11/20/2013 12:26 PM, Bruno Prémont wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 19 November 2013 Stephen Clark wrote:
Thanks for the response. I have subscribed to the intel-gfx list. I didn't post
the error_state file since it huge.
It's best to submit a but report on bugs.freedesktop.org and
on on what triggers the hang, please add!
Bruno
On Sun, 17 November 2013 Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi List,
I am getting this in kernel 3.11 x86_64
Nov 17 18:56:19 joker4 kernel: [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* stuck on
render ring
Nov 17 18:56:19 joker4 kernel: [drm] capturing error event; loo
Hi List,
I am getting this in kernel 3.11 x86_64
Nov 17 18:56:19 joker4 kernel: [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* stuck on
render ring
Nov 17 18:56:19 joker4 kernel: [drm] capturing error event; look for more
information in /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_error_state
Nov 17 18:56:19 joker4 k
test - is the ml alive.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)
"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the lin
Johannes Weiner wrote:
Hi,
Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
userspace
Please supply the full dmesg output on the non-working kernel the
corresponding .config (or /proc/config.gz).
Added Dave to CC.
Hannes
Duh - I rebooted into the new kernel and no long
Johannes Weiner wrote:
Hi,
Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Which governor are you using? ondemand?
Not sure - but the only thing that is changed is the kernel - if I go
back to 2.6.23.1 it works correctly.
Have a look at /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/c
Hello,
Running linux 2.6.23.1-21.fc7
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq
correctly reflects the cpu speed, when idle it is 996000 and when
compiling it is 1826000.
Its also the same as what is in /proc/cpuinfo.
But with 2.6.23.8-34.fc7
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/c
Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 07:41:31PM -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am trying to get throttling to work on the following processor
I think by throttling, you actually mean changing frequency/voltage ?
(throttling is something else, where the CPU skip
Hello List,
I am trying to get throttling to work on the following processor with
linux 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4
with no luck.
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+
cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/info
processor id:0
acpi id: 0
bus mastering control: no
power management:yes
thr
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Alberto Gonzalez wrote:
The problem comes from a very high rate of load/unload cycles of the heads
that reaches the 300.000-600.000 limit in 2-3 years (with smartmontools it
can checked it with "smartctl -A /dev/sda") . There are reports of HDD
Hi List,
When the asus-laptop module is loaded it automatically turns on my
wireless led
light irregardless of the whether or not the my wireless is up or not. I
had previously
been using the out of kernel asus-laptop module, which no longer
compiles because of
missing some structure definitio
I just upgraded my HP N5430 laptop to fedora 7 with a 2.6.21 kernel.
It used to be udma/66 under the old ide driver.
ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x000101f0 ctl 0x000103f6 bmdma 0x00011000
irq 14
ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x00010170 ctl 0x00010376 bmdma 0x00011008
irq 15
scsi0 : pata_ali
ata1
David Schwartz wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:55:10 -0700
"David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A key is a number. A signature is a number. They are neither
statements nor
instructions. The argument that GPLv2 prohibits Tivoization is
really and
truly absurd. It has ne
Frank Sorenson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The patch to "remove combined mode quirk" (git bisect says
8cdfb29c0cd8018f92214c11c631d8926f4cb032) makes my laptop run slower
than a dead sloth. "hdparm -T" indicates that buffered disk reads on my
hard drive drop from 48-50
Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 5:08 pm, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:32:43PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Francesco Pretto wrote:
> > 2007/5/4, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Yeap, the third iteration of the patch just got submitted.
> >>
> >> http://thread.gma
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Great news.
Here's hoping that Intel produces a standalone video card eventually, to
further take away market share from closed source competitors.
Jeff, not biased at all...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body o
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 05:19:45PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
+Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
+
+if (condition)
+ action();
+
+This does not apply if one branch of a conditional statement is a single
+statement. Use braces in bo
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
Hmmm ... what if David was German and had a couple of umlauts in his
name :-) One would expect to at least _spell_ his own name properly in
his code. Sources need to take care of that too (but we better stick
to only UTF-8 fo
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On 5/7/07, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2007 19:49:50 +
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon 2007-05-07 16:10:53, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 14:04 +, Pavel Machek wrote:
Can we stick to a
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
I'm running fc6 but with kernel 2.6.21 from kernel.org - compiled with
the .config file from fc6.
My system is a asus laptop with an ich7 chipset which has both sata and
pata controllers. My
laptop only brings out the pata controller interfac
Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Monday, April 30, 2007 1:22 pm Stephen Clark wrote:
Please don't do this!
Yeah the kernel will boot but the hd performance is sh*t on my
laptop. I am running FC6 with
kernel 2.6.21 and without the combined_mode setting my disk
performance goes down to a
who
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Yeah the kernel will boot but the hd performance is sh*t on my laptop. I
am running FC6 with
kernel 2.6.21 and without the combined_mode setting my disk performance
goes down to a
whopping 1.25mb/sec from 44mb/sec when I boot with combined_mode
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jeff Garzik (8):
libata/IDE: remove combined mode quirk
You can't just remove the "combined_mode=" kernel parameter or
every Linux user who uses that will get an unbootable kernel
with no good way of diagnosing the
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Andreas Dilger wrote:
It's true that this is a "feature" of ext3 with data=ordered (the default),
but I suspect the same thing is now true in reiserfs too.
Oh, well.. Journalling sucks.
I was actually _really_ hoping that somebody would come
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:31:43PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:58:05PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
"no regressions" is definitely not feasible.
14 known regressions, some of them not yet debugged at all, are
different from your "some small r
Stephen Clark wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
It is laptop that does not have a serial port and I could not couldn't
get the
kernel to boot using a usb serial port so I couldn't get a screen
capture of
the intermittant panic.
If you can wri
://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/31/160
Submitter : Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : unknown
The poster says rtl8139, but doesn't provide more info. His lspci says
"RTL8169SC", which sounds more like r8169 to me.
Yes, thanks.
The r8169
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
It is laptop that does not have a serial port and I could not couldn't
get the
kernel to boot using a usb serial port so I couldn't get a screen
capture of
the intermittant panic.
If you can write it down with a pen and paper, o
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Francois Romieu wrote:
Pointer for the rtl8139 regression please ?
I'm guessing it's this one:
Subject: boot failure: rtl8139: exception in interrupt routine
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/31/160
Submitter : Ste
Jeff Garzik wrote:
IMO, the closer you look, the more warts you find. Before you starting
doing your work with kernel regressions, no one was really tracking it.
I bet you have helped cut down on the regressions, but I have no good
way to quantify my gut feeling.
Additional comments on dev
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Look at the facts:
8 out of 14 regressions in my current list were reported in March or earlier.
And for many regressions fixed it took several weeks until debugging
by a kernel developer was started.
We do not lack testers
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
With the patch applied, I don't see *any* new activity in those
S.M.A.R.T.
attributes over multiple hibernates (Linux "suspend-to-disk").
Scratch that -- operator failure
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Apr 18 2007 09:39, Stephen Clark wrote:
So this is the pop I hear on my new laptop that is using
libata=combined_mode when I shut my system down. I didn't get the
pop with the same disk drive in an older laptop that was only ide.
It sounds like a relay closi
Len Brown wrote:
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 16:23, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Len Brown wrote:
< Linux version 2.6.20-1.2933.fc6
< ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.1 20070105
< (Red Hat 4.1.1-51)) #1 SMP Mon Mar 19 11:38:26 EDT 2007
---
Linux version 2.6.20-1.3023.fc7
([EMAIL PROTE
Alan Cox wrote:
scsi0 : pata_ali
PM: Adding info for No Bus:host0
ata1.00: ATA-5: HITACHI_DK23CA-20, 00H1A0A3, max UDMA/100 <
drive can do 100
ata1.00: 39070080 sectors, multi 16: LBA
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33<=== configured as 33
How is this system act
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello,
I have just tried booting the fc7-rc2 live cd on 2 of my laptops and it
failed on both.
FC7 test4 will be out any day now. Please test that -- test2 is ancient
now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Mark Lord wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
With the patch applied, I don't see *any* new activity in those S.M.A.R.T.
attributes over multiple hibernates (Linux "suspend-to-disk").
Scratch that -- operator failure. ;)
The patch makes no difference over hibernates in the SMART logs.
It's stil
Mark Lord wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
+ if (dev->needs_flush && ata_try_flush_cache(dev)) {
return ata_scsi_flush_xlat;
+ dev->needs_flush = 0;
Works better if you swap the dev-> and return lines
Heh, yeah, I noticed that!
Alan Cox wrote:
Thought about that and querying power state before doing shutdown
sequence but things get somewhat ugly because shutdown sequence is
driven from sd->shutdown(). We'll have to snoop both sync and shutdown
commands and check whether the system is shutting down. Also, I felt
ve
Stephen Clark wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:14:01 -0400 Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have just tried booting the fc7-rc2 live cd on 2 of my laptops and it
failed on both.
Laptop 1 is an asus vbi s96f that get a panic tha
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:14:01 -0400 Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have just tried booting the fc7-rc2 live cd on 2 of my laptops and it
failed on both.
Laptop 1 is an asus vbi s96f that get a panic that says exception in
interrupt routin
Hello,
I have just tried booting the fc7-rc2 live cd on 2 of my laptops and it
failed on both.
Laptop 1 is an asus vbi s96f that get a panic that says exception in
interrupt routine
for my rtl8139.
This device works fine in 2.6.20.2
$ lspci -v
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 9
Mark Hahn wrote:
So in an attempt to summarise the situation, what are the advantages of RSDL
over mainline.
Fairness
why do you think fairness is good, especially always good?
Starvation free
even starvation is sometimes a good thing - there's a place for processes
that only
Con Kolivas wrote:
Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
Full patch:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.28.patch
Series:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/stairc
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
it seems broken to manipulate xfer_mask after returning from the
driver's ->mode_filter hook.
this patch is more than just a speed-limited warning printk, afaics
I
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
it seems broken to manipulate xfer_mask after returning from the
driver's ->mode_filter hook.
this patch is more than just a speed-limited warning printk, afaics
I actually suggested that order because the only way the printk can be
done correct
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Actually, it's quite clear under US law what a derivative work is and
what rights you need to distribute it, and equally clear that
compiling code does not make a "translation" in a copyright sense.
Read Micro Star v. Formgen -- it's good law and it's funny and
reada
Patrick Ale wrote:
On 2/4/07, Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Hancock wrote:
But why are we taking away the users capability to control his/her own
hardware. Sounds like windows.
I wouldn't go as far as making that comparsion, most of all cause
Robert Hancock wrote:
Hi guys,
Me again, sorry.
Is it possible to make hdparm work with libata?
I have some drives that for some reason fall back to lower UDMA
settings (like UDMA/44) while the drive is UDMA/100. I blame the way I
set-up my raid arrays for this and the bus not being able to ha
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:56:20PM -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
Sunil Naidu wrote:
On 1/20/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is not expected to increase write performance, but it should help
you do something else during that time, o
Sunil Naidu wrote:
On 1/20/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is not expected to increase write performance, but it should help
you do something else during that time, or also give more responsiveness
to Ctrl-C. It is possible that you have fast and slow RAM, or that your
video
Kay Sievers wrote:
On 1/6/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:27:34AM +0200, Yakov Lerner wrote:
How can I get serial_no from usb-attached HD drive ?
use the *_id programs that come with udev, they show you how to properly
do that.
Only "adv
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 08:49 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wednesday, January 3, 2007 5:53 am, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 21:01 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Using MMCONFIG for PCI config space access is simply an
optimization, not a requi
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-29 02:48]:
Can anybody get corruption with this thing applied? It goes on top
of plain v2.6.20-rc2.
It works for me now, both your testcase as well as an installation of
Debian on this ARM device. I manually applie
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:59 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
here's a totally new tangent on this: it's possible that user code is
simply BUGGY.
I'm sad to say this doesn't trigger :-(
-
To unsubscribe from this l
James Cloos wrote:
"Jan" == Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> HOWEVER, unix people probably _had a reason_ to make ESC generate
Jan> part of what function keys do.
You are looking at it backwards. The Escape key generates an ASCII
escape. The funtion keys (includi
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Dec 16 2006 08:45, Pavel Machek wrote:
Two escapes works now. :-)
Actually could we fix our consoles, somehow, to make esc usable?
Having important key like esc unusable on consoles is quite ugly.
It's something between a misdesign and a misconfigurati
John Richard Moser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A while back my distro moved to libata for sata_via. I was since
confused; my disk seemed a lot slower, and it looked like DMA was off.
I'm not sure how SATA works; is it even possible to enable/disable
32-bit IO and DMA?
l" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:42:55 -0500 Stephen Clark wrote:
can someone tell me why I have to replace the 803.11 stack that is
James Bruce wrote:
Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:18:18PM -0400, James Bruce wrote:
>>The tradeoff is a realistic 4.4% power savings vs a 300% increase in
>>the minimum sleep period. A user will see zero power savings if they
>>have a USB mouse (probably 99% of desktops). On
Hello List,
I am having a problem 2.6.13rc4 described below on a HP Pavilion N5430
laptop.
1) If I cold boot with only 'lacpi' to run level 3 - shortly after I get
the login prompt the laptop freezes.
2) If I cold boot with 'lacpi acpi=off pci=noacpi,usepirqmask' the
system boots and does
Stephen Clark wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
(Please do reply-to-all when dealing with kernel stuff)
Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:35:55 -0400,
Stephen Clark
Stephen Clark wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
(Please do reply-to-all when dealing with kernel stuff)
Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:35:55 -0400,
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
I recently up
Andrew Morton wrote:
(Please do reply-to-all when dealing with kernel stuff)
Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:35:55 -0400,
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
I recently upgraded my laptop, HP Pavilion N5430, from a
Lee Revell wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 19:35 -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Additional info I don't see any interrupts in /proc/interrupts for the
Allegro which is on int 5.
I just tried the same laptop with knoppix and a 2.4.27 kernel and sound
works great and I do
see interrupts for Al
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:35:55 -0400,
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
I recently upgraded my laptop, HP Pavilion N5430, from a 2.4.21 kernel
to 2.6.12. As a result of
doing this my sound no longer works correctly. It plays the same thing
repeatedly some number
of times
Hello List,
I recently upgraded my laptop, HP Pavilion N5430, from a 2.4.21 kernel
to 2.6.12. As a result of
doing this my sound no longer works correctly. It plays the same thing
repeatedly some number
of times - if it plays at all.
Any ideas on how to debug this would be appreciated.
Additio
Hello,
I recently upgraded my laptop, HP Pavilion N5430, from a 2.4.21 kernel
to 2.6.12. As a result of
doing this my sound no longer works correctly. It plays the same thing
repeatedly some number
of times - if it plays at all.
Any ideas on how to debug this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Ste
Feb 28 08:20:23 pc-sec kernel: Undo loss 24.96.49.185/22 c2 l0 ss2/65535
p0
Feb 28 08:22:12 pc-sec kernel: Undo loss 24.96.49.185/22 c2 l0 ss2/65535
p0
Can anyone tell me what these messages mean? It looks like they are
coming from
tcp_input.c:tcp_try_undo_recovery
Should I worry about them?
PC
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 12:20:43PM -0500, Stephen E. Clark wrote:
> > Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 04:12:19PM -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
> > > > Anybody else experience a DMA slowdown going from sto
Anybody else experience a DMA slowdown going from stock 2.4.1 to either
2.4.2pre2 or 2.4.1ac8.
My hdparm -t numbers dropped from 15mb+ to around 10mb.
Linux version 2.4.1-ac8 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
egcs-2.91.66
19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #9 Fri Feb 9 15:41:34 EST 2001
BIOS-pr
Guys,
from .config on 2.4.1
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OFFBOARD is not set
CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y
Shouldn' t the value be CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO instead of CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO
in the code below?
Steve
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 1
This sucks! I have had several systems with VIA chipsets and have never had any
problems. Currently I am running a SOYO K6-2 system with UDMA 33 and a SOYO K-7
system with both UDMA-33 and UDMA-66 with not problems. How do we know that
there is not some related hardware problem, (cable, power supp
That makes sense.
Steve
Craig Schlenter wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:40:33AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> [/proc/meminfo shared is 0]
> > Then shouldn't it be removed?
>
> Probably not. There may be tools that rely on it existing that may break
> if it goes
Then shouldn't it be removed?
Craig Schlenter wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 07:25:34AM -0600, Steven Cole wrote:
> > Stephen Clark wrote:
> > >
> > >I recently installed 2.4test9pre5 and noticed that when I cat
> > >/proc/meminfo the value for s
I recently installed 2.4test9pre5 and noticed that when I cat
/proc/meminfo the value for shared memory is 0. Am I the only one that
is seeing this.
Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ a
76 matches
Mail list logo
