Hi !
I'm having problems when booting 2.4.0 test10 and test11 kernels
(perhaps some earlier kernels too).
Approximately nine out of ten times the kernel hangs when
trying to detect partitions on the first HPT366 disk.
It looks something like this:
Nov 21 08:08:40 t kernel: Uniform
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
[..]
> 2.2.18pre20
[..]
> o Fix ipv6 procfs bug (Al Viro)
Seems in this place was introduced small bug.
Linking kernel with disabled CONFIG_SYSCTL fails with:
kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0x5f8): undefined reference to
Keith Owens wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:11:04 -0600,
> Matthew Vanecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi. I see these warnings while compiling modules in 2.4.0-test10. This
> >is with RH 7.0's kgcc (why-oh-why did they base their system on
> >2.96!!). It doesn't seem to break
In poll, the DMA buffers need to be allocated if not already, otherwise
fragsize, dmasize, count etc. contain bogus values, which lead to bogus
poll mask return. (The alternative would have been to special case
!dmabuf_*.ready and defer DMA buffer allocation, but when the user
does poll, it
In poll, the DMA buffers need to be allocated if not already, otherwise
fragsize, dmasize, count etc. contain bogus values, which lead to bogus
poll mask return. (The alternative would have been to special case
!dmabuf_*.ready and defer DMA buffer allocation, but when the user
does poll, it
[Chip Salzenberg]
> --- drivers/char/Makefile.prev
> +++ drivers/char/Makefile Fri Nov 17 13:30:04 2000
> @@ -12,5 +12,5 @@
> SUB_DIRS :=
> MOD_SUB_DIRS := $(SUB_DIRS)
> -ALL_SUB_DIRS := $(SUB_DIRS) rio ftape joystick drm agp
> +ALL_SUB_DIRS := $(SUB_DIRS) rio ftape joystick
>
> #
> These are hardware problems, not software. Programs like gcc and ld
> segfaulting like this is NOT a software problem.
>
> Please don't turn up with some 'hey, it worked with my disk', that's no
> clue that the distrib is bad. The same arguments as 'it works with
> Windows'.
This could be a
I have a cdrom with iso9660+RR filesystem, with a few hundred files in
ten directories. With all previous kernels (checked up to test11-pre3),
I had no problems with it. With test11 final, "ls" command shows
zero entries on the mounted CD, and each "ls" attempt causes this
kernel message:
pub/../ide-2.2.17/ide.2.2.17.all.20001120.patch
pub/../ide-2.2.18/ide.2.2.18-22.all.20001120.patch
pub/../ide.2.4.0-t11/ide.2.4.0-t11.1120.patch
If you do not set CONFIG_IDEDISK_STROKE it will warn you how much it is
keeping that you can not use.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research
i dont want to revisit the flame fest (at all, please) but it seems i have been
using a kernel that successfully compiled under RedHat 7's gcc snapshot (2.96).
i normally use gcc-2.91.66 for everything (mv kgcc gcc) but just synced my
system with rawhide, so the gcc/kgcc pair is back on my
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:11:04 -0600,
Matthew Vanecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi. I see these warnings while compiling modules in 2.4.0-test10. This
>is with RH 7.0's kgcc (why-oh-why did they base their system on
>2.96!!). It doesn't seem to break anything--I'm just curious as to what
>the
[Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> I haven't checked this or anything, but it seems to me that all you
> need is a cooperating process outside the jail, that opens some
> world-readable directory
In that case, you are already outside. (: Why bother with the chroot
process at all?
Peter
-
To
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="4B08707380476D0EA895C09B"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--4B08707380476D0EA895C09B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
John Cavan wrote:
> Tim Waugh wrote:
> >
> >
Hi. I see these warnings while compiling modules in 2.4.0-test10. This
is with RH 7.0's kgcc (why-oh-why did they base their system on
2.96!!). It doesn't seem to break anything--I'm just curious as to what
the warnings signify.
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:8:
Hi Linus,
In 2.4-test11 attempting to hard link a file across filesystems (the
link does fail correctly) results in one of the filesystems (the one
the hard link was to be created on) to be in a state such that it
can't be unmounted.
The attached patch fixes this problem.
Chris.
---
Hi Linus,
This patch allows me to unload and load the apm driver module
more reliably. Apparently at least the BIOS on my Thinkpad does
not like the APM DriverVersion call being done more than once,
so I need to remeber the fact that I have already done this call.
