Il Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:25:22AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger ha scritto:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:00:04 +0100
Luca Tettamanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:33:39PM -0600, Jay Cliburn ha scritto:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:07:37 -0600 Jay Cliburn
Jay Cliburn wrote:
Perhaps a dumb question, but when can I begin submitting differential
patches? Now? I'd like to incorporate some of Arjan's and Randy's
comments.
Submit patches starting... now! :)
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
Dale Farnsworth wrote:
From Dale Farnsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mv643xx_eth: Fix race condition in mv643xx_eth_free_tx_descs
This bug was found and isolated by Thibaut VARENE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED]. This patch is a modification of their
fixes. We acquire and
Auke Kok wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Auke Kok wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
upstream-linus
Jeff,
is there a reason that you didn't pull the e1000 tree from us? I send
you all the
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
IMHO the MSI disabling should be removed from drivers and be done
in the PCI core.
That is the consensus opinion.
Currently drivers implement the MSI tests because the core PCI code
hasn't been up to snuff. I (and others) have been discouraging that,
but when a
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:33:29 -0500
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
IMHO the MSI disabling should be removed from drivers and be done
in the PCI core.
That is the consensus opinion.
Currently drivers implement the MSI tests because the core PCI code
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:33:29 -0500
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
IMHO the MSI disabling should be removed from drivers and be done
in the PCI core.
That is the consensus opinion.
Currently drivers implement the MSI tests because the
Randy Dunlap wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:33:29 -0500
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
IMHO the MSI disabling should be removed from drivers and be done
in the PCI core.
That is the consensus opinion.
Currently drivers implement the
As usual, these are post-2.6.20 material.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
Replace global queue and lock with per-device queues and locks. Mostly a
straightforward replacement of ubd_io_lock with dev-lock and ubd_queue with
dev-queue.
Complications -
There was no way to get a request struct (and queue) from the
structure sent to the io_thread, so a pointer to
Fix a bunch of style violations in mem.c.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
arch/um/os-Linux/mem.c |9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm/arch/um/os-Linux/mem.c
===
---
Add a couple of comments about some non-locked data.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.c |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm/arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.c
===
---
We shouldn't be using the os wrappers from os code - we can use libc
directly. This patch replaces wrapper calls with libc calls.
It turns out that os_sigio_async had only one caller, which was in
startup.c, so that function is moved there and its name changed.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL
Some style fixes in startup.c.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm/arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.c
===
Locking comments and emacs comment removal in the low-level memory and
temp file code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
arch/um/include/tempfile.h | 10 --
arch/um/kernel/mem.c |3 ++-
arch/um/os-Linux/mem.c |7 +++
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+),
Some small locking and formatting fixes in the ubd driver.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c | 35 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 14:17, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:02:30AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Monday 22 January 2007 21:13, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
I was playing with user-mode Linux and found that mknod creates
devices node in hostfs with wrong
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:22:46PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
Anything else relevant? Do you know which signal interrupted select? Is this
a single or multithreaded application? And where did the signal come from?
It is, AFAIK, a multi-threaded application. I don't have any information
on which
I knew of course about libdvdcss but I've never noticed before that the
kernel issues these error messages to the syslog.
Various bits of random desktop junk poll drives to see what has appeared
and stick icons on desktops. Some of them do stuff that produces messages
like this because they
On 2007-01-03, DervishD wrote:
Hi all :)
Hallo!
I've noticed that, even if I say NO to initramfs (and even ramdisk
support), the make process wants to GEN usr/initramfs_data.cpio.gz by
running the scripts/gen_initramfs_list.sh script.
Why is that script run no matter the
On 1/24/07, Lionel Landwerlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mardi 23 janvier 2007 à 16:30 -0500, Len Brown a écrit :
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 07:27, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
Le mardi 23 janvier 2007 à 17:22 +0800, Luming Yu a écrit :
Please try to remove processor module.
Ok, that's
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 04:41:39AM +0530, Sunil Naidu wrote:
You have to remember that the Kernel Summit is invite only. Holding
the summit at a location doesn't really mean it's open to anyone
there.
Defnitely this could be held on invite only. Many Top forums happen in
India in this
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:45:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
There is an ongoing desultory effort from Ralf to unify the ARM and MIPS
APM implementations. Independently converting them both to use seqfile
at this stage might muck that up. Ralf, talk to me?
I was planning to get back to
Pablo Sebastian Greco wrote:
Well, it took me a few days, but I think I'm ready to report back. One
of the drives was failing, and it stopped after rewiring power supply so
the last problem seems to be corrected.
OTOH, your blacklist seems to be needed too, now I'm running FC6
distribution
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 00:01, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Alan wrote:
kernel: Error: Illegal request -- (Sense key=0x05)
kernel: Read of scrambled sector without authentication -- (asc=0x6f,
ascq=0x03)
The disc is using digital rights management. If you are in a country
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 03:52, Pavel Pisa wrote:
i've added your patch to -rt, but note that there's a new, slightly
incompatible clockevents code in -rt now so you'll need to do some more
(hopefully trivial) fixups for this to build and work.
Ingo
Hello Ingo,
Unfortunately,
Scott Preece [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My own hot button is making sure that the definition of what
constitutes user activity is managed in exactly one place, whether in
the kernel or not. My naive model would be to put the response at user
level, but to provide a single point of
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
On 2007-01-23, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
[]
what it does is scan the entire tree for lines of the form
...if... CONFIG_whatever...
collects all of those CONFIG variables and, one at a time, checks to
see if that variable even exists in any
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 8:07 am, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:42:15 -0800, David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed the check can be omitted. Should I send a new patch just
moving class_device_get() into if (master-bus_num == bus_num)
block?
Yes, please.
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Does SATA electrical conector keying let the disk firmware unload
heads before the user manages to pull it out enough to sever power?
I don't think so.
Heh, thought as much. (Good)
OK, here it is in full signed-off glory. Hopefully we can get this in
for 2.6.20.
---
Several people reported issues with certain drive commands timing out on
sata_nv controllers running in ADMA mode. The commands in question were
non-DMA-mapped commands, usually FLUSH CACHE or FLUSH CACHE
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 22:00 +, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
- Provide a generic way to verify clocksources. TSC needs
verification due to broken hardware and BIOS implementations. The
previous attempt to allow TSC usage for high resolution and/or
dynamic ticks only in combination with
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:16:31 -0800
Daniel Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 22:00 +, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
- Provide a generic way to verify clocksources. TSC needs
verification due to broken hardware and BIOS implementations. The
previous attempt to allow
Apple Macbook 2GHz (x86, not amd64)
Please try to remove processor module.
Ok, that's done. Same problem.
any difference with idle=poll?
if yes, how about idle=halt?
idle=poll seems to fix the problem (cpu fan is running almost at full
speed). Maybe I should run a
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Imagine for a moment that we solve time-warp somehow. Any other
problems?
Well, a user-level daemon have to process a lot of data just to detect user
interaction. Considering that the trackpad bandwidth is nearly 5KB/sec,
probably would be better to
From: Oleg Nesterov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are doing -buf_prepare(buf) before adding buf to q-stream list. This
means that videobuf_qbuf() should not try to re-add a STATE_PREPARED buffer.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:49:55 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we enter reclaim and the number of page cache pages
is too high then we switch off swapping during reclaim
to avoid touching anonymous pages.
In general, I like this (kind of) feature.
+ /*
+ *
Christoph Lameter wrote:
This is a patch using some of Aubrey's work plugging it in what is IMHO
the right way. Feel free to improve on it. I have gotten repeatedly
requests to be able to limit the pagecache. With the revised VM statistics
this is now actually possile. I'd like to know more
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
if (sc-may_swap
zone_page_state(zone, NR_FILE_PAGES)
!(curreht-flags PF_MEMALLOC))
sc-may_swap = 0;
That is probably better than what we have so far.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
Paul Davies wrote:
This patch is a proposed cleanup of the current page table organisation.
Such a cleanup would be a logical first step towards introducing at least
a partial clean page table interface, geared towards providing enhanced
virtualization oportunities for x86. It is also a common
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
1. Insure that anonymous pages that may contain performance
critical data is never subject to swap.
2. Insure rapid turnaround of pages in the cache.
So if these two aren't working properly at 100%, then I want to know the
reason why. Or at
one more thing...
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:49:55 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -1168,6 +1170,11 @@ zonelist_scan:
!cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall(zone, gfp_mask))
goto try_next_zone;
+ if ((gfp_mask
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 18:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
There appears to be some fairly clear duplication between my clocksource
tree and this release of high resolution timers. Not to mention that we
both submitted our tree's to Andrew within days .
To lessen Andrews burden it would
Hi,
I've moved the new FireWire stack to an in-tree git repository and
moved over the missing patches from my out-of-tree version. The tree
is available over here:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~krh/linux-2.6
with gitweb avialable here:
On 1/24/07, Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
1. Insure that anonymous pages that may contain performance
critical data is never subject to swap.
2. Insure rapid turnaround of pages in the cache.
So if these two aren't working
Aubrey Li wrote:
On 1/24/07, Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
1. Insure that anonymous pages that may contain performance
critical data is never subject to swap.
2. Insure rapid turnaround of pages in the cache.
So if these two
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:12:42 +0900 (JST)
takada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen)
Subject: Re: fix typo in geode_configre()@cyrix.c
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:50:07 -0500
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:38:35AM +0900, takada wrote:
You are right. I agree to
Linus,
Please pull 'master' from:
git://git.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/v4l-dvb.git
master.
The patch fixes an important bug on V4L core. By doing some ioctls on an
unexpected order, it is possible to hang the machine without needing to be
root, causing a DoS.
-
On Tuesday January 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think your patch is not enough to slove the read_page error
completely. I think in the bitmap_init_from_disk we also need to check
the 'count' never exceeds the size of file before calling the
read_page function. How do your think about it.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 10:58:29AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Florin Iucha wrote:
Jiri and Trond,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Florin Iucha wrote:
All the testing was done via a ssh into the workstation.
Linus, please pull from
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git for-linus
This tree is also available from kernel.org mirrors at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git
for-linus
This will pick up three small fixes:
Hoang-Nam
Hello Roland!
Here is a patch set for ehca as a result of previous disscussions
and comments:
1. fix improper use of yield within spinlock context
2. fix mismatched use of spin_unlock in irq handler
3. remove do_mmap()
4. remove obsolete prototypes
PS: I've sent the first two recently for 2.6.20,
Here is a patch for ehca_cq.c that fixes improper use of yield
with spinlock held.
Thanks
Nam
Signed-off-by: Hoang-Nam Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
ehca_cq.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -Nurp infiniband_orig/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_cq.c
Here is a patch for ehca_irq.c that fixes mismatched use of spin_unlock
in irq handler.
Thanks
Nam
Signed-off-by: Hoang-Nam Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
ehca_irq.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -Nurp infiniband_orig/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_irq.c
This patch removes do_mmap() from ehca:
- Call remap_pfn_range() for hardware register block
- Use vm_insert_page() to register memory allocated for completion queues
and queue pairs
- The actual mmap() call/trigger is now controlled by user space, ie. libehca
Thanks
Nam
Signed-off-by:
Here is a patch for ehca_classes.h that removes obsolete prototypes.
Thanks
Nam
Signed-off-by: Hoang-Nam Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
ehca_classes.h | 14 --
1 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff -Nurp infiniband_orig/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_classes.h
kbuild: create KBUILD_OUTPUT
When requesting build to another directory, try to create it first.
Cc: Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
,-*- bash -*-
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kernel.org/_work/src/linux-2.6.20-rc5$
|[EMAIL
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:56:24 -0500
Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch adds a barrier() to lockdep.c lockdep_recursion updates. This
variable behaves like the preemption count and should therefore use similar
memory barriers.
This patch applies on 2.6.20-rc4-git3.
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:56:31 -0500
Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a patch to lockdep.c so it behaves correctly when a kprobe breakpoint
is
put on a marker within hardirq tracing functions as long as the marker is
within
the lockdep_recursion incremented boundaries. It
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
I don't prefer to cause zone fallback by this.
This may use ZONE_DMA before exhausing ZONE_NORMAL (ia64),
Hmmm... We could use node_page_state instead of zone_page_state.
Very rapid page allocation can eats some amount of lower zone.
One
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Now that 2.6.19 is out, most likely not. -stable releases are made
for the latest stable 2.6.x kernel, once 2.6.x+1 is out that's the one
-stable patches are made for (2.6.16 is an exception)..
There's generally a bit of overlap. 2.6.17.14 was about
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:30:16 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
I don't prefer to cause zone fallback by this.
This may use ZONE_DMA before exhausing ZONE_NORMAL (ia64),
Hmmm... We could use node_page_state instead of
Aubrey Li wrote:
On 1/19/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Aubrey,
I used your patch on my PPC64 box and I do not get expected
behavior. As you had requested, I am attaching zoneinfo and meminfo
dumps:
Please let me know if you need any further data to help me out
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:53:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:53:05 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compile-tested.
You can runtime-test this interface without ever having mounted a CODA fs.
Please. compile-tested-only patches are always a
Christoph's patch is better than mine. The only thing I think is that
zone-max_pagecache_pages should be checked never less than
zone-pages_low.
The good part of the patch is using the existing reclaimer. But the
problem in my opinion of the idea is the existing reclaimer too. Think
of when vfs
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 07:56:51PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
here's a trivial patch which adds R6 reponse support to the au1xmmc
driver. Fixes SD card detection / operation.
NAK. MMC_RSP_R1 and MMC_RSP_R6 have the same value so this will break
the switch.
not in my version of
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:55:54 +0100
Sébastien Dugué [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+asmlinkage long
+compat_sys_lio_submit(aio_context_t ctx_id, int mode, int nr, u32 __user
*iocb,
+ struct compat_sigevent __user *sig_user)
+{
+ struct kioctx *ctx;
+ struct lio_event *lio =
On 1/24/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On 1/19/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Aubrey,
I used your patch on my PPC64 box and I do not get expected
behavior. As you had requested, I am attaching zoneinfo and meminfo
dumps:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:55:54 +0100
Sébastien Dugué [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+struct lio_event *lio_create(struct sigevent __user *user_event,
+ int mode)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ struct lio_event *lio = NULL;
+
+ if (unlikely((mode == LIO_NOWAIT) !user_event))
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:50:18 +0100
Sébastien Dugué [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static long aio_setup_sigevent(struct aio_notify *notify,
+struct sigevent __user *user_event)
+{
+ sigevent_t event;
+ struct task_struct *target;
+
+ if
From: Neil Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:13:32 -0500
As it is currently written, sys_select checks its return code to convert
ERESTARTNOHAND to EINTR. However, the check is within an if (tvp) clause, and
so if select is called from userspace with a NULL timeval, then it
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:55:54 +0100
Sébastien Dugué [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+void lio_check(struct lio_event *lio)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = atomic_dec_and_test(lio-lio_users);
+
+ if (unlikely(ret) lio-lio_notify.notify != SIGEV_NONE) {
+ /* last one - notify
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:52:02AM +0100, Manuel Lauss wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 07:56:51PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
here's a trivial patch which adds R6 reponse support to the au1xmmc
driver. Fixes SD card detection / operation.
NAK. MMC_RSP_R1 and MMC_RSP_R6 have the same
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:42:13 +0100 (CET)
Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ mutex_init(cs-mutex);
+ mutex_lock(cs-mutex);
I have vague memories of making rude comments about this a few months ago.
It is very weird to lock a mutex just after intialising it. I mean, if any
Christoph Lameter wrote:
This is a patch using some of Aubrey's work plugging it in what is IMHO
the right way. Feel free to improve on it. I have gotten repeatedly
requests to be able to limit the pagecache. With the revised VM statistics
this is now actually possile. I'd like to know more
* Daniel Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To lessen Andrews burden it would be wise to integrate the two trees
prior to anything going into -mm .. [...]
i disagree. Thomas' tree has been tested in -rt for some time already,
and he's the author of this code so as far as i'm concerned he calls
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:57:38 -0500
Jeff Layton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The questions are:
1) how much would this slow down lookups for these filesystems?
2) is it enough to justify adding more infrastructure to avoid it?
What might be best is to start with this approach and then only
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:03:21AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Grant !
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:52:44AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:05:44 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:00:40PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Ah, think I
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:19:37 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:03:21AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Grant !
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:52:44AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:05:44 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Users have reported a symlink issue with my recent smbfs backport.
Turns out my backport overlooked a second 2.6 patch w/ the fix:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/?PAGE=csetREV=419e7b76CdrmRG_NZ8LKj9DUUBGu1w
This is a backport of Haroldo Gamal's 2.6 patch that fixes the symlink
issue,
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:04:36AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
Hi Dann,
I'm running slackware-11, no smbfs package, 'smbmnt' is from samba-3.0.23c
package with two tiny unrelated (?) patches:
Thanks again Grant. You might check out the patch I just submitted -
turns out this was an issue that
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 02:12:57PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Users have reported a symlink issue with my recent smbfs backport.
Turns out my backport overlooked a second 2.6 patch w/ the fix:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/?PAGE=csetREV=419e7b76CdrmRG_NZ8LKj9DUUBGu1w
Perfect. Patch
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:12:57 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users have reported a symlink issue with my recent smbfs backport.
Turns out my backport overlooked a second 2.6 patch w/ the fix:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/?PAGE=csetREV=419e7b76CdrmRG_NZ8LKj9DUUBGu1w
This
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:46:24AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:12:57 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users have reported a symlink issue with my recent smbfs backport.
Turns out my backport overlooked a second 2.6 patch w/ the fix:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:26:52 +1100
NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ for (j = 0; j vcnt ; j++)
+
memcpy(page_address(sbio-bi_io_vec[j].bv_page),
+
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:45:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
There is an ongoing desultory effort from Ralf to unify the ARM and MIPS
APM implementations. Independently converting them both to use seqfile
at this stage might muck that up. Ralf, talk to me?
What happened with this anyways?
I just successfully called do_path_lookup() in my kernel module. I
just removed the fastcall from the declaration of do_path_lookup(),
then the problem disappeared. I don't quite understand fastcall
though.
Can someone explain it?
Thanks,
-x
On 1/23/07, Xin Zhao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
I do everything you like :-) if we can find the bug.
So here are the files (2.6.18.6):
http://server055.de-nserver.de/filemap.o
http://server055.de-nserver.de/filemap.s
Stefan
Chuck Ebbert schrieb:
Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
I've 3 Servers which works wonderful with 2.6.16.X (also
On 2007-01-24, Xin Zhao wrote:
Archived-At: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/485775
Hallo.
I just successfully called do_path_lookup() in my kernel module. I
just removed the fastcall from the declaration of do_path_lookup(),
then the problem disappeared. I don't quite
Nicholas Miell wrote:
so if uc_stack doesn't point to the stack in use immediately prior to
signal generation, this is a bug.
Looking at arch/i386/kernel/signal.c (and others) inside
setup_rt_frame(), the problem is pretty obvious:
err |= __put_user(current-sas_ss_sp,
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:30:27 +0900 (JST)
Atsushi Nemoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] Make CARDBUS_MEM_SIZE and CARDBUS_IO_SIZE customizable
CARDBUS_MEM_SIZE was increased to 64MB on 2.6.20-rc2, but larger size
might result in allocation failure for the reserving itself on some
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:45:07 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
setup-bus.o is linked only on x86
oops, that's untrue. But it will break ppc32, I think.
I suppose we can deprive the ppc32 guys of eight bytes of RAM. But putting
cardbus things in pci.c seems wrong..
diff -puN
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 16:49 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
This is a patch using some of Aubrey's work plugging it in what is IMHO
the right way. Feel free to improve on it. I have gotten repeatedly
requests to be able to limit the pagecache. With the revised VM statistics
this is now
On Tuesday January 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:26:52 +1100
NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ for (j = 0; j vcnt ; j++)
+
memcpy(page_address(sbio-bi_io_vec[j].bv_page),
+
All fixes for ugly bugs and/or regressions.
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
upstream-linus
to receive the following updates:
drivers/ata/ahci.c| 39 +++
This is a summary and diffstat of all the changes pending in branch
libata-dev.git#upstream for kernel 2.6.21. Items of note:
* major sata_promise improvements, including PATA and ATAPI support
* new drivers sata_inic162x, pata_it8213, MPC52xx
* sata_via PATA port support
* other minor
The block layer uses lock to protect request queue. Every scsi device
has a unique request queue, and queue lock is the default lock in struct
request_queue. This is good for normal cases. But for a host with
shared queue tag (e.g. stex controllers), a queue lock per device means
the shared queue
From: Samuel Ortiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:36:58 +0200
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:56:13PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch removes kernel 2.4 compatibility code.
Looks correct to me, thanks.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz
From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:13:19 +0100
After commit d3dcc077bf88806201093f86325ec656e4dbfbce,
include/linux/if_{addr,link}.h should be processed with unifdef.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied, thanks Adrian.
I believe at least the
As the patch indicates, the Al Viro patch had already been merged into
my history (and another branch depending on it, making rebasing
difficult if not impossible), but since it was merged by Linus, the
actual patch isn't shown here by 'git diff'.
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
501 - 600 of 678 matches
Mail list logo