Re: [PATCH] dax: Allow block size > PAGE_SIZE

2024-11-04 Thread Jan Kara
mapping_empty(mapping) || wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) > > --- > base-commit: 81983758430957d9a5cbfe324fd70cf63e7e > change-id: 20241101-dax-page-size-83a1073b4e1b > > Cheers, > ~~ Lina > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] dax: Remove an unused field in struct dax_operations

2024-09-02 Thread Jan Kara
LLET Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > Slightly compile tested only, but "git grep dax_supported" now returns > nothing. > --- > include/linux/dax.h | 6 -- > 1 file

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] ext2: Use dax_is_supported()

2024-01-30 Thread Jan Kara
support DAX. > > This is relevant for architectures which require a dynamic check > to validate whether they have virtually aliased data caches. > > Fixes: d92576f1167c ("dax: does not work correctly with virtual aliasing > caches") > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers >

Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] ext2: Use dax_is_supported()

2024-01-30 Thread Jan Kara
sed data caches > (ARCH_HAS_CACHE_ALIASING_DYNAMIC=y). > > Fixes: d92576f1167c ("dax: does not work correctly with virtual aliasing > caches") > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers > Cc: Jan Kara > Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: Li

Re: [PATCH] fs : Fix warning using plain integer as NULL

2023-11-08 Thread Jan Kara
0. > > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh Nice cleanup. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > fs/dax.c | 2 +- > fs/direct-io.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >

Re: [PATCH][next] fsdax: remove redundant variable 'error'

2023-06-21 Thread Jan Kara
alue stored to 'error' is > used in the enclosing expression, the value is never actually read > from 'error' [deadcode.DeadStores] > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Yeah, good spotting. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara

Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dax: fix cache flush on PMD-mapped pages

2022-02-03 Thread Jan Kara
"dax: wrprotect pmd_t in dax_mapping_entry_mkclean") > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > fs/dax.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deleti

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] mm: rmap: fix cache flush on THP pages

2022-02-03 Thread Jan Kara
due to this. Maybe because the architectures that > have virtual indexed caches is less. > > Fixes: f27176cfc363 ("mm: convert page_mkclean_one() to use > page_vma_mapped_walk()") > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song > Reviewed-by: Yang Shi Looks good.

Re: [PATCH] dax: Fix missed wakeup in put_unlocked_entry()

2021-04-19 Thread Jan Kara
t; > { > > > - /* If we were the only waiter woken, wake the next one */ > > > - if (entry && !dax_is_conflict(entry)) > > > - dax_wake_entry(xas, entry, false); > > > + if (dax_is_conflict(entry)) > > > + return; > > > + > > > + dax_wake_entry(xas, entry, false); > > > > Hi Dan, > > > How does this work if entry is NULL? dax_entry_waitqueue() will not > > know if it needs to adjust the index. > > Wake waiters both at current index as well PMD adjusted index. It feels > little ugly though. > > > I think the fix might be to > > specify that put_unlocked_entry() in the invalidate path needs to do a > > wake_up_all(). > > Doing a wake_up_all() when we invalidate an entry, sounds good. I will give > it a try. Yeah, that's what I'd suggest as well. After invalidating entry, there's no point to let other waiters sleep. Trying to optimize for thundering herd problems in face of entry invalidation is really fragile as you noticed. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] bfq: silence lockdep for bfqd/ioc lock inversion

2021-04-15 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 14-04-21 11:33:14, Khazhy Kumykov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 2:54 AM Jan Kara wrote: > > > > On Thu 18-03-21 23:00:15, Khazhismel Kumykov wrote: > > > lockdep warns of circular locking due to inversion between > > > bfq_insert_requests and bfq_exit

Re: [PATCH] direct-io: use read lock for DIO_LOCKING flag

2021-04-15 Thread Jan Kara
ev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode > *inode, > > fail_dio: > if (dio->flags & DIO_LOCKING && iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ) > - inode_unlock(inode); > + inode_unlock_shared(inode); > > kmem_cache_free(dio_cache, dio); > return retval; > -- > 2.29.2 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] bfq: silence lockdep for bfqd/ioc lock inversion

2021-04-14 Thread Jan Kara
xit_icq is either called with a refcount, > + * or with queue quiesced, use a differnet lock class to > + * silence lockdep > + */ > + spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&bfqd->lock, flags, 1); > bfqq->bic = NULL; > bfq_exit_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq); > bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, is_sync); > -- > 2.31.0.rc2.261.g7f71774620-goog > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: More KCSAN data-race Reports