Also, we should have been
there's already the Linux Scalability Project's wake_one() patch for 2.2.9
(which applies fine to 2.2.18preX):
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/linux-scalability/patches/p_accept-2.2.9.diff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
I noticed that for 2.4.0-test11 there is no help
for CONFIG_TOSHIBA, although there is for 2.2.17.
The following patch borrows the words for CONFIG_TOSHIBA
from the 2.2.17 Documentation/Configure.help, dropping
an extraneous "the" from the first line.
This patch applies to 2.4.0-test11.
Steven
Ion Badulescu wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 17:56:20 -0700, Jeff V. Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > also, the rpc.lockd program is reporting an error when invoked from the
> > System V init startup scripts:
> >
> > lockd: lockdsvc: invalid argument
>
> lockd is a kernel thread
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 17:56:20 -0700, Jeff V. Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also, the rpc.lockd program is reporting an error when invoked from the
> System V init startup scripts:
>
> lockd: lockdsvc: invalid argument
lockd is a kernel thread nowadays, remove it from your nfsd start
doing a mount :/dir /mount_point generates the following noisy
error messages:
kmem_create: Forcing size word alignment - nfs-fh
also, the rpc.lockd program is reporting an error when invoked from the
System V init startup scripts:
lockd: lockdsvc: invalid argument
during system
Dan Hollis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jorge Nerin wrote:
> > Well, this is a little update to the proc.txt file, it's based in 2.2 kernel, and
>I have updated it a little to the 2.4 series, I have updated all the thing I have
>been told in lk, so I submit this in order to include this in
On 20 Nov, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I used the IMPS/2 compatible mouse emulation of the wacom driver
> (/dev/input/mice).
Don't do that. It's evil. Use the xinput driver instead.
> PS: Is there an OHCI compliant PCI USB controller card available? I'm
> using an UHCI type with a VIA
Ben Ford wrote:
> Ya, I also had a system that ran many OS's great, including Linux, Win98,
> Win2k, etc. However when I went to install NT on it, the CPU overheated
> every time. Ya, I know, doesn't make sense, but that's how it was.
>
> -b
>
>
It makes sense for me as win2000 is always 5°c
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>work in our transition mechanisms. IOW, we don't have to just worry about
>1 architecture and 1 distribution, we have to make sure upgrades work,
>make sure things don't break, and ensure backward compatibility is retained
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:53:04AM +1030, Alan Kennington wrote:
> >
> > I still think that write_null() should be rewritten as:
> >
> > ===
> > static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
> >
On Tuesday November 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Monday November 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi all. 2.4.0-test11 is crashing during bootup while
> > detecting my raid5 array. According to the EIP printed (assuming
> > I did it right), that's in the function xor_block().
> >
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Paul Fulghum wrote:
> When in fact according to this linux-kernel post:
> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9912.1/0653.html
> they are goats that eat fermented potatoes.
Hahaha, gotta love flame wars =)
pavel
--
Bask in the glow of the digital silence
On Monday November 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here´s the output of ksymoops:
>
>
> >>EIP; c01c8e66<=
In drivers/md/Makefile, swap the order of "raid5.o xor.o" to be "xor.o
raid5.o", recompile, install, reboot.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Monday November 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all. 2.4.0-test11 is crashing during bootup while
> detecting my raid5 array. According to the EIP printed (assuming
> I did it right), that's in the function xor_block().
> 2.4.0-test10 works fine with the same .config. One
Hi!
> > > Actually, I was planning on doing on putting in a hack to do something
> > > like that: calculate a checksum after every buffer data update and check
> > > it after write completion, to make sure nothing scribbled in the buffer
> > > in the interim. This would also pick up some bad
i decided to use kernel-2.4.0-test10 again. But while unpacking the
archive the tar-program hangs and the kernel says :
hda: lost interrupt
this doesn´t stop.
I´ll reboot now.
At this time reporting errors is the only way i can help. But i´m on this
list since a few hours only, so maybe i´m
I have just subscribed to this list - so possibly email me directly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: kernel 2.4.0-test10 (no patches added)
Problem: getting dma problems - having to run system with no dma
for disc access - seems to be a bus mastering problem.
