On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, octave klaba wrote:
> > > Oct 26 16:38:01 ns29 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
> > let me guess: intel eepro100 or similar??
> yeap
er, "me too":
Bus 0, device 2, function 0:
Ethernet controller: Intel 82557 (rev 8).
Medium devsel. Fast
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > bitmap is all about, and should be forced to go back to the bad old times
> > when you had to check the stepping levels etc to figure out what the CPU's
> > could do.
>
> You still do. In fact your example SEP specifically requires this due to
> Intel
Hi,
We have /usr mounted over NFS on our workstations RH6.2
Server RH 6.2
nfs-utils-0.1.9.1-1
Kernel 2.2.16
These workstations happily use samba and other services without any
delays but with NFS they hang in X for up to 15 minutes before NFS
come
back.
We can ssh into the workstations and use
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Wakko Warner wrote:
> I attempted to create a 4gb sparce file with dd. It failed.
> I created one that was 2.1gb in size which worked. Then I appeneded more
> junk to the end of the file making it over 2.2gb.
>
> doing an ls -l shows:
> ls: x: Value too large for defined
Anonymous wrote:
>
> In redhat where is the process scheduler located? Does this scheduler
> implement round robin?
It doesn't matter whether it's RedHat, or any other distribution.
They're all the same kernel.
Look at schedule() in kernel/sched.c to see the heart of the scheduler.
My
Okay, updates:
Compiled modutils 2.3.19 and the problem
persists.
Arch is i386, AMD K-6.
Result for modprobe -ae (test10-pre5):
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.0-test10-pre5/kernel/drivers/usb/dc2xx.o
depmod: usb_bulk_msg
depmod:
i get the following when trying to compile netfilter:
ld -m elf_i386 -r -o fs.o filesystems.o open.o read_write.o
devices.o file_table.o buffer.o super.o block_dev.o stat.o exec.o
pipe.o namei.o fcntl.o ioctl.o readdir.o select.o fifo.o locks.o
dcache.o inode.o attr.o bad_inode.o file.o iobuf.o
* Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001026 18:33] wrote:
> > the application of a close event. What can I say, "the fd formerly known
> > as X" is now gone? It would be incorrect to say that "fd X was closed",
> > since X no longer refers to anything, and the application may have reused
> > that fd
I attempted to create a 4gb sparce file with dd. It failed.
I created one that was 2.1gb in size which worked. Then I appeneded more
junk to the end of the file making it over 2.2gb.
doing an ls -l shows:
ls: x: Value too large for defined data type
NOTE: this worked in 2.4.0-test6 and I
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> I'd much rather have an event interface that is documented to be edge-
>> triggered and is really _lightweight_, than have another interface that
>> starts out with some piggy features.
>
>Agreed (except for that 'edge-triggered'
> the application of a close event. What can I say, "the fd formerly known
> as X" is now gone? It would be incorrect to say that "fd X was closed",
> since X no longer refers to anything, and the application may have reused
> that fd for another file.
Which is precisely why you need to know
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 07:01:26PM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> and even more obvious:
>
> + buffer += sprintf(buffer, "ASID:\t%p\n", mm);
>
> Actually putting it into the buffer would be useful as well :)
That serves me right for hand-editing patches.
J
--
Repeat to self: I
> > corrected for include the facts that the XMM feature bit is an Intel specific
> > bit that other vendors may use for other things, so you need to test vendor ==
>^^^
> Note that they shouldn't do that! I would consider a very bad thing if they
> goes out of sync on
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:50:40AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > kqueue currently does this; a close() on an fd will remove any pending
> > events from the queues that they are on which correspond to that fd.
>
> This seems an odd thing to do. Surely what you need to do is to post a
> 'close
* Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001026 17:50] wrote:
> > kqueue currently does this; a close() on an fd will remove any pending
> > events from the queues that they are on which correspond to that fd.