2021-04-12 Thread Jan Kara
On Mon 12-04-21 18:42:58, Hao Sun wrote: > Jan Kara 于2021年4月12日周一 下午5:02写道: > > > > Hello, > > > > On Sun 11-04-21 11:42:05, Hao Sun wrote: > > > Since the last KCSAN report[1], I found two more KCSAN reports that > > > Syzbot had not reported. >

Re: More KCSAN data-race Reports

2021-04-12 Thread Jan Kara
0 > vfs_write+0x6db/0x7c0 > ksys_write+0xce/0x180 > __x64_sys_write+0x3e/0x50 > do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cackbjszw5sp4jb51+c5mrmssgq73x8ieko_ev6ctxvvtva7...@mail.gmail.com/ -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] ext4: add a configurable parameter to prevent endless loop in ext4_mb_discard_group_p

2021-04-09 Thread Jan Kara
info 8813bb5f72d0 > > struct ext4_group_info { > > bb_state = 0, > > bb_free_root = { > > rb_node = 0x0 > > }, > > bb_first_free = 1681, > > bb_free = 0, > > Not related to this issue, but above two variables values doesn't looks > consistent. > > > bb_fragments = 0, > > bb_largest_free_order = -1, > > bb_prealloc_list = { > > next = 0x880268291d78, > > prev = 0x880268291d78 ---> *** The list is empty > > }, > > Ok. So when you collected the dump this list was empty. No, it is not empty. It has a single element. Note that the structure is at 8813bb5f72d0 so the pointers would have to be like 8813bb5f7xxx. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] inotify: fix minmax.cocci warnings

2021-04-07 Thread Jan Kara
s harder to understand for me. So I prefer to keep things as they are in this particular case... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: KCSAN: data-race in __jbd2_journal_file_buffer / jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata

2021-04-06 Thread Jan Kara
On Tue 06-04-21 11:01:39, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 02:32:33PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > And the comment explains, why we do this unreliable check. Again, if we > > wanted to silence KCSAN, we could use data_race() macro but AFAIU Ted isn't > &g

Re: KCSAN: data-race in __jbd2_journal_file_buffer / jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata

2021-04-06 Thread Jan Kara
I'm quite confident it was caused by one of unlocked accesses to jh->b_transaction in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(). And as the comments explain, these are only assertions which we redo under proper lock if they look like they would fail. So the code is in fact correct.

Re: KCSAN: data-race in __jbd2_journal_file_buffer / jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata

2021-04-06 Thread Jan Kara
. Again, if we wanted to silence KCSAN, we could use data_race() macro but AFAIU Ted isn't very fond of that annotation. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ext2: Convert kmap to kmap_local_page

2021-03-31 Thread Jan Kara
12 --- > fs/ext2/namei.c | 34 +++--- > 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.28.0.rc0.12.gb6a658bd00c9 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] jbd2: avoid -Wempty-body warnings

2021-03-30 Thread Jan Kara
ntk() macros to no_printk(), which avoids this > warning and adds format string checking. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Sure. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > include/linux/jbd2.h | 2 +- > 1 f

Re: [BUG] fs/notify/mark: A potential use after free in fsnotify_put_mark_wake

2021-03-29 Thread Jan Kara
mark_wake() can be called only for marks attached to objects and these have mark->conn != NULL and we are sure that fsnotify_destroy_group() will wait for all such marks to be torn down and freed before dropping last group reference and freeing the group. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Updated locking documentation for transaction_t

2021-03-29 Thread Jan Kara
On Fri 26-03-21 09:18:45, Alexander Lochmann wrote: > On 11.02.21 10:30, Jan Kara wrote: > >> diff --git a/include/linux/jbd2.h b/include/linux/jbd2.h > >> index 99d3cd051ac3..18f77d9b1745 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/jbd2.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/j

Re: ext2_set_link()->ext2_put_page() question

2021-03-25 Thread Jan Kara
patch together to submit with the kmap_local_page() > patch. OK :). Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] fanotify_user: use upper_32_bits() to verify mask

2021-03-25 Thread Jan Kara
; > Cc: Amir Goldstein > Cc: Jan Kara > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Thanks for the cleanup. I've added it to my tree. Honza > --- > fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.11 03/44] ext4: add reclaim checks to xattr code

2021-03-25 Thread Jan Kara
3-21 07:24:18, Sasha Levin wrote: > From: Jan Kara > > [ Upstream commit 163f0ec1df33cf468509ff38cbcbb5eb0d7fac60 ] > > Syzbot is reporting that ext4 can enter fs reclaim from kvmalloc() while > the transaction is started like: > > fs_reclaim_acquire+0x117/0x150 mm

Re: [PATCH] Updated locking documentation for journal_head

2021-03-19 Thread Jan Kara
nn > Signed-off-by: Horst Schirmeier Yeah, I think that was a typo since the beginning. Thanks for the fix. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > include/linux/journal-head.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file

Re: [PATCH] fs/ext2/: fix misspellings using codespell tool

2021-03-19 Thread Jan Kara
&sbi->s_next_gen_lock); > > - /* per fileystem reservation list head & lock */ > + /* per filesystem reservation list head & lock */ > spin_lock_init(&sbi->s_rsv_window_lock); > sbi->s_rsv_window_root = RB_ROOT; > /* > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 17

2021-03-17 Thread Jan Kara
it2sys_epoll_pwait2 > compat_sys_epoll_pwait2 > 442 common mount_setattr sys_mount_setattr > sys_mount_setattr > -443 common quotactl_path sys_quotactl_path > +443 common quotactl_path sys_quotactl_path > sys_quotactl_path -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [RFC] inode.i_opflags - Usage of two different locking schemes

2021-03-16 Thread Jan Kara
hile the inode is alive. Now this is fine for the particular flag we update but in theory, if the compiler wants to screw us and stores temporarily some nonsensical value in i_opflags we'd have a problem. This is mostly a theoretical issue but eventually we probably want to fix this. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] quota: Add mountpath based quota support

2021-03-16 Thread Jan Kara
1 + > arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 + > arch/xtensa/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 + > fs/quota/quota.c| 49 +++-- > include/linux/syscalls.h| 2 + > include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 4 +- > kernel/sys_ni.c | 1 + > 22 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.29.2 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [syzbot] WARNING: ODEBUG bug in ext4_fill_super (3)

2021-03-15 Thread Jan Kara
m/x/repro.c?x=1191aab2d0 > > The issue was bisected to: > > commit 2d01ddc86606564fb08c56e3bc93a0693895f710 > Author: Jan Kara > Date: Wed Dec 16 10:18:40 2020 + > > ext4: save error info to sb through journal if available After some head scratching I think

Re: [syzbot] KCSAN: data-race in start_this_handle / start_this_handle

2021-03-11 Thread Jan Kara
== So this case is harmless. start_this_handle() does indeed check journal->j_running_transaction without any protection and this is only a racy check to opportunistically preallocate a transaction if we are likely to need it. There was some macro to instruct KCSAN that the read is actually fine, wasn't there? Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [RFC] Better page cache error handling

2021-02-24 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 24-02-21 13:41:15, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 01:38:48PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > We allocate a page and try to read it. 29 threads pile up waiting > > > for the page lock in filemap_update_page(). The error returned by the > > > orig

Re: possible deadlock in evict

2021-02-24 Thread Jan Kara
/vmscan.c:3523 [inline] > balance_pgdat+0x745/0x1270 mm/vmscan.c:3681 > kswapd+0x5b1/0xdb0 mm/vmscan.c:3938 > kthread+0x3b1/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292 > ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:296 Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [RFC] Better page cache error handling

2021-02-24 Thread Jan Kara
page); > clear_bit_unlock(PG_fscache, &page->flags); > - wake_up_page_bit(page, PG_fscache); > + wake_up_page_bit(page, PG_fscache, 0); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_page_fscache); > > @@ -2298,8 +2310,11 @@ static int filemap_update_page(struct kiocb *iocb, > if (iocb->ki_flags & (IOCB_NOWAIT | IOCB_NOIO)) > return -EAGAIN; > if (!(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ)) { > - put_and_wait_on_page_locked(page, TASK_KILLABLE); > - return AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE; > + error = put_and_wait_on_page_locked(page, > + TASK_KILLABLE); > + if (!error) > + return AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE; > + return error; > } > error = __lock_page_async(page, iocb->ki_waitq); > if (error) -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ext4: fix integer overflow in s_log_groups_per_flex

2021-02-24 Thread Jan Kara
er.c:4983 > > Reported-by: syzbot+a8b4b0c60155e87e9...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Signed-off-by: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > v2: updated > 32 condit

Re: [PATCH] fs/ext4: fix integer overflow in s_log_groups_per_flex

2021-02-23 Thread Jan Kara
Honza > + ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "too many log groups per > flexible block group"); > + goto err_freesgi; > + } > + sbi->s_mb_prefetch = min_t(uint, 1 << > sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex, > BLK_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE >> (sb->s_blocksize_bits - 9)); > sbi->s_mb_prefetch *= 8; /* 8 prefetch IOs in flight at most */ > } else { > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: possible deadlock in start_this_handle (2)

2021-02-15 Thread Jan Kara
On Mon 15-02-21 23:06:15, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2021/02/15 21:45, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Sat 13-02-21 23:26:37, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > >> Excuse me, but it seems to me that nothing prevents > >> ext4_xattr_set_handle() from reaching ext4_xattr_inode_l

Re: possible deadlock in start_this_handle (2)

2021-02-15 Thread Jan Kara
On Sat 13-02-21 23:26:37, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2021/02/11 19:49, Jan Kara wrote: > > This stacktrace should never happen. ext4_xattr_set() starts a transaction. > > That internally goes through start_this_handle() which calls: > > > > handle->saved_allo

Re: [PATCH 1/2] quota: Add mountpath based quota support

2021-02-12 Thread Jan Kara
On Fri 12-02-21 11:29:00, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:05:05AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Fri 12-02-21 09:38:35, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 03:38:13PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > + if (!mountpoin

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] quota: Add mountpath based quota support

2021-02-12 Thread Jan Kara
uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 4 +- > kernel/sys_ni.c | 1 + > 22 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 1/2] quota: Add mountpath based quota support

2021-02-12 Thread Jan Kara
fix this or is there userspace code that is confused by a changed > return value? I'd leave the original quotactl(2) as is. There's no strong reason to risk breaking some userspace. For the new syscall, I agree we can just standardize the return value, there ENODEV makes even less s

Re: [PATCH v2] Updated locking documentation for transaction_t

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Kara
mment: > "no lock needed for jbd2 thread". > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Lochmann > Signed-off-by: Horst Schirmeier Thanks. You can add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > include/linux/jbd2.h | 8 +

Re: possible deadlock in dquot_commit

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Kara
On Thu 11-02-21 12:47:18, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:37 PM Jan Kara wrote: > > > > On Wed 10-02-21 03:25:22, syzbot wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > syzbot found the following issue on: > > > > > > HEAD commit:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Updated locking documentation for transaction_t

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Kara
On Thu 11-02-21 10:53:51, Alexander Lochmann wrote: > > > On 11.02.21 10:30, Jan Kara wrote: > > >*/ > > > unsigned long t_log_start; > > > - /* Number of buffers on the t_buffers list [j_list_lock] */ > > >

Re: possible deadlock in fs_reclaim_acquire (2)

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Kara
On Thu 11-02-21 20:04:14, Hillf Danton wrote: > On Thu 11-02-21 12:07:29, Jan Kara wrote: > >> Fix 71b565ceff37 ("ext4: drop ext4_kvmalloc()") by restoring the > >> GFP_NOFS introduced in dec214d00e0d ("ext4: xattr inode deduplication"). > >&g

Re: possible deadlock in start_this_handle (2)

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Kara
On Thu 11-02-21 12:28:48, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:22 PM Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:49 AM Jan Kara wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > added mm guys to CC. > > > > > > On

Re: possible deadlock in start_this_handle (2)

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Kara
On Thu 11-02-21 12:22:39, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:49 AM Jan Kara wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > added mm guys to CC. > > > > On Wed 10-02-21 05:35:18, syzbot wrote: > > > HEAD commit:1e0d27fc Merge branch 'akpm&

Re: possible deadlock in dquot_commit

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Kara
56bf60 > R13: 00007ffefc77f01f R14: 7f8097ffc300 R15: 00022000 > > > --- > This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. > See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. > syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkal...@googlegroups.com. > > syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: possible deadlock in start_this_handle (2)

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Kara
out. Given we don't have a reproducer it will be probably difficult to debug this. I'd note that about year and half ago similar report happened (got autoclosed) so it may be something real somewhere but it may also be just some HW glitch or something like that. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: possible deadlock in fs_reclaim_acquire (2)

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Kara
fs/xattr.c:583 > > do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:77 [inline] > > __do_fast_syscall_32+0x56/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:139 > > do_fast_syscall_32+0x2f/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:164 > > entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x4d/0x5c > > Fix 71b565ceff37 ("ext4: drop ext4_kvmalloc()") by restoring the > GFP_NOFS introduced in dec214d00e0d ("ext4: xattr inode deduplication"). > > Note this may be the fix also to possible deadlock > Reported-by: syzbot+bfdded10ab7dcd750...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/563a0205bafb7...@google.com/ Please no. Ext4 is using scoping API to limit allocations to GFP_NOFS inside transactions. In this case something didn't work which seems like a lockdep bug at the first sight but I'll talk to mm guys about it. Definitely to problem doesn't seem to be in ext4. Honza > > --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c > @@ -1459,7 +1459,7 @@ ext4_xattr_inode_cache_find(struct inode > if (!ce) > return NULL; > > - ea_data = kvmalloc(value_len, GFP_KERNEL); > + ea_data = kvmalloc(value_len, GFP_NOFS); > if (!ea_data) { > mb_cache_entry_put(ea_inode_cache, ce); > return NULL; -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Updated locking documentation for journal_t

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Kara
em is marked with a short comment: > "no lock for quick racy checks". > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Lochmann > Signed-off-by: Horst Schirmeier This patch looks good. You can add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Updated locking documentation for transaction_t

2021-02-11 Thread Jan Kara
this > - * list match each other one for one at all times. [j_list_lock] > + * list match each other one for one at all times. [j_list_lock, no > lock for quick racy checks] >*/ > struct journal_head *t_shadow_list; The above three cases are the same as t_reserved_list. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 1/2] quota: Add mountpath based quota support

2021-02-09 Thread Jan Kara
On Tue 09-02-21 08:51:01, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:53:50PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Now quota data stored in a normal file is a setup we try to deprecate > > anyway so another option is to just leave quotactl_path() only for those > > setups wh

Re: [PATCH 0/7] fsdax,xfs: Add reflink&dedupe support for fsdax

2021-02-08 Thread Jan Kara
ap_util.c | 6 +- > fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 30 ++- > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 8 +- > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 1 + > fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 3 +- > fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 11 ++- > fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 23 - > include/linux/dax.h | 5 ++ >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] quota: Add mountpath based quota support

2021-02-04 Thread Jan Kara
On Thu 04-02-21 07:34:14, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 07:02:41PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Hum, let me think out loud. The path we pass to Q_QUOTAON is a path to > > quota file - unless the filesystem stores quota in hidden files in which > > case

Re: [PATCH] parser: Fix kernel-doc markups

2021-02-03 Thread Jan Kara
e as well since I don't think we have a designated lib/parser.c maintainer... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] handle large user and group ID for isofs and udf

2021-02-03 Thread Jan Kara
. > > BingJing Chang (3): > parser: add unsigned int parser > isofs: handle large user and group ID > udf: handle large user and group ID Thanks for the patches. I've added these three patches to my tree. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 01/18] vfs: add miscattr ops

2021-02-03 Thread Jan Kara
ma->fsx_nextents = old_ma.fsx_nextents; > + ma->fsx_projid = old_ma.fsx_projid; > + ma->fsx_cowextsize = old_ma.fsx_cowextsize; > + } else { > + ma->flags |= old_ma.flags & ~FS_COMMON_F

Re: [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 5/6] block, bfq: keep shared queues out of the waker mechanism

2021-02-03 Thread Jan Kara
ed queues in the waking mechanism may > cause more control troubles than throughput benefits. This commit > keeps shared queues out of the waker-detection mechanism. > > Tested-by: Jan Kara > Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente Honestly this makes me somewhat nervous. It is just a ban

Re: [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 2/6] block, bfq: put reqs of waker and woken in dispatch list

2021-02-03 Thread Jan Kara
new I/O request as > >> soon as possible. So this commit puts this new I/O request directly > >> into the dispatch list. > >> > >> Tested-by: Jan Kara > >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente > >> --- > >> block/bfq-iosched.c | 17 +

Re: [PATCH 1/2] quota: Add mountpath based quota support

2021-02-02 Thread Jan Kara
ite(cmd)) { This needs to be (quotactl_cmd_write(cmd) || quotactl_cmd_onoff(cmd)). Otherwise I agree what you suggest is somewhat more readable given how small the function is. > ret = mnt_want_write(path.mnt); > if (ret) > goto out1; > } > if (quotactl_cmd_onoff(cmd)) > down_write(&sb->s_umount); > else > down_read(&sb->s_umount); > > and duplicate the checks after the do_quotactl call. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] Revert "bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth"

2021-02-02 Thread Jan Kara
this! What I didn't notice is that shallow_depth indeed gets used for each bitmap word separately and not for bitmap as a whole. I'd say this could use some more documentation but that's unrelated to your revert. So feel free to add: Rev

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] handle large user and group ID for isofs and udf

2021-01-28 Thread Jan Kara
; fs/isofs/inode.c | 9 + > fs/udf/super.c | 9 + > include/linux/parser.h | 1 + > lib/parser.c | 44 +--- > 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.4 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] make jbd2 debug switch per device

2021-01-26 Thread Jan Kara
tification to each message similarly as we do it with ext4 messages (likely by using journal->j_dev) - which is very simple to do after your patches 3 and 4. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-01-26 Thread Jan Kara
On Tue 26-01-21 08:47:55, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 1/26/21 6:29 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Mon 25-01-21 11:39:50, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> On 1/25/21 11:35 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Il giorno 25 gen 2021, alle ore 10:40, S

Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-01-26 Thread Jan Kara
) > >> > > > > Hi Jens, > > how to proceed in such a case (with patches already applied by you)? > > Shall I send you a v2 with only this change? > > We just have to ignore it... But in the future, always double check that > you are using the right shas, not some sha from an internal tree. FWIW I have a commit hook in my git tree that just refuses a commit with unknown Fixes tag SHA. Exactly to catch such mishaps in the patches I merge... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] isofs: release buffer head before return

2021-01-25 Thread Jan Kara
On Mon 18-01-21 15:41:23, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 18-01-21 04:04:55, Pan Bian wrote: > > Release the buffer header before returning error code. > > > > Fixes: 2deb1acc653c ("isofs: fix access to unallocated memory when reading > > corrupted filesystem")

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] jbd2: introduce some new log interfaces

2021-01-25 Thread Jan Kara
; + > +#define jbd2_debug(j, fmt, a...) \ > + jbd2_log(JBD2_DEBUG, j, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, (fmt), ##a) > + > +#else > + > +#define jbd2_err(j, fmt, a...) > +#define jbd2_warn(j, fmt, a...) > +#define jbd2_notice(j, fmt, a...) > +#define jbd2_info(j, fmt, a...) > +#define jbd2_debug(j, fmt, a...) > + > +#endif > #endif > > /* > -- > 2.30.0 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: Expense of read_iter

2021-01-20 Thread Jan Kara
ate solution for this read problem. And I'm also against duplicating ->read_iter functionatily in ->read handler. The maintenance burden of this code duplication is IMHO just too big. We rather need to improve the generic code so that the fast path is faster. And every filesystem will benefit because this is not ext4 specific problem. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] [v3] block: Fix an error handling in add_partition

2021-01-18 Thread Jan Kara
On Sun 17-01-21 16:53:42, Dinghao Liu wrote: > Once we have called device_initialize(), we should use put_device() to > give up the reference on error, just like what we have done on failure > of device_add(). > > Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu Looks good to me. You can add: Review

Re: [PATCH] isofs: release buffer head before return

2021-01-18 Thread Jan Kara
> " in block %lu of inode %lu\n", block, > inode->i_ino); > + brelse(bh); > return -EIO; > } > > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 0/2] page_count can't be used to decide when wp_page_copy

2021-01-15 Thread Jan Kara
sem). As a result this has been a long term source of deadlocks, stale data exposure issues, and filesystem corruption issues due to insufficient locking for multiple filesystems. But when I was looking at what it would take to achieve this several years ago, fixing all GUP users to deal with mmap_sem being dropped during a fault was a gigantic task because there were users of GUP relying on mmap_sem being held for large code sections around the GUP call... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: soft_dirty: userfaultfd: introduce wrprotect_tlb_flush_pending

2021-01-15 Thread Jan Kara
returns true for it. At least for shared pages. Because filesystems/mm in the writeback path need to detect whether the page is pinned and thus its contents can change anytime without noticing, the page can be dirtied at random times etc. In that case we need to bounce the page during writeback (to avoid checksum failures), keep page as dirty in internal filesystem bookkeeping (and in MM as well) etc... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] udf: fix the problem that the disc content is not displayed

2021-01-14 Thread Jan Kara
t; sb->s_blocksize_bits), > @@ -757,8 +759,7 @@ static int udf_check_vsd(struct super_block *sb) > > if (nsr > 0) > return 1; > - else if (!bh && sector - (sbi->s_session << sb->s_blocksize_bits) == > - VSD_FIRST_SECTOR_OFFSET) > + else if (!bh && sector - sector_offset == VSD_FIRST_SECTOR_OFFSET) > return -1; > else > return 0; > -- > 2.20.1 > > > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 1/2] udf: fix hole append when File Tail exists

2021-01-14 Thread Jan Kara
nt' loaded by udf_next_aext() ends up being EXT_NOT_RECORDED_ALLOCATED, we will end up passing it to udf_do_extend_file() which recognizes it as preallocation extent and will insert a hole extent before it? Am I missing something? Honza > etype = udf_next_aext(inode, &next_epos, &eloc, &elen, 1); > if (etype == -1) > break; > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 1/1] udf: fix silent AED tagLocation corruption

2021-01-14 Thread Jan Kara
* We've rewritten the last extent but there may be > empty > + * indirect extent after it - enter it. > + */ > + udf_next_aext(inode, last_pos, &tmploc, &tmplen, 0); > + } > } > > /* Managed to do everything necessary? */ > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] udf: fix the problem that the disc content is not displayed

2021-01-14 Thread Jan Kara
blocksize_bits), > @@ -757,8 +759,7 @@ static int udf_check_vsd(struct super_block *sb) > > if (nsr > 0) > return 1; > - else if (!bh && sector - (sbi->s_session << sb->s_blocksize_bits) == > - VSD_FIRST_SECTOR_OFFSET) > + else if (!bh && sector - sector_offset == VSD_FIRST_SECTOR_OFFSET) > return -1; > else > return 0; > -- > 2.20.1 > > > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 0/1] udf: fix silent AED tagLocation corruption

2021-01-13 Thread Jan Kara
5 # PD > require_tag_id $AED_LSN 258 # AED > > LBN_BASE=`extract32 $PD_LSN 188` # Partition Starting Location > AED_LBN=`expr $AED_LSN - $LBN_BASE` > AED_TAG_LOCATION=`extract32 $AED_LSN 12` > > if [ $AED_TAG_LOCATION -ne $AED_LBN ] ; then > echo Test FAILED: expected AED tag location $AED_LBN, actual is > $AED_TAG_LOCATION > exit 1 > else > echo Test PASSED. AED tag location field is correct. > fi > > Steven J. Magnani "I claim this network for MARS! > Earthling, return my space modulator!" > #include > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:LINE!

2021-01-12 Thread Jan Kara
ile it's being written back but usually it takes time before next writeback of the page is started. But I guess with the DB load it is possible e.g. if we frequently flush out some page for data consistency reasons (I know PostgreSQL is using sync_file_range(2) interface to start flushing pages early and then uses fsync(2) when it really needs the pages written which could create a situation with unfair treatment of PageWriteback bit). Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] block: fallocate: avoid false positive on collision detection

2021-01-07 Thread Jan Kara
> - end >> PAGE_SHIFT); > + invalidate_first_page, > + invalidate_last_page); > } > > const struct file_operations def_blk_fops = { > -- >

Re: [PATCH 08/10] md: Implement ->corrupted_range()

2021-01-06 Thread Jan Kara
t gendisk *disk, bool > verbose); > bool bdev_check_media_change(struct block_device *bdev); > int __invalidate_device(struct block_device *bdev, bool kill_dirty); > void bd_set_nr_sectors(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sectors); > +int bd_corrupted_range(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t disk_off, > +loff_t bdev_off, size_t len, void *data); > > /* for drivers/char/raw.c: */ > int blkdev_ioctl(struct block_device *, fmode_t, unsigned, unsigned long); > -- > 2.29.2 > > > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 05/10] mm, pmem: Implement ->memory_failure() in pmem driver

2021-01-06 Thread Jan Kara
largest mapping to avoid breaking up > - * device-dax mappings which are constant size. The > - * actual size of the mapping being torn down is > - * communicated in siginfo, see kill_proc() > - */ > - start = (page->index << PAGE_SHIFT) & ~(size - 1); > - unmap_mapping_range(page->mapping, start, start + size, 0); > - } > - kill_procs(&to_kill, flags & MF_MUST_KILL, !unmap_success, pfn, flags); > - rc = 0; > -unlock: > - dax_unlock_page(page, cookie); > out: > /* drop pgmap ref acquired in caller */ > put_dev_pagemap(pgmap); > -- > 2.29.2 > > > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm, fsdax: Refactor memory-failure handler for dax mapping

2021-01-06 Thread Jan Kara
d *to_kill, >* to be informed of all such data corruptions. >*/ > if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm) > - add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill); > + add_to_kill(t, page, mapping, pgoff, vma, > to_kill); > } > } > read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); > @@ -550,7 +551,8 @@ static void collect_procs(struct page *page, struct > list_head *tokill, > if (PageAnon(page)) > collect_procs_anon(page, tokill, force_early); > else > - collect_procs_file(page, tokill, force_early); > + collect_procs_file(page, page->mapping, page_to_pgoff(page), Why not use page_mapping() helper here? It would be safer for THPs if they ever get here... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] Use IS_ERR instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL and set inode null when IS_ERR.

2021-01-06 Thread Jan Kara
nks for the patch! It looks good to me. You can add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 23 --- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --g

Re: [RFC PATCH kernel] block: initialize block_device::bd_bdi for bdev_cache

2021-01-06 Thread Jan Kara
ata; > + struct block_device *bdev = &ei->bdev; > > inode_init_once(&ei->vfs_inode); > + bdev->bd_bdi = &noop_backing_dev_info; > } > > static void bdev_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] writeback: add warning messages for not registered bdi

2020-12-22 Thread Jan Kara
(wb->bdi), inode->i_ino, sb->s_id); > > inode->dirtied_when = jiffies; > if (dirtytime) > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: general protection fault in ext4_commit_super

2020-12-22 Thread Jan Kara
ttps://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1798348750 > > C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=10c0293750 > > > > The issue was bisected to: > > > > commit e810c942a325cf749e859d7aa3a43dc219cea299 > > Author: Jan Kara > >

Re: WARNING: ODEBUG bug in ext4_fill_super (2)

2020-12-22 Thread Jan Kara
zkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=128f512350 > C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=14f9f30f50 > > The issue was bisected to: > > commit e810c942a325cf749e859d7aa3a43dc219cea299 > Author: Jan Kara > Date: Wed Dec 16 10:18:40 2020 + > >

Re: memory leak in v2_read_file_info

2020-12-22 Thread Jan Kara
It may contain errors. > See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. > syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkal...@googlegroups.com. > > syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. > syzbot can test

Re: [PATCH v2] inotify, memcg: account inotify instances to kmemcg

2020-12-21 Thread Jan Kara
zeof(struct inotify_event_info), > > GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); > > if (unlikely(!oevent)) { > > fsnotify_destroy_group(group); > > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > diff --git a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h > > b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h > > index a2e42d3cd87c..e5409b83e731 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h > > +++ b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h > > @@ -470,6 +470,7 @@ static inline void fsnotify_update_flags(struct dentry > > *dentry) > > > > /* create a new group */ > > extern struct fsnotify_group *fsnotify_alloc_group(const struct > > fsnotify_ops *ops); > > +extern struct fsnotify_group *fsnotify_alloc_user_group(const struct > > fsnotify_ops *ops); > > /* get reference to a group */ > > extern void fsnotify_get_group(struct fsnotify_group *group); > > /* drop reference on a group from fsnotify_alloc_group */ > > -- > > 2.29.2.684.gfbc64c5ab5-goog > > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH 1/3] vfs: add new f_op->syncfs vector

2020-12-17 Thread Jan Kara
coherent so ignoring ->sync_fs() return value there is fine. With dquot_quota_sync() it might make some sense to return the error - that's just a backend for Q_SYNC quotactl(2). OTOH I'm not sure anybody really cares - Q_SYNC is rarely used. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: linux-next fsnotify mod breaks tail -f

2020-12-11 Thread Jan Kara
/* >* Some events can be sent on both parent dir and child marks >* (e.g. FS_ATTRIB). If both parent dir and child are >* watching, report the event once to parent dir with name (if >* interested) and once to child without name (if interested). > + * The child watcher is expecting an event without a file name > + * and without the FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD flag. >*/ > + mask &= ~FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD; > dir = NULL; > name = NULL; > } > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: kernel BUG at fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c:LINE! (2)

2020-12-09 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 09-12-20 17:15:02, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:59 PM Jan Kara wrote: > > > > On Wed 09-12-20 14:38:42, Jan Kara wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > so I was debugging the dnotify crash below (it's 100% reproducible for me) &g

Re: kernel BUG at fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c:LINE! (2)

2020-12-09 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 09-12-20 14:38:42, Jan Kara wrote: > Hello! > > so I was debugging the dnotify crash below (it's 100% reproducible for me) > and I came to the following. The reproducer opens 'file0' on FUSE > filesystem which is a directory at that point. Then it attached d

Re: kernel BUG at fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c:LINE! (2)

2020-12-09 Thread Jan Kara
://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. > syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkal...@googlegroups.com. > > syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. > For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection > syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see: > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] fs: quota: fix array-index-out-of-bounds bug by passing correct argument to vfs_cleanup_quota_inode()

2020-12-09 Thread Jan Kara
if (ret < 0) > - vfs_cleanup_quota_inode(sb, type); > + vfs_cleanup_quota_inode(sb, cnt); > } > > return ret; > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH] fanotify: Fix sys_fanotify_mark() on native x86-32

2020-12-02 Thread Jan Kara
On Tue 01-12-20 16:51:26, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:48:10AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Mon 30-11-20 17:30:59, Brian Gerst wrote: > > > Commit 121b32a58a3a converted native x86-32 which take 64-bit arguments to > > > use the compat hand

Re: [PATCH] fanotify: Fix sys_fanotify_mark() on native x86-32

2020-12-01 Thread Jan Kara
for the patch! It looks good to me. Feel free to add: Acked-by: Jan Kara I assume you plan to push this via x86 tree given the changes are mostly there, don't you? Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >