Re: [PATCH 6/7] containers (V7): BeanCounters over generic process containers

2007-02-13 Thread Pavel Emelianov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This patch implements the BeanCounter resource control abstraction > over generic process containers. It contains the beancounter core > code, plus the numfiles resource counter. It doesn't currently contain > any of the memory tracking code or the code for switching

Re: [PATCH] nanosecond filesystem support???

2007-02-13 Thread Andi Kleen
> It seems that the part that's not returning nanosecond is in the code > below. I've modified it, and now stat() is returning st_mtim.tv_nsec > correctly. > > I've tested it on ext2 and reiserfs, and both seems to be working. > > > I don't know why "t.tv_nsec = 0;" was set in the code. Any

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere

2007-02-13 Thread Olivier Galibert
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:52:39AM +0900, Ian Kent wrote: > Indeed. > Which kernel can you use? > I believe that 2200 had another problem so can you use an fc5 kernel > later than that? I've ported your patch to 2257 (nothing special, only moved lines), and it seems to work beautifully. I'm

Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] dvb shared datastructure bug?

2007-02-13 Thread Manu Abraham
On 2/13/07, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, while working on the last pieces of the file_ops constantification, DVB is the small village in France that is holding the Romans at bay... but I think I found the final flaw in it now: *pdvbdev = dvbdev = kmalloc(sizeof(struct

Re: md: md6_raid5 crash 2.6.20

2007-02-13 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday February 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >However > >this "kernel BUG" is something newly introduced in 2.6.20 which should > >be fixed in 2.6.20.1. Patch is below. > > I am using raid6. Am I at risk after applying this patch? I'm not going to say "you are not at risk after applying

Re: [PATCH] nanosecond filesystem support???

2007-02-13 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 16:38 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: > On 2/12/07, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The bigger problem is getting a file system that support it. > > > Andi, > > It seems that the part that's not returning nanosecond is in the code > below. I've modified it, and now

[GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.21 - part II

2007-02-13 Thread Len Brown
Hi Linus, please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release This... adds the sony-laptop driver, which controls brightness on akpm's vaio... removes the experimental hotkey driver, per schedule. adds the ACPI support needed by the upcoming rtc

Re: [patch 4/9] Remove the TSC synchronization on SMP machines

2007-02-13 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 09:28 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tuesday 13 February 2007 07:40, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 16:34 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > > > I've threatened to just disable RDTSC for ring 3 before, but

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] more support for memory-less-node.

2007-02-13 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:29:49 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In my understanding, a "node" is a block of cpu, memory, devices. > > and there could be cpu-only-node, memory-only-node, device-only-node... > > The trouble with this is that you'll need to harden large parts > of

[PATCH] nanosecond filesystem support???

2007-02-13 Thread Jeff Chua
On 2/12/07, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The bigger problem is getting a file system that support it. Andi, It seems that the part that's not returning nanosecond is in the code below. I've modified it, and now stat() is returning st_mtim.tv_nsec correctly. I've tested it on

Re: [patch 4/9] Remove the TSC synchronization on SMP machines

2007-02-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 07:40, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 16:34 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > I've threatened to just disable RDTSC for ring 3 before, but it'll likely > > > never happen because too many programs use

ARP hidden patch vs. arp ignore/announce

2007-02-13 Thread Menny Hamburger
Hi, In the following document: http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.arp_problem.html The following is noted: "The risk is that other hosts can probe for VIP using unicast packets for which the hidden flag always replies. I'll continue to support the hidden flag for 2.4 and 2.6

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] more support for memory-less-node.

