, the local MDK 9.2 mirrors are not up to date. On Friday 20 February 2004 15:06, Shaul Karl wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:02:05PM

Re: are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-03-07 Thread Diego Iastrubni
write this, Mandrake Update is working. Even with an ADSL connection, it's a bit slow, but at least it's getting the job done. So, in answer to my own question, the local MDK 9.2 mirrors are not up to date. On Friday 20 February 2004 15:06, Shaul Karl wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:02

Re: are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-03-07 Thread Shlomo Solomon
of 219 Mb) that needed updating. As I write this, Mandrake Update is working. Even with an ADSL connection, it's a bit slow, but at least it's getting the job done. So, in answer to my own question, the local MDK 9.2 mirrors are not up to date. On Friday 20 February 2004 15:06, Shaul

Re: are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-03-07 Thread Herouth Maoz
Quoting Diego Iastrubni [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just for your information, the release cycle (+updates) of mdk92 is over. this means no more updates for you mister :) Excuse me? MDK 9.2 reached end-of-life? I don't think so. There are still updates for 9.1. Security updates still come in until

Re: are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-03-07 Thread Diego Iastrubni
On Sunday 07 March 2004 14:48, Herouth Maoz wrote: Quoting Diego Iastrubni [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just for your information, the release cycle (+updates) of mdk92 is over. this means no more updates for you mister :) Excuse me? MDK 9.2 reached end-of-life? I don't think so. There are still

Re: are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-03-07 Thread Shlomo Solomon
On Sunday 07 March 2004 14:54, Diego Iastrubni wrote: as far as i know, the EOL of the desktop products is about 6 months. It can be verified quite easily, but I am too lazy :) I checked and I'm happy to say you're wrong ;-) As you can see base support of MDK9.0 ends soon, but 9.2 is still

Re: are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-03-07 Thread Shlomo Solomon
On Sunday 07 March 2004 16:47, Diego Iastrubni wrote: I wonder what desktop updates means... Sorry - I should have included the following explanation: With the release of Mandrake Linux 9.1, a lifetime cycle that customers can easily anticipate was put into place. MandrakeSoft will provide 12

Re: are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-03-07 Thread Diego Iastrubni
On Sunday 07 March 2004 16:59, Shlomo Solomon wrote: On Sunday 07 March 2004 16:47, Diego Iastrubni wrote: I wonder what desktop updates means... Sorry - I should have included the following explanation: With the release of Mandrake Linux 9.1, a lifetime cycle that customers can easily

are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-02-20 Thread Shlomo Solomon
I regularly (about once a week) use Mandrake update to keep all my RPMs current. For at least a month, I haven't seen any RPMs being updated and that's unusual - there are usualy some updates almost every time I run update. Can anyone tell me if the mirrors I've been using are up to date? The

Re: are MDK 9.2 update mirrors up to date?

2004-02-20 Thread Shaul Karl
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:02:05PM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote: I regularly (about once a week) use Mandrake update to keep all my RPMs current. For at least a month, I haven't seen any RPMs being updated and that's unusual - there are usualy some updates almost every time I run update. Can

Printing on MDK 9.2

2003-12-31 Thread Amichai Rotman
Hi All, I have a Cannon BJ-220 and MDK 9.2 installed using the CUPS server. My printer shows up correctly, but when trying to print the Test Page, all I get it pages and pages of gibberish... I don't have enough paper and ink for a trial and error process... I don't print that much, but I

Re: Hebrew and MDK 9.2

2003-12-05 Thread Dotan Mazor
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 20:28:52 +0200, Diego Iastrubni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oded Arbel wrote: 02 2003, 19:23,Amichai Rotman: Hi All, I Have downloaded the ISOs of MDK 9.2 shortly after it became available. I installed the system and all seemed fine. I have noticed the Hebrew

Hebrew and MDK 9.2

2003-12-02 Thread Amichai Rotman
Hi All, I Have downloaded the ISOs of MDK 9.2 shortly after it became available. I installed the system and all seemed fine. I have noticed the Hebrew support files are missing. For instance, the Hebrew files for Open Office 1.1.0RC4, The KOffice Hebrew files and more. All Esperanto files

