Guy Teverovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It can be setup in ClearCase in 5 minutes. Create a bunch of dynamic
views each with it's own brunch and script the hourly/nightly builds
inside each view. Couple of one-liners will suffice.
I wasn't clear. All the work was scripting builds. No CVS
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 22:00, Shachar Tal wrote:
snip..
And how much did the time it took you to learn to do that, cost your
company?
One 2-day course at Rational and a crashburn accelerated course of
migrating Windows VOBs from NT domain to another AD domain, while
preserving all the
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 11:33, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Guy Teverovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It can be setup in ClearCase in 5 minutes. Create a bunch of dynamic
views each with it's own brunch and script the hourly/nightly builds
inside each view. Couple of one-liners will suffice.
I
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 04:22, Guy Teverovsky wrote:
CVS is not: version control mechanism which is content aware and action
driven. It lacks inline documentation features and code maintenance
(bugs, features) tracking...
Actually, CVS is a version control system and *that's it*.
To: Guy Teverovsky; Linux-IL mailing list
Cc: Tal, Shachar; 'Shachar Shemesh'
Subject: Re: Version control (was: Re: What's wrong with this code?)
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 04:22, Guy Teverovsky wrote:
CVS is not: version control mechanism which is content
aware and action
driven
gone of business a few years
ago.
Shachar Tal
Verint Systems
-Original Message-
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Guy Teverovsky; Linux-IL mailing list
Cc: Tal, Shachar; 'Shachar Shemesh'
Subject: Re: Version control (was: Re
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003, Tal, Shachar wrote about RE: Version control (was: Re: What's
wrong with this code?):
If only the small integratable single-minded tools were *easily*
integratable, I suspect Rational would have gone of business a few years
ago.
Why do they need to be easily integratable
and implement your own.
Shachar Tal
Verint Systems
-Original Message-
From: Boaz Rymland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 4:40 PM
To: Linux-IL mailing list
Subject: Re: Version control (was: Re: What's wrong with this code?)
I think this is exactly
PM
To: Tal, Shachar
Cc: 'Gilad Ben-Yossef'; Guy Teverovsky; Linux-IL mailing
list; 'Shachar Shemesh'
Subject: Re: Version control (was: Re: What's wrong with this code?)
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003, Tal, Shachar wrote about RE: Version
control (was: Re: What's wrong with this code?):
If only
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Easily doesn't mean a sysadmin for a day. Easily means not having to
invest considerable man-power into making cvs and diff and branches
and IDE integration and nightly building and whatnot work
together. YMMV for the definition of considerable.
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 18:58, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Easily doesn't mean a sysadmin for a day. Easily means not having to
invest considerable man-power into making cvs and diff and branches
and IDE integration and nightly building and whatnot work
Guy Teverovsky wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 18:58, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Easily doesn't mean a sysadmin for a day. Easily means not having to
invest considerable man-power into making cvs and diff and branches
and IDE integration and nightly
12 matches
Mail list logo