Hardware: Aopen AX34Pro mother board, Via
Here´s the output of ksymoops:
No modules in ksyms, skipping objects
Warning (read_lsmod): no symbols in lsmod, is /proc/modules a valid lsmod
file?
Warning (compare_maps): ksyms_base symbol
machine_real_restart_R__ver_machine_real_restart not found in System.map.
Ignoring ksyms_base entry
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Oliver Poths wrote:
> looks fascinating...
you know, it looks even more fascinating when you pass it through ksymoops
like this:
ksymoops < rawoops > oops
and then mail the result.
Regards,
Tigran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Just like the first time after the kernel crashed, i pressed
ctrl-alt-del, then another oops-message appeared.
After that i could only switch the system off. Reboot with the same result
--> power off.
Switching on again (3rd time) --> system boots!!!
But again the kernel says at ide2, ide3 and
Ya, I also had a system that ran many OS's great, including Linux, Win98,
Win2k, etc. However when I went to install NT on it, the CPU overheated
every time. Ya, I know, doesn't make sense, but that's how it was.
-b
John Jasen wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
>
> >
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> 3) edit /etc/ftpusers to allow root ftp
>
> 4) edit /etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/rlogin to comment out securetty
> PAM module (so we can telnet as root on _any_ tty)
Not into security are you?
-b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jorge Nerin wrote:
> Well, this is a little update to the proc.txt file, it's based in 2.2 kernel, and I
>have updated it a little to the 2.4 series, I have updated all the thing I have been
>told in lk, so I submit this in order to include this in the main tree in order to
Hello again,
I Tried again to built my soft-raid by the same way, with the same
result. But this time i sent you that nice message the kernel has shown
me:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0010 printing eip:
c01c8e66
*pde =
Oops:
CPU:0
Hi all. 2.4.0-test11 is crashing during bootup while
detecting my raid5 array. According to the EIP printed (assuming
I did it right), that's in the function xor_block().
2.4.0-test10 works fine with the same .config. One of the
things in the change file for test11 is "make
I just installed a Promise Ultra66 in my computer. It is running kernel
2.2.17 with the unified ide patch (20001118) from Andre Hedrick. When I
boot the machine with drives plugged into this device the machine will hang
during the partition check of the first drive connected to this
AS> When I user the ieee1394 subsystem to transmit data from a camcorder to an
AS> IDE disk and the IDE driver is not using DMA, then there will be some data
AS> lost in the ieee1394 driver. If I turn on DMA in the IDE driver (hdparm -d1
AS> /dev/hda), I do not have any data loss in the
John Jasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> On this note, I recall a time that I 'appropriated' a workstation for
> linux.
>
> It was pulled out of the student labs, where it had worked for 3 months
> running NT 4.0, but the RH install kept on crashing out.
So what? My former machine ran
> Frederic LESPEZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think the problem is due to a bad PCI detection but i let you judge.
> > Here is a description of the problem :
> > I'm under X (Xfree 4.0.1).
> > I switch to a VT (virtual terminal).
> > I load my sound module (modprobe emu10k1).
>
> could
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000, Oleg Drokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hub.c in 2.4.0-test10 and above contains hardcoded HZ value,
> which is wrong. Here is the patch:
>
>
> --- drivers/usb/hub.c.origFri Nov 17 12:51:34 2000
> +++ drivers/usb/hub.c Fri Nov 17 12:51:59 2000
> @@ -813,7
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 08:53:19AM -0500, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
> [root@merrimac linux-2.2.17]# make dep
> gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/mkdep
>scripts/mkdep.c
> collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault], core dumped
> make: ***
Hello,
I just got a severe ext2 filesystem corruption again (something from
ext2_free_blocks about freeing blocks not in datazone and then in system
zones and also allocating block in system zone). Previously (last week) it
happened on a 4cpu machine. Today on 2cpu. All UP machines running
> it's heck of alot better if we don't have a user that later
> thinks 'Damn, linux developers are meanies'...
>
> Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/
When in fact according to this linux-kernel post:
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9912.1/0653.html
>
> Just for comparison, RedHat delivers glibc compiled with
> 2.3.nn/2.4.0 headers -> newer interfaces are supported.
>
Let's not even get started on what RH did or did not do. If everyone did
what RH did, then everyone else can just roll over and die, since there
will be no
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 02:16:41PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Do programs compiled against a glibc with LFS (2.4.x kernel) support, and
> > > using that LFS support, work on kernel 2.2.x machines?
> >
> > Yes. Even glibc (2.2) compiled against kernel without LFS support has LFS
> >
Can everyone lay off this guy, he made a mistake and the heat is not cool.
This is no way for the general masses to get a taste of Linux, cool?
Please jsut let it die or offline the chap.
Regards,
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Development, TRG
Linux ATA Development
-
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Michael J. Dikkema wrote:
> Does Linux 2.4pre support the raid controller on the abit vp6? The kernel
> says it supports the 370, but it doesn't mention raid. I was confused as
> to if there was a difference or not.
I have a standalone card with the HPT370 chipset doing
Hello
I am using a Gigabyte 6VXDC7 Dual Pentium III MB.
This motherboard uses a Via 694 chipset. cf
http://www.giga-byte.com/products/6vxdc7.htm
With the 2.4.0-test11-pre1 kernel the system freezes during boot. I
suspect APIC pbs.
Can anybody help me ?
Thanks. Vincent
Below is the content of
Hi,
I've a Wacom Graphire USB. I tested the test11-pre6 kernel with my
Graphire USB. The scroll whell of the Graphire mouse does not work with
the last test kernels. The last kernel supporting the wheel was
test11-pre2, I
think...
I used the IMPS/2 compatible mouse emulation of
To Charles:
I see your intentions but you really want to take this up with Redhat
and some linux advocacy groups. linux-kernel really doesnt need to deal
with things like gcc being broken and such (which I don't think is your
case; check your hardware -- my reason? I've deployed RH 6.2 on 20 or
Hello,
I´ve set up a Debian-2.2-System and built a Kernel-2.4.0-test11 on it.
Hardwareconfiguration : athlon-850MHz, Asus-A7V (promise ultra-100 on
board), additional promise ultra-100-card. 3 IBM DTLA 307045 Disks only
one at each IDE-channel. The three ata-100 disks should become a raid-5.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:53:04AM +1030, Alan Kennington wrote:
>
> I still think that write_null() should be rewritten as:
>
> ===
> static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
> size_t count, loff_t
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 07:32:39PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 20 Nov 00 at 13:19, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Does kernel 2.4.x compile and run well for all of our supported archs?
>
> AFAIK yes. At least on all Debian archs.
So, sparc, ultrasparc, i386 (with pcmcia support), alpha, arm,
November 20, 2000.
Thanks to Wolfgang Scherr, who was the first maintainer of this driver,
we now have support for Iomega Buz cards again. There are no changes for
current DC10plus and LML33 cards users (besides that dc10.[ch] files
have been renamed to zoran.[ch]), however I would like to ask
Hi,
I also get this kernel panic with the latest kernel (test11-pre5/6)
but I didn't get it with any earlier kernels. I don't think this has anything to do
with Linux-IrDA but maybe I'm wrong.
-- Dag
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:57:30 +0400 (GMT-4), you wrote:
> Guys,
>
> can someone confirm the
I've got an older HP E40 that I'm having problems getting to work with
DMA turned on.
Specifically, I get the following errors when I do a
"hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda" and the same for hdc. If I boot into single
user mode I can't seem to generate the problem, but after booting into
multi user mode I
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
These are hardware problems, not software. Programs like gcc and ld
segfaulting like this is NOT a software problem.
Please don't turn up with some 'hey, it worked with my disk', that's no
clue that the distrib is bad. The same arguments as
Hi,
I've a Wacom Graphire USB. I tested the test11-pre6 kernel with my
Graphire USB. The scroll whell of the Graphire mouse does not work with the last
test kernels. The last kernel supporting the wheel was test11-pre2, I think...
I used the IMPS/2 compatible mouse emulation of
Well, this is a little update to the proc.txt file, it's based in 2.2 kernel, and I
have updated it a little to the 2.4 series, I have updated all the thing I have been
told in lk, so I submit this in order to include this in the main tree in order to
have a better updated info.
diff -urN
When I user the ieee1394 subsystem to transmit data from a camcorder to an
IDE disk and the IDE driver is not using DMA, then there will be some data
lost in the ieee1394 driver. If I turn on DMA in the IDE driver (hdparm -d1
/dev/hda), I do not have any data loss in the ieee1394 driver. Also,
Same experince here
Boxes ran perfectly fine with Windows (95/98/NT) but barfed with linux.
RAM replacement fixed it. Now whenever I see a signal 11 with gcc memory
is the first thing I go after.
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, John Jasen wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
>
> "Trond" == Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> " " == Ivan Kanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ivan> space. I am running this on ext2fs. Fsck-ing the filesystem
Ivan> does not help. The only way to recover the space is to
Ivan> reformat the partition.
Ivan>
HELLO WORLD!
Michael, do not take this as a flame, please. You just happen to jump on
that nerve at the wrong point. ;-)
http://www.linux-ide.org/chipsets.html
Linux ATA Development Project, Supported Chipsets (p1 of 3)
Supported Chipsets and
My NT box fritzed on sending this via outlook express, so I lost Kai's
email (MUTT works better on Linux). Here's the other info he inquired
about on the 3.1pre1 compile problems.
Jeff
We were using the attached spec file for 3.1pre1 and the other file for
3.1beta7 (sorry I posted the wrong
On 20 Nov 00 at 13:19, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Does kernel 2.4.x compile and run well for all of our supported archs?
AFAIK yes. At least on all Debian archs.
> Do programs compiled against a glibc with LFS (2.4.x kernel) support, and
> using that LFS support, work on kernel 2.2.x machines?
Does Linux 2.4pre support the raid controller on the abit vp6? The kernel
says it supports the 370, but it doesn't mention raid. I was confused as
to if there was a difference or not.
Also, OT, does anyone know if the controller is managed through hardware
or through software?
Thanks.
,.;::
:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 07:06:07PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 20 Nov 00 at 17:56, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> > I just noticed this problem -
> > I'm missing some large files created in the filesystem.
> >
> > This is 'ls' output from 2.4.0-test11/test10
> > total 33
> > drwxr-xr-x6 root
Andreas:
My changes for process accounting were not accepted along with the rest of
the 32-bit UID patches. The current state of things as I understand it is
that SGI is working on some "enhanced" accounting support for Linux, which
may end up replacing the current process accounting. (stuff
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
> (4) For those who think the hardware is broken; The hardware worked
> for six months using Windows/2000. It has a NT core.
On this note, I recall a time that I 'appropriated' a workstation for
linux.
It was pulled out of the student
At the risk of being flamed for a distribution type discussion...
Security nuts are probably rolling on the floor laughing at you for
these two. I can think of some situations where these would be usefull
though.
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> 3) edit /etc/ftpusers to allow root
> a lock of the PCI bus (as SCSI and NIC are still working). Only the
> timer interrupts and NMI seem to be stuck : can a driver cause
> something so "lowlevel" ?
Something stopping the timers on the APIC I guess. But quite what or how I
don't know
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Dans son message du Mon 20 November, Fort David ecrit :
> > Further investigations showed that the problem will occur only when
> > Xfree 4.0.1 is running with an smp kenel . Xfree 3.3.6 is ok. Could this
> > be a bug in X ? I thought that the kernel should prevent such a bug
> > from locking
On 20 Nov 00 at 17:56, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> I just noticed this problem -
> I'm missing some large files created in the filesystem.
>
> This is 'ls' output from 2.4.0-test11/test10
> total 33
> drwxr-xr-x6 root root 4096 Nov 20 18:06 .
> drwxr-xr-x 42 root root
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
> > I certainly don't know what to purchase for my
> > next attempt at a "shrink-wrap" installation.
>
> Try Red Hat 7.0 -- it is certainly better. True, no distribution is
[SNIPPED...]
I
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 05:07:14PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The patch against test11-pre7 (1043 lines) is at
> >
> > http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/tq_scheduler.patch
> >
> > It affects the following files:
>
> Andrew, can you put your patches on a properly configured site.
Hi
I just noticed this problem -
I'm missing some large files created in the filesystem.
This is 'ls' output from 2.4.0-test11/test10
total 33
drwxr-xr-x6 root root 4096 Nov 20 18:06 .
drwxr-xr-x 42 root root 1024 Nov 20 14:02 ..
drwxr-xr-x2 root root
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 07:00:41PM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > Writeprotect the flashbios with the motherboard jumper, and remove the
> > > cmos battery.