2007-02-13 Thread Andi Kleen
> In my understanding, a "node" is a block of cpu, memory, devices. > and there could be cpu-only-node, memory-only-node, device-only-node... The trouble with this is that you'll need to harden large parts of code against these. Especially a NULL pgdat is something quite dangerous. You could

Re: libsata tests started

2007-02-13 Thread Patrick Ale
So, my AMD Athlon XP2400+ with pata_pdc2027x, pata_sil680 and pata_via survived four days of bonnie++, emerge -e world, dd if=//dev/random of=/tmp/whatever, and most of all, four days of me :) SO I guess it's safe to assume I didn't find any weird things by using 2.6.20 and the new libata

Re: [patch 3/3, resend] kbuild: correctly skip tilded backups in localversion files

2007-02-13 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, > I mean, all by-hand modifications must be in the $(srctree) (let's get > this term), $(objtree) is output *only*. Thus, i would propose to remove > it from the path. Even dynamic SCM mechanism of adding local version > doesn't use `localversion' files. I use localversion-$foo files in

[PATCH]Style fix for fs/select.c

2007-02-13 Thread Cong WANG
Style fix in fs/select.c. Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/select.c.orig2007-02-13 12:42:37.0 +0800 +++ fs/select.c 2007-02-13 12:46:44.0 +0800 @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(poll_initwait); static void free_poll_entry(struct poll_table_entry

[PATCH]typo fix in comments

2007-02-13 Thread Cong WANG
Typo and tiny mistakes in comments of include/linux/poll.h. Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/linux/poll.h.orig 2007-02-13 10:25:43.0 +0800 +++ include/linux/poll.h2007-02-13 10:27:10.0 +0800 @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ struct poll_table_struct; /* -

Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/7] containers (V7): Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code

2007-02-13 Thread Srivatsa Vaddagiri
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:18:57AM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > Which make me wonder why we need task_lock() at all ..I can understand > the need for a lock like that if we are reading/updating multiple words > in task_struct under the lock. In this case, it is used to read/write > just one

[PATCH]typo fix in comments

2007-02-13 Thread Cong WANG
Typo and tiny mistakes in comments of include/linux/poll.h. Signed-off-by: WANG Cong [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/linux/poll.h.orig 2007-02-13 10:25:43.0 +0800 +++ include/linux/poll.h2007-02-13 10:27:10.0 +0800 @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ struct poll_table_struct; /* - *

[PATCH]Style fix for fs/select.c

2007-02-13 Thread Cong WANG
Style fix in fs/select.c. Signed-off-by: WANG Cong [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- fs/select.c.orig2007-02-13 12:42:37.0 +0800 +++ fs/select.c 2007-02-13 12:46:44.0 +0800 @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(poll_initwait); static void free_poll_entry(struct poll_table_entry *entry)

Re: [patch 3/3, resend] kbuild: correctly skip tilded backups in localversion files

2007-02-13 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, I mean, all by-hand modifications must be in the $(srctree) (let's get this term), $(objtree) is output *only*. Thus, i would propose to remove it from the path. Even dynamic SCM mechanism of adding local version doesn't use `localversion' files. I use localversion-$foo files in both

Re: libsata tests started

2007-02-13 Thread Patrick Ale
So, my AMD Athlon XP2400+ with pata_pdc2027x, pata_sil680 and pata_via survived four days of bonnie++, emerge -e world, dd if=//dev/random of=/tmp/whatever, and most of all, four days of me :) SO I guess it's safe to assume I didn't find any weird things by using 2.6.20 and the new libata

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] more support for memory-less-node.

2007-02-13 Thread Andi Kleen
In my understanding, a node is a block of cpu, memory, devices. and there could be cpu-only-node, memory-only-node, device-only-node... The trouble with this is that you'll need to harden large parts of code against these. Especially a NULL pgdat is something quite dangerous. You could make

Re: [patch 4/9] Remove the TSC synchronization on SMP machines

2007-02-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 07:40, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 16:34 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: I've threatened to just disable RDTSC for ring 3 before, but it'll likely never happen because too many programs use it.