>
> This seems an odd thing to do. Surely what you need to do is to post a
> 'close completed'
Rik writes:
> it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
> to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
> in the VG...
>
> It looks like somewhere in either the utilities or the
> kernel, the argument of which LV to snapshot gets mangled...
> Oh, I'm using version
> certainly accept it), then why not just do the equivalent of a reset in
> the high-level IDE driver on coming back from sleep? Possibly together
> with forcing any other setup state we know about.
Because windows seems to drop the controller back to PIO mode 0 and the BIOS
knows about it. At
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
>
> Martin,
>
> A lot of changes. Have you tested this adequately? Changes of this
> magnitude this late in the 2.4 cycle could break a lot of stuff. I'll
> apply your patch, and let you know.
>
> :-)
>
> Jeff
Martin,
1. Adaptec SCSI driver on a 4 x P6 POCA
> kqueue currently does this; a close() on an fd will remove any pending
> events from the queues that they are on which correspond to that fd.
This seems an odd thing to do. Surely what you need to do is to post a
'close completed' event to the queue. This also makes more sense when you
have a
Richard B. Johnson writes:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
>> Richard B. Johnson writes:
>>> o Once installed, a kernel module is every bit as "efficient"
>>> as some driver linked into the kernel at build-time. Of course
>>
>> I doubt this is true on most modern processors. On
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> However, we also need to remember what got us to this discussion in the
> first place. One of the reasons why poll() is such a piggy interface is
> exactly because it tries to be "nice" to the programmer.
poll() is a piggy interface because it is O(n) in polled file
> Let's face it. People who don't follow the intel ordering of bits are
> _buggy_. And yes, there are tons of buggy chips out there (mainly from
Its tricky to do so, some of them were not even documented. And one of them
(SEP) changed in the undocumented phase from one version of SYSCALL to
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000 16:48:05 -0600,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>scsi_register--> scsi_register_R__ver_scsi_register
You have been bitten by the broken Makefiles, time to do a complete
cleanup and start again.
mv .config ..
make mrproper (clean is not enough)
mv ../.config ..
make
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 09:10:06PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> With LVM from 2.2.18aa kernels (I dont exactly remember which one)
Ok, nothing relevant is recently changed there so it should be an userspace
issue.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:37:07PM +, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
>
> Hi Rik,
>
> I can't reproduce it on my box.
>
> Could you provide a "lvcreate -d" output of what you did to help
> me to dig into that one.
>
> Did somebody else out there face the same 0.8final snapshot weirdness?
Martin,
A lot of changes. Have you tested this adequately? Changes of this
magnitude this late in the 2.4 cycle could break a lot of stuff. I'll
apply your patch, and let you know.
:-)
Jeff
Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Please have a look at the following patch and feel free to
Hi,
This is a notice that was sent to the
linux-usb-devel mailing list last month.
~Randy
___
|Randy Dunlap |
|randy.dunlap_at_intel.com503-677-5408|
---
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 03:45:27PM -0700, I wrote:
> > + buffer += sprintf("ASID: %p\n", mm);
>
> Obviously, this should be:
>
> + buffer += sprintf("ASID:\t%p\n", mm);
and even more obvious:
+ buffer +=
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:34:48PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > > it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
> > > to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
> >
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:37:37PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Negative d_count (-805538369) for [binary garbage]/
>
> followed by an oops. Kernel logfile extract below, uuencoded.
Thanks for the feedback.
The oops is forced by the kernel after it sees then wrong negative d_count.
I'd say
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Klaus Naumann wrote:
> Byeong-ryeol Kim wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Klaus Naumann wrote:
> >
> > > I was having some little trouble with the QLOGIC Fibre Channel SCSI
> > > cards.
> > > The issue is, that I have a box with an internal SCSI controller/disk
> > > and
hi Stephen,
On Oct 26, 11:00am, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Subject: Re: Quota mods needed for journaled quota
> ...
> > This would allow ext3 to do that which it needs to do differently
> > at Q_QUOTAON and would also allow Jan's changes to work in such
> > a way that both the current form of
Miles Lane wrote:
> Perhaps this is related to the PCI issues that are being debated on the list now.
> Would someone look at my bus configuration and let me know what to test or what
>patch to apply to get my kernel booting?
My Athlon box has a MSI A6195KMS bios. The motherboard has the
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:15:30 Marc Schneider wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Marc Schneider wrote:
> > >
> > > msgsnd seems to be corrupting memory around the msgbuf pointer.
> > >
> > > for example I have the following code:
> > >
> > > pMsgBuf = malloc(iPacketLen + 4 + 8);
> > >
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:21:41PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Well, this is usually handled by a third module that takes care of
> > registering/unregistering the existence of the two modules that need to
> > be possible to load/unload separately.
>
> But that module then depends on both of the
Andre Hedrick writes:
> APM signals ATA/IDE to goto sleep.
> IDE then records and buffers the setup of the host and device.
> IDE forces device and host to PIO 0 (imortant step, explain later)
> IDE issues spindown and sleep task-command.
> IDE returns to APM with success/failure.
Insert here...
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 03:45:27PM -0700, I wrote:
> + buffer += sprintf("ASID: %p\n", mm);
Obviously, this should be:
+ buffer += sprintf("ASID:\t%p\n", mm);
for consistency.
J
PGP signature
Hi,
/proc has no way to indicate whether tasks share an address space.
This one-liner patch adds a new ASID: field to /proc//status so
there's some way to see address-space sharing between tasks.
While this is hardly a bug-fix, it is a pretty useful thing to know
which is otherwise completely
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:34:48PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
> > to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
> > in the VG...
>
> OK, I reproduced it in 2.2 as well ...
Perhaps this is related to the PCI issues that are being debated on the list now.
Would someone look at my bus configuration and let me know what to test or what patch
to apply to get my kernel booting?
lspci -vv reports:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-751 [Irongate]
> Well, this is usually handled by a third module that takes care of
> registering/unregistering the existence of the two modules that need to
> be possible to load/unload separately.
But that module then depends on both of the others unless you keep recompiling
it
-
To unsubscribe from this
Good job -- A++. I hardly even noticed it was down.
:-)
Jeff
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>
> kernel.org is back up.
>
> -hpa
>
> --
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
> "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
>
Hi!
The attached patch fixes many different little bugs in the USB input,
joystick input and core input drivers maintained by me.
drivers/char/joystick/adi.c:
Fix gamepad handling for Logitech ThunderPad Digital and WingMan Gamepad
drivers/char/joystick/gamecon.c
Fix PSX
Jim Gettys wrote:
> So I want an interface in which I can get as many events as possible
> at once, and one in which the events themselves can have appropriate
> aggregation behavior. It isn't quite clear to me if the proposed interface
> would have this property.
I believe get_event,
Hi Rik,
I can't reproduce it on my box.
Could you provide a "lvcreate -d" output of what you did to help
me to dig into that one.
Did somebody else out there face the same 0.8final snapshot weirdness?
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:36:37PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Hi Heinz,
>
> it looks
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:24:38PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:05:04PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> >
> > > yop, I 've done :
> > >
> > > make -j10 World
> > > in the xfree tree and simulateously :
>
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:05:04PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
>
> > yop, I 've done :
> >
> > make -j10 World
> > in the xfree tree and simulateously :
> >
> > while true; do make dep && make clean && make bzImage; done
> > in the kernel
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:05:04PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> yop, I 've done :
>
> make -j10 World
> in the xfree tree and simulateously :
>
> while true; do make dep && make clean && make bzImage; done
> in the kernel tree
Now it'd be nice to verify that the problem also happens
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:11:54PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
>
> > > > > > ../drivers/block/ide.c, line 162, on version 2.2.17 does bad things
> > > > > > to the timer. It writes 0 to the control-word for timer 0. This
> > > > > > does the
kernel.org is back up.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
> cpu family : 5
> model : 8
> model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor
> ^^
>
> Shouldn't it be K6-2?