Re: Hebrew and MDK 9.2

2003-12-02 Thread Oded Arbel
02 2003, 19:23,Amichai Rotman: Hi All, I Have downloaded the ISOs of MDK 9.2 shortly after it became available. I installed the system and all seemed fine. I have noticed the Hebrew support files are missing. For instance, the Hebrew files for Open Office 1.1.0RC4, The KOffice

Re: Hebrew and MDK 9.2

2003-12-02 Thread Diego Iastrubni
Oded Arbel wrote: 02 2003, 19:23,Amichai Rotman: Hi All, I Have downloaded the ISOs of MDK 9.2 shortly after it became available. I installed the system and all seemed fine. I have noticed the Hebrew support files are missing. For instance, the Hebrew files for Open Office 1.1.0RC4

Re: MDK 9.2

2003-11-22 Thread Dovix
On Monday 17 November 2003 21:28, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Is there a kind soul here that wishes to contribute ISO images of Mandrake 9.2 that will not harm unpatched LG drives? Ehad 9.2b is available for Download. It includes the patched kernel released by Mandrake shortly after the incident and

Re: MDK 9.2

2003-11-18 Thread Diego Iastrubni
, 17 2003, 23:28,Tzafrir Cohen: On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:24:39PM +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote: Tzafrir, no it's the SAME thing I got last month. the funniest thing is that they freezed cooker for 2-3 week for bug hunting. nothing was committed to cooker in those weeks, and 1.5

Re: MDK 9.2

2003-11-18 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:07:19PM +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote: , 17 2003, 23:28,Tzafrir Cohen: On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:24:39PM +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote: Tzafrir, no it's the SAME thing I got last month. the funniest thing is that they freezed cooker for 2-3 week for bug

Re: MDK 9.2

2003-11-17 Thread Diego Iastrubni
There are some other problems: 1) sometimes if you update the kernel (to 2.4.22-21mdk for example) ext3 root partitions cannot be mounted 2) if you press the magic button, and then reboot, it will ask you to run fsck, even if you have an ext3 partition. do not press y, since it's done without

Re: MDK 9.2

2003-11-17 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:24:39PM +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote: Tzafrir, no it's the SAME thing I got last month. the funniest thing is that they freezed cooker for 2-3 week for bug hunting. nothing was committed to cooker in those weeks, and 1.5 week after 9.2 was released to club

MDK 9.2

2003-11-16 Thread Shlomo Solomon
Has anyone on the list installed/upgraded to MDK 9.2? If so, any comments, problems, suggestions? TIA -- Shlomo Solomon http://come.to/shlomo.solomon Sent by KMail (KDE 3.1) on LINUX Mandrake 9.1 = To unsubscribe, send mail

Re: MDK 9.2

2003-11-16 Thread Oded Arbel
16 2003, 18:45,Shlomo Solomon: Has anyone on the list installed/upgraded to MDK 9.2? If so, any comments, problems, suggestions? I've put it on my laptop. works fine. LVM support in DiskDrake (had it on 9.1, but it had some problems. now it works). good power managment, ACPI finally

Re: MDK 9.2

2003-11-16 Thread Dovix
://www.whatsup.org.il/index.php?name=PNphpBB2file=viewtopict=6530 --- Shlomo Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone on the list installed/upgraded to MDK 9.2? If so, any comments, problems, suggestions? TIA -- Shlomo Solomon http://come.to/shlomo.solomon Sent by KMail (KDE 3.1) on LINUX

Re: MDK 9.2

2003-11-16 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:22:56AM -0800, Dovix wrote: I use 9.2 for over a month. Overall, it feels more robust than 9.1. I no longer experience any freezes, crashes etc. There are no major new features, but the increased stability and maturity is a great bonus. If you have LG CD-ROM, make

Re: MDK 9.2

2003-11-16 Thread Shlomo Solomon
On Monday 17 November 2003 03:34, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:22:56AM -0800, Dovix wrote: I use 9.2 for over a month. Overall, it feels more robust than 9.1. I no longer experience any freezes, crashes etc. There are no major new features, but the increased stability