ARP hidden patch vs. arp ignore/announce

2007-02-13 Thread Menny Hamburger
Hi, In the following document: http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.arp_problem.html The following is noted: The risk is that other hosts can probe for VIP using unicast packets for which the hidden flag always replies. I'll continue to support the hidden flag for 2.4 and 2.6

[PATCH] nanosecond filesystem support???

2007-02-13 Thread Jeff Chua
On 2/12/07, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The bigger problem is getting a file system that support it. Andi, It seems that the part that's not returning nanosecond is in the code below. I've modified it, and now stat() is returning st_mtim.tv_nsec correctly. I've tested it on

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] more support for memory-less-node.

2007-02-13 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:29:49 +0100 Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my understanding, a node is a block of cpu, memory, devices. and there could be cpu-only-node, memory-only-node, device-only-node... The trouble with this is that you'll need to harden large parts of code against

Re: [patch 4/9] Remove the TSC synchronization on SMP machines

2007-02-13 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 09:28 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: On Tuesday 13 February 2007 07:40, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 16:34 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: I've threatened to just disable RDTSC for ring 3 before, but it'll

Re: [PATCH] nanosecond filesystem support???

2007-02-13 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 16:38 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: On 2/12/07, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The bigger problem is getting a file system that support it. Andi, It seems that the part that's not returning nanosecond is in the code below. I've modified it, and now stat() is

Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] dvb shared datastructure bug?

2007-02-13 Thread Manu Abraham
On 2/13/07, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, while working on the last pieces of the file_ops constantification, DVB is the small village in France that is holding the Romans at bay... but I think I found the final flaw in it now: *pdvbdev = dvbdev = kmalloc(sizeof(struct

Re: [PATCH] nanosecond filesystem support???

2007-02-13 Thread Andi Kleen
It seems that the part that's not returning nanosecond is in the code below. I've modified it, and now stat() is returning st_mtim.tv_nsec correctly. I've tested it on ext2 and reiserfs, and both seems to be working. I don't know why t.tv_nsec = 0; was set in the code. Any idea? The

Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] automatic tuning applied to some kernel components

2007-02-13 Thread Nadia Derbey
Eric W. Biederman wrote: Nadia Derbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I do not fully agree with you: It is true that some ipc tunables play the role of DoS limits. But IMHO the *mni ones (semmni, msgmni, shmmni) are used by the ipc subsystem to adapt its data structures sizes to what is being asked

Re: 2.6.19.1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2911!

2007-02-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christoph Lameter wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Martin MOKREJS wrote: Hi, is this a known issue? Should I bother to upgrade to 2.6.19.2 if it contains the fix? Thank you any help. It might be related to NFS. The machine in question is NFSv3 client, udp. And used for computations. The

Re: [PATCH] nanosecond filesystem support???

2007-02-13 Thread Jeff Chua
On 2/13/07, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it was there to avoid the following situation: on disk it's still in seconds On 2/13/07, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want ns resolution you need a file system that supports it: that's currently XFS, JFS, NTFS/CIFS

Re: [PATCH mm] cfag12864b: fix crash when built-in and no parport present

2007-02-13 Thread Daniel Walker
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 21:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: This looks hacky. One other thing that could be added is a change in the initcalls . ks0108 should be subsys_initcall() and the LCD devices device_initcall(). That would make sure one runs before the other. I don't think that alone

Small problem with kernel 2.6.20 and make menuconfig

2007-02-13 Thread Dominic Newton
Just a small issue with the latest kernel 2.6.20. When compiling make menuconfig our ncurses library is not being detected. I currently use 2.6.15 with no problem and comparing the 2 I found a script ( scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/check-lxdialog.sh ) in the lxdialog directory that checks for the

Re: ARP hidden patch vs. arp ignore/announce

2007-02-13 Thread Arjan van de Ven
If there is currently no way to provide this functionality using arp_ignore/arp_annonce/arp_filter or their friends, why is this still a patch And is not integrated into the mainline kernel? eh? if you keep reading the doc it'll explain that there is arptables in the current kernels, which