We report what AMD report
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 12:53:00PM -0400, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > The addition of an "init_quota" method to the super_operations struct,
> > with quota_on calling this and defaulting to installing the default
> > quota_ops if the method is NULL, ought to be sufficient to let ext3
> > get
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> Linus, what do you think about that? I can do the remaining filesystems
> and give it initial testing today.
Ok, looks reasonable, if not really pretty. I'd probably prefer
last_page = size >> PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
last_page_size =
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
> to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
> in the VG...
OK, I reproduced it in 2.2 as well ... ;(
> I have run both the following command lines (after lvremoving
> snap1,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:11:54PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> > > > > ../drivers/block/ide.c, line 162, on version 2.2.17 does bad things
> > > > > to the timer. It writes 0 to the control-word for timer 0. This
> > > > > does the following:
> > > [Snipped...]
> > > >
> > > > Well,
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 01:42:29PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> > > > ../drivers/block/ide.c, line 162, on version 2.2.17 does bad things
> > > > to the timer. It writes 0 to the control-word for timer 0. This
> > > > does the following:
> >
Note that there is another aspect to the efficiency / performance of the
select/poll style of interfaces not immediately obvious, but which occurs
as a result of how some (streaming/batching) protocols work.
An X server does not call select all that often (probably one of the two items most
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:21:29PM +0200, octave klaba wrote:
>
>
> > > Oct 26 16:38:01 ns29 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
> > let me guess: intel eepro100 or similar??
> yeap
>
> 00:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08)
> Subsystem:
Linus, Alan,
I am proposing this patch for inclusion in the 2.2.x tree. (Whether it goes
into 2.2.18 or 2.2.19 is your call.) We have run this successfully with
2.2.14 through 2.2.17.
Our kernel patches help stacking file systems work properly in two
areas:
* dentry reference count fixes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Robert Lynch wrote:
>
> > Oct 19 13:00:23 ives kernel: EIP:0010:[try_to_swap_out+252/796]
>
> Those Oopsen look like they're from test10-pre4 (fixed in pre5). Also,
> please include the lines beginning with "kernel BUG at...".
>
>
Hi Heinz,
it looks like the LVM snapshotting in 2.4 doesn't allow you
to create snapshots from anything else than the _first_ LV
in the VG...
I have run both the following command lines (after lvremoving
snap1, of course) and both of them give as a result that the
LV /dev/test_vg/swap ends up
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:00:03AM -0500, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> > Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2000 09:17:49 -0400 (EDT),
> > > "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > >This shows that out of 34,678 bytes
This is a long posting, with a humble beginning, but it has
a point. I'm being complete so that no one is left in the
dark, or in any doubt as to what that point is. That means
rehashing some history.
This posting is not really about select or Linux: it's about
interfaces. Like cached state,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 01:42:29PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > > ../drivers/block/ide.c, line 162, on version 2.2.17 does bad things
> > > to the timer. It writes 0 to the control-word for timer 0. This
> > > does the following:
> [Snipped...]
> >
> > Well, at least on 2.4.0-test9,
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Robert Lynch wrote:
> Oct 19 13:00:23 ives kernel: EIP:0010:[try_to_swap_out+252/796]
Those Oopsen look like they're from test10-pre4 (fixed in pre5). Also,
please include the lines beginning with "kernel BUG at...".
-ben
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 12:04:21PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> > ../drivers/block/ide.c, line 162, on version 2.2.17 does bad things
> > to the timer. It writes 0 to the control-word for timer 0. This
> > does the following:
[Snipped...]
>
Andrea Arcangeli writes ("Re: linux 2.2.18-pre17: "Kernel panic: LRU list corrupted""):
> I also included the fix in a new VM-global patch against vanilla 2.2.18pre17
> (the VM-global patch is available as a single patch inside 2.2.18pre17aa1/
> directory too but I have to maintain a separate
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Forever shall I be. wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 02:57:30PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > > __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed.
