On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 04:10:44PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Basically as I commented in genapic_flat, that at least on hyperthreading
> cpus the destination mask is not always honored, and so if you only
> allow one hyperthread I have seen the irq show up on the other hyperthread.
Which
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:36:23PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> True, that seems to be missing.
>
> I agree that the patch seems to consist mostly of renaming doesn't make
> it any easier to read.
>
> And it's worrying that it doesn't handle the hotplug case at all.
This patch is mostly a cleanup
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What experimental evidence did you have?
>
> But I'm tempted to drop this unless the hotplug mystery can be cleared
> up. There was past information that logical is unsafe for hotplug.
Basically as I commented in genapic_flat, that at least on
On Sunday 11 February 2007 12:13, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels. Furher simplify and clean
> > up
> > the APIC initialization code.
>
> Where is the code that
On Sunday 11 February 2007 12:13, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels. Furher simplify and clean
up
the APIC initialization code.
Where is the code that the subject
Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What experimental evidence did you have?
But I'm tempted to drop this unless the hotplug mystery can be cleared
up. There was past information that logical is unsafe for hotplug.
Basically as I commented in genapic_flat, that at least on hyperthreading
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:36:23PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
True, that seems to be missing.
I agree that the patch seems to consist mostly of renaming doesn't make
it any easier to read.
And it's worrying that it doesn't handle the hotplug case at all.
This patch is mostly a cleanup patch
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 04:10:44PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Basically as I commented in genapic_flat, that at least on hyperthreading
cpus the destination mask is not always honored, and so if you only
allow one hyperthread I have seen the irq show up on the other hyperthread.
Which
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels. Furher simplify and clean up
> the APIC initialization code.
Where is the code that the subject describes?
I have two problems here.
- I don't see anything
Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels. Furher simplify and clean up
the APIC initialization code.
Where is the code that the subject describes?
I have two problems here.
- I don't see anything handling the
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels. Furher simplify and clean up
the APIC initialization code.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Andi Kleen
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels. Furher simplify and clean up
the APIC initialization code.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Suresh Siddha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Andi Kleen [EMAIL
12 matches
Mail list logo