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Martin A. Fink
Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2007 00:31 schrieben Sie: Martin A. Fink wrote: I have to store big amounts of data coming from 2 digital cameras to disk. Thus I have to write blocks of around 1 MB at 30 to 50 frames per second for a long period of time. So it is important for me that the

Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.20 fix for PageUptodate memorder problem (try 3)

2007-02-13 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 06:52 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: Thanks for the confirmation. I'll obviously have to resend a new patchset because I made a silly paper-bag bug with this one. May I say that the s390 specific part of the change is acked-by: you? Yes. -- blue skies, Martin. Martin

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] nvidiafb: allow ignoring EDID info

2007-02-13 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
(some of you might get this mail in double copy , sorry) On 2/11/07, Luca Tettamanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for the delay. Ditto! It also seemed that my kernel compiling sk1llz had gone AWL, I couldn't get the newly compiled kernel to run, until I realized the initrd.img was

git issues while fetching from http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/

2007-02-13 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi everybody, I'm trying to fetch from the Linux kernel repository at http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/. After downloading the objects, git failed while trying to fetch tags. Retrying the fetch operation gives the following output: $ git-fetch origin

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Martin A. Fink
Am Montag, 12. Februar 2007 20:08 schrieben Sie: On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:56:29 +0100 Martin A. Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to store big amounts of data coming from 2 digital cameras to disk. Thus I have to write blocks of around 1 MB at 30 to 50 frames per second for a long

Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?

2007-02-13 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb: I think we can introduce a pm_safe flag that will indicate if the driver handles suspend/resume correctly. If we do it, we can flag all of the drivers currently in the tree as pm_safe unless we know that they aren't. Next, we can convert the core to fail the

Re: Experimental driver for Ricoh Bay1Controller SD Card readers

2007-02-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Pierre Ossman, le Tue 13 Feb 2007 06:47:41 +0100, a écrit : Sascha Sommer wrote: I still consider this driver experimental, but without documentation this is probably not going to change anytime soon. The question is now what I should do with the driver? Is it worth to be included in

Re: [patches] [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [4/25] x86: kernel-mode faults pollute current-thead

2007-02-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 08:52, Jan Beulich wrote: Yup. How does this patch look to you? We set error_code and trap_no for userspace faults and kernel faults which call die(). We don't set them for kernelspace faults which are fixed up. Actually, after a second round of thinking I

Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?

2007-02-13 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Geert Uytterhoeven schrieb: On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Pavel Machek wrote: Can't the upper layer just assume -ENOSYS if .resume/.suspend is NULL? It's nicer if you don't have to implement dummy functions at all. Unfortunately, drivers currently assume NULL == nothing is needed, More often than

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Arjan van de Ven
The problem is: FreeBSD is fast, but lacks of some special drivers. Linux has all drivers but access to harddisk is unpredictable and thus unreliable! What can I do?? there's several tunables you can do; 1) increase /sys/block/device/queue/nr_requests the linux default is on the low

Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] automatic tuning applied to some kernel components

2007-02-13 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Nadia Derbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, should I understand from this that automatic tuning and the AKT framework itself would make sense, given that I find the rigth tunables it should be applied to? Sort of. The concept of things tuning themselves automatically makes a lot of sense.

Re: [PATCH 1/6] AKT - Tunable structure and registration routines

2007-02-13 Thread Nadia Derbey
Andi Kleen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + +This feature aims at making the kernel automatically change the tunables +values as it sees resources running out. The only reason we have resource limit is to avoid DOS when one resource consumes too much memory. When there is no such danger

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Matthias Schniedermeyer
Martin A. Fink wrote: Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2007 00:31 schrieben Sie: Martin A. Fink wrote: I have to store big amounts of data coming from 2 digital cameras to disk. Thus I have to write blocks of around 1 MB at 30 to 50 frames per second for a long period of time. So it is important