> > > __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed.
> > > __alloc_pages: 5-order
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Forever shall I be. wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 02:57:30PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed.
> > __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed.
> > __alloc_pages: 5-order allocation failed.
> > __alloc_pages: 4-order allocation
Mircea Damian wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:20:45AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > Mircea Damian wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm unable to boot kernel 2.4.0-test10-pre5 on a:
> >
> > Upgrade GCC to 2.91.66 (aka egcs-1.1.2)
>
> Ok. I can do that, but there is nowhere written
LT,
I can do it from user-space completely, but not today.
The tools are missing.
Also I have/will get my traces on my code in a day or so.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 12:04:21PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> ../drivers/block/ide.c, line 162, on version 2.2.17 does bad things
> to the timer. It writes 0 to the control-word for timer 0. This
> does the following:
>
> o Selects timer 0.
> o Latches the timer.
> o Selects
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 02:16:28AM -0700, Gideon Glass wrote:
> Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> >
> > Also, consider the following scenario for the proposed get_event():
> >
> >1. packet arrives, queues an event.
> >2. user retrieves event.
> >3. second packet arrives, queues event again.
>
Markus Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Oct 26 11:24:13 ns29 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
> > Oct 26 11:24:15 ns29 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
> > Oct 26 12:22:21 ns29 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
> > Oct 26 16:16:59 ns29 kernel: eth0: card reports
> > Oct 26 16:38:01 ns29 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
> let me guess: intel eepro100 or similar??
yeap
00:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08)
Subsystem: Asustek Computer, Inc.: Unknown device 1043
Control: I/O+ Mem+
octave klaba wrote:
>
> >
>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/people/andrea/patches/v2.2/2.2.18pre17/VM-global-2.2.18pre17-7.bz2
> > > eth0: card reports no resources
> > > VFS: file-max limit 4096 reached
> > > Kernel panic: VFS: LRU block list corrupted.
> > > Kernel panic: VFS: LRU block list
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:20:45AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> Mircea Damian wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm unable to boot kernel 2.4.0-test10-pre5 on a:
>
> Upgrade GCC to 2.91.66 (aka egcs-1.1.2)
Ok. I can do that, but there is nowhere written that I should do
that. If I remember right
"Eric W. Biederman" wrote:
>
> Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's harder to write correct programs that use edge-triggered events.
>
> Huh? The race between when an event is reported, and when you take action
> on it effectively means all events are edge triggered.
Nope. With any
> > Hi,
> > After I create a RAID setup on the drives,The
> > superblock will be generated at the end of the drives.
> > If I move these drives to other linux system, will
> > this
> > system recognise the RAID setup without reconfiguring
> > the Linux ?
>
> If the CHS / LBA settings are the
> "christian" == Christian Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
christian> Hi,
christian> i hope i am right here, and this problem wasn't mailed a thousand times
christian> before - but it is not older than 3 days (2.4.0-test10-pre5 is'nt
christian> older...)
christian> I am playing around
On 26 Oct 2000, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[Snipped...]
../drivers/block/ide.c, line 162, on version 2.2.17 does bad things
to the timer. It writes 0 to the control-word for timer 0. This
does the following:
o Selects timer 0.
o Latches
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000 09:17:49 -0400 (EDT),
> "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> >This shows that out of 34,678 bytes we needed, we wasted 6282, ~1.5
> >pages. Since there are 5 modules, we waste about 1/3 page per module.
> >
> >So I
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
>> Per chance are you running the name service caching daemon (nscd)? I'd
>> also guess you aren't disabling fsync() for your sysylog files (it's part
>> of the syslog.conf format) -- this is a conciderable drain on syslogd.
>
>Agree. It is there for
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 02:46:19PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > I've made a few correctness changes to this code. Items that needed to be
> > corrected for include the facts that the XMM feature bit is an Intel specific
> > bit that other
Hi,
I have the same problem.
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
[...snip...]
> Could you send me your 'lspci -vvxxx' to confirm it's the very same
> chip?
00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 0686 (rev 21)
Subsystem: Unknown device 1106:
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:42:31PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:20:43PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Have you any idea what is the relation between time and this chip
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:42:31PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:20:43PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Have you any idea what is the relation between time and this chip ?
> > >
> > > Also, I'm experiencing the problem for
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:04:16PM +0100, Mark Cooke wrote:
> On 26 Oct 2000, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
>
> > This is an athlon 750 machine, with scsi and ide a disk...
> > I've tryed to see where the problem was comming from for age
> > ( the problem is what you describe and it happen after
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> OK, I include below a more or less translation for 2.4. I have not even
> compiled this, and have not got the hardware to test it anyway.
I disagree violently with doing this in the low-level drivers.
If it cannot be done in user space (which
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test10. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test10/ (specified)
-m /usr/src/linux/System.map (default)
Error (regular_file): read_system_map stat /usr/src/linux/System.map
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Roger Larsson wrote:
>
> > I noted that even try_to_free_buffers locks lru_list_lock.
>
> lru_list_lock != pagemap_lru_lock
>
btw, while we are at it, I am not able to reproduce this with test10-pre5
but am still running tests
Igmar Palsenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 23 Oct 2000, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
>
> > Not true. The named on our loghost is authoritative for the reverse
> > mappings for all of the machines which can log there.
>
> Put the names of your machines in /etc/hosts on your logmachine.
I realize all of this is 2.5 material.
We had been talking about this earlier, until Viro and Cox told us to
quit until 2.5.
Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> It goes off-list.
But, in light of Andreas Gruenbacher's proposal
(http://lwn.net/2000/1026/a/extended-attributes.php3) and Stephen
>
>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/people/andrea/patches/v2.2/2.2.18pre17/VM-global-2.2.18pre17-7.bz2
> > eth0: card reports no resources
> > VFS: file-max limit 4096 reached
> > Kernel panic: VFS: LRU block list corrupted.
> > Kernel panic: VFS: LRU block list corrupted.
> > Kernel panic: VFS: LRU
Hi All,
I built the kernel on RedHat Linux 7 after configuring
the build (make menuconfig) for SMP kernel.
After installing the kernel (copy bzImage to /boot directory
and run lilo) I rebooted the system to run the new kernel.
Then I looked at the /proc/ksyms file to see if the
symbol names are
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Roger Larsson wrote:
> I noted that even try_to_free_buffers locks lru_list_lock.
lru_list_lock != pagemap_lru_lock
cheers,
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Marc Schneider wrote:
> >
> > msgsnd seems to be corrupting memory around the msgbuf pointer.
> >
> > for example I have the following code:
> >
> > pMsgBuf = malloc(iPacketLen + 4 + 8);
> > bzero(pMsgBuf, iPacketLen + 4 + 8);
> > pMsgBuf += 4; /* Build a guard band
That makes sense.
Steve
Craig Schlenter wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:40:33AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> [/proc/meminfo shared is 0]
> > Then shouldn't it be removed?
>
> Probably not. There may be tools that rely on it existing that may break
> if it goes away altogether.
>
> Maybe
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:40:33AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
[/proc/meminfo shared is 0]
> Then shouldn't it be removed?
Probably not. There may be tools that rely on it existing that may break
if it goes away altogether.
Maybe 'free' does for example.
--C
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Marc Schneider wrote:
>
> msgsnd seems to be corrupting memory around the msgbuf pointer.
>
> for example I have the following code:
>
> pMsgBuf = malloc(iPacketLen + 4 + 8);
> bzero(pMsgBuf, iPacketLen + 4 + 8);
> pMsgBuf += 4; /* Build a guard band */
>
> printf("PMQ:pMsgBuf:
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo
