Re: [PATCH] i.MX6 PCIe: Fix imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset() polarity

2016-03-30 Thread Roberto Fichera
On 03/30/2016 03:38 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Roberto Fichera wrote: >> On 03/30/2016 12:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Wednesday 30 March 2016 10:00:33 Roberto Fichera wrote: >>>>> Check your XIO2001 routing and in

Re: [PATCH] i.MX6 PCIe: Fix imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset() polarity

2016-03-30 Thread Roberto Fichera
On 03/30/2016 12:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 30 March 2016 10:00:33 Roberto Fichera wrote: >>> Check your XIO2001 routing and insure the following for proper IRQ mapping: >>> Slot12: IDSEL A28: socket INTA = XIO2001 INTA >>> Slot13: IDSEL A29: socket

Re: [PATCH] i.MX6 PCIe: Fix imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset() polarity

2016-03-30 Thread Roberto Fichera
On 03/29/2016 07:31 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Roberto Fichera wrote: >>> >>> Roberto, >>> >>> What board/platform is this and what does /proc/interrupts look like? >> It's a custom board >> >> root

Re: [PATCH] i.MX6 PCIe: Fix imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset() polarity

2016-03-29 Thread Roberto Fichera
On 03/29/2016 06:40 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Roberto Fichera wrote: >> On 03/29/2016 05:10 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: >>> Arnd, >>> >>> Right, on the IMX the MSI interrupt is GIC-120 which is also the >>> legacy INTD and

Re: [PATCH] i.MX6 PCIe: Fix imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset() polarity

2016-03-29 Thread Roberto Fichera
On 03/29/2016 05:10 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > Arnd, > > Right, on the IMX the MSI interrupt is GIC-120 which is also the > legacy INTD and I do see that if I happen to put a radio in a slot > where due to swizzling its pin1 becomes INTD (GIC-120) the interrupt > does fire and the device works. Any ot

iMX6 SSI in TDM master mode and SDMA

2015-10-27 Thread Roberto Fichera
3217x_ssi_setup: SSI_STMSK=0x00fc,SSI_SRMSK=0x00fc si3217x_ssi_set_clock: BIT_CLK=53248000 Finally the SSI1 registers are set like this: ssi_scr=0x00bf ssi_sier=0x01d005f5 ssi_stcr=0x02e8 ssi_srcr=0x0288 ssi_stccr=0x0000670b ssi

Re: [Announce] Development release 0.1 of the LatencyTOP tool

2008-01-18 Thread Roberto Fichera
be also interesting to define _externally_ the mapping of the reason so the userspace tool could handle it easily. Roberto Fichera. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [Announce] Development release 0.1 of the LatencyTOP tool

2008-01-18 Thread Roberto Fichera
At 19.35 18/01/2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >Roberto Fichera wrote: >> At 18.36 18/01/2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>> The Intel Open Source Technology Center is pleased to announce the >>> release of version 0.1 of LatencyTOP, a tool for developers to vis

Soft lockup detected on CPU#X

2007-02-23 Thread Roberto Fichera
29 spargi kernel: [] _sinittext+0x15a/0x15e Feb 16 13:06:29 spargi kernel: Roberto Fichera. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the

HDD Errors ?!

2001-06-01 Thread Roberto Fichera
)): ext2_write_inode: unable to read inode block - inode=1553880, block=3112978 It's a disk error or a FS error ? What can I do to fix the problem ? I 500Km distant from this machine :-( and I want made some check remotely before reboot it. Any suggestion ? Thanks in advance. Roberto Fichera.

Re: Adaptec Array1000

2001-03-26 Thread Roberto Fichera
que volume. > >These boards are not currently supported in RAID mode. Your >best bet is Linux MD. Ok! As I was thinking, I must configure it with Linux MD. Thanks. Roberto Fichera. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a mes

Adaptec Array1000

2001-03-26 Thread Roberto Fichera
Hi all, Does anyone know how to configure this controller (chipset AAA-133U2 aka AIC-78xx) with one RAID5 hardware volume ? The kernel 2.2.16 see all the disks (4x18Gb) but don't see the unique volume. Thanks in advance. Roberto Fichera. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified without page_table_lock held

2000-12-09 Thread Roberto Fichera
At 07.00 09/12/00 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: >Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 16:07:03 +0100 >From: Roberto Fichera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >8 bits for a spinlock ? What kind of use we have here ? > >Sparc32 (like some other older architectures) do not have a >wor

Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified without page_table_lock held

2000-12-09 Thread Roberto Fichera
At 06.42 09/12/00 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: >Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 15:48:05 +0100 >From: Roberto Fichera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>atomic_t does not guarentee a large enough range necessary for mm->rss > >If we haven't some atomic_t t

Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified without page_table_lock held

2000-12-09 Thread Roberto Fichera
At 13.43 09/12/00 +0100, Rasmus Andersen wrote: >On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 11:25:09AM +0100, Roberto Fichera wrote: >[...] > > >+ spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock); > > > mm->rss++; > > >+ spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock); >

Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified without page_table_lock held

2000-12-09 Thread Roberto Fichera
At 21.29 08/12/00 +0100, Rasmus Andersen wrote: >Hi. > >The following patch moves the page_table_lock in mm/* to cover the >modification of mm->rss in 240-test12-pre7. It was inspired by a >similar patch from davej(?) which covered too much, AFAIR. The item >is on Tytso's ToDo list. [...snip...]

Re: Ext2 & Performances

2000-11-21 Thread Roberto Fichera
At 19.00 21/11/00 +0100, Jakob Østergaard wrote: >On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 05:58:58PM +0100, Roberto Fichera wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I need to know if there are some differences, in performances, between > > a ext2 filesystem in a 10Gb partition and another that resi

Ext2 & Performances

2000-11-21 Thread Roberto Fichera
Hi All, I need to know if there are some differences, in performances, between a ext2 filesystem in a 10Gb partition and another that reside in a 130Gb, each one have 4Kb block size. I'm configuring a Compaq ML350 2x800PIII, 1Gb RAM, 5x36Gb UWS3 RAID 5 with Smart Array 4300, as database SQL serv

Re: Lists problems ?

2000-10-23 Thread Roberto Fichera
At 11.10 23/10/00 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: >On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 10:56:15AM +0100, Roberto Fichera wrote: > > I'm receiving duplicated email from Linux-Kernel, Linux-Net and Linux-SMP. > > There's some problems ? > >Yes, yours. Double subscription. (E

Lists problems ?

2000-10-23 Thread Roberto Fichera
I'm receiving duplicated email from Linux-Kernel, Linux-Net and Linux-SMP. There's some problems ? Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/