Re: ARP hidden patch vs. arp ignore/announce

2007-02-13 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Feb 13 2007 09:52, Arjan van de Ven wrote: If there is currently no way to provide this functionality using arp_ignore/arp_annonce/arp_filter or their friends, why is this still a patch And is not integrated into the mainline kernel? eh? if you keep reading the doc it'll explain that

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Andi Kleen
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The problem is: FreeBSD is fast, but lacks of some special drivers. Linux has all drivers but access to harddisk is unpredictable and thus unreliable! What can I do?? there's several tunables you can do; [...] Well Linux certainly

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:18 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The problem is: FreeBSD is fast, but lacks of some special drivers. Linux has all drivers but access to harddisk is unpredictable and thus unreliable! What can I do??

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Martin A. Fink
Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2007 11:16 schrieben Sie: Martin A. Fink wrote: Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2007 00:31 schrieben Sie: Martin A. Fink wrote: I have to store big amounts of data coming from 2 digital cameras to disk. Thus I have to write blocks of around 1 MB at 30 to 50 frames per

Re: Coding style RFC: convert for (i=0;iARRAY_SIZE(array);i++) to array_for_each(index, array)

2007-02-13 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 18:42 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: Joe Perches wrote: [...] perhaps: #define array_for_each(element, array) \ for ((element) = (array); \ (element) ((array) + ARRAY_SIZE((array))); \ (element)++) If you're going for consistency, then

Re: [GIT] NFS client updates for 2.6.20

2007-02-13 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 23:39 -0800, Trond Myklebust wrote: commit 7c85d9007d05436e71d2b805b96c1e36a8193bd4 Author: Trond Myklebust [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed Dec 13 15:23:48 2006 -0500 NFS: Fixup some outdated comments... Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust [EMAIL PROTECTED] A

Re: [PATCH 1/6] AKT - Tunable structure and registration routines

2007-02-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 11:18, Nadia Derbey wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + +This feature aims at making the kernel automatically change the tunables +values as it sees resources running out. The only reason we have resource limit is to avoid DOS when one

Re: Coding style RFC: convert for (i=0;iARRAY_SIZE(array);i++) to array_for_each(index, array)

2007-02-13 Thread Nick Piggin
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 18:42 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: Joe Perches wrote: [...] perhaps: #define array_for_each(element, array) \ for ((element) = (array); \ (element) ((array) + ARRAY_SIZE((array))); \ (element)++) If you're

Re: md: md6_raid5 crash 2.6.20

2007-02-13 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday February 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However this kernel BUG is something newly introduced in 2.6.20 which should be fixed in 2.6.20.1. Patch is below. I am using raid6. Am I at risk after applying this patch? I'm not going to say you are not at risk after applying this patch as

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere

2007-02-13 Thread Olivier Galibert
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:52:39AM +0900, Ian Kent wrote: Indeed. Which kernel can you use? I believe that 2200 had another problem so can you use an fc5 kernel later than that? I've ported your patch to 2257 (nothing special, only moved lines), and it seems to work beautifully. I'm

Re: [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...

2007-02-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:26:42 -0800 (PST) Davide Libenzi davidel@xmailserver.org wrote: ARM-OABI also defines them, dunno why. Rmk? I suspect that OABI stands for old ABI and the alignment of 64 bit quantities changed at some point. I am pretty sure that arm is only 32bit, but I assume that

[PATCH] fix error management in 8250_pci.c pciserial_resume_one

2007-02-13 Thread Stefano Brivio
CC drivers/serial/8250_pci.o drivers/serial/8250_pci.c: In function 'pciserial_resume_one': drivers/serial/8250_pci.c:1830: warning: ignoring return value of 'pci_enable_device', declared with attribute warn_unused_result This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] fix error management in 8250_pci.c pciserial_resume_one

2007-02-13 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote: CC drivers/serial/8250_pci.o drivers/serial/8250_pci.c: In function 'pciserial_resume_one': drivers/serial/8250_pci.c:1830: warning: ignoring return value of 'pci_enable_device', declared with attribute warn_unused_result

