> " " == Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about adding a test in invalidate_inode_pages() like
> /* We cannot invalidate a locked page */ if
> (TryLockPage(page))
> continue;
> + /* We cannot invalidate a page that
> " " == Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> invalidate_inode_pages nfs_zap_caches nfs_lock fcntl_setlk
> do_fcntl sys_fcntl
> So I guess that NFS locking is really bad if the region is
> mmapped!
Yep, but that's a symptom, not a cause. We want to be able to run
> " " == Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Indeed. page->mapping is set to NULL in two places, one in
> __remove_inode_pages() and the other one in the swap code after
> we've checked that it was NULL. I hadn't found the particular
> call trace that caused us
> " " == David S Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, judging by the trace you provided Russell, I'd say
> this is some peculiarity with NFS silly rename handling, and
> it'd be best to look for the bug in that code (early inode
> reference loss, for example?)
Linus Torvalds writes:
> Can you get a full stack trace?
filemap_write_page
filemap_sync
filemap_unmap
do_munmap
sys_munmap
> How about adding a test in invalidate_inode_pages() like
(Added, along with a call to drop a stack trace out).
Yes, this does stop the problem in filemap_write_page.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 10:20:25PM +0200, Urban Widmark wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > Hello all. The attached patch changes the behavoir of fs/nls/Config.in from:
> > CONFIG_SMB_FS != n to CONFIG_INET = y && CONFIG_SMB_FS != n. This is neeed
> > because if CONFIG_INET
In article <8snvuj$1l0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Hmm.. Looks like page->mapping was cleared by truncate_inode_pages()
>when the inode was free'd, and there was still write-back activity on
>one of the pages in question.
Looking some more, the fact that the
Hi,
I maintain a small site with a couple of linux boxes that run 2.2.16 and
cfengine 1.5.4. Recently, I changed the configuration and ever since,
three of the machines randomly have Postfix' smtp process killed by
SIGSEGV. The problem only shows up when cfengine is active.
My kernels have
> I have a question about the time-slice of linux, how do I know it, or how
> can I test it?
First look for the (platform-specific) definition of HZ in
include/asm/param.h. This is how many timer interrups you get per second (eg
on i386 it's 100). Then look at include/linux/sched.h for the
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Yourst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The following bug was just logged for 2.4.0-test10-pre4.
Just remove the two BUG() tests at lines 101-103 in mm/vmscan.c: they
seem to be bogus, and what they test for isn't actually a bug at all..
Linus
-
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> " " == Petr Vandrovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You do not have to use NFS - look for my postings with
> > 'page->mapping == NULL' in archive. Your code uses shared mmap,
> > 'page->isn't
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Petr Vandrovec writes:
>> ... or from sys_exit() if you forget to unmap. Or from anywhere if
>> swapping code decides to swap such page. I'm trying to hunt it down
>> for more than month, but I have no idea what's wrong. In
From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:07:55 +0100 (BST)
Trond Myklebust writes:
> It's probably particularly nasty under NFS because of
> invalidate_inode_pages(). The latter empties the page cache whenever
> we can no longer trust it and calls
Trond Myklebust writes:
> It's probably particularly nasty under NFS because of
> invalidate_inode_pages(). The latter empties the page cache whenever
> we can no longer trust it and calls remove_inode_page() on every
> unlocked page. It won't care whether the page is mmapped or not.
>
> My
> " " == Petr Vandrovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You do not have to use NFS - look for my postings with
> 'page->mapping == NULL' in archive. Your code uses shared mmap,
> 'page->isn't
> it? Probably shared by couple of processes.
It's probably particularly nasty
Roger Larsson writes:
> Will it work correctly if 4. is done before 3. (even before 2?)
> Is it legal/good practice to unmap the file after closing it?
> (Since the sharing needs the fd to mmap it)
Dunno, haven't tried that yet. I'll have a go tomorrow, but I think
it'll work correctly. I'll
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:16:14PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > solution is really elegant. Excluding all the debug code and assertions
> > I stick in there, the guts of via audio mmap support went from ~50 lines
> > to ~10.
>
> Was it 50 lines with
Russell King wrote:
>
> Petr Vandrovec writes:
> > ... or from sys_exit() if you forget to unmap. Or from anywhere if
> > swapping code decides to swap such page. I'm trying to hunt it down
> > for more than month, but I have no idea what's wrong. In my case
> > way to trigger bug is:
>
> I
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:16:14PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > solution is really elegant. Excluding all the debug code and assertions
> > I stick in there, the guts of via audio mmap support went from ~50 lines
> > to ~10.
>
> Was it 50 lines
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> I stole the last two lines from drivers/char/drm/vm.c, which might need
> to be fixed up also.. He uses the vm_flags above and nevers calls
> get_page, at the very least.
The DRM code does
atomic_inc(_to_page(physical)->count);
which is
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:16:14PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> solution is really elegant. Excluding all the debug code and assertions
> I stick in there, the guts of via audio mmap support went from ~50 lines
> to ~10.
Was it 50 lines with remap_page_range?
Which is the advantage of
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> I don't get it.
> If you say that IDE disables interrupts during init, does that mean that
> it disables _all_ interrupts or just that you mask the IDE IRQs?
Yes, it is called probing.
You issue a command to the channel and hope that something
Hi !
One kernel oops with 2.4.0-pre4 :
ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.4.0-test10. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test10 (specified)
-m /usr/src/linux/System.map (default)
Oct 19 23:40:25 tron kernel:
Updated per Andrea's suggestions...
--
Jeff Garzik| The difference between laziness and
Building 1024 | prioritization is the end result.
MandrakeSoft |
diff -urN vanilla/linux-2.4.0-test10-pre4/drivers/char/pc_keyb.c
The following bug was just logged for 2.4.0-test10-pre4.
The machine was recompiling glibc (off a ReiserFS 3.6.18 filesystem)
and X was just running a screensaver at the time this happened. X was
locked up and I couldn't switch to a console, so I killed it with
Alt+SysRq. I was then able to get
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:08:12PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> 8< snip >8
>
> > For the subset 1 above, I am preparing to begin to run regularly
> > (weekly very least, daily possibly) scanner which tries interactive
> > testing of recipients address at all of user's domain's MX servers,
>
At 02:09 PM 19/10/2000 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> > Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his account
> > yanked for abuse of mailing lists.
>
>http://www.ilan.net/contact.htm for a nice list of addresses to send
>complaints to.
the original email came from 216.27.3.45.
a
Petr Vandrovec writes:
> ... or from sys_exit() if you forget to unmap. Or from anywhere if
> swapping code decides to swap such page. I'm trying to hunt it down
> for more than month, but I have no idea what's wrong. In my case
> way to trigger bug is:
I actually think its as simple as:
1.
Matti Aarnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We ([EMAIL PROTECTED] -> me & DaveM) got just reports that
> somebody is diverting incoming email to some sort of auto-responding
> ticket system.
>
> The thing does not carry original message "Received:" headers in replies,
> and is reporting invalid
Matti Aarnio wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:08:46PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > Matt said someone was diverting email. diverting or intercepting email
> > is a crime in the US.
> > Perhaps Matt was wrong?
>
> Or using words which have different sets of meanings for you
>
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:08:46PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Matt said someone was diverting email. diverting or intercepting email
> is a crime in the US.
> Perhaps Matt was wrong?
Or using words which have different sets of meanings for you
(lawyer mind?) vs. me
On 19 Oct 00 at 22:16, Russell King wrote:
> I'm seeing an oops caused by a NULL pointer dereference in mm/filemap.c,
> filemap_write_page. The NULL pointer in question is page->mapping.
> The box on which this is happening is using a root NFS filesystem (in
> fact all but one of its
Rui Sousa wrote:
> How about keeping master volume to 0 while you mess up the other
> registers?
Not a bad idea. 0x8000, so it's muted as well as volume 0.
> And it's not a scaling problem? (wrong number of precision bits)
It might be scaling bug, but I'm pretty certain the number of
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Timur Tabi wrote:
> ** Reply to message from James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 19 Oct 2000
> 18:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
> > Apple sells a computer with dual AGP slots.
> I've never heard this. Could you tell me exactly which model this is?
I think he's confusing dualhead
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Rui Sousa wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > We need the dynamic bit resolution detection.
>
> > Isn't this producing noise/pops? (since you maximize the volume).
>
> During audio init I hear pops, but then again I heard pops
Hi,
I'm seeing an oops caused by a NULL pointer dereference in mm/filemap.c,
filemap_write_page. The NULL pointer in question is page->mapping.
The box on which this is happening is using a root NFS filesystem (in
fact all but one of its filesystems are NFS).
So the file that was mapped has
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 01:15:06PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> This is being forwarded from BugTraq where there is an ongoing
> discussion over a security hole in IIS based on it's unicode decoder.
> This particular individual is stating that several unicode decoders,
> including
Rui Sousa wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > We need the dynamic bit resolution detection.
> Isn't this producing noise/pops? (since you maximize the volume).
During audio init I hear pops, but then again I heard pops during audio
init before these changes too :)
> > Judging
It's up to you guys what you want to do. I was just giving you a bigger
club to use, if you
needed it. Playing games with LKML is not cool since about a dozen
companies who ship Linux
(including now us) depend on it as an "essential facility" of our
businesses to get bug reports
and track the
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 02:40:36PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Matt,
>
> A legal perspective.
>
> It is a Felony Federal) in the United States to divert or re-route
> emails on the internet,
...
> I would suggest calling the FBI office in your area and file a formal
> complaint. You can be
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> and quite frankly we should just change the damn "nopage()" arguments to
> be
>
> struct page * (*nopage)(struct vm_area_struct * area, unsigned long pgoff,
>int write_access);
>
> because the nopage() routine really shouldn't care about "address" at all
> (the
Matt said someone was diverting email. diverting or intercepting email
is a crime in the US.
Perhaps Matt was wrong?
:-)
Jeff
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>
> Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> By author:"Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > If
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:"Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> If someone committs a crime in the US, and you don't report it, you have
> also just committed another one by failing to report it (like if you
> witness a murder, and turn and
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:40:36 -0600
From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A legal perspective.
We have no interest in sending the FBI to go knock down someones
doors, just removing the offending address and fixing the problem,
thats all.
I used to live in New Jersey,
Here's some sample code on how to do this. You use a macro called
"kernel_thread" and in the thread you start, you have to do soe munging
of current->
Jeff
int nwfs_asynch_io_process(void *id)
{
register int i = (int)id;
current->session = 1;
current->pgrp = 1;
`real_root_dev' must be `int', not `kdev_t'.
The reason for this is that we still have (in ):
typedef unsigned short kdev_t;
while kernel/sysctl.c has the following line:
{KERN_REALROOTDEV, "real-root-dev", _root_dev, sizeof(int), 0644, NULL,
_dointvec},
This causes a nice
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Wagner)
Date:18 Oct 2000 20:29:33 GMT
Adding more bits to the pool should never hurt; the cryptographic
mixing ensures this. What _can_ hurt is adding predictable bits but
(erroneously) bumping up the entropy counter.
Yes; and writing to
Hello,
Can anyone tell me how kernel threads (threads in the kernel space)
works in linux?
In other words, how can I schedule them like normal user-level threads?
It seems to me that are NOT schedulable like user-level
threads/processes in general since they are not
pre-emptible at all.
Is it
Hi, All:
I have a question about the time-slice of linux, how do I know it, or how
can I test it?
Thanks for you help.
Zhixu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
Matt,
A legal perspective.
It is a Felony Federal) in the United States to divert or re-route
emails on the internet,
esspecially across interstate lines. It's also a Felony (Federal) to
misuse and email
address to disrupt interstate or international commerce.
I would suggest calling the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> > I'll keep looking.
>
> Is it easy to reproduce? If so, try to make tcpdump, which
> covers one of these messages.
It's extremely rare. We maintain persistent connections open for long
periods of time and even though a user who triggered it is online,
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Joel Jaeggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> the AGP bus specification is for a single device (master)
>
> you can review it at:
>
> http://www.intel.com/technology/agp/agp_index.htm
>
Technically, AGP is a "port", not a
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> It's a big update, but I think it is necessary.
> We need the new codec-specific init functions.
> We need the new ac97-valid-reg checking.
> We need the dynamic bit resolution detection.
Isn't this producing noise/pops? (since you maximize the volume).
>
>Apple sells a computer with dual AGP slots. I just was looking for a intel
>box like this. Since AGP is a port on the PCI bus it is possible to have
>more than one AGP port on a/each PCI bus but this requires the PCI chipset
>to support this.
Well, I don't know of such a Mac. To my
We ([EMAIL PROTECTED] -> me & DaveM) got just reports that
somebody is diverting incoming email to some sort of auto-responding
ticket system.
The thing does not carry original message "Received:" headers in replies,
and is reporting invalid URL.
Independent of that, people with supposedly
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > > Since this code works in my local tests, my two concerns at this point
> > > are correct vma->vm_pgoff treatment, and correct vm_flags/vm_file usage.
>
> Can I completely ignore vm_pgoff in nopage()? Currently I just do the
> following, to get
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Tom Rini wrote:
> Hello all. The attached patch changes the behavoir of fs/nls/Config.in from:
> CONFIG_SMB_FS != n to CONFIG_INET = y && CONFIG_SMB_FS != n. This is neeed
> because if CONFIG_INET isn't set, CONFIG_SMB_FS isn't asked about and
> therefor isn't set at all,
Mdacon in test10-pre4 missed one restore_flag. Here is the patch that
removes it.
--- mdacon.c.orig Thu Oct 19 20:17:07 2000
+++ mdacon.cThu Oct 19 20:17:20 2000
@@ -129,7 +129,6 @@
outb_p(reg+1, mda_index_port); outb_p(val & 0xff, mda_value_port);
Ben,
you added these two BUG() conditions in your atomic pte patch:
> diff -ur v2.4.0-test10-pre2/mm/vmscan.c work-10-2/mm/vmscan.c
> --- v2.4.0-test10-pre2/mm/vmscan.cFri Oct 13 17:18:37 2000
> +++ work-10-2/mm/vmscan.c Fri Oct 13 17:19:47 2000
> @@ -99,6 +98,10 @@
> if
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
i'm not saying this totally explains the problems you're seeing,
but i think it's suspect.
This isn't it at all. Only when _real data_ (not FIN etc.) sits in
receive queue does the RST get emitted on
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Looks reasonable - although your "max_size" checks are wrong at mmap time.
> You should check for something like
thanks
> > Since this code works in my local tests, my two concerns at this point
> > are correct vma->vm_pgoff treatment, and correct vm_flags/vm_file
Hello again all. I've taken what Petr suggested and put into a patch. Now,
are there any suggestions this time around? I'm still wondering if the whole
thing shouldn't be dependant on CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT, but since I don't know
the smbfs code at all, I can't say.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Well coolio. Would somebody be up for sanity checking my audio mmap
> code (attached)? It doesn't look too hard at all to get the audio
> drivers doing the correct thing.
Looks reasonable - although your "max_size" checks are wrong at mmap time.
I got this oops dding partitions. test10-pre3
works fine.
below is a representative sample.
Thanks
-- todd --
root@pcx4168:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda
Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1216 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device BootStart EndBlocks Id
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Brian Craft wrote:
> In the code below, I removed the shutdown() and added the block
> after do_scan() to eliminate the RST. The read() never finds any data.
> If there's no data pending, why does read() have any affect?
EOF is considered pending data... and has to be read.
It's a big update, but I think it is necessary.
We need the new codec-specific init functions.
We need the new ac97-valid-reg checking.
We need the dynamic bit resolution detection.
Full change description, and tested patch against 2.4.0-test10-pre4,
follows. This includes some interface
On Mon, Oct 16 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > I if cdrecord bypassed the sg driver and spoke to the
> > cdrom driver directly. I know the CDROM_SEND_PACKET
> > ioctl() is in place for lk 2.4 but from which version
> > has it been functional in the lk 2.2 series?
>
> But the write command is not
On Mon, Oct 16 2000, Mark Cooke wrote:
> > Yes but there is a way to do this directly now, the question is can the
> > user-space apps change to go both ways.
>
> Hi Andre,
>
> Is there any tool / test code that you know of to 'do this directly' -
> I'm wanting to try to avoid ade-scsi
On Mon, Oct 16 2000, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> As far as I know, cdrecord interfaces to Linux either
> via the sg or pg devices. No-one would be happier than
> I if cdrecord bypassed the sg driver and spoke to the
> cdrom driver directly. I know the CDROM_SEND_PACKET
> ioctl() is in place for lk
Are you mocking me? :)
You know, I don't even know why we are even qualifying the idiot's comments
by talking about it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard B.
Johnson
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:53 PM
To: Mark Haney
Cc: Dan
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Mark Haney wrote:
> Richard Johnson wrote:
> >Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in
> >the whole county than have computers. Two haven't been booted since
> >the day the were received by the kids because they've been busy
> >studying for the
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 08:29:47PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> It is not correct. At first, duplicated define_bool breaks xconfig (AFAIK),
> and worse, first test is ignored at all by your code. Maybe something
> like (untested)
>
> if [ "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" = "m" -o "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" = "y" ];
Hello!
> Well, there were quite a few TCP bugs fixed after 2.2.14.
Seems, it is that bug, which you have seen talking from
(sorry, I cannot pronounce this host name publically 8)) to amber.
ACK, following FIN was considered as illegal data.
We have fixed it both in 2.2 and 2.3.
Alexey
-
To
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> * include/asm-i386/elf.h:
> - make Pentium IV and other post-P6 processors use the "i686"
> family name (same fix as the system_utsname.machine init fix
> which went
> The problem: I can't have the Tulip and EEPro drivers loaded at the same
> time. If I have the Tulip driver loaded, and I load the EEPro driver, the
> self check fails with 0x and complains that I don't have the card in
> a bus master slot. If I have the EEPro driver loaded and the
** Reply to message from James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 19 Oct 2000
18:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
> Apple sells a computer with dual AGP slots.
I've never heard this. Could you tell me exactly which model this is?
--
Timur Tabi - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interactive Silicon -
Richard Johnson wrote:
>Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in
>the whole county than have computers. Two haven't been booted since
>the day the were received by the kids because they've been busy
>studying for the M-CAP test.
Not true. Cary is quite large and is
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:30:51PM -0500, Andrew C. Dingman wrote:
> I'm working on a project for my senior seminar for which I (and my
> profs) think I need to modify the process descriptor
> struct. Unfortunately, I don't seem to be good enough with 'grep' to
> figure out where the type is
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 02:32:26PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Dan Hollis wrote:
> [Snipped...]
>
> >
> > The machine's physical location is in Cary, NC. Anyone live near there
> > willing to make a personal visit to the location to identify the
> > individual
This patch should fix the Pentium IV and other CPU detection
glitches which remain in test10-pre4.
The necessary fixes are:
* arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:
- (Pentium IV) don't goto name_decoded, return instead; otherwise
x86_model_id which was grabbed from the extended cpuid levels
will
> There is no reason there cannot be multiple AGP buses. After all there are
> motherboards with 2,3,4 (or more!) PCI buses.
Apple sells a computer with dual AGP slots. I just was looking for a intel
box like this. Since AGP is a port on the PCI bus it is possible to have
more than one AGP port
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Dan Hollis wrote:
[Snipped...]
>
> The machine's physical location is in Cary, NC. Anyone live near there
> willing to make a personal visit to the location to identify the
> individual responsible?
>
> -Dan
"You get more respect with a kind word and a gun than a kind
On 19 Oct 00 at 11:00, Tom Rini wrote:
> --- fs/nls/Config.in.orig Thu Oct 19 09:11:48 2000
> +++ fs/nls/Config.inThu Oct 19 09:49:53 2000
> @@ -4,8 +4,13 @@
>
> # msdos and Joliet want NLS
> if [ "$CONFIG_JOLIET" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_FAT_FS" != "n" \
> - -o "$CONFIG_NTFS_FS" != "n" -o
I have a simple solution for your problem. Just call the police and have them
arrest whoever is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to use Linux and
this mailing list. (That *is* the only reason you're here, right?) Then you
can spend your time writing a wonderful OS of your own to
Man, I wish I was close enough. I am only about 4 hours from there, but I
woulnd't waste my time. If he doesn't like it he can stick with Windows and
all of it's wonderful on time development and bug free environment. ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
> Due ot this and other reasons I'm restoring the 2.2.x behavior by
> default, but adding a sysctl so that systems using dynamic addressing
> may elect to get the different bind() behavior.
>
> Later,
> David S. Miller
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a system uses dynamic addressing, binding to
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 10:45:02AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> To this I agree, but I cannot change the fact that this assumption
> does exist in applications, so this is why I reverted the change.
Would you accept a patch for an setsockopt to enable it again ?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from
** Reply to message from "Andrew C. Dingman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:30:51 -0500 (EST)
> I'm working on a project for my senior seminar for which I (and my
> profs) think I need to modify the process descriptor
> struct. Unfortunately, I don't seem to be good enough with
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> This is just to give folks something to sync against. Test it by all means
> however.
>
> Must fix stuff left to do for 2.2.18final
> - Merge the S/390 stuff and make S/390 build again
> - Fix the megaraid (revert if need be)
> - Fix the ps/2
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Alex Buell wrote:
> Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his account
> yanked for abuse of mailing lists.
http://www.ilan.net/contact.htm for a nice list of addresses to send
complaints to.
The machine's physical location is in Cary, NC. Anyone live
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> the AGP bus specification is for a single device (master)
> you can review it at:
> http://www.intel.com/technology/agp/agp_index.htm
There is no reason there cannot be multiple AGP buses. After all there are
motherboards with 2,3,4 (or more!) PCI
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 07:55:42PM +0200, Sven Krohlas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Hello all. The attached patch changes the behavoir of fs/nls/Config.in from:
>
> There's nothing attached...?
D'oh. Look now. :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
--- fs/nls/Config.in.orig
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:35:12 -0600
From: Matt Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't you find it a little compelling that the nearly identical JVM
code passes the Java Compatibility test suite on Linux 2.2,
Solaris, HPUX, SCO, and even Windows?
He is arguing that returning
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Andrew C. Dingman wrote:
> I'm working on a project for my senior seminar for which I (and my
> profs) think I need to modify the process descriptor
> struct. Unfortunately, I don't seem to be good enough with 'grep' to
> figure out where the type is declared. Could someone
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 11:35:12AM -0600, Matt Peterson wrote:
> Again, there is not a bug in the JVM's handling of
> java.net.DatagramSocket(). I offered the JVM as an example only because
> it is one application that I know of expects the standardized behavior
> of bind(). The bind() behavior
Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > The JRE compliance tests have a test which makes sure that for a
> > non-local addresses, bind() returns an error code, specifically
> > -EADDRNOTAVAIL.
>
> Sounds like a bug that should be reported to Sun.
>
Hello? Send a bug to Sun? I don't see any logic here. I
KMF AV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> ... obviously the Linux logo should be the
> international symbol for the fucking retard.
Actually, this was considered. However, in those dark days, the ISO
had not yet standardized the international symbol for the fucking
retard. A symbol for "dimwit
I'm working on a project for my senior seminar for which I (and my
profs) think I need to modify the process descriptor
struct. Unfortunately, I don't seem to be good enough with 'grep' to
figure out where the type is declared. Could someone give me a pointer
to the right file in the 2.4.0-testX
Hello!
> I'll keep looking.
Is it easy to reproduce? If so, try to make tcpdump, which
covers one of these messages.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This is being forwarded from BugTraq where there is an ongoing
discussion over a security hole in IIS based on it's unicode decoder.
This particular individual is stating that several unicode decoders,
including the one in the Linux unicode_console driver, have failed to
adhere to certain
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
