On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> > Ok, thanks for the explanation Alan. So, there's no technical argument,
> > just "being nice to the users", and add a new driver, which we know we'll
> > have to remove soon, thus having to persuade its users, who
Hi,
On Thursday 26 July 2007, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > driver to using platform-device. I got a reply, that it's not worth it
> > > now
> > > that IDE is slowly becoming obsolete, and the pata_platform serves the
> > > perpose perfectly well.
On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > pata_platform and ide_platform are carrying same driver names,
> > to easily switch between these drivers, without need to touch
> > platform code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <[EMAIL PRO
Hi,
On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
>
> This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use
> same platform data structure and same resources.
>
> To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable
> and platform specified iops removed from that driver. It's fine
Hello.
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
driver to using platform-device. I got a reply, that it's not worth it now
that IDE is slowly becoming obsolete, and the pata_platform serves the
perpose perfectly well. I found this argument reasonable, I had the same
doubt, just wanted to double-check. So
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > driver to using platform-device. I got a reply, that it's not worth it now
> > that IDE is slowly becoming obsolete, and the pata_platform serves the
> > perpose perfectly well. I found this argument reasonable, I had the same
> > doubt, just wanted to d
> driver to using platform-device. I got a reply, that it's not worth it now
> that IDE is slowly becoming obsolete, and the pata_platform serves the
> perpose perfectly well. I found this argument reasonable, I had the same
> doubt, just wanted to double-check. So, why do we now need a new lega
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> > > Wrong list to submit sych stuff, post to linux-ide.
>
> > Not entirely. The patch (or other patches in the series) would also touch
> > ARM platforms in the mainline, currently using that driver. As I didn't
>
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use
same platform data structure and same resources.
To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable
and platform specified iops removed from that driver. It's fine,
since those were never used any
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> > > This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use
> > > same platform data structure and same resources.
>
> > > To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable
> > > and platform specified io
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use
same platform data structure and same resources.
To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable
and platform specified iops removed from that driver. It's fine,
since those were never used any
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
>
> This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use
> same platform data structure and same resources.
>
> To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable
> and platform specified iops removed from that driver. It's fine,
> since t
Hello.
Scott Wood wrote:
+hwif->hw.io_ports[IDE_DATA_OFFSET] = port;
+
+port += (1 << pdata->ioport_shift);
+for (i = IDE_ERROR_OFFSET; i <= IDE_STATUS_OFFSET;
+ i++, port += (1 << pdata->ioport_shift))
Looks like shift doesn't buy as anything, why not just use strid
Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
+ hwif->hw.io_ports[IDE_DATA_OFFSET] = port;
+
+ port += (1 << pdata->ioport_shift);
+ for (i = IDE_ERROR_OFFSET; i <= IDE_STATUS_OFFSET;
+i++, port += (1 << pdata->ioport_shift))
Looks like shift doesn't buy as anything, why not just us
Vitaly Bordug wrote:
This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use
same platform data structure and same resources.
To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable
and platform specified iops removed from that driver. It's fine,
since those were never used anyway.
On Jul 25, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use
same platform data structure and same resources.
To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable
and platform specified iops removed from that driver. It's fine,
since tho
> pata_platform and ide_platform are carrying same driver names,
> to easily switch between these drivers, without need to touch
> platform code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To
This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use
same platform data structure and same resources.
To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable
and platform specified iops removed from that driver. It's fine,
since those were never used anyway.
pata_platform and ide_platf
18 matches
Mail list logo
