I seem to recall a discussion on faster processors causing timing
problems during a kernel make, but I'm unable to find it in the kernel
archives. I've now upgraded to an Athlon 900 MHz processor and an ASUS
A7V motherboard and have started seeing this. It shows up as the
following messages
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote:
And one more point for the Janitor's list:
Get rid of superflous irqsave()/irqrestore()'s - in 90% of the cases
either spin_lock_irq() or spin_lock() is sufficient. That's both faster
and better readable.
spin_lock_irq(): you know that the
On Sunday, January 28, 2001 02:29:09 PM +1100 Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Starr wrote:
Andrew, the patch HAS made a difference. For example, while untaring
glibc-2.2.1.tar.gz the system was not sluggish (mouse movements in X)
etc.
Seems to be a go for latency
Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch?
Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy.
So for others if there are.
mirabilos
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12+custom(^=href;C-style-comments)
GO/S dx@ s--: a--- C++ UL P--- L++$(-^lang) E/joe W+(++)
N?
I just uploaded it to kernel.org, and I expect that I'll do the final
2.4.1 tomorrow, before leaving for NY and LinuxWorld. Please test that the
pre-kernel works for you..
Hello Linus,
can we please see Andrew's latest ACPI fixes ([Acpi] ACPI source release
updated: 1-25-2001) in 2.4.1
On Friday, January 26, 2001 01:19:49 PM -0500 James Lewis Nance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW IBM's JFS file system does not have a lost+found directory. I dont
remember if reiserfs does or not.
reiserfsck creates it.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:57:53PM +0100, Dominik Kubla wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 11:35:43PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
...
An attack against an Xray system is much more likely to come from inside the
companies network.
...
We are not talking about attacks here, we are talking
Hm. As a point of comparison, I use a similar system to yours (full SCSI,
though, no IDE) and I can copy a 100MB file from disk-to-disk, or on the
same disk, in around 13 seconds. Where are you copying to the SCSI drive
from - the same drive, an IDE disk, CDROM? If IDE, what are its
particulars?
On Sun, Jan 28 2001, mirabilos wrote:
Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch?
No, I haven't submitted it yet due to the massive restructering. Plus,
it also touches other parts than loop itself.
Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy.
So for others if there are.
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:29:52PM +, James Sutherland wrote:
There is nothing silly with the decision, davem is simply a modern day
internet hero.
No. If it were something essential, perhaps, but it's just a minor
performance tweak to cut packet loss over congested links. It's not
On Sun, Jan 28 2001, Andreas Franck wrote:
Hi Jens,
I've tested your patch quite as heavy as it gets: I created 5 files of each
100 MB, set up 5 loop devices and made a RAID5 array out of them, putting
ext2 on it and running a bonnie loop with 350 MB test size over it for the
night.
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 02:37:48PM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
Thus spake Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Conclusions:
For a NIC which cannot do scatter/gather/checksums, the zerocopy
patch makes no change in throughput in all case.
For a NIC which can do
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 06:04:17AM -0800, Ben Ford wrote:
James Sutherland wrote:
[snip]
those firewalls should be updated to allow ECN-enabled packets
through. However, to break connectivity to such sites deliberately just
because they are not supporting an *experimental* extension to
Thus spake Felix von Leitner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What is missing here is a good authoritative web ressource that tells
people which NIC to buy.
I started one now.
It's at http://www.fefe.de/linuxeth/, but there is not much content yet.
Please contribute!
Felix
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 12:27:46 -0600 (CST), Thomas Molina wrote:
I seem to recall a discussion on faster processors causing timing
problems during a kernel make, but I'm unable to find it in the kernel
archives. I've now upgraded to an Athlon 900 MHz processor and an ASUS
A7V motherboard and have
I had this problem when I was upgrading my kernel, and happened to do
it during the daylight savings time roll-back. Confused the heck out
of me for a while. Anyways, you can try 'touching' all your files,
and do a 'make clean' then try again. If it doesn't complain about a
long arg list, you
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 02:09:19PM +, James Sutherland wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Ben Ford wrote:
Do keep in mind, we aren't breaking connectivity, they are.
Let me guess: you're a lawyer? :-)
This is a very strange definition: if someone makes a change such that
their machine can
I did this:
date
dd if=/dev/zero of=TESTFILE bs=1024 count=102400
date
sync
date
and I gave the time differences from the first to the last timestamp.
Regards, Para-dox ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Harada" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "paradox3" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, forget this last email. Here is hdparm output.
hdparm
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 05:11:20PM +, James Sutherland wrote:
[snip]
The simplest thing in this chaos is to fix the firewall because it is in
violation to begin with.
It is not in violation, and you can't fix it: it's not yours.
[snip]
It's too bad we end up defining protocols using
Title:
¢Ä ¿À´ÃÀÇ À¯¸Ó ÇѸ¶µð ¢Å
"Dad, I don't want to go to school today.," said
the boy. "Why not, son?" "Well, one of the chickens on the
school farm died last week and we had chicken soup for lunch
the next day. And three days ago one of the pigs died and we
had roast pork
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:08:40PM -0500, jamal wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
A sufficiently paranoid firewall should block requests that he doesn't
fully understand. ECN was in this category, so old firewalls are
"right" to block these. (Sending an 'RST' is not
Hi,
This one-liner fixes a subtle 21143 autonegotiation problem for me on a Zynx
quad card. The driver would claim to negotiate 100-FD, but would report late
collisions and bad transmit throughput.
The driver still allows packets to be transmitted during autonegotiation,
but that only drops a
Hi,
The following bug-report concerns all linux-versions (inclusive 2.2.18) I have
had to do with!
I have been trying to mount the dos-partition /dev/hdb1 on /dos/d for
three years and it fails:
My /etc/fstab is:
/dev/hda3 / ext2 defaults 0 1
/dev/hdb2 /downloads ext2 defaults 0 1
/proc
I suggest type # fdisk -l /dev/hdb
Maybe it's FAT32 where the others are FAT16?
Try SCANDISK(tm)...
If you're familiar with FAT, you also could use DEBUG, the Norton
Utilities etc. to look for a failure in the filesystem. For FAT16 it's easy.
Bootsector, 2xFAT, root dir, data blocks
Send us a
Hi Martin!
While moving from 2.4.0-test9 to 2.4.0 I got the following problem:
Linux thinks my usb controller is on IRQ 12 instead of IRQ 9.
The 'BIOS box' (on boot) still states that usb is on IRQ 9.
Under test9 pci-irq-behaviour was okay for me, but with 2.4.0 I cant
load the usb-modules (the
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had this problem when I was upgrading my kernel, and happened to do
it during the daylight savings time roll-back. Confused the heck out
of me for a while. Anyways, you can try 'touching' all your files,
and do a 'make clean' then try again.
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:35:50 +, David Ford wrote:
AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically
enable it at run time.
I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in...
Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it anyway, thanks!
Hi Thomas an linux-sound (: !
I made up a new patch for the aci.c and related files. It's for
miroSOUND sound cards.
It applies cleanly against 2.4.0, but problems can occur when not
compiled as modules. - I will work on this issue, but my box has
problems booting completely into 2.4.0 (PCI
Problem in a nutshell: The module for my soundcard (cs4232.o) won't
load until after a "cat /proc/isapnp" has been run. I'm guessing
(though not sure) that this isn't the intended behavior. ISAPnP is
compiled into the kernel, and detects the card correctly during boot, as
evidenced by the
In Sept of 2000, I did a survey of 30,000 websites and found that 8% of
them were unreachable from an ECN capable client. Two major culprits were
identified, the Cisco PIX and Local Director. To Cisco's credit, fixes
were released quickly.
Here is a message I sent with info about the Cisco
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Thunder from the hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
A file-system without a lost+found directory is like love without sex.
You mean, possible but leaving you unsatisfied? Well, I think a file
system without a lost+found is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today, H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be
*renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck c) use "/lost+found" by name,
or by inode? As far as I know it always uses the same inode
Hi,
At 02:33 PM 28/01/2001 -0700, Dax Kelson wrote:
Here is the fix for PIX:
(see
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCds23698)
Bud ID: CSCds23698
Headline: PIX sends RSET in response to tcp connections with ECN
bits set
Product: PIX
Component:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Dieter Ntzel wrote:
I just uploaded it to kernel.org, and I expect that I'll do the final
2.4.1 tomorrow, before leaving for NY and LinuxWorld. Please test that the
pre-kernel works for you..
Hello Linus,
can we please see Andrew's latest ACPI fixes ([Acpi]
Hi Linus, Alan,
this patch has proven to be stable an useable. It hasn't changed
since 2.2.13.
The patch affects kd_mksound and kd_nosound which are responsible for
generating sound.
The default behaviour won't be changed but it's now possible for a LKM to
hook into these calls and change the
Will this patch work with the low-latency patch? I have a few other patches in this
kernel (one
fixing the ps hang issue).
Andrew Morton wrote:
Shawn Starr wrote:
Andrew, the patch HAS made a difference. For example, while untaring
glibc-2.2.1.tar.gz the
system was not sluggish (mouse
In article 01a301c0895e$b142cc90$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
mirabilos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch?
Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy.
Only if Jens sends it to me in a timely fashion (which by now means
"real soon").
Hello,
I was wondering what 802.11 PCI cards anyone knows of that run
under Linux-2.4. (or 2.2 for that matter)
I have looked at Documentation/Configure.help and done a quick
grep of all the documentation for "802.11" without much luck. I can't seem
to find anything related to
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Mike Pontillo wrote:
I was wondering what 802.11 PCI cards anyone knows of that run
under Linux-2.4. (or 2.2 for that matter)
I _think_ a good many of the 802.11 wireless ISA and PCI cards are just
bus to PCMCIA adapters, so it would be a question of whether or not
For test methodology and results go to this website, about 1/3 the way
down you'll see the ECN bullet point.
http://www.aciri.org/tbit/
Dax Kelson
Guru Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Dieter Ntzel wrote:
I just uploaded it to kernel.org, and I expect that I'll do the final
2.4.1 tomorrow, before leaving for NY and LinuxWorld. Please test that the
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 17:46:12 -0800 (PST),
"Sergey Kubushin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modules still don't load:
=== Cut ===
ide-mod.o: Can't handle sections of type 32131
ide-probe-mod.o: Can't handle sections of type 256950710
ide-disk.o: Can't handle sections of type 688840897
ext2.o: Can't
I understand a large portion of the kernel 2.4 networking code was updated
and/or completely replaced. Under 2.2 I have ipchains configured to do
basic masquerading for my local LAN. Is there a straightforward guide which
describes how to do masquerading and firewalling with 2.4 after moving
I'm tempted to use raiserfs on a 45gig raid partition because I don't
want to grow old and die before it finishes fscking. The main hassle
is that that partition will be NFSed out and in the past there have
been mutterings of rfs hacing hassles with nfs. Have these been sorted?
Is there anything
Hi, all,
My mailer (NS4.76/Linux 2.4.0-test10) has corrupted some messages and
send them at least twice. I apologize for that, please don't be worried.
Thunder
---
Woah... I did a "cat /boot/vmlinuz /dev/audio" - and I think I heard
god...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Alec Smith wrote:
I understand a large portion of the kernel 2.4 networking code was updated
and/or completely replaced. Under 2.2 I have ipchains configured to do
basic masquerading for my local LAN. Is there a straightforward guide which
describes how to do
Andrew's latest ACPI fixes (acpica-linux-2125 patched against
2.4.0) compile fine here and don't hang on my Vaio after loading
tables.
That's a start. I'll play around some more.
Jeff Garzik writes:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Dieter Ntzel wrote:
I just uploaded it to
It sounds to me like you have a SCSI bus problem. Have you checked
termination? Cable quality? Cable lengths?
Forgive me, I'm rather ignorant of SCSI hardware.All that I have is a
cable (appears
to be good quality, came with motherboard) about 60 centimeters long going
from the
motherboard
in include/linux/mm.h:
-extern void zap_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
unsigned long size, int actions);
+extern void zap_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
unsigned long size)
The function has changed and breaks memory.c ?
memory.c:352:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 05:07:33PM -0500, John Jasen wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Mike Pontillo wrote:
I was wondering what 802.11 PCI cards anyone knows of that run
under Linux-2.4. (or 2.2 for that matter)
I _think_ a good many of the 802.11 wireless ISA and PCI cards are just
bus
Nevermind, the low-latency patch changed this function.. ignore
Shawn Starr wrote:
in include/linux/mm.h:
-extern void zap_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
unsigned long size, int actions);
+extern void zap_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
Drew Bertola writes:
Andrew's latest ACPI fixes (acpica-linux-2125 patched against
2.4.0) compile fine here and don't hang on my Vaio after loading
tables.
That's a start. I'll play around some more.
Unfortunately, pcmcia modules fail to load. I can't understand the
interaction.
"paradox3" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did this:
date
dd if=/dev/zero of=TESTFILE bs=1024 count=102400
date
sync
date
and I gave the time differences from the first to the last
timestamp.
hmm. i ran this on my old ppro200 with adaptec 2940uw and ibm
DDRS-39130W drive.
I am getting messages everytime I use the network from my RH7 +
kernel-2.4.1-pre11 system:
modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module net-pf-10
I have checked my .config and can't find that modules. This does not
happen with 2.4.0 kernel, only with the latest pre series maybe pre7 on.
Lou
-
Drew Bertola writes:
Drew Bertola writes:
Andrew's latest ACPI fixes (acpica-linux-2125 patched against
2.4.0) compile fine here and don't hang on my Vaio after loading
tables.
That's a start. I'll play around some more.
Unfortunately, pcmcia modules fail to load. I can't
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
There is nothing silly with the decision, davem is simply a modern day
internet hero.
No. If it were something essential, perhaps, but it's just a minor
performance tweak to cut packet loss over congested links. It's not
IPv6. It's not PMTU. It's not even
kernel 2.4.0-ac12
# ps -eo user,pid,args,wchan|egrep "imap|update|procmail"
root 7 [kupdate]get_request_wait
david 627 imapdget_request_wait
david 752 procmail -f linu down
david 761 procmail -f linu down
david 799 procmail -f linu down
david
Em Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 06:55:25PM -0500, Louis Garcia escreveu:
I am getting messages everytime I use the network from my RH7 +
kernel-2.4.1-pre11 system:
modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module net-pf-10
I have checked my .config and can't find that modules. This does not
happen
you do not have to specify vesa,pixclock,hslen and vslen, as you leave
them on defaults.
Talking of defaults for matroxfb, would you consider limiting the fv:
value default to something reasonable that'll work on all monitors? It
took me several recompiles/reboots to get a setting that
On Mon, Jan 29 2001, David Ford wrote:
kernel 2.4.0-ac12
# ps -eo user,pid,args,wchan|egrep "imap|update|procmail"
root 7 [kupdate]get_request_wait
david 627 imapdget_request_wait
david 752 procmail -f linu down
david 761 procmail -f linu down
Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I've backed out of the low-latency patch but kept the timepegs patch in.
I've applied your reiserfs low-latency patch on a stock 2.4.1-pre11 kernel.
Let's see what happens :)
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:16:06 +0100,
SR (c) 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my /proc/ksyms shows that the exported symbols from 8390.o are different
from the other symbols because they have "_R__ver_" in front of them.
FAQ http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s8-8
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Hi Linus,
Sorry to bother you. I'm trying to find where you uploaded
linux-2.4.1-pre11.
I was on ftp.kernel.org and ftp.us.kernel.org and could not find it in the
/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4 or /pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/test-kernels/
directories. Is it somewhere different?
Also, Alan, I
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:55:51PM -0800, David D.W. Downey wrote:
Hi Linus,
Sorry to bother you. I'm trying to find where you uploaded
linux-2.4.1-pre11.
I was on ftp.kernel.org and ftp.us.kernel.org and could not find it in the
/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4 or
Short story:
Hi Andre,
why on Earth ide_delay_50ms uses jiffies instead of mdelay(50) ?!
It is invoked with interrupts disabled, causing NMI watchdog detected
on my system, leading to complete crash of system.
Long story:
At home I have Asus A7V motherboard with 1G Athlon, and onboard
Patch was in /pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/test/patch-2.4.1-pre11.gz
I'm on ftp.kernel.org right this second in /pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/
There is only a test-kernels/ subdir there, not a test/
test-kernels/ does not contain the patch.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Nevermind. I found it.
It's actually residing in /pub/linux/kernel/testing/ and NOT in
/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ or it's subdirs.
David D.W. Downey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
Damn... So much for typing too fast... Screwed it up...
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 07:59:47PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:55:51PM -0800, David D.W. Downey wrote:
Hi Linus,
Sorry to bother you. I'm trying to find where you uploaded
Hi Linus
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I just uploaded it to kernel.org, and I expect that I'll do the final
2.4.1 tomorrow, before leaving for NY and LinuxWorld. Please test that the
pre-kernel works for you..
yes, it works :-)
The main noticeable things in pre11 are
How about:
http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/testing/patch-2.4.1-pre11.gz
Bob...
"David D.W. Downey" wrote:
Patch was in /pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/test/patch-2.4.1-pre11.gz
I'm on ftp.kernel.org right this second in /pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/
There is only a test-kernels/
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Derek Wildstar wrote:
OK, tried the patch and it worked, don't remember the exact errors with
the .tar.gz, there were 7 or so undefined references.
ACPI soft-hangs one step before (after looking at the non-debug source
it may be the same place) it did last time, right
Everything but a kernel version :-(
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
Short story:
Hi Andre,
why on Earth ide_delay_50ms uses jiffies instead of mdelay(50) ?!
It is invoked with interrupts disabled, causing NMI watchdog detected
on my system, leading to complete crash of
Em Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 08:10:41PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield escreveu:
Damn... So much for typing too fast... Screwed it up...
t fast 8)
Patch was in /pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/test/patch-2.4.1-pre11.gz
Patch was in /pub/linux/kernel/test/patch-2.4.1-pre11.gz
This is working great for me so far. I've now got my full 1G RAM and samba
seems to be working fine. Woohoo! One more oops dead.
Put it in the official kernel. Put it in the official kernel. Put it in
the err, excuse me. I was chanting again.
--Rainer
-Original Message-
From:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 00:30:34, Petr Vandrovec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
you do not have to specify vesa,pixclock,hslen and vslen, as you leave
them on defaults.
Talking of defaults for matroxfb, would you consider limiting the fv:
value default to something reasonable that'll work
Hi,
Last I knew (straight from the Lucent people), the ISA bridge
card worked fine and the PCI card did NOT work at all. I've since
confirmed that, first hand, myself (I currently have the ISA bridge in
operation) on the 2.2 kernels. The ISA bridge also works on the 2.4
kernels
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 06:55:25PM -0500, Louis Garcia escreveu:
I am getting messages everytime I use the network from my RH7 +
kernel-2.4.1-pre11 system:
modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module net-pf-10
I have checked my .config and can't find that
Am Sonntag, 28. Januar 2001 22:46 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Dieter Ntzel wrote:
I just uploaded it to kernel.org, and I expect that I'll do the final
2.4.1 tomorrow, before leaving for NY and LinuxWorld. Please test that
the pre-kernel works for you..
Hello Linus,
Ulrich Drepper writes:
Pierre Rousselet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
for me :
make CFLAGS='-O2 -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE'
compiles without any patch. is it correct ?
Yes. RTLD_NEXT is not in any standard, it's an extension available
via -D_GNU_SOURCE.
This isn't a HURD feature.
This isn't even a
After a hiatus from linux-kernel, I find that the lack of a digest on
the new server is a nuisance. I'm thinking of setting up a Majordomo
digestifier, with the caveat that non-plaintext messages may have some
displaced bits.
Would there be an interest in this?
Romain Kang
On Mon, Jan 28, 2001 at 17:36 Andre Hedrick wrote:
Everything but a kernel version :-(
Sorry. Corruption happens since I have this motherboard just before
christmas - something about 2.4.0-test13-pre2. It was not so massive
as today - with 2.4.0-ac10 (before it just died, today it damaged
hdh
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote:
I was on ftp.kernel.org and ftp.us.kernel.org and could not find it in the
/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4 or /pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/test-kernels/
directories. Is it somewhere different?
All my "current" test-patches are always under
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:31:52AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I just uploaded it to kernel.org, and I expect that I'll do the final
2.4.1 tomorrow, before leaving for NY and LinuxWorld. Please test that the
pre-kernel works for you..
The Cyrix III of my employer doesn't boot without
John Fremlin writes:
When the IP address of an interface changes, TCP connections with the
old source address are useless. Applications are not notified of this
and time out ordinarily, just as if nothing had happened. This is
behaviour isn't very helpful when you have a dynamic IP and know
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 06:21:52PM +0100, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
This happens on a freshly booted 2.4.0 macine, with devfs and devfsd
running.
I got the oops by doing
# cd /dev
# ls -las
(segmentation fault)
The first oops causes the death of devfsd.
No such problems here and
The one LInus posted plus his addendum for the ll_rw_blk.
http://blue-labs.org/patches/ps-hang.patch
-d
Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29 2001, David Ford wrote:
kernel 2.4.0-ac12
# ps -eo user,pid,args,wchan|egrep "imap|update|procmail"
root 7 [kupdate]get_request_wait
I am behind a raptor firewall and ran the test that David M posted a
couple days ago and was able to sucessfully connect to his test machine.
so either raptor tolorates ECN (at least in the verion I am running) or
the test was not valid.
David Lang
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
Date:
I have pre11 running with Andrea's suggested fix.
high_queued_sectors = total_ram / 3;
low_queued_sectors = high_queued_sectors / 2;
if (low_queued_sectors 0)
low_queued_sectors = total_ram / 2;
/*
* for big RAM machines (= 384MB), use
On Sun, Jan 28 2001, David Ford wrote:
The one LInus posted plus his addendum for the ll_rw_blk.
http://blue-labs.org/patches/ps-hang.patch
You merged it wrong, Linus suggested to remove the entire
if (!list_empty(q-request_freelist[rw])) {
Drew Bertola wrote:
Drew Bertola writes:
Andrew's latest ACPI fixes (acpica-linux-2125 patched against
2.4.0) compile fine here and don't hang on my Vaio after loading
tables.
That's a start. I'll play around some more.
Unfortunately, pcmcia modules fail to load. I can't
On Mon, Jan 29 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
Try this ll_rw_blk.c change instead, on top of pre11. Include
Linus' mm fixes of course.
On top of ac12 I mean, pre11 already has a different (but functional)
change.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Am Montag, 29. Januar 2001 04:46 schrieb Jens Axboe:
On Mon, Jan 29 2001, Dieter Ntzel wrote:
I have pre11 running with Andrea's suggested fix.
high_queued_sectors = total_ram / 3;
low_queued_sectors = high_queued_sectors / 2;
if (low_queued_sectors 0)
On Mon, Jan 29 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I work for a company that develops a systems and performance management
product for Unix (as well as PC and TANDEM) called PROGNOSIS. Currently we
support AIX, HP, Solaris, UnixWare, IRIX, and Linux.
I've hit a bit of a wall trying to
From: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another one..
Robert, can you get the dump_pirq script from the pcmcia_cs package
and send the output to us?
...it seems to reflect my settings in the bios:
Interrupt routing table found at address 0xf0a50:
Version 1.0, size 0x0080
Interrupt
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Robert Siemer wrote:
From: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another one..
Robert, can you get the dump_pirq script from the pcmcia_cs package
and send the output to us?
...it seems to reflect my settings in the bios:
No, but that's really interesting..
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I work for a company that develops a systems and performance management
product for Unix (as well as PC and TANDEM) called PROGNOSIS. Currently we
support AIX, HP, Solaris, UnixWare, IRIX, and Linux.
I've hit a bit of a wall trying to
Here is the output from dmesg. How do I tell if it is improperly terminated?
Thanks, Para-dox ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Brown" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: Poor SCSI drive performance on SMP
| Your "link" values are in the range 1-4. Which makes perfect sense, but
| that's absolutely _not_ what the Linux SiS routing code expects (the code
| seems to expect them to be ASCII 'A' - 'D').
| It looks very much like "pirq_sis_get()" and "pirq_sis_set()" in
| arch/i386/kernel/pci-irq.c are
| Your "link" values are in the range 1-4. Which makes perfect sense, but
| that's absolutely _not_ what the Linux SiS routing code expects (the code
| seems to expect them to be ASCII 'A' - 'D').
| It looks very much like "pirq_sis_get()" and "pirq_sis_set()" in
| arch/i386/kernel/pci-irq.c are
301 - 400 of 423 matches
Mail list logo
