Value of TASK_UNMAPPED_SIZE on 2.4

2000-11-03 Thread Josue Emmanuel Amaro
All, TASK_UNMAPPED_SIZE is defined in include/asm-i386/processor.h as: #define TASK_UNMAPPED_SIZE(TASK_SIZE / 3) The value of TASK_SIZE is defined as PAGE_OFFSET which is set to 0xC000 (page.h). This works out to be a value of 0x400. The question is: Are there any negative side ef

Cmpci sound problem (test10)

2000-11-03 Thread Frederik Vanrenterghem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've recently changed kernel versions, from 2.2.17 to 2.4.0-test10. Since then, I have 'grainy' sound while playing mp3's as a user (a bit like an old record). This does not happen when I play the mp3's as root. I didn't have this problem in 2.2.

Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

2000-11-03 Thread kuznet
Hello! > It is not safe, just not worse than 2.2. Andi.. 8) That issue, which was meant here, it is 100% safe. I start to suspect you did not look into this code since 2.2. I acn assume that nothing has changed in ISDN, in other drivers big changes happened. 8) Alexey - To unsubscribe fro

November updates to plugin scheduler policies for Linux

2000-11-03 Thread Scott Rhine
http://resourcemanagement.unixsolutions.hp.com/WaRM/schedpolicy.html come and see the updates for November to plugin scheduler policies for Linux: - support for Linux 2_4 test 9 - support for IA64 kernels - a performance enhancement related to sched yield correctness - utilities fix

how to get IP address of current machine from C++ code?

2000-11-03 Thread Christopher Friesen
I would like to get the IP address of one of the interfaces of the machine that I'm currently on from within some C++ code. It looks like I should be able to do this by doing an ioctl(atoi(fd, SIOCGIFADDR, &ifr) with the interface name set in the appropriate field in ifr, but I'm not sure how I

loop device hangs

2000-11-03 Thread Christian van Enckevort
> 10. To Do But Non Showstopper > > * Loop device can still hang (William Stearns has script that will >hang 2.4.0-test7, Peter Enderborg has a short sequence that will >hang 2.4.0test9) I think I have the same problem with 2.4.0-test10 (with rieserfs-patch). With small imag

Re: [BUG] /proc//stat access stalls badly for swapping process, 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-03 Thread Jens Axboe
On Fri, Nov 03 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > I very much agree. Kflushd is still hungry for free write > > bandwidth here. > > In the LKML tradition of code talks and silly opinions walk... > > Attached is a diagnostic patch which gets kflushd under control, > and takes make -j30 bzImage buil

Re: Broken colors on console with 2.4.0-textXX

2000-11-03 Thread James Simmons
> > How recent of a test kernel. Yes their was a problem with the console > > palette but it is now fixed in the most recent test kernels. > > 2.4.0-test10-pre5 Please upgrade to a newer kernel. This problem has been fixed :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k

Re: 255.255.255.255 won't broadcast to multiple NICs

2000-11-03 Thread Paul Flinders
Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 3) Java sucks in many ways. Today's way is that it > never occurred to Sun that a machine might have more > than one IP address assigned to it, so > InetAddress.getLocalHost() returns exactly one > address. Unfortunately, just about EVERY machine has >

Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

2000-11-03 Thread James Simmons
> * VGA Console can cause SMP deadlock when doing printk {CRITICAL} >(Keith Owens) Still not fixed :-( Here is the patch again. Keith give it a try and tell me if it solves your problems. --- vgacon.c.orig Tue Oct 24 18:45:58 2000 +++ vgacon.cTue Oct 24 19:08:51 2000 @@ -

Re: blk-8 oopses at boot (was: blk-7 fails to boot)

2000-11-03 Thread Jens Axboe
On Fri, Nov 03 2000, David Mansfield wrote: > Hi Jens. > > I've tried your blk-8 patch and it oopses during boot. I only hand > copied the stack trace, and ran it through ksymoops: > > Call Trace: [] [] [] [] > [] [] [] > [] [] [] [] [] > [] > Warning (Oops_read): Code line not seen, du

PATCH: remove dead code resource_fixup()

2000-11-03 Thread Grant Grundler
ooops... --- Forwarded Message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host vger.rutgers.edu[128.6.14.121] said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 09:54:19 -0800 (PST) From: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PATC

0-order allocation failed / Fragmentation Bug? (2.4.0-test10)

2000-11-03 Thread Jordan Mendelson
I've been receiving these error messages during times of near complete memory depletion. This particular machine runs a bare minimum of processes and a our own application which is a threaded long running (1 day, 5:39) which consumes most of the resources on the machine. Oddly enough however, the

Re: Blocked processes <=> Elevator starvation?

2000-11-03 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Oct 30 2000, Miles Lane wrote: > I just reproduced the problem in test10-pre7. Here's the > output you requested: Thanks > vmstat 1 > procs memoryswap io system cpu > r b w swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs

Re: 255.255.255.255 won't broadcast to multiple NICs

2000-11-03 Thread Rob Landley
--- Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So the question is, is the stack's behavior right? > If > > not, what's involved in fixing it, and if so, is > it > > documented anywhere? > > I think historically, BSD stacks were routing > 255.255.255.2

Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations...

2000-11-03 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 03:38:56PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > [..] while thats very > sensible [..] Not that it matters much but jfs means "journalling filesystem" and fs/jfs isn't a filesystem in the ext3 patch, so it doesn't look that sensible to me. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations...

2000-11-03 Thread Andreas Dilger
Michael Boman writes: > It seems like both IBM's JFS and ext3 wants to use fs/jfs .. IMHO that > is like asking for problem.. A more logic location for ext3 should be > fs/ext3, no? Actually, if you would look in linux/fs, you will see that ext3 IS in linux/fs/ext3. However, there is a second co

Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

2000-11-03 Thread Andi Kleen
> > * Spin doing ioctls on a down netdeice as it unloads == BOOM > >(prumpf, Alan Cox) Possible other net driver SMP issues (andi > >kleen) > > Turns out to be safe according to Jeff and ANK It is not safe, just not worse than 2.2. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: sen

raid5 2.4-test10: EXT2-fs corruption during sync

2000-11-03 Thread jsack
Running mke2fs on a raid5 which is still syncing causes a *variety* of filesystem corruption errors: (sample errs) - - ...kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_check_descriptors: Block bitmap for group 4 not in group (block 0)! - e2fsck 1.18, 11-Nov-1999 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/0

panic in reiserfs on test-2.4.0-test9/10

2000-11-03 Thread Andy Robinson
Hi, I tried the linux-2.4.0-test9-resiserfs-3.6.18-patch on both 2.4.0-test9 and test2.4.0-test10 and got the following PANIC I originally saw this PANIC when doing a 'cp -a / /reiserfs'. I narrowed it done to a simple symlink Andy [root@client19 /reiserfs]# ln -s foo.tar foo Unable to ha

blk-8 oopses at boot (was: blk-7 fails to boot)

2000-11-03 Thread David Mansfield
Hi Jens. I've tried your blk-8 patch and it oopses during boot. I only hand copied the stack trace, and ran it through ksymoops: Call Trace: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Warning (Oops_read): Code line not seen, dumping what data is available Trace; c01310e0 <__wait_on_buffer+

SETFPXREGS fix

2000-11-03 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
While auditing the PIII-4 patch for 2.2.x I found a local security problem in SETFPXREGS that affects 2.4.0-test10 too when it's compiled for PIII processors and run on a PIII CPU. The problem is that any user can break the FPU by uploading into the kernel a not valid mxcsr value. I verified with

Re: test10-pre7

2000-11-03 Thread Vladislav Malyshkin
Hi, Peter > [Vladislav Malyshkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > > Also, the function remove_duplicates can be written using make rules > > and functions. Using functions "foreach" "if" from make and > > comparison you can easily build a function remove_duplicates in make, > > no shell involved. > > Coul

Re: Dual XEON - >>SLOW<< on SMP

2000-11-03 Thread Ricky Beam
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, bert hubert wrote: >> Thanks! That patch did the trick - our machine is now running lovely. > >Your very rare problem was solved in 3 hours and 50 minutes. Most commercial >support shops try and fail to deliver 4 hour response times - this makes me >feel warm inside :-) To be

Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

2000-11-03 Thread Philipp Rumpf
> > 3. Security > > * Fix module remove race bug (still to be done: TTY, ldisc, I2C, >video_device - Al Viro) (Rogier Wolff will handle ATM) TBD: sysctl, kernel_thread * drivers/input/mousedev.c dereferences userspace pointers directly. We should make this fail for a bit to catch

Re: panic in reiserfs: _get_block_create_0 gets bh_result->b_data= NULL

2000-11-03 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > Hi Hans, > > Simply starting the validation phase of SPEC SFS with NFS mounted reiserfs > filesystem panics as shown in the log below. A quick look at the source > suggests that _get_block_create_0() (and therefore, more generally, > reiserfs_get_bloc

panic in reiserfs: _get_block_create_0 gets bh_result->b_data = NULL

2000-11-03 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Hi Hans, Simply starting the validation phase of SPEC SFS with NFS mounted reiserfs filesystem panics as shown in the log below. A quick look at the source suggests that _get_block_create_0() (and therefore, more generally, reiserfs_get_block()) was passed a buffer head bh_result with ->b_data =

Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

2000-11-03 Thread Alan Cox
> * Palmax PD1100 hangs during boot since 2.4.0-test9 (Alan Cox) Fixed in pre10. > * AIC7xxx doesnt work non PCI ? (Doug says OK, new version due >anyway) This is now in Justin Gibbs hand but will take time to move on. Doug confirmed his current code is now merged too. >

[PATCH] SysRQ Registration Patch v: 0.10

2000-11-03 Thread Crutcher Dunnavant
Anyone interested in advanced debuging features: I've reved the SysRQ Registration Patch, available at: http://bama.ua.edu/~dunna001/sysrq-register/ The latest is 0.10, and applies to 2.2.18-pre9, 2.4.0-test10-pre6, and 2.4.0-test10-pre7. I got tired of reving the patch accross 6 versions, so I

Re: [BUG] /proc//stat access stalls badly for swapping process,2.4.0-test10

2000-11-03 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 02 2000, Val Henson wrote: > > > > > 3) combine this with the elevator starvation stuff (ask Jens > > > > >Axboe for blk-7 to alleviate this issue) and you have a > > > > >scenario where p

Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations...

2000-11-03 Thread Alan Cox
> It seems like both IBM's JFS and ext3 wants to use fs/jfs .. IMHO that > is like asking for problem.. A more logic location for ext3 should be > fs/ext3, no? fs/jfs is the general purpose journalling layer. Of course while thats very sensible it does clash with the ibm jfs. Maybe fs/journalling

Re: Looking for better 2.2-based VM (do_try_to_free_pages fails, machine hangs)

2000-11-03 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 10:03:27PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:59:01PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > > it appears there has been amazingly little research on this > > subject and it's completely unknown which approach will work > > "best" ... or even, what kind of behavio

Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

2000-11-03 Thread tytso
Travel and other things have kept me more than a little busy lately, so I fell a bit behind during the test10-pre* series, and didn't have a chance to issue new updates of the 2.4 TODO list as often as I would like. I've caught up on my backlog, however, and this is as up to date as I can make i

Linux job accounting demo next week

2000-11-03 Thread Marlys Kohnke
Linux job accounting will be demo'd at the SGI booth next week at SuperComputing 2000 in Dallas. I think the SGI and LANL lawyers are down to the last legal issue to be resolved, and then the source will be available at http://oss.sgi.com/projects/csa. We've got some testing to compl

Thrash reduction & RE: 2.4.0-test10 Sluggish After Load

2000-11-03 Thread Jonathan George
-Original Message- From: Christoph Rohland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 7:54 AM To: Rik van Riel Cc: Jonathan George; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: 2.4.0-test10 Sluggish After Load Hi Rik, >On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: >>

ext3 vs. JFS file locations...

2000-11-03 Thread Michael Boman
Hi Gurus, I was trying to build a super-big kernel with allot of Journaling File System inside it to try out what is best for us to use. Now, I encountered a problem.. It seems like both IBM's JFS and ext3 wants to use fs/jfs .. IMHO that is like asking for problem.. A more logic location for ex

Re: issues with ide-tape under 2.4.x and with 2.2.x+ide patches

2000-11-03 Thread Mike Dresser
(forgot to CC: this to the list when i replied to Jens, and decided to add another paragraph) I just tried my Seagate drive, and i can read my tapes in it. If i swap over to the HP, i can't read the tapes. I'll look today, whether the Seagate replies with a bunch of those I/O Errors. It's not

panic in reiserfs in 2.4.0-test10, BUG at highmem.c:220

2000-11-03 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Hello, Having tried the 2.4.0-test9 patch of reiserfs under 2.4.0-test10 I got the following panic (see kdb session below). I was running bonnie on it over NFS and at the same time running tar xIf linux-2.4.0-test10.tar.bz2 locally. Regards, Tigran root@hilbert:~# reiserfs: checking transaction

Re: [PATCH] x86 boot time check for cpu features

2000-11-03 Thread Brian Gerst
Alan Cox wrote: > > > + lea cpuid_fail_msg, %si > > + callprtstr > > +1: jmp 1b > > +cpuid_fail_msg: > > + .string "Required CPU features are not present - compile kernel for the >proper CPU type." > > +cpuid_pass: > > Only one very minor suggestion > > 1: hlt >

Re: That Dirty Son of a Bitch, Bill Gates!!!

2000-11-03 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Relax everyone. Andre has not gone insane from coding (or is he even sane to begin with?). He knows the site is a joke. Like he said earlier. He just wanted a reason to say "That Dirty Son of a Bitch, Bill Gates!!!" "Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote: > It's

Re: That Dirty Son of a Bitch, Bill Gates!!!

2000-11-03 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote: It's a joke, man. read it! Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.2.17 on an i686 machine (801.18 BogoMips). "Memory is like gasoline. You use it up when you are running. Of course you get it all back when you reboot..."; Actual explanation obtai

Re: so vesafb doesn't work in i815

2000-11-03 Thread Alan Cox
> > want 2.4test or 2.2.18pre18 + ide patch > how? > which driver? 2.2.18pre19 or 2.4.0test10 + the codec init patch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: select() bug

2000-11-03 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Paul Marquis wrote: > It shows that even though select() says a file descriptor is not > writable, a write() can still succeed. This code is not used anywhere > in the real world, or at least my real world :-P. It just demonstrates > "the bug". > It demonstrates nothing ex

Re: 2.4.0-test10 Sluggish After Load

2000-11-03 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Rik, On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > The 2.4 VM is basically pretty good when you're not > thrashing and has efficient management of the VM until > your working set reaches the size of physical memory. > > But once you hit the thrashing point, the VM falls > flat on its face. This i

Re: [PATCH] x86 boot time check for cpu features

2000-11-03 Thread Alan Cox
> + lea cpuid_fail_msg, %si > + callprtstr > +1: jmp 1b > +cpuid_fail_msg: > + .string "Required CPU features are not present - compile kernel for the proper >CPU type." > +cpuid_pass: Only one very minor suggestion 1: hlt j 1b Q: are any of the thi

[PATCH] ac3200.c, ne3210.c, fmv18x.c & sis900.c check_region() removal

2000-11-03 Thread Andrey Panin
Hi all, new check_region() removal patchset (for 2.4.0-test10) is here :) Best regards, Andrey -- Andrey Panin| Embedded systems software engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]| PGP key: http://www.orbita1.ru/~pazke/AndreyPanin.asc diff -urN /mnt/disk/linux/drivers/net/ac3

Re: NVdriver with new 2.4.test10 not function

2000-11-03 Thread Udo A. Steinberg
Vitali Lieder wrote: > > Hallo. > > Ich have test new NVdriver 0.95 with new kernel 2.4.0test10, but > have the output: > ***unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.0-test10/video/NVdriver Just add the following lines somewhere on top of nv.c and recompile the nvidia module. #define mem_map_inc

BUG FIX?: mm->rss is modified in some places without holding the page_table_lock

2000-11-03 Thread tytso
I'm in the process of updating the 2.4 bug list for test10, and as near as I can tell, there was a lot of discussion about two different ways of fixing this bug: > 9. To Do > * mm->rss is modified in some places without holding the > page_table_lock (sct) To wit, either making mm->rss

Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)

2000-11-03 Thread Thomas Pornin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > There are two immediate reasons I can come up with for this: I do not quite follow you on these two reasons. I daily work on an Alpha machine, which runs under Linux, and I use the Compaq C compiler since it gives better code on the applications I am de

Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)

2000-11-03 Thread Martin Dalecki
Tim Riker wrote: > > ok, a very valid point. The "C++ kernel code" reference is very telling. > (ouch). ;-) > > Obviously the changes to support non-gcc compilers should have the goal > of minimal impact on gcc users lives. I recognize that the mainstream > will still use gcc. > > Q: Why should

Re: USB init order dependencies.

2000-11-03 Thread Russell King
Dunlap, Randy writes: > David is entitled to his opinion (IMO). > And I dislike this patch, as he and I have already discussed. > > Short of fixing the link order, I like Jeff's suggestion > better (if it actually works, that is): go back to the > way it was a few months ago by calling usb_init(

Re: eepro checksum problem.

2000-11-03 Thread octave klaba
> eth0: Invalid EEPROM checksum 0x8107, check settings before activating > this device. all Cobalt's RAQ are this errors. Octave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml

Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10

2000-11-03 Thread Ben Ford
I have this problem also. I am running vesafb and X4.01 w/ a voodoo3500. Switching to a vc sometimes gives you black text (hiliting w/ mouse fixes it) and alternating green and red pixels across the top of the screen. -b [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 07:38:56PM +0100, Rag

NVdriver with new 2.4.test10 not function

2000-11-03 Thread Vitali Lieder
Hallo. Ich have test new NVdriver 0.95 with new kernel 2.4.0test10, but have the output: ***unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.0-test10/video/NVdriver I know that NVdriver are not for dev.kernel, but they worked perfektly with 2.4.0-test9. Thanks. T.. - To unsubscribe from this lis

Re: Include file problem with kernel 2.2.16 (seems to be the same with 2.2.17)

2000-11-03 Thread Kurt Wall
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 10:30:54AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % % % Hello, % % I've found an unfortunate bug in the "linux/timex.h" file. This file % include "sys/time.h" and this cause any program that use the adjtimex % syscall to be unable to compile (You get a lot of multiple defini

Re: Broken colors on console with 2.4.0-textXX

2000-11-03 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, James Simmons wrote: > > Console colors are completely messed up (read: black, I even suspect > > the font to be corrupt somehow) if switching back to console mode > > from X (either by quitting or ctrl-alt-fX) in recent 2.4.0-textXX > > kernels. 2.2.XX do work just fine. Is t

Include file problem with kernel 2.2.16 (seems to be the same with 2.2.17)

2000-11-03 Thread Laurent . Kersten
Hello, I've found an unfortunate bug in the "linux/timex.h" file. This file include "sys/time.h" and this cause any program that use the adjtimex syscall to be unable to compile (You get a lot of multiple definition error message). The only work-around, I've made is to comment the "#include

eepro checksum problem.

2000-11-03 Thread Mofeed Shahin
g'day all, I am having problems with my Intel Ether Express Pro 100 card. I keep getting this message : eth0: Invalid EEPROM checksum 0x8107, check settings before activating this device. What does this mean? Can I do anything to solve this problem ? Or has the card gone bad ? Mof. - To unsub

user-mode port 0.33-2.4.0-test10 - Fixed patch

2000-11-03 Thread Jeff Dike
After I generated the patch, I noticed some stuff I didn't want to release, so I edited the patch by hand, and of course, messed it up. So, the new patch is available at http://sourceforge.net/project/filelist.php?g roup_id=429 as usual. Jeff - To unsubscribe f

<    1   2