> > > Checkmate. :-)
> > Only if you run your
We were using the attached spec file for 3.1pre1 and the other file for
3.1beta7 (sorry I posted the wrong file, it was about 2 a.m. in the
morning). When built against 2.2.18-21 with 3.1pre1, I get a whole new
slew of errors. Neither seems to work. I have attached the 3.1pre1
spec file which
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> > Try Red Hat 7.0 -- it is certainly better. True, no distribution is
> > perfect but over the years I've developed my own CD image upgrade.iso
> > which goes directly after installing latest
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In reading about the cool new features of Linux v2.4, most of
> the improvements/changes seem to relate to high-end systems.
> Would users of low-end systems (386/486, low memory, etc.) be
> advised to stay with kernel v2.2.x or is v2.4.x the way
"Benjamin Monate
> In his message of Sat 18 November, Andrew Morton writes :
> > Try booting with the `noapic' option. Looks like your APIC
> > is getting itself unprogrammed. Check that you're not
> > overclocked and not over temperature.
>
> Booting with noapic did not improve anything.
>
Hello.
In reading about the cool new features of Linux v2.4, most of the
improvements/changes seem to relate to high-end systems. Would users of low-end
systems (386/486, low memory, etc.) be advised to stay with kernel v2.2.x or is
v2.4.x the way to go for these systems as well?
Thank you.
Hi,
I too run linux on a Compaq Deskpro EN PII 350. It never crashed. It runned 2.2.9 ->
2.2.15, without any oops. But I must say, I only run official kernels from kernel.org
that I compiled myself. I'm not interested in the pre-compiled redhat thingies.
Did you compile your kernel
Neil Brown wrote:
>
> Linus, Ingo:
>
> the attached patch, modifies a warning message in md.c which seems to
> often cause confusion - the following email includes one example
> there-of (there have been others over the months).
>
> Hopefully the new text is clearer.
>
> (patch against
> The patch against test11-pre7 (1043 lines) is at
>
> http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/tq_scheduler.patch
>
> It affects the following files:
Andrew, can you put your patches on a properly configured site. The site
admins have all ICMP packets blocked on www.uow.edu.au so you
Luca Montecchiani wrote:
:
> Anyway I'll do more investigation about my problem to get bootp
> work with dhcp compiled into kernel next week
With the 2.2.18pre22 kernel and also pre21 last time I checked
if you compile the kernel with DHCP and BOOTP, it's impossible
to use bootp, you need to
Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
> I can even see obvious bugs in the trace, i.e., :
> stat("/usrusr/lib/ldscripts", 0xba7c) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
Probably only a cosmetic problem. A regular run (RedHat binutils-2.9.5.0.22-6)
yields:
stat("/usrusr/lib/ldscripts", 0xb5c4) =
Hi!
I want to share memory between two differents processes in kernel mode. The
goal is to copy the read buffer of a user process into the read buffer of
another user process. I know it's possible to do it by creating an
intermediate buffer in kernel mode and to use the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrei Smirnov wrote:
>
> I have a newly installed RH-7.0 distribution on a Celeron Pentium 400.
> When I tried to compile the kernel I got the following:
>
> 1. I ran make xconfig (or make menuconfig) and saved without changing any
>options -
Hi,
is anybody maintaining the BSD process accounting? It's currently
broken since it still uses 16 bit uids :-(
struct acct in contains:
/*
* No binary format break with 2.0 - but when we hit 32bit uid we'll
* have to bite one
*/
__u16 ac_uid;
The de4x5 driver crashed on me twice today (on a 2 CPU x86 box); The
network went down for no visible reason (nothing in syslog or on the console).
The network card is a
00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43 (rev 41)
Subsystem: Compu-Shack: Unknown
> I have a newly installed RH-7.0 distribution on a Celeron Pentium 400.
> When I tried to compile the kernel I got the following:
>
> 1. I ran make xconfig (or make menuconfig) and saved without changing any
>options - completed OK
Step 0: make mrproper
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 08:53:19AM -0500, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
Charles,
6.2 is one of te better distributions. You should also go talk to RedHat
directly.
Jeff
>
> I tried to help a friend this weekend convert to Linux.
> He lives in Upstate New York, so it was a long trip from
>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 11:10:21AM +0100, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
> > ISDN_MODEM_ANZREG undefined on 2.4.0-10(11) and 2.2.18-22, rpm.spec is
> > attached.
>
> This has been fixed 2000/03/03, see below. Just use the latest version,
>
1 - 100 of 281 matches
Mail list logo