Re: [PATCH] fix error management in 8250_pci.c pciserial_resume_one

2007-02-13 Thread Alan
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:30:10 +0100 Stefano Brivio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CC drivers/serial/8250_pci.o drivers/serial/8250_pci.c: In function 'pciserial_resume_one': drivers/serial/8250_pci.c:1830: warning: ignoring return value of 'pci_enable_device', declared with attribute

Re: Coding style RFC: convert for (i=0;iARRAY_SIZE(array);i++) to array_for_each(index, array)

2007-02-13 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 21:54 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 18:42 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: Joe Perches wrote: [...] perhaps: #define array_for_each(element, array) \ for ((element) = (array); \ (element) ((array) +

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Alan
Well they do. The Flash disk I have (SATA-I) is capable of 48 MB/s and this value is reached over the whole disk size by windows as well as by FreeBSD. See my test results in the first thread. Ok a flash disk should be more stable My Seagate Barracuda Harddisk drive (SATA-II) starts with

[PATCH debugfs: implement symbolic links

2007-02-13 Thread Peter Oberparleiter
From: Peter Oberparleiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] debugfs: implement symbolic links Implement a new function debugfs_create_symlink() which can be used to create symbolic links in debugfs. This function can be useful for people moving functionality from /proc to debugfs (e.g. the gcov-kernel patch).

Re: dvb shared datastructure bug?

2007-02-13 Thread Manu Abraham
On 2/13/07, Marcel Siegert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 13 February 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote: Hi, while working on the last pieces of the file_ops constantification, DVB is the small village in France that is holding the Romans at bay... but I think I found the final flaw in it

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Alan
there's several tunables you can do; 1) increase /sys/block/device/queue/nr_requests the linux default is on the low side 5) echo a larger value into /sys/block/device/queue/max_sectors_kb the default seems to be 512 which is... really low. The hw max is in another file in that

Re: git issues while fetching from http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/

2007-02-13 Thread Sébastien Dugué
Hi Laurent, On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:29:59 +0100 Laurent Pinchart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody, I'm trying to fetch from the Linux kernel repository at http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/. After downloading the objects, git failed while

Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [21/25] x86_64: a memcpy that tries to reduce cache pressure

2007-02-13 Thread Eric Dumazet
Andi Kleen a écrit : From: Bryan O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] This copy routine is memcpy-compatible, but on some architectures will use cache-bypassing loads to avoid bringing the source data into the cache. One case where this is useful is when a device issues a DMA to a memory region, and

Re: 2.6.20: Rebuild after trivial patch rebuilds way too much

2007-02-13 Thread Milton Miller
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:38:15 -0500 (EST), Andrey Borzenkov wrote: Is not it too much fore a trivial two lines patch to a single file? {pts/1}% stg import ~/patch/Re_2_6_20_rc6_libata_PATA_ATAPI_CDROM_is_not_working.patch Importing patch

Re: dvb shared datastructure bug?

2007-02-13 Thread Marcel Siegert
On Tuesday 13 February 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote: Hi, while working on the last pieces of the file_ops constantification, DVB is the small village in France that is holding the Romans at bay... but I think I found the final flaw in it now: *pdvbdev = dvbdev =

Re: dvb shared datastructure bug?

2007-02-13 Thread Arjan van de Ven
attached find a patch that fixes the problem. Hi, Thank you for the quick response. I think there is a small bug in this; at least I don't see where you copy over the content of the fops template to the newly allocated piece of memory... Greetings, Arjan van de Ven -- if you want to mail

Re: dvb shared datastructure bug?

2007-02-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 03:14:23PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote: thanks for pointing out this issue. attached find a patch that fixes the problem. @mauro - please pull changeset a7ac92d208fe dvbdev: fix illegal re-usage of fileoperations struct from

Re: Why can't I build a running Kernel?

2007-02-13 Thread Jiri Slaby
albcamus napsal(a): 2007/2/12, Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED]: and lines from your boot loader. title Fedora Core (2.6.20) root (hd0,1) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.20 ro root=LABEL=/ vga=0x31B initrd /initrd-2.6.20.img And I have the SATA device /dev/sda3 labeled as '/'. I would try to

Re: Experimental driver for Ricoh Bay1Controller SD Card readers

2007-02-13 Thread Sascha Sommer
Hi, On Tuesday 13 February 2007 06:47, Pierre Ossman wrote: Sascha Sommer wrote: I still consider this driver experimental, but without documentation this is probably not going to change anytime soon. The question is now what I should do with the driver? Is it worth to be included in the

[PATCH] ecryptfs: fix forgotten format specifier

2007-02-13 Thread Thomas Hisch
add format specifier %d for uid in ecryptfs_printk Signed-off-by: Thomas Hisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- fs/ecryptfs/messaging.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/messaging.c b/fs/ecryptfs/messaging.c index 47d7e7b..1674d33 100644 ---

Re: [PATCH] mfd: SM501 core driver (#2)

2007-02-13 Thread Manuel Lauss
Hi Ben, On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:07:41AM +, Ben Dooks wrote: This is a new release of the SM501 MFD driver. +struct sm501_platdata_fbsub { + struct fb_mode *def_mode; + unsigned longmax_mem; + unsigned int flags; +}; This may be a very

Re: dvb shared datastructure bug?

2007-02-13 Thread Marcel Siegert
On Tuesday 13 February 2007, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 03:14:23PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote: thanks for pointing out this issue. attached find a patch that fixes the problem. @mauro - please pull changeset a7ac92d208fe dvbdev: fix illegal re-usage of

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Jörn Engel
On Tue, 13 February 2007 11:27:58 +, Alan wrote: isn't yet a heavily optimised libata path. Secondly erase block size matters with flash drives so the bigger each I/O the better erase block behaviour we should get. Although that should max out somewhere between 16KiB and 128KiB,

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Jörn Engel
On Tue, 13 February 2007 11:29:18 +0100, Martin A. Fink wrote: Please Read Carefully! I talk about flash disk, not normal harddisks. There are no mechanical parts in flash disks, only flash memory. And therefore 48MB/s is excellent (compared to all other available disks) [...] Well.

Re: [patch 1/1] PM: Adds remount fs ro at suspend

2007-02-13 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Why do you think remounting filesystems is necessary? Are you getting problems with some particular filesystem? No. But anything in a removable device neets to be either remounted read-only or unmounted if that is at all possible, because the user could unplug it. It is of course,

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Matthias Schniedermeyer
Martin A. Fink wrote: Also you have skipped the information how the images arrive on the system (PCI(e) card?), that may be important for an end to end view of the problem. Images arrive via Gigabit Ethernet. GigE Vision standard. (PCIe x4) The the next question is: ChipSet/Used

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Martin A. Fink
Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2007 12:25 schrieben Sie: Well they do. The Flash disk I have (SATA-I) is capable of 48 MB/s and this value is reached over the whole disk size by windows as well as by FreeBSD. See my test results in the first thread. Ok a flash disk should be more stable

Please pull x86 updates

2007-02-13 Thread Andi Kleen
Linux please pull from git://one.firstfloor.org/home/andi/git/linux-2.6 This is not all, but I pruned lots of stuff that still wasn't quite ready. Less is more I guess. Adrian Bunk: i386: arch/i386/kernel/e820.c should #include asm/setup.h i386: arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Martin A. Fink
Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2007 13:24 schrieben Sie: Martin A. Fink wrote: Also you have skipped the information how the images arrive on the system (PCI(e) card?), that may be important for an end to end view of the problem. Images arrive via Gigabit Ethernet. GigE Vision standard.

Re: [PATCH 2.6.20 11/14] nfnetlink_log: iterator functions need iter_state * only

2007-02-13 Thread Patrick McHardy
Micha³ Miros³aw wrote: get_*() don't need access to seq_file - iter_state is enough for them. Applied, thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 2.6.20 12/14] nfnetlink_log: possible NULL pointer dereference in nfulnl_recv_config()

2007-02-13 Thread Patrick McHardy
Micha³ Miros³aw wrote: Eliminate possible NULL pointer dereference in nfulnl_recv_config(). Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.20/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c.10 2007-02-12 17:05:14.0 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.20/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c

Re: [PATCH 2.6.20 13/14] nfnetlink_log: fix reference counting

2007-02-13 Thread Patrick McHardy
Micha³ Miros³aw wrote: Fix reference counting (memory leak) problem in __nfulnl_send() and callers related to packet queueing. Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.20/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c.11 2007-02-12 17:35:50.0 +0100 +++

Re: dvb shared datastructure bug?

2007-02-13 Thread Marcel Siegert
On Tuesday 13 February 2007, you wrote: attached find a patch that fixes the problem. Hi, Thank you for the quick response. I think there is a small bug in this; at least I don't see where you copy over the content of the fops template to the newly allocated piece of memory...

Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] Re: dvb shared datastructure bug?

2007-02-13 Thread Trent Piepho
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Wouldn't it be better to kmalloc both struct dvb_device and struct file_operations together instead of doing 2 separate allocations? struct dvd_device_plus_fops { struct dvb_device dev; struct file_operations fops; } *dev_fops = kmalloc (sizeof

Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] Re: dvb shared datastructure bug?

2007-02-13 Thread Marcel Siegert
On Tuesday 13 February 2007, Trent Piepho wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Wouldn't it be better to kmalloc both struct dvb_device and struct file_operations together instead of doing 2 separate allocations? struct dvd_device_plus_fops { struct dvb_device dev;

Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] Re: dvb shared datastructure bug?

2007-02-13 Thread Manu Abraham
On 2/13/07, Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Wouldn't it be better to kmalloc both struct dvb_device and struct file_operations together instead of doing 2 separate allocations? struct dvd_device_plus_fops { struct dvb_device dev; struct

Re: [PATCH mm] cfag12864b: fix crash when built-in and no parport present

2007-02-13 Thread Miguel Ojeda
On 2/13/07, Daniel Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 21:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: This looks hacky. One other thing that could be added is a change in the initcalls . ks0108 should be subsys_initcall() and the LCD devices device_initcall(). That would make sure one

Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Matthias Schniedermeyer
Martin A. Fink wrote: The needed total bandwidth may be to high and at least the incoming part via GigE may have serious overhead. 150MB/s in via (at least 2) GigE, without Zero-Copy there is another 150MB/s memory to memory. Then there is the next 150MB/s memory to the discs, without

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introducing cpuidle: core cpuidle infrastructure

2007-02-13 Thread Venkatesh Pallipadi
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 08:22:01PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:39:25AM -0800, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote: Introducing 'cpuidle', a new CPU power management infrastructure to manage idle CPUs in a clean and efficient manner. cpuidle separates out the drivers

[patch 01/11] syslets: add async.h include file, kernel-side API definitions

2007-02-13 Thread Ingo Molnar
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] add include/linux/async.h which contains the kernel-side API declarations. it also provides NOP stubs for the !CONFIG_ASYNC_SUPPORT case. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/linux/async.h

[patch 03/11] syslets: generic kernel bits

2007-02-13 Thread Ingo Molnar
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] add the kernel generic bits - these are present even if !CONFIG_ASYNC_SUPPORT. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/linux/sched.h |7 ++- kernel/exit.c |3 +++

[patch 06/11] syslets: core, documentation

2007-02-13 Thread Ingo Molnar
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add Documentation/syslet-design.txt with a high-level description of the syslet concepts. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Documentation/syslet-design.txt | 137

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >