[PATCH] ktest: take submenu into account

2017-09-21 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
nu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option '...' { ... submenu 'Advanced options for Ubuntu' $menuentry_id_option '...' { ... menuentry 'ktest' { ... === Correct it by taking submenu entries into account in get_grub2_index(). Signed-off-by: Satoru T

[PATCH] brd: prevent overflow caused by too large rd_size parameter

2017-09-21 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
value. To prevent overflow, this parameter should be equal to or smaller than the max value of sector_t >> 11, 10 bits are for 1024 and 1 bit is for sign bit. Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi --- drivers/block/brd.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/block/brd.c b/d

Re: [FYI] GCC segfaults under heavy multithreaded compilation with AMD Ryzen

2017-09-16 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
2017-08-11 19:07 GMT+09:00 Borislav Petkov : > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:54:01AM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: >> # I'm a LKML subscriber, but not a x86 list subscriber >> >> I found the following new linux kernel bugzilla about Ryzen related problem. >> Since

[FYI] GCC segfaults under heavy multithreaded compilation with AMD Ryzen

2017-07-25 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
# I'm a LKML subscriber, but not a x86 list subscriber I found the following new linux kernel bugzilla about Ryzen related problem. Since many developers don't check this bugzilla and I've also encountered this problem, I decided to introduce this problem here. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bu

Re: [BUG] x86: failed to boot a kernel on a Ryzen machine

2017-04-29 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:34:06 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > On 27/04/2017 02:42, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > At Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:58:27 +0200, > >> On 26/04/2017 13:47, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > >>> OK, here it is. > >> > >> It look

Re: [BUG] x86: failed to boot a kernel on a Ryzen machine

2017-04-26 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:58:27 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > On 26/04/2017 13:47, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > OK, here it is. > > It looks like the cause is that AMD has removed TBM instructions > compared to e.g. Piledriver, so libvirt resorts to a much older b

Re: [BUG] x86: failed to boot a kernel on a Ryzen machine

2017-04-26 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:58:50 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > Hello, > > 2017-04-24 22:09 GMT+09:00 Satoru Takeuchi : > > At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:48:46 +0200, > > Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:39:12PM +0900, Satoru Takeuc

Re: [BUG] x86: failed to boot a kernel on a Ryzen machine

2017-04-26 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:48:22 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > On 25/04/2017 11:36, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Looking at CR4: 003006f0, it doesn't have OSXSAVE set. I.e., bit > > 18. And when that bit is not set, VMOVDQA raises an #UD. > > > > And for some reason qemu doesn't like it

Re: [BUG] x86: failed to boot a kernel on a Ryzen machine

2017-04-24 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:48:46 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:39:12PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > I used the following auto-test tool (its backend is ktest). > > > > https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/elkdat > > > > T

Re: [BUG] x86: failed to boot a kernel on a Ryzen machine

2017-04-24 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:07:53 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 03:58:05PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > Recently I bought a new Ryzen machine. When I tried to test v4.11-rc8 on > > it, it failed to boot > > with

Re: [BUG] x86: failed to boot a kernel on a Ryzen machine

2017-04-24 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:58:05 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > [1 ] > Recently I bought a new Ryzen machine. When I tried to test v4.11-rc8 on it, > it failed to boot > with the following panic log. > > ``` > ... > [0.227720] raid6: sse2x1 gen() 7985 MB/s >

[BUG] x86: failed to boot a kernel on a Ryzen machine

2017-04-23 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
Recently I bought a new Ryzen machine. When I tried to test v4.11-rc8 on it, it failed to boot with the following panic log. ``` ... [0.227720] raid6: sse2x1 gen() 7985 MB/s [0.295709] raid6: sse2x1 xor() 8181 MB/s [0.363706] raid6: sse2x2 gen() 17531 MB/s [0.431699] raid6

Linux kernel statistics from the other perspective than existing ones

2017-04-08 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/linux-kernel-statistics/blob/master/README.md Thanks, Satoru

[PATCH] cgroup: change the limit of CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT depending on the size of the corresponding bitmasks

2017-03-28 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
f the corresponding bitmasks are changed - to make the meaning of this limit clear Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi --- kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c index 4885132..576b184 100644 --- a/k

[ANNOUNCE] elkdat: an easy linux kernel development and test tool

2017-03-23 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
For more information, please refer to the following URL. https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/elkdat Thanks, Satoru

[PATCH] mm: remove unnecessary description about a non-exist gfp flag

2016-02-16 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
Since __GFP_NOACCOUNT is removed by the following commit, its description is not necessary. commit 20b5c3039863 ("Revert 'gfp: add __GFP_NOACCOUNT'") Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi --- include/linux/gfp.h | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/g

Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/78] 3.12.36-stable review

2015-01-10 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
135 fail: 0 > Qemu tests: > total: 27 pass: 27 fail: 0 > > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. > > Guenter Plus, this kernel passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel wit

Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/84] 3.18.2-stable review

2015-01-08 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
est mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: clear bio reference after submit_one_bio()

2015-01-06 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
> next time. > > I reproduced ENOMEM case with the following script (need > CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC, and CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS). I confirmed that this problem reproduce with 3.19-rc3 and not reproduce with 3.19-rc3 with your patch. Tested-by: Satoru Takeuchi Thank you for

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/27] 3.2.66-rc1 review

2014-12-29 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
l: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 - mem

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/197] 3.12.31-stable review

2014-10-19 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
.12.31-rc1.xz > and the diffstat can be found below. This kernel passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (ke

Re: [PATCH 3.17 00/25] 3.17.1-stable review

2014-10-14 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
test results: > > > total: 30 pass: 30 fail: 0 > > > > > > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. > > > > Thanks for testing all 3 of these and letting me know. > > All 4, sorry... Those 4 kernels also passd my test. - Te

Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/26] 3.16.5-stable review

2014-10-08 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
anks for testing all 3 of these and letting me know. Plus, all these kernels passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result

Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/357] 3.16.4-stable review

2014-10-04 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
ssed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-

Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/96] 3.12.30-stable review

2014-10-03 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
nel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debi

[RFC] ktest doc: Automated test of linux kernel by using ktest v1.1.3

2014-09-27 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
Hi, I revised ktest documentation. v1.1.2->v1.1.3: Support not only debian/jessy, but also CentOS7 as target system http://www.slideshare.net/satorutakeuchi18/kernel-auto-testbyktest It's not the ktest reference guild, but the quick learning guild of ktest especially focuses on some important f

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/142] 3.12.29-stable review

2014-09-27 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
- Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Bu

Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/45] 3.4.104-rc1 review

2014-09-22 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
ith this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400

Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/158] 3.16.3-stable review

2014-09-16 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
he diffstat can be found below. All 3.10.55-rc1, 3.14.19-rc1, and 3.6.3-rc1 passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kerne

Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/131] 3.2.63-rc1 review

2014-09-12 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
- Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/r

Re: [PATCH] ktest: add ability to skip during BISECT_MANUAL

2014-08-30 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi Thanks, Satoru > > --- > tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl | 6 -- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl b/tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl > index 55ab700..72010f4 100755 > --- a/tools/

Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/17] 3.16.1-stable review

2014-08-10 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
stable-rc kernels! It's the largest number I've ever tested at a one time :-) - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/94] 3.2.62-rc1 review

2014-08-06 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
er.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. > > Guenter This kernel passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .confi

Re: [PATCH 3.15 00/42] 3.15.9-stable review

2014-08-06 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
; > > >greg k-h > > > > > > > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions > > compared to previous 3.15.8 > > Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know. > > greg k-h All 3.15.9-rc1, 3.14.16-rc1, 3.10.52-rc1, and 3.4.102-rc1 p

Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/94] 3.12.26-stable review

2014-07-30 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
ss: 139 fail: 0 > > Qemu tests all passed. > > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. > > Guenter This kernel passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test

Re: [PATCH 3.15 00/37] 3.15.8-stable review

2014-07-30 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
est mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel

Re: [PATCH 3.15 000/109] 3.15.7-stable review

2014-07-27 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
est mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/170] 3.12.25-stable review

2014-07-18 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
his kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environ

Re: [PATCH 3.15 00/84] 3.15.6-stable review

2014-07-17 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:50:45 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:12:28PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 07/16/2014 04:09 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > >On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:16:57PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > >>This is the start of the stable revi

Re: [PATCH 3.15 00/84] 3.15.6-stable review

2014-07-16 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. # "selftests" is not added to this list yet. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: use BUG_ON

2014-07-09 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
Hi Himangi, (2014/07/09 7:21), Himangi Saraogi wrote: Use BUG_ON(x) rather than if(x) BUG(); The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows: // @@ identifier x; @@ -if (x) BUG(); +BUG_ON(x); // Strictly speaking, BUG_ON() is "if (unlikely(x)) BUG". Anyway, I consider that put thi

Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/125] 3.2.61-rc1 review

2014-07-09 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
ilders. > > Guenter > This kernel passed my test. I didn't hit the problem which Guenter reported since I only test x86_64 arch. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github

Re: [PATCH 3.15 000/122] 3.15.5-stable review

2014-07-08 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
sappeared. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-st

Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/59] 3.14.11-stable review

2014-07-05 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Sat, 5 Jul 2014 12:10:58 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 02:56:55PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Sat, 05 Jul 2014 18:21:04 +0900, > > Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > Add Takashi Iw

Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/59] 3.14.11-stable review

2014-07-05 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
Hi Greg, Add Takashi Iwai to this thread. At Sat, 05 Jul 2014 16:00:41 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > At Fri, 04 Jul 2014 22:45:42 -0700, > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On 07/04/2014 03:18 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stabl

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/46] 3.10.47-stable review

2014-07-05 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
stable/Makefile:795: recipe for target 'sound' failed make[1]: *** [sound] Error 2 ... LD net/built-in.o Makefile:130: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 FAILED! CRITICAL FAILURE... failed build ========

Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/59] 3.14.11-stable review

2014-07-05 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
===== - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log)

Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/19] 3.4.97-stable review

2014-07-04 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
; > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. This kernel passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Resul

Re: [PATCH 3.15 00/66] 3.15.4-stable review

2014-07-04 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
uilders. > > On a side note, would be great if you can update the master branch > of -stable at some point. It is still at -rc2. This kernel passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Tes

Re: [PATCH 1/1] FS/BTRFS: replace count*size kzalloc by kcalloc

2014-07-01 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
(2014/07/02 9:01), David Sterba wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:35:43PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote: kcalloc manages count*sizeof overflow. Cc: Chris Mason Cc: Josef Bacik Cc: linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick Reviewed-by: David Sterba Reviewed-by: Satoru

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/181] 3.12.24-stable review

2014-07-01 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
gt; let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed Jul 2 11:49:58 2014 > Anything received after that time might be too late. This kernel passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: h

Re: [PATCH 3.15 000/139] 3.15.3-stable review

2014-06-28 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
3.15.3-rc1, 3.14.10-rc1, 3.10.46-r1, and 3.4.96-rc1 passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, kte

Re: [PATCH 3.15 00/61] 3.15.2-stable review

2014-06-25 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
1, 3.10.45-rc1, and 3.4.95-rc1 passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http:

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/111] 3.12.23-stable review

2014-06-23 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
l: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 - mem

Re: [PATCH v4] lib: add size unit t/p/e to memparse

2014-06-17 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
. Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi Thanks, Satoru Sorry, didn't do this before. Good luck with the simple_strto*() work! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kerne

Re: [PATCH 3.15 00/12] 3.15.1-stable review

2014-06-14 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
lders. 3.15.1-rc1, 3.14.8-rc1, 3.10.44-rc1, and 3.4.94-rc1 passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, kt

Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/78] 3.14.7-stable review

2014-06-10 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
and the diffstat can be found below. 3.14.7-rc1, 3.10.43-rc1, and 3.4.93-rc1 passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (k

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/92] 3.2.60-rc1 review

2014-06-09 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Although it's too late, I tell you that it passd my test just FYI. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuc

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/146] 3.12.22-stable review

2014-06-09 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
l: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 - mem

Re: [PATCH 3.14 000/228] 3.14.6-stable review

2014-06-06 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
following one. https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.14.6-rc2.xz > > > > Build and qemu tests are still ok. Same applies to 3.4 and 3.10. 3.14.6-rc2, 3.10.42-rc1, and 3.4.92-rc1 passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kerne

Re: [PATCH 3.4 0/9] 3.4.91-stable review

2014-05-18 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
tecture. > > Guenter > This kernel passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config

Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/23] 3.14.1-stable review

2014-04-11 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
and 3.14.1-rc1 passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuch

Re: [PATCH 3.4 000/134] 3.4.87-stable review

2014-04-11 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
nel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x8

Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/200] 3.2.56-rc1 review

2014-04-01 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
: 87 skipped: 22 fail: 7 > > Qemu tests all passed. Results are as expected. > > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. > > Guenter This kernel passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest

Re: [PATCH 3.13 00/46] 3.13.8-stable review

2014-03-29 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
net:8010/builders. > > Guenter 3.4.85-rc1, 3.10.35-rc1, and 3.13.8-rc1 passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel

Re: [PATCH v2] hung_task : check the value of "sysctl_hung_task_timeout_sec"

2014-03-28 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
Hi Liu, At Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:56:58 +0800, Liu hua wrote: > > 于 2014/3/26 0:25, Satoru Takeuchi 写道: > > At Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:58:58 +0800, > > Liu hua wrote: > >> > >> 于 2014/3/24 4:50, Satoru Takeuchi 写道: > >>> At Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:54

Re: [PATCH v2] hung_task : check the value of "sysctl_hung_task_timeout_sec"

2014-03-25 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:58:58 +0800, Liu hua wrote: > > 于 2014/3/24 4:50, Satoru Takeuchi 写道: > > At Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:54:04 +0800, > > Liu Hua wrote: > >> > >> As sysctl_hung_task_timeout_sec is unsigned long, when this value is > &

Re: [PATCH v2] hung_task : check the value of "sysctl_hung_task_timeout_sec"

2014-03-23 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:54:04 +0800, Liu Hua wrote: > > As sysctl_hung_task_timeout_sec is unsigned long, when this value is > larger then LONG_MAX/HZ, the function schedule_timeout_interruptible in > watchdog will return immediately without sleep and with print : > > [ 205.452934] schedule_timeo

Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/149] 3.13.7-stable review

2014-03-21 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
ainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel

Re: [RFC] ktest doc: Automated test of linux kernel by using ktest

2014-03-20 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:55:02 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:22:49 +0900 > Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I wrote a ktest document and published it. > > > > http://www.slideshare.net/satorutakeuchi18/kernel-au

[RFC] ktest doc: Automated test of linux kernel by using ktest

2014-03-15 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
Hi, I wrote a ktest document and published it. http://www.slideshare.net/satorutakeuchi18/kernel-auto-testbyktest It's not the ktest reference guild, but the quick learning guild of ktest especially focuses on some important features. After reading this document, you'll be able to do the follow

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ktest: remove the misleading $buildonly and introduce $laststep.

2014-03-11 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:43:40 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > At Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:13:00 -0400, > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 23:36:49 +0900 > > Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > > > > From: Satoru Takeuchi > > > >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ktest: remove the misleading $buildonly and introduce $laststep.

2014-03-11 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:13:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 23:36:49 +0900 > Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > > From: Satoru Takeuchi > > > > Each test of ktest consists of the following steps. > > > > build -> install -> boo

[PATCH 3/3] ktest: remove the misleading $buildonly and introduce $laststep.

2014-03-09 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
From: Satoru Takeuchi Each test of ktest consists of the following steps. build -> install -> boot -> run user defined tests. $buildonly means not whether the test is build onlyor not. Actually this variable mean the last step of the test as follows. 0: boot or more 1: build 2

[PATCH 2/3] ktest: Some cleanup for improving readability

2014-03-09 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
From: Satoru Takeuchi Some cleanup for improving readability as follows. - Initialize $ktest_config at its definition. - Put parentheses around the `config-file' argument in the usage message because it's a optional one. - Rename get_ktest_config{,s} to more d

[PATCH 1/3] ktest: add 2nd parameter of run_command() to set the redirect target file

2014-03-09 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
From: Satoru Takeuchi If we'd like to set the redirect target file of run_command(), we should define $redirect before this function and should undef it after this function. Since it's user-unfriendly, add 2nd parameter of run_command() for this purpose. Signed-off-by: Satoru Ta

Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/99] 3.4.83-stable review

2014-03-08 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Sat, 08 Mar 2014 09:10:00 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 03/08/2014 08:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 06:35:52AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> On 03/08/2014 01:47 AM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > >>> At Fri, 7 Mar 2014 17:06:5

Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/99] 3.4.83-stable review

2014-03-08 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
- Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 - mem

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ktest: add 2nd parameter of run_command() to set the redirect target file

2014-03-08 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Fri, 7 Mar 2014 19:43:28 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 09:12:31 +0900 > Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > > Hi Steven, > > > > At Sun, 02 Mar 2014 21:20:31 +0900, > > Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > > > > > From: Satoru T

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ktest: add 2nd parameter of run_command() to set the redirect target file

2014-03-07 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
Hi Steven, At Sun, 02 Mar 2014 21:20:31 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > From: Satoru Takeuchi > > If we'd like to set the redirect target file of run_command(), > we should define $redirect before calling this function and should undef it > after calling this fu

Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/172] 3.13.6-stable review

2014-03-05 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
is kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ktest: run make mrproper not only for OUTPUT_DIR but also for BUILD_DIR to avoid build failure

2014-03-02 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Sun, 2 Mar 2014 08:29:16 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 21:23:36 +0900 > Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > > From: Satoru Takeuchi > > > > Build failure hapens with the following log if BUILD_DIR is dirty. > > If you want to do mak

[PATCH 2/2] ktest: run make mrproper not only for OUTPUT_DIR but also for BUILD_DIR to avoid build failure

2014-03-02 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
From: Satoru Takeuchi Build failure hapens with the following log if BUILD_DIR is dirty. === ... RUNNING TEST 1 of 1 with option build olddefconfig make O=/home/sat/ktest/output mrproper ... CLEAN arch/x86/tools

[PATCH 1/2] ktest: add 2nd parameter of run_command() to set the redirect target file

2014-03-02 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
From: Satoru Takeuchi If we'd like to set the redirect target file of run_command(), we should define $redirect before calling this function and should undef it after calling this function. Since it's user-unfriendly, add 2nd parameter of run_command() for this purpose. Signed-off-

Re: [PATCH] ktest: Set CLOSE_CONSOLE_SIGNAL in the kvm.conf

2014-02-26 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:21:18 -0500, MUNEDA Takahiro wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:30:39 -0500, > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 10:19:28 +0900 > > Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > > >> From: Satoru Takeuchi > >> > >> As m

[PATCH] ktest: Set CLOSE_CONSOLE_SIGNAL in the kvm.conf

2014-02-22 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
From: Satoru Takeuchi As mentioned at commit 5a5d8e48449, we can't terminate 'virsh console' with the default signal(INT). So it's better to set CLOSE_CONSOLE_SIGNAL in the kvm.conf. Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi Cc: Steven Rostedt --- tools/testing/ktest/examples/kvm.c

Re: [PATCH 3.13 00/99] 3.13.5-stable review

2014-02-21 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
est mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel

Re: [PATCH 3.13 00/40] 3.13.4-stable review

2014-02-20 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
uild the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: I

Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/12] 3.4.78-stable review

2014-01-27 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
- Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 - mem

Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/27] 3.12.9-stable review

2014-01-25 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
IRTUAL ... > Eric W. Biederman > vfs: In d_path don't call d_dname on a mount point This kernel also passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/23] 3.10.28-stable review

2014-01-25 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Je

Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/77] 3.12.8-stable review

2014-01-14 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/118] 3.12.6-stable review

2013-12-19 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
l: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - test results(kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/- - Build Machine: debian jessy x86_64 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 memory: 8GB - Test machine:

Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/62] 3.12.5-stable review

2013-12-11 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
gt; let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu Dec 12 08:00:42 UTC 2013. > Anything received after that time might be too late. This kernel can be built and boot without any problem. Building a kernel with this kernel also works fine. - test tool: https://github.com/satoru-ta

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/52] 3.10.24-stable review

2013-12-11 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
gt; let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu Dec 12 07:59:40 UTC 2013. > Anything received after that time might be too late. This kernel can be built and boot without any problem. Building a kernel with this kernel also works fine. - test tool: https://github.com/satoru-ta

Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/25] 3.4.74-stable review

2013-12-11 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
gt; let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu Dec 12 07:59:15 UTC 2013. > Anything received after that time might be too late. This kernel can be built and boot without any problem. Building a kernel with this kernel also works fine. - test tool: https://github.com/satoru-ta

Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/32] 3.4.73-stable review

2013-12-08 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
l: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - [NEW] test results(kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/- - Build Machine: debian jessy x86_64 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 memory: 8GB - Te

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/212] 3.12.3-stable review

2013-12-04 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:13:11 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.3 release. > There are 212 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. >

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/173] 3.10.22-stable review

2013-12-04 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:09:43 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.22 release. > There are 173 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/60] 3.4.72-stable review

2013-12-04 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:05:41 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.72 release. > There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. >

  1   2   3   >