> So, I think such a fork/execve/exit hooks is harmless now.
I don't recall seeing any microbenchmarking of the impact on fork/exit
of such hooks. You might find such a benchmark in lmbench, or at
http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 15:46 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Alan> pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE,
> &softp->interrupt_line);
> Alan> request_irq(softp->interrupt_line, sseintr, SA_INTERRUPT,
> "sse", softp);
>
> Don't do that. The kernel may need you to use a differe
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 10:27 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> Thanks, your patch fixes the copy_pte_range latency.
> >>
> >>clear_page_range is also problematic.
> >
> >
> > Yes, I saw that from your other traces too. I know th
Hi Amon,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:19:16AM +0100, Amon Ott wrote:
> > -> 5. Posix Capabilities Without Stacking Support
> >
> > I don't get the point of these claims.
> > The LSM framework currently has full support for dynamic and
> > logic-changeable POSIX.1e capabilities, using the capable()
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Agree it needs fixing, but I actually think the rx-offset stuff is more
> urgent than this. For the future, it would be useful for both of us to
> have separate r8169-fixes and r8169-cleanups queues.
Do you have a synonym/pointer for the rx-offset stuff
Horst von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Machine is sparc64, bk of today, gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3 (Aurora Corona). First 2.6
> I try to build here, so it might be something known.
>
> Build fails due to -Werror with:
>
> include/asm/uaccess.h: In function `load_elf_binary':
> arch/sparc64/kernel/..
Chris Wright wrote:
>>/proc/N/status will tell you that a process has
>>a signal pending, but it won't tell you how many are pending).
>>
>>
>
>Suggestion for good place to display that info?
>
>
I guess another line in /proc/N/status:
SigQue: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 0 0 1238 0 0 0 0 0 ... 0
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:10:38PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
> >>For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
> >>
> >>VFS: Cannot open root d
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Mickey Stein wrote:
From: Mickey Stein
Versions: linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk11, gcc4 (GCC) 4.0.0 20050217 (latest fc
rawhide from 19Feb DL)
gcc 4.0.x cvs seems to dislike "include/linux/i2c.h file" and others due to a
current gcc 4.0.x change having to do with
array declarations.
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
> >> For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
> >>
> >> VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or u
Ingo,
We've had a PPC port of your RT work underway with
a focus on trace instrumentation. This is based upon
realtime-preempt-2.6.11-rc2-V0.7.37-02. A diff is
attached.
To the extent possible the tracing facilities are the
same as your x86 work. In the process a few PPC/gcc
issues needed to
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:16:53PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, that worked. 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 now boots OK, but hdb1 seems to be
> > > missing.
>
> Looking at the IDE update in rc4-mm1:
>
> +void ide_init_disk(struct gendisk *disk, ide_drive_
Alan> I ask the card which interrupt line it was given at
Alan> boot-time:
Alan> pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE,
&softp->interrupt_line);
Alan> Then I request an IRQ:
Alan> request_irq(softp->interrupt_line, sseintr, SA_INTERRUPT,
"sse", softp);
D
Any chance to convince the alien who took control of Jeff's libata queue to
push:
r8169: synchronization and balancing when the device is closed
(1.1982.1.58 ?)
Test case on current 2.6.11-rc4:
- ifconfig ethX 10.0.0.1 up
- ifconfig ethX down
- ifconfig ethX 10.0.0.1 up
-> Rx does not work any mo
Erm, this updated patch.
J
If we're sending a signal relating to a faulting instruction, then
always generate siginfo for that signal.
If the user has some unrelated process which has managed to consume
the user's entire allocation of siginfo, then signals will start being
delivered without
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:40, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:12, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:38, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> > >
> > > On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches
Dmitry Torokhov a ecrit le 24.02.2005 00:40:
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:12, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:38, J.A. Magallon wrote:
On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
- Various fixes and
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could someone try this?
Let's turn that into a real patch.
--- 25/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c~ide_init_disk-fixWed Feb 23 16:24:44 2005
+++ 25-akpm/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c Wed Feb 23 16:24:55 2005
@@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ide_unr
Hi Burn
Could you try the attached patch
It solved the same problem for me, it is NOT SMP safe due
to cli() calls, though will run fine on your system. I have been
running a console box for about 1mth non-stop with these applied.
The patch does two things it allows the driver to be built-in and
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Mathieu Segaud wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait derni??rement que :
>
> > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
> >> when trying to mount /var.
> >> (I ha
Olof Johansson wrote:
> How's this? I went with get_val_no_fault(), since it isn't really a
> get_user.*() any more (ptr being passed in), and no_paging is a little
> misleading (not all faults are due to paging).
How ironic: I deliberately didn't choose "no_fault" because that
function *does* tak
> gdb attach the vmware, then force it to call routine you preloaded...
>
> Or look at subterfugue.
> Pavel
Brilliant Pavel. Thank you. gdb works great.
Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:52:23 +1100
Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'd be pretty happy for you to queue this up with Andrew for
> 2.6.12. Anyone else?
No objections from me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PR
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, that worked. 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 now boots OK, but hdb1 seems to be
> > missing.
Looking at the IDE update in rc4-mm1:
+void ide_init_disk(struct gendisk *disk, ide_drive_t *drive)
+{
+ ide_hwif_t *hwif = drive->hwif;
+ unsigned int unit
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:36:50PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> hey, what's this /dev/hds ? digging into /sys/block...
>
> ~$ ls -l /sys/block/hds/device
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 f?v 23 22:45 /sys/block/hds/device ->
> ../../devices/pci:00/:00:04.1/ide1/1.1/
>
> /dev/hdq should be
Alan Kilian wrote:
Maybe that's it.
I ask the card which interrupt line it was given at boot-time:
pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE,
&softp->interrupt_line);
Then I request an IRQ:
request_irq(softp->interrupt_line, sseintr,
Mark Lord wrote:
Minor patch for new 2.6.xx sata_qstor driver attached,
as per Alexey's fine-toothed comb! :)
Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cool, I'll throw this into libata-2.6 soonish.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the b
Hugh Dickins wrote:
I'm off to bed, but since your appetite for looking at patches
is greater than mine, I'll throw what I'm currently testing over
the wall to you now. Against 2.6.11-rc4-bk9, but my starting point
was obviously your patches. Not yet split up, but clearly should be.
Yeah you've s
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:
>
> >It's not quite inexplicable. It means that task has hit its limit for
> >pending signals ;-) But I agree, this should be fixed. I think I had
> >tested this with broken test cases, thanks for catching.
> >
> It's partic
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 06:42:32PM +, Telemaque Ndizihiwe wrote:
> This Patch replaces "(2 * HZ)" with "DATA_TIMEOUT" which is defined as
> #define DATA_TIMEOUT (2 * HZ)
> in /drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c in kernel 2.6.10.
>
> Signed-off-by: Telemaque Ndizihiwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This has
Dominik Brodowski a écrit :
+pcmcia-bridge-resource-management-fix.patch
is responsible for this "no resource available" message, because the other
ones relate to other areas.
This line from dmesg-2.6.11-rc4 is no longer present in -rc4-mm1:
PCI: Transparent bridge - :00:1e.0
This is probably d
Vijayalakshmi Hadimani wrote:
Hi,
I am inserting a module(device driver) using insmod.
I want to send a message from this module to an user process.
For this I used msgsnd with buffer in the call as a local
variable. I am getting an error "EFAULT" for this call.
However this did not happen w
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:12, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:38, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> >
> > On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
> > >
> > >
> > > - Various fixes and
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait derniÃrement que :
> Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
>> when trying to mount /var.
>> (I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and an IDE cdrom on another.)
>> They are
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 04:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
>
> - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> down a bit.
>
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone ha
Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 23.02.2005 21:12, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
> >> when trying to mount /var.
> >> (I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and an
Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Motherboard is a biostar with nforce2 chipset, 2800xp cpu, gig of ram.
I've recently made the observation that while I can view 30fps video
from my firewire equipt movie camera with a minimal cpu hit of 2-3%,
but viewing the video from a webcam on a usb 1.1 circuit
Chris Wright wrote:
>It's not quite inexplicable. It means that task has hit its limit for
>pending signals ;-) But I agree, this should be fixed. I think I had
>tested this with broken test cases, thanks for catching.
>
>
It's particularly confusing for users, because it's a per-user limit
r
Alan Kilian wrote:
kernel: SSE: Found a DeCypher card.
kernel: ACPI: PCI interrupt :13:03.0[A] -> GSI 36 (level, low) ->
IRQ 217
The first message is in my driver after pci_find_device()
The second is from when I do pci_enable_device(dev);
Can you decode the mys
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
Thanks, your patch fixes the copy_pte_range latency.
clear_page_range is also problematic.
Yes, I saw that from your other traces too. I know there are plans
to improve clear_page_range during 2.6.12, but I didn't realize that
it had beco
Minor patch for new 2.6.xx sata_qstor driver attached,
as per Alexey's fine-toothed comb! :)
Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cheers
--
Mark Lord
Real-Time Remedies Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux/drivers/scsi/sata_qstor.c.orig2005-02-16 20:31:57.0
-0500
+++ linux/dri
linux-os wrote:
Trying to run an old server with a new kernel. A connection
fails with "interrupted system call" as soon as a client
attempts to connect. A trap in the code to continue
works, but subsequent send() and recv() calls fail in
the same way.
Anybody know how to mask that SIGIO (or whatev
Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It does not seem to be finding the keyboard at all...
Can you confirm that Linus's tree is OK? You'd best use the patch
at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.5/testing/cset/ to make sure you
have the latest stuff.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:38, J.A. Magallon wrote:
>
> On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
> >
> >
> > - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> > down a bit.
> Alan> kernel: SSE: Found a DeCypher card. kernel: ACPI: PCI
> Alan> interrupt :13:03.0[A] -> GSI 36 (level, low) -> IRQ 217
>
> If ACPI has set this device up to use interrupt 217, why are you
> registering it on IRQ 5?
>
Peter,
Maybe that's it.
I ask the car
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 05:57:14PM -0500, linux-os wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Mickey Stein wrote:
>
> >From: Mickey Stein
> >Versions: linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk11, gcc4 (GCC) 4.0.0 20050217 (latest fc
> >rawhide from 19Feb DL)
> >
> >gcc 4.0.x cvs seems to dislike "include/linux/i2c.h file" and ot
"Thomas S. Iversen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd be suspecting that the sector remapping is the cause of the problem.
> > How is it implemented?
>
> Quite simple actually. You're most welcome to see the code, but I have
> just done a test like the one below. Never mind the performance fi
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:36:50PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 23.02.2005 21:12, Andrew Morton a ?crit :
> >Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
> >>when trying to mount /var.
> >>(I have two IDE disks on the s
Hello-
We have hit a defect where an exiting xterm process will hang. This is running
on a 2-cpu IA-64 box. We have a multithreaded application, where one thread
is SCHED_FIFO and is running with priority 98, and the other thread is just
a normal SCHED_OTHER thread. The SCHED_FIFO thread is in
> +++
> linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/ext2/ioctl.c
> 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ int ext2_ioctl (struct inode * inode, st
> case EXT2_IOC_SETFLAGS: {
> unsigned int oldflags;
>
> - if (IS_RDONLY(ino
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:03:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
> > >> For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-r
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 01:11:29PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
>
> ;
> ; Bind Mount Extensions
> ;
> ; This part adds the required checks for touch_atime() to allow
> ; for vfsmount based NOATIME and NODIRATIME
> ; autofs4 update_atime is the only exception (ignored on purpose)
and that purpo
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 01:10:49PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
>
> ;
> ; Bind Mount Extensions
> ;
> ; This part adds support for the RDONLY, NOATIME and NODIRATIME
> ; vfsmount flags, propagates those options into loopback (bind)
> ; mounts and displays them properly in show_vfsmnt()/proc
wr
> "Alan" == Alan Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alan> kernel: SSE: Found a DeCypher card. kernel: ACPI: PCI
Alan> interrupt :13:03.0[A] -> GSI 36 (level, low) -> IRQ 217
If ACPI has set this device up to use interrupt 217, why are you
registering it on IRQ 5?
--
Dr Peter Chub
Not the most clever subject, I agree :)
hell, i'm not sure if this is a KERNEL bug. but it definitely is an
annoyance, so...
distro is slackware 10.
i have a small script i run every time i connect to the internet (and i
connect via dial-up when )
this is one command in the script:
/usr/sbin/ntpd
Steven Cole wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or unknown-block(3,1)
Please append a correct "root="
Hi!
On the Linux router I'm running, I use the ipt_owner iptables module,
and since a few kernel versions back, I've begun getting kernel panics
in the ipt_owner module.
Unfortunately, the start of it coincided with a CPU upgrade of the
router, so at first I thought it was a hardware failure. The
- Original Message -
From: "Arjan van de Ven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ammar T. Al-Sayegh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:483!
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 16:45 -0500, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 15
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:45:37AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> ty den 22.02.2005 Klokka 13:12 (+0100) skreiv Herbert Poetzl:
>
> > diff -NurpP --minimal
> > linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01/fs/namei.c
> > linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01/fs/namei.c
> > --- li
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:37:53AM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
> I copied a working .config from an earlier kernel(-rc3), and ran make
> oldconfig, answering most of the new questions 'n'.
Then you get into trouble with stuff under CONFIG_EMBEDDED. Answering
'n' turns off stock functionality. Thoug
- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Dickins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ammar T. Al-Sayegh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:483!
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
Any suggestion on what else I can do to miti
On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
>
> - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> down a bit.
>
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has patches in here which ar
Le 23.02.2005 21:12, Andrew Morton a écrit :
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
when trying to mount /var.
(I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and an IDE cdrom on another.)
They are usually hda, hdb, and hdc.
MAKEDEV h
El mié, 23-02-2005 a las 14:07 -0800, Crispin Cowan escribió:
> If that is what you meant, then we had no issue.
>
> It looked like you were referring to Immunix because, in the quoted
> text, one paragraph only discussed Immunix (by name) and then the
> subsequent paragraph just said "them" and
> + page = pfn_to_page(p >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + /*
> + * On ia64 if a page has been mapped somewhere as
> + * uncached, then it must also be accessed uncached
> + * by the kernel or data corruption may occur
> + */
> +#ifdef A
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Dick Johnson wrote:
>
> callpci_enable_device(dev)
> ... before you use the IRQ in dev->irq.
>
> The reported IRQ is bogus until you make that
> call. It's a reported BUG, probably won't
> ever get fixed because it's considered a
> fe
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has patches in here which are 2.6.11
> material, please tell me.
Any chance to convince the alien who took control of Jeff's libata queue to
push:
r8169: synchronization and balancing when the device is closed
Something has caused the page at offset 51 (block 102) to have buffer_heads
for blocks 128 and 129 attached to it.
Ok.
I'd be suspecting that the sector remapping is the cause of the problem.
How is it implemented?
Quite simple actually. You're most welcome to see the code, but I have
just done a
Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro wrote:
El mié, 23-02-2005 a las 13:37 -0800, Crispin Cowan escribió:
Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro wrote:
You are confused. It is Secure Computing Corporation that holds patents
that threaten SELinux
http://www.securecomputing.com/pdf/Statement_of_Assurance.pd
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 21:03 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, your patch fixes the copy_pte_range latency.
> >
> > clear_page_range is also problematic.
>
> Yes, I saw that from your other traces too.
Heh, sorry, that one was a dupe... I
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 20:53 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Please replace by new patch below, which I'm now running through lmbench.
>
> That second patch seems fine, and I see no lmbench regression from it.
Should go into 2.6.11, right?
Lee
-
To unsub
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or unknown-block(3,1)
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel
From: Mickey Stein
Versions: linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk11, gcc4 (GCC) 4.0.0 20050217 (latest fc
rawhide from 19Feb DL)
gcc 4.0.x cvs seems to dislike "include/linux/i2c.h file" and others
due to a current gcc 4.0.x change having to do with
array declarations.
Example error msg: include/linux/i2c.h
El mié, 23-02-2005 a las 13:37 -0800, Crispin Cowan escribió:
> Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro wrote:
> You are confused. It is Secure Computing Corporation that holds patents
> that threaten SELinux
> http://www.securecomputing.com/pdf/Statement_of_Assurance.pdf
>
> Immunix has never threatene
Roland Dreier schrieb:
> Prakash> If I am not totally mistaken this is not gcc4 friendly
> Prakash> code. (lvalue thing...)
>
> Actually you misread the code slightly. It's a little subtle, but
> code like
>
> *(__le32 *)prd = cpu_to_le32(len);
>
> is not using a cast as an l
> But not all cases could be accounted in that way. If you
> report back that memtest86 ran cleanly...
Hugh,
Nothing to do with the 'problem' in this thread, but an aside that is perhaps
relevant.
On my main gateway, I couldn't get any kernel greater than 2.6.4 to run
without an 'oops' after
Dominik Brodowski a écrit :
+pcmcia-bridge-resource-management-fix.patch
is responsible for this "no resource available" message, because the other
ones relate to other areas.
Yes, good catch, reverting it makes PCMCIA work again.
Let me know if you want me to test some patches.
Thanks,
Brice
-
To
Prakash> If I am not totally mistaken this is not gcc4 friendly
Prakash> code. (lvalue thing...)
Actually you misread the code slightly. It's a little subtle, but
code like
*(__le32 *)prd = cpu_to_le32(len);
is not using a cast as an lvalue. It's dereferencing a cast an
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 16:45 -0500, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 15:41 -0500, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I recently installed Fedora RC3 on a new server.
> >> The kernel is 2.6.10-1.741_FC3smp. The server
> >> crashes every few days. When I examine /var/
Hi,
I am trying to get bochs to use tun/tap on x86_64, strace reveals the
following problem:
open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR)= 7
ioctl(7, TUNSETIFF, 0x7fffe6c0) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
I wonder if this a tun/tap or a bochs problem. Any clues?
Tom
--
T h o m a s Z e
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> How's this? I went with get_val_no_fault(), since it isn't really a
> get_user.*() any more (ptr being passed in), and no_paging is a little
> misleading (not all faults are due to paging).
Applied with minor cosmetic changes. I'm like a dog who li
Remove the sparse warnings about using plain integer as NULL pointer in
the following files:
arch/i386/oprofile/backtrace.c
drivers/char/isicom.c
drivers/char/drm/radeon_state.c
drivers/mtd/maps/nettel.c
drivers/net/wireless/prism54/isl_ioctl.c
drivers/serial/8250_early.c
fs/reiserfs/namei.c
Sig
Linux 2.6 (mm tree) Compile Statistics (gcc 3.4.1)
Web page with links to complete details:
http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/
KernelbzImage bzImage bzImage modules bzImage modules
(defconfig) (allno) (allyes) (allyes) (allmod) (allmod)
---
> The problem arises from code touching the union in alloc_posix_timer()
> which makes firing go non-zero. When firing is checked in
> posix_cpu_timer_set() it will be positive causing an infinite loop.
>
> So either the below fix or preferably move the INIT_LIST_HEAD(x) from
> alloc_posix_timer()
Hello!
I once again tried reiserfs, this time on my ibook:
ei ~ # mkreiserfs -V
mkreiserfs 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com)
ei ~ # uname -a
Linux ei 2.6.10 #5 Sun Feb 6 17:26:47 CET 2005 ppc 750CXe PowerBook4,1 GNU/Linux
If I tar xf $big_tar (speaking about the gcc-source), my system hangs:
- no
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 15:41 -0500, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
Hi All,
I recently installed Fedora RC3 on a new server.
The kernel is 2.6.10-1.741_FC3smp. The server
crashes every few days. When I examine /var/log/messages,
I find the following line just before the crash:
Feb 22 23:50:35 hostname ker
Thanks for finding that.
Ack! I did a quick merge of my well-tested patches with the cputime_t
stuff, and apparently didn't do quite as much testing as I thought I did.
There was a little query/replace error in my per-process-itimer-cpu patch
now in -mm. Your patch is necessary but not sufficien
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:28:58PM +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > Here is a preliminary set of patches to allow gcc-4.0 (20050130)
> > to compile the 2.4.30-pre1 kernel. I make no claim that the patches
> > are complete, but they have been tested successfully on i386
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Jeff Garzik wrote:
You should add this to your procmailrc :)
# Nuke duplicate messages
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| $FORMAIL -D 32768 msgid.cache
That has the nasty side-effect of spreading messages for a single
discussion amongst many different mailboxes depending on whi
Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro wrote:
Also, it was a pretty good thing from them this piece of work.
Think that they investors may dislike the model they followed when the
merge happened, anyways, and as an example, I pretty ignore those
patents claims,for example, think that Type Enforcement (TE)
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
>
> I recently installed Fedora RC3 on a new server.
> The kernel is 2.6.10-1.741_FC3smp.
I can't really speak for Fedora RC3 kernels,
perhaps there's some special patch in there that happens to
trigger it for you, but certainly there have been occas
Alexey Dobriyan schrieb:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2005 21:57, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>+ addr = sg_dma_address(sg);
>>+ *(u64 *)prd = cpu_to_le64(addr);
>
>
> *(__le64 *) prd
>
>
>>+ prd += sizeof(u64);
>
>
>>+ len = sg_dma_len(sg);
>>+ *(u
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 01:42:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.11-rc3-mm1:
>...
> bk-kbuild.patch
>...
This adds -Wno-pointer-sign to the main Makefile a second time.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkne
Thanks. All this stuff was minor, so I'll wait until 2.6.11 release to
update.
I forwarded the qstor stuff to maintainer Mark Lord.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:28:58PM +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Here is a preliminary set of patches to allow gcc-4.0 (20050130)
> to compile the 2.4.30-pre1 kernel. I make no claim that the patches
> are complete, but they have been tested successfully on i386 (multiple
> boxes), x86-64, and
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:20:09PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Andrew Morton a écrit :
> >ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
> I can't get PCMCIA to work anymore since rc4-mm1.
> It was working great with rc4 and rc3-mm1.
>
> PCMCIA loa
Rogério Brito wrote:
On Feb 20 2005, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
My linux laptop says:
irq 5: nobody cared!
(...)
Does anyone care? :-)
Well, I'm getting similar stack traces with my system and those are sure
scary, but it seems that my e-mails to the list are simply ignored,
unfortunately.
I poste
Factor out some code
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -puN drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-460 drivers/net/r8169.c
--- a/drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-460 2005-02-23 21:35:28.715271999 +0100
+++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c 2005-02-23 21:35:28.720271177 +0100
@@ -495,6 +495,13 @@
While working on a driver for z85230 based board I noticed what looks
like it could be a problem. If the interrupt handler is handling an
interrupt on port b and an interrupt comes in for port a, it seems to me
that the port b handler would be called instead of the port a handler,
and possibly
I finally had some time to debug this one a little more
thoroughly. On two different machines (Shuttle SB61G1) I
get the same results, so I do not believe it is bad hardware...
The bug is as follows:
I have 1 4-port tulip NIC in the machine. If I generate traffic
between two interfaces, it runs f
101 - 200 of 319 matches
Mail list